UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

 

SCHEDULE 14A

PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(a) OF THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

 

Filed by the Registrant  ☒                             Filed by a Party other than the Registrant  ☐

Check the appropriate box:

 

 Preliminary Proxy Statement
 Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule14a-6(e)(2))
 Definitive Proxy Statement
 Definitive Additional Materials
 Soliciting Material Pursuant to§240.14a-12

NATIONAL FUEL GAS COMPANY

(Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

 

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if Other Than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

 No fee required.

 Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules14a-6(i)(4) and0-11.
 (1) 

Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

 

     

 (2) 

Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

 

     

 (3) 

Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

 

     

 (4) 

Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

 

     

 (5) 

Total fee paid:

 

     

 Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

 Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
 (1) 

Amount Previously Paid:

 

     

 (2) 

Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

 

     

 (3) 

Filing Party:

 

     

 (4) 

Date Filed:

 

     

 

 

 


NATIONAL FUEL GAS COMPANY

 

Notice of Annual Meeting

and

Proxy Statement

 

Annual Meeting of Stockholders

to be held on

March 7, 2019


WHY YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT

Q:Who is asking for my vote and why am I receiving this document?

A: The Board of Directors asks that you vote on the matters listed in the Notice of Annual Meeting, which are more fully described in this proxy statement. This proxy statement is a document that Securities and Exchange Commission regulations require we give you when we ask you to sign a proxy designating individuals to vote on your behalf. A proxy, if duly executed and not revoked, will be voted and, if it contains any specific instructions, will be voted in accordance with those instructions.

Q:How many shares are not voted at the Annual Meeting onnon-routine matters (like the advisory vote on executive compensation and proposals other than the ratification of accountant)?

A:19% of all shares were not voted last year at our Annual Meeting onnon-routine matters.YOU MUST TELL YOUR BROKER HOW TO VOTE YOUR SHARES. Since 2010, brokers have not been able to vote customer shares onnon-routine matters. As you can see, this has disenfranchised a significant group of our stockholders.11, 2021

 

LOGO

Shares Not Voted at the Annual Meeting on Executive Compensation Shares Unvoted (% of Outstanding) Other Unvoted Shares Broker Non-Vote

Q:How can I vote?

A: There are four ways to vote by proxy:

Vote by Phone by calling1-800-690-6903: You will need information from your proxy card to vote; have it available and follow the instructions provided.

Vote by scanning the Quick Response CodeLOGOor “QR Code” on the Proxy card: By accessing the QR site through the proxy card you can vote your shares.

Vote by Internet by going to www.proxyvote.com: You will need information from your proxy card to vote; have it available and follow the instructions provided.

Vote by Mail: Complete and return the separate enclosed proxy card in the prepaid and addressed envelope.

You may also vote in person at the Annual Meeting. However, if you are the beneficial owner of the shares, you must obtain a legal proxy from the stockholder of record, usually your bank or broker, and bring it with you. A legal proxy identifies you, states the number of shares you own, and gives you the right to vote those shares. Without a legal proxy we cannot identify you as the owner, and will not know how many shares you have to vote.

i


TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROXY STATEMENT OVERVIEW & SUMMARY

iii

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

GENERAL INFORMATION

1

• PROPOSAL 1. ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

4

Nominees for Election as Directors for Three-Year Terms to Expire in 2022

4

Directors Whose Terms Expire in 2021

7

Directors Whose Terms Expire in 2020

10

Annual Meeting Attendance

12

Director Independence

12

Board Leadership Structure

12

Diversity

13

Meetings of the Board of Directors and Standing Committees

13

Method of Evaluating Board and Committee Effectiveness

16

Charitable Contributions by Company

16

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

16

Risk Oversight

16

Related Person Transactions

16

Director Compensation

17

Director Compensation Table — Fiscal 2018

18

Audit Fees

18

Audit Committee Report

20

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

22

Equity Compensation Plan Information

24

Executive Compensation

25

Compensation Committee Report

25

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

25

Fiscal 2018 Summary Compensation Table

44

Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal 2018

46

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal 2018Year-End

47

Option Exercises and Stock Vested in Fiscal 2018

49

Fiscal 2018 Pension Benefits

49

Fiscal 2018 Nonqualified Defined Contribution and Other Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plans

51

Fiscal 2018 Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

52

CEO Pay Ratio

59

•    PROPOSAL2. ADVISORY APPROVAL OF NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION

61

•    PROPOSAL3. APPROVAL OF THE AMENDED AND RESTATED 2010 EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN

69

•    PROPOSAL4. APPROVAL OF THE AMENDED AND RESTATED 2009NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN

81

•    PROPOSAL5. RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM

84

SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

85

CODE OF ETHICS

85

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING DELIVERY OF STOCKHOLDER DOCUMENTS

85

PROPOSALS OF SECURITY HOLDERS FOR THE 2020 ANNUAL MEETING

85

OTHER BUSINESS

86

WHERE YOU CAN FIND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

86

YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT!

PLEASE VOTE BY PHONE, BY QR CODE OR BY INTERNET, OR COMPLETE, SIGN, DATE AND RETURN YOUR PROXY CARD.

ii


This proxy statement contains certain “forward-looking statements” as defined by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements should be read with the cautionary statements and important factors included under the heading “Safe Harbor for Forward-Looking Statements” in National Fuel Gas Company’s (“National Fuel” or the “Company”) Form10-K at Item 7 “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and with the information included in the Company’s Form10-K at Item 1A “Risk Factors”. Forward-looking statements are all statements other than statements of historical fact, including, without limitation, statements regarding future prospects, plans, objectives, goals, projections, estimates of oil and gas quantities, strategies, future events or performance and underlying assumptions, capital structure, anticipated capital expenditures, completion of construction and other projects, projections for pension and other post-retirement benefit obligations, impacts of the adoption of new accounting rules, and possible outcomes of litigation or regulatory proceedings, as well as statements that are identified by the use of the words “anticipates,” “estimates,” “expects,” “forecasts,” “intends,” “plans,” “predicts,” “projects,” “believes,” “seeks,” “will,” “may” and similar expressions.

Proxy Statement Overview & Summary

This overview and summary includes certain business performance information and highlights information contained elsewhere in this proxy statement. This overview and summary does not contain all of the information that you should consider, and you should read the Company’s Summary Annual Report and Form10-K and this entire proxy statement carefully before voting.

Annual Meeting Voting Matters

The table below summarizes the matters that will be subject to the vote of stockholders at the 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of National Fuel Gas Company:

Proposals

Board Vote

Recommendation

Page Number

(for additional details)

1. Election of Directors

FOR ALL NOMINEESPage 4

2. Advisory Approval of Named Executive Officer

    Compensation

FORPage 61

3. Approval of the Amended and Restated 2010

    Equity Compensation Plan

FORPage 69

4. Approval of the Amended and Restated 2009

    Non-Employee Director Equity Compensation

    Plan

FORPage 81

5. Ratification of Appointment of Independent

    Registered Public Accounting Firm

FORPage 84

iii


Annual Meeting of Stockholders

Ø    Time and Date

March 7, 2019 at 9:30 a.m. local time

Ø    Location

The Ritz-Carlton Golf Resort, Naples, 2600 Tiburón Drive, Naples, FL 34109

Ø    Record Date

January 7, 2019

Ø    Voting Details

Stockholders as of the record date are entitled to one vote for each share of common stock for each director nominee and each other proposal to be voted.

Ø    Voting Deadline

Votes must be received by March 6, 2019 (unless attending in person).

For stock that is held in employee benefit plans votes must be received by March 5, 2019.

Ø    Attending the Meeting

National Fuel stockholders as of the record date are entitled to attend the annual meeting. In accordance with our security procedures, all persons attending the annual meeting may be asked for picture identification and proof of stock ownership. Please see “Attending the Meeting” on page 2.

Overview of Business Performance and Near-Term Plans

Fiscal 2018 was another successful year with strong financial and operational results for National Fuel. Over the course of the year, our Exploration & Production subsidiary, Seneca Resources Company, LLC (“Seneca”), set company records for production and proved reserves. Seneca’s production increase also drove the continued growth of our Gathering subsidiary, National Fuel Gas Midstream Company, LLC, which set a company record for throughput in 2018. Lower taxes from tax legislation enacted in late calendar 2017 served as a tailwind throughout the year, helping to offset the decline in realized natural gas pricing experienced by Seneca.

Despite significant regulatory hurdles placed in our path by state regulators over the past couple of years, our Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”)-regulated Pipeline & Storage business continued to create meaningful opportunities for further expansion that leverage the location of our existing asset base. In May 2018, we announced our FM100 Project, which in conjunction with a third-party downstream interstate pipeline project, will provide an important outlet for Seneca’s growing production in the Appalachian basin, allowing it to reach premium markets. We are targeting the close of calendar 2021 for the startup of this 330,000 dekatherm per day project. Our Utility business continued to deliver consistent and predictable earnings while providing safe and reliable service for the 750,200 customers located in our Western New York and Northwest Pennsylvania service territories.

As we look into 2019 and beyond, we have significant opportunities in front of us to invest in our regulated businesses, expanding and modernizing our transmission, storage and distribution assets. In the Exploration and Production business, Seneca’s acreage position remains one of the largest in the basin and, as a provenlow-cost producer, with the vast majority of our natural gas rights owned in fee, we have the ability to capitalize on opportunities as pricing and returns warrant. Ourco-development of the Marcellus and Utica shales, along with owning and efficiently operating the associated gathering infrastructure, allows us to achieve enhanced returns.

We expect Seneca production and Gathering segment revenue growth to be driven by a third drilling rig that Seneca added in May 2018. We will continue our transition to development of the Utica Shale in our

iv


Western Development Area (“WDA”), returning to existing Marcellus pads to drill new wells in the deeper Utica formation. By utilizing existing infrastructure to support Seneca’s growing production, we expect to drive enhanced consolidated upstream and midstream returns and minimize our environmental footprint. In our Eastern Development Area (“EDA”), the commissioning of the Atlantic Sunrise project in October 2018 has provided the Company with an important avenue to further develop our acreage in Lycoming County, Pennsylvania, one of the most prolific positions in Appalachia.

2018 Financial and Operating Highlights:

Increased Dividend for 48th Consecutive Year: In June, the Board of Directors increased the Company’s annual dividend rate by 2.4% to $1.70 per share, marking the 48th year of consecutive dividend increases and 116th year of uninterrupted dividend payments. The financial stability afforded by our integrated operations supports the Company’s dividend.

Generated Significant Free Cash Flow: The Company’s net cash provided from operating activities totaled $613.6 million in fiscal 2018, and our net cash used in investing activities was $528.9 million. The excess cash flow was the result of the Company’s efforts to prudently manage and mitigate financial risks and efficiently allocate capital for reinvestment in the business.

Continued Appalachian Natural Gas Production Growth: Seneca generated net production of 178.1 billion cubic feet equivalent (“Bcfe”) in fiscal 2018, an increase of 2.6 percent versus the prior year. The increase was driven by higher natural gas production in Appalachia, which increased 4.2 percent versus 2017. The higher output was also the primary driver of the Gathering segment’s performance in fiscal 2018, which saw a 2 percent throughput increase. With the anticipation of additional pipeline capacity out of the basin in late calendar 2021, the Company returned to athree-rig program for the first time since January 2016.

Increased Proved Reserves: Seneca’s total proved natural gas and crude oil reserves at September 30, 2018 increased 17 percent to 2,523 Bcfe from 2,154 Bcfe at September 30, 2017.

Continued Development of the Utica Shale in Appalachia: In fiscal 2018, Seneca made significant progress in the testing and appraisal of the Utica shale in both the Company’s WDA and EDA operations in Pennsylvania. Seneca now has 11 Utica wells producing in the WDA, and an additional500-plus locations prospective for Utica development in this area. Additionally, Seneca resumed Utica development in the EDA (Tioga County) during the third quarter of fiscal 2018, where it has over 40 Utica locations remaining. As of September 30, 2018, nearly 20 percent of the Company’s proved reserves are in the Utica Shale formation.

Continued Expansion of Interstate Pipeline Systems: In fiscal 2018, Empire Pipeline, Inc. (“Empire”) filed its application with the FERC for authorization to construct its Empire North Project. With an estimated capital cost of $145 million and a targetin-service date in the second half of fiscal 2020, this fully-subscribed project is designed to provide 205,000 Dth/day of incremental firm transportation capacity from Tioga County, Pennsylvania to markets along Empire’s interstate pipeline system. Additionally, in May 2018, National Fuel Gas Supply Corporation (“Supply Corporation”) executed a long-term precedent agreement with Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC (“Transco”), under which Transco will lease 330,000 Dth/day of incremental capacity created by an expansion component of Supply Corporation’s FM100 Project. The FM100 Project has an estimated capital cost of $280 million and a targetin-service date of late calendar year 2021. Transco will utilize this leased capacity to provide Seneca with 330,000 Dth/day of incremental firm transportation from the WDA and EDA to premiumMid-Atlantic markets connected to Zone 6 of the Transco pipeline system.

Supply Corporation and Empire also continue to pursue the development of, and remain committed to, the Northern Access Project, an approximately $500 million expansion of their respective pipeline systems in New York and Pennsylvania, which would move 490,000 Dth/day

v


of Seneca’s WDA production to interconnections with Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, L.L.C. and TransCanada Corporation. In August 2018, the Company received a favorable decision from the FERC, finding that the New York Department of Environmental Conservation waived its authority to act on our application for a water quality certification. In light of ongoing legal actions and the need to complete project development activities in advance of construction, the targetin-service date for Northern Access is no earlier than the first half of fiscal 2022.

Utility Continued Focus on System Improvement: In fiscal 2018, the Utility segment invested $69.9 million in the safety and reliability of its system, replacing 153 miles of older pipelines in New York and Pennsylvania. The Company’s replacement of aging natural gas infrastructure improves safety and reliability of the system and leads to fewer leaks, directly resulting in lower greenhouse gas emissions. In addition, through the efforts of its dedicated employees, our Utility continued to provide exceptional customer service and recorded high levels of customer satisfaction in both states.

LOGO

Annual Dividend Rate ($1.70/Share) At Fiscal Year End Gathering Segment Throughput (BCf) Exploration & Production Net Production (Bcfe) Utility Segment Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Physical Plant Reported to U.S. EPA on calendar year basis (thousand metric tons of CO2e)

vi


Ongoing Development Plans

National Fuel remains committed to its long-term strategy of safe and financially prudent development of its natural gas assets in Appalachia via its integrated business model. Our capital intensive operations require a focus on strategic initiatives, including those between subsidiaries, which may take several years from business planning through completion. The results of this focus include:

Ongoing Major Interstate Pipeline Expansion and Modernization Projects: As Seneca continues to develop its vast acreage position in the WDA, the Company is working to build the pipeline infrastructure necessary to move Seneca and third-party production from Pennsylvania to premium markets outside of the Appalachian basin. While Supply Corporation and Empire remain involved in various legal challenges to move forward construction of their Northern Access expansion project, the Company has continued to develop new projects to leverage its existing assets in Appalachia to move production to demand centers, including the FM100 (330,000 Dth/day), Empire North (205,000 Dth/day), and Line N to Monaca projects (133,000 Dth/day). Collectively, these projects represent investments of approximately $450 million by our Pipeline & Storage business.

Additionally, the Pipeline & Storage segment expects to continue its accelerated system modernization efforts over the next two to four years. Investments in system modernization, such as pipeline replacement and compression facility upgrades, are designed in a manner that will enhance safety and reliability and reduce environmental impact.

Integrated Upstream and Midstream Development in Appalachia:The Company continues to execute a multi-year plan to develop and grow our upstream and midstream assets in Appalachia. The strategy leverages the exceptional resource potential within our 785,000 net acres in the Marcellus and Utica shales, the geographic integration of our valuable pipeline footprint in Appalachia, and the operational and financial synergies that are generated from the Company’s integrated business structure. With the addition of a third drilling rig in fiscal 2018, the Company expects ongoing production growth and Gathering segment revenue growth over the next several years.

Investment in Safe and Reliable Utility System:The Company’s Utility segment will continue to direct capital spending to pipeline repair, replacement and maintenance to support its statutory obligation to provide safe and reliable service for our customers.

Acceptance of the EPA’sMethane Challenge:The Company recently announced its participation in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Natural Gas STAR Methane Challenge Program, a voluntary program designed to provide a platform for utilities, pipeline and storage companies, and energy producers to make, track, and communicate commitments to reduce methane emissions. In connection with this program, and in furtherance of our longstanding commitment to safe and responsible operations, the Company will analyze new and innovative approaches for further emission reduction and explore the expansion of current best management practices and the applicability of future best practices.

vii


Proposal 1 — Election of Directors

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTEFOR ALL NOMINEES FOR THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS.

Nominees for three-year term:

David C. Carroll — age 62

Principal Occupation: President and Chief Executive Officer of Gas Technology Institute

Expertise:Leadership, Industry, Technology

Steven C. Finch — age 60

Principal Occupation: Former Plant Manager, General Motors’ Tonawanda, N.Y. Engine Plant

Expertise:Leadership, Manufacturing, Capital and Labor Management

Joseph N. Jaggers — age 65

Principal Occupation: Former President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of Jagged Peak Energy Inc.

Expertise:Leadership, Exploration and Production

David F. Smith — age 65

Principal Occupation: Chairman of the Board and Former Chief Executive Officer of National Fuel Gas Company

Expertise:Leadership, Industry, Regional

For complete information on this proposal, please refer to page 4 and following.

Proposal 2 — Advisory Approval of Named Executive Officer Compensation

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE APPROVAL OF THE COMPANY’S NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION.

This proposal allows stockholders to take part in anon-binding, advisory vote to approve the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers. The summary below and the discussion in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis (as well as the proposal for the advisory vote to approve the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers (the“Say-on-Pay” vote) provide information about the Company’s compensation programs. Unless otherwise indicated, we intend capitalized and abbreviated terms to have the same meaning in this section as in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis.

CEO Compensation in Alignment with Peers

As described in the 2018 Financial and Operating Highlights above, fiscal 2018 was another strong year financially and operationally for National Fuel. Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) compensation is targeted to be within the 50th to 75th percentiles of the Korn Ferry Energy Industry market data. The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors understands the importance of using benchmark data that reflects information from companies with comparable business segments over similar time periods. Reflected in the table below is Korn Ferry’s comparison of fiscal 2017 total direct compensation for the Company’s CEO (Mr. Tanski) against that of CEOs in our Korn Ferry peer group. The Company’s CEO target total direct compensation, shown in the table below, is in line with that of our peers (43rd percentile). Actual total direct compensation, which includes actual compensation paid as a result of performance against annual incentive goals, was at the 45th percentile of our peers.

viii


Fiscal 2017 is the most recent complete fiscal year for which proxy statement data is available. Fiscal 2018 compensation cannot yet be accurately compared to peers because 2018 compensation data for most of those peers is not yet available.

CEO & President

Compared to CEO proxy data for fiscal year 2017

               Total Direct
Compensation

Company

 

Title

 

FYE
Revenue

(millions)

 

Market Cap
as of 9/30/17

(millions)

 

FYE # of

Employees

 Actual Target  

ATMOS ENERGY CORP

 CEO $2,760 $8,893 4,565 $4,583,351 $4,342,068  

CABOT OIL & GAS CORP

 Chairman, CEO & President $1,764 $12,372 468 $12,122,248 $10,903,498  

ENERGEN CORP

 Chairman, President & CEO $961 $5,315 390 $6,796,850 $6,341,430  

EQT CORP

 President & CEO $3,378 $11,308 2,067 $8,001,614 $6,851,589  

MDU RESOURCES GROUP INC

 President & CEO $4,443 $5,068 10,140 $3,674,303 $3,090,046  

NEW JERSEY RESOURCES CORP

 Chairman, CEO & President $2,269 $3,648 1,052 $2,575,759 $2,357,459  

RANGE RESOURCES CORP

 Chairman, President & CEO $2,611 $4,856 773 $8,505,649 $8,615,649  

SM ENERGY CO

 President & CEO $1,129 $1,980 635 $7,346,339 $6,812,800  

SOUTHWESTERN ENERGY CO

 President & CEO $3,203 $3,111 1,575 $8,547,712 $8,593,252  

SOUTHWEST GAS HOLDINGS INC

 President & CEO $2,549 $3,695 7,771 $3,495,921 $3,322,671  

SPIRE INC

 CEO & President $1,741 $3,603 3,279 $3,211,544 $3,181,544  

UGI CORP

 Vice Chair, President & CEO $6,121 $8,124 13,000 $6,476,859 $6,635,265  

WGL HOLDINGS INC

 Chairman & CEO $2,355 $4,313 1,500 $4,032,943 $3,824,362  

WHITING PETROLEUM CORP

 President & CEO $1,481 $2,010 830 $5,775,000 $6,116,500  

Summary Statistics

            

75th Percentile

  $3,092 $7,422 4,244 $7,837,795 $6,841,892  

Average

  $2,626 $5,592 3,432 $6,081,864 $5,784,867  

Median

  $2,452 $4,584 1,538 $6,125,930 $6,228,965  

25th Percentile

  $1,747 $3,614 787 $3,763,963 $3,448,094  

NATIONAL FUEL GAS CO

 CEO & President $1,580 $4,841 2,100 $5,603,294 $5,324,913  

Percentile Rank

   18% 54% 62% 45% 43%  

LOGO

NOTE:

Total Direct Compensation = base salary + bonus + long-term incentives (target value for cash and grant date value for equity)

© 2018 Korn Ferry. All rights reserved

1

As a result of stockholder feedback, the Company has fully transitioned its long-term incentive program from one awarded partially in cash to one awarded fully in equity. For the Company’s CEO and certain other named executive officers, 100 percent of the long-term incentive award is performance-based relative to the Korn Ferry peer group.

Objectives of the Compensation Committee

When setting compensation for the Company’s executives, the Compensation Committee’s primary goal is to provide balanced incentives for creating value for stockholders in both the near-term and long-term. In order for this to occur, the Compensation Committee awards a combination of cash and equity components that are designed to:

Ø

Focus management efforts on both near-term and long-term drivers of stockholder value, including financial, safety, environmental, and customer service metrics;

Ø

Tie executive compensation to long-term total shareholder return and long-term total return on capital by linking a significant portion of an executive officer’s potential compensation to the future price of the Company’s common stock and the future returns on capital achieved by the Company, both relative to peers; and

ix


Ø

Attract, motivate, reward and retain management talent in the highly competitive energy industry in order to achieve the objectives that contribute to the overall success of the Company.

Elements of Compensation

The Compensation Committee has developed the Company’s compensation policies and procedures to align the interests of executives with those of the Company’s stockholders and, where appropriate, other stakeholders, including customers. The main elements of the executive compensation program are as follows:

Ø

Base Salary (Cash) — Provides a predictable base compensation forday-to-day job performance;

Ø

Short-Term Performance Incentives (Cash) — Utilizes metrics specific to each executive in order to motivate them to deliver near-term financial, safety, environmental, and customer service results, generally over a period that is no longer than two years; and

Ø

Long-Term Performance Incentives (Equity) — Focuses the attention of executives on delivering long-term stockholder value and on maintaining a significant personal investment in the Company through stock ownership.

For fiscal 2018, 81% of our CEO’s target compensation was tied to long-term(3-year) performance or shorter-term business performance, as reflected in the charts below (target compensation consists of base salary, target annual incentive, and grant date fair value of the long-term incentive award).

CEO Compensation Aligned with Shareholders’ Interests

LOGO

81% Variable Compensation Key Factors Performance* Shares 60% 50% Total Return on Capital (3-year average ROC vs. peer group) 50% Total Shareholder Return (3-year TSR vs. peer group) Annual Incentive 21% Goals relate to earnings, safety and costs Base Salary 19% 81% of Target Compensation is Tied to 3-Year Performance or Short-Term Business Performance

*

Fiscal 2018 target compensation for CEO

x


CEO and Other Named Executive Officer Target Compensation

LOGO

President & CEO 2018 Target Compensation Structure Performance Shares 60% Annual Incentive 21% Base Salary 19% Other Named Executive Officers' 2018 Average Target Compensation Structure Restricted Stock Units 8% Performance Shares 39% Annual Incentive 24% Base Salary 29%

Key Compensation Features

Ø

Annual performance incentives of the named executive officers are based on objective performance goals;

Ø

Long-term performance incentives are composed entirely of equity;

Ø

Long-term performance goals consist of three-year total shareholder return (“TSR”) and three-year total return on capital (“ROC”), each relative to a peer group;

Ø

The Company does not provide tax“gross-ups”;

Ø

Named executive officers and other officers are required to meet stock ownership guidelines that range from one to six times base salary;

Ø

Executive officers may not hedge or pledge Company stock;

Ø

Equity incentive plans prohibit the repricing of equity awards without stockholder approval;

Ø

The Committee engaged two independent compensation consultants to assist in setting compensation;

Ø

Allchange-in-control agreements are double triggered; and

Ø

The Board has adopted a clawback provision (see “Recovery of Funds” in the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, included as Appendix B to this proxy statement).

xi


2018Say-on-Pay Vote and Stockholder Engagement

The 2018Say-on-Pay advisory vote yielded a result of approximately 97% of votes cast in support of the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers. The Board considered this outcome an indicator of stockholder support for the overall philosophy and structure of the Company’s executive compensation policies and decisions. As a result, the Committee did not make any significant changes to the executive compensation program that were based specifically on the results of the 2018Say-on-Pay advisory vote.

In recent years, including 2018, members of Company management have heldin-person meetings with some of the Company’s largest stockholders to obtain feedback on the Company’s compensation program, among other topics. Several of the Company’s largest stockholders have informed the Company that scheduling such visits every two to three years is appropriate. Management engages with the Company’s stockholders in telephone conferences and intends to schedulein-person meetings in 2019, if desired. The Board has directed management to continue to engage as appropriate with interested stockholders, and to inform it of any requests for meetings with members of the Board. The Board and management believe that engagement with stockholders facilitates important dialogue from which we gather various important viewpoints.

The Board recommends a voteFOR the advisory approval of named executive officer compensation because it believes that the Company’s compensation policies and procedures, as developed following engagement with its stockholders, encourage a culture of pay for performance and are strongly aligned with the interests of the Company’s stockholders.

For complete information on this proposal, please refer to page 61 and following.

Proposal 3 — Approval of the Amended and Restated 2010 Equity Compensation Plan

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTEFOR THE APPROVAL OF THE AMENDED AND RESTATED 2010 EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN.

We are seeking your approval of the amended and restated National Fuel Gas Company 2010 Equity Compensation Plan (the “Plan”) for the purposes of increasing the number of shares authorized for issuance under the Plan by an additional 2,700,000 shares of our common stock, par value $1.00 per share, and extending the termination date of the Plan by five years. Please note that we are also seeking approval for a proposed share increase under the Director Plan, as described below in Proposal 4, and you may want to take the information set forth in Proposal 4 into consideration when evaluating this Proposal 3 to fully determine the effects of both proposed share approvals.

As a result of stockholder feedback, we have structured a significant part of our management’s compensation in the form of equity awards that directly align the interests of key executives and other key management employees with the interests of the Company’s stockholders in growing the market value of the Company. In addition, in recent years equity awards have become more common in the energy industry. These developments naturally result in additional shares being used against the currently authorized number of shares to grant, which stockholders last approved in 2015. We believe that the Plan has served its intended purposes well and will continue to do so over the next five to six years.

For complete information on this proposal, please refer to page 69 and following.

xii


Proposal 4 — Approval of the Amended and Restated 2009Non-Employee Director Equity Compensation Plan

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTEFOR THE APPROVAL OF THE AMENDED AND RESTATED 2009NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN.

We are seeking your approval of the amended and restated National Fuel Gas Company 2009Non-Employee Director Equity Compensation Plan (the “Director Plan”) for the purpose of increasing the number of shares authorized for issuance under the Director Plan by an additional 250,000 shares of our common stock, par value $1.00 per share. Please note that we are also seeking approval for a proposed share increase under the Plan, as described below in Proposal 3, and you may want to take the information set forth in Proposal 3 into consideration when evaluating this Proposal 4 to fully determine the effects of both proposed share approvals.

We believe that the Director Plan facilitates our ability to attract and retain highly qualifiednon-employee directors and helps to align their financial interests with those of the Company’s stockholders.

For complete information on this proposal, please refer to page 81 and following.

Proposal 5 — Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTEFOR RATIFICATION OF THIS APPOINTMENT.

As a matter of good governance, it is important that stockholders vote to ratify the selection of the Company’s independent auditor. The Company has selected PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s independent auditor for fiscal 2019.

For complete information on this proposal, please refer to page 84.

xiii


NATIONAL FUEL GAS COMPANY

6363 MAIN STREET

WILLIAMSVILLE, NEW YORK 14221

January 18, 201922, 2021

Dear Stockholders of National Fuel Gas Company:

We are pleasedEach year, our proxy statement provides you with a brief summary of the Company’s recent operations and detailed information relating to invitethe items on the agenda for you to join usvote on at the Annual Meeting of StockholdersStockholders. While these Annual Meetings have always taken place in person, upon careful consideration and in the interest of National Fuel Gas Company. maintaining the health and safety of our stockholders and our Company representatives, our Board of Directors has determined to hold the 2021 Annual Meeting virtually, via a live webcast. We are facing truly unprecedented times, with the global coronavirus pandemic affecting our communities, organizations, colleagues and families. While we will miss holding this meeting in person, we have made arrangements to hold an electronic webcast meeting that will afford stockholders the same rights and access as if the meeting were held in person, including the ability to vote shares electronically during the meeting. We appreciate your understanding as we navigate these unique times.

The meeting will be held at 9:10:30 a.m. local timeEastern Time on March 7, 2019 11, 2021, conducted via live webcast at The Ritz-Carlton Golf Resort, Naples, 2600 Tiburón Drive, Naples, Florida, 34109.www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/NFG2021. The matters on the agenda for the meeting are outlined in the enclosed Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement.

At the meeting, you will be asked to consider and vote on four proposals, all as explained in more detail in the proxy statement: (1) the election of four directors, (2) advisory approval of named executive officer compensation, (3) the Company’s proposal to amend the Restated Certificate of Incorporation to have annual elections of the Directors, and (4) ratification of the appointment of the Company’s independent public accounting firm. Your Board of Directors unanimously recommends that you vote FOR each of these proposals.

So that you may elect Company directors and secure the representation of your interests at the Annual Meeting, we urge you to vote your shares.The preferred methods of voting are by telephone, by Quick Response Code or (“QR Code”) or by Internet as described on the proxy card. These methods are both convenient for you and reduce the expense of soliciting proxies for the Company. If you prefer not to vote by telephone, QR Code or the Internet, please complete, sign and date your proxy card and mail it in the envelope provided. The Proxies are committed by law to vote your shares as you instruct on the proxy card, by telephone, by QR Code or by Internet.

The Company’s annual proxy statement contains important stockholder and/or company proposals for which votes are needed in order to be passed — and yourYour vote is always important. Stockholder voting is the primary means by which stockholders can influence a company’s operations and its corporate governance. In fact, stockholders who do vote can influence the outcome of the electionproposals in greater proportion than their percentage share ownership.

Your vote is important. Please make your voice heard by voting your shares on these important matters.shares.

If you plan to be present at the Annual Meeting, you may so indicate when you vote by telephone, by QR Code or by Internet, or you can check the “WILL ATTEND MEETING” box on the proxy card. Even if you plan to be present,attend the Annual Meeting virtually, we encourage you to promptly vote your shares in advance of the meeting, by telephone, by QR Code or by Internet, or to complete, sign, date and return your proxy card in advance of the meeting.card. If you later wish to vote in person at the Annual Meeting, you can revoke your proxy by giving written notice to the Secretary of the Annual Meeting and/or the Trustee (as described on the second page of the proxy statement), and/or by casting your ballot at the Annual Meeting.

Coffee will be served at 9:00 a.m. and I look forward to meeting with you at that time.

Please review the proxy statement and take advantage of your right to vote.

Sincerely yours,

Ronald J. TanskiDavid P. Bauer

President and Chief Executive Officer


NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

to be held on March 7, 201911, 2021

To the Stockholders of National Fuel Gas Company:

Notice is hereby given that the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of National Fuel Gas Company (the “Company”) will be held at 9:10:30 a.m. local timeEastern Time on March 7, 201911, 2021, conducted via live webcast at The Ritz-Carlton Golf Resort, Naples, 2600 Tiburón Drive, Naples, Florida, 34109. The doors to the meeting will open at 9:00 a.m. local time.www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/NFG2021. At the meeting, action will be taken with respect to:

 

 (1)

The election of four directors to hold office for three-year terms, as provided in the attached proxy statement and until their respective successors have been elected and qualified;

 

 (2)

Advisory approval of named executive officer compensation;

 

 (3)

Approval of an amendment of the amended and restated 2010 Equity Compensation Plan;Restated Certificate of Incorporation to declassify the Board of Directors;

 

 (4)

Approval of the amended and restated 2009Non-Employee Director Equity Compensation Plan;

(5)

Ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2019;2021;

and such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.

Stockholders of record at the close of business on January 7, 2019,11, 2021, will be entitled to vote at the meeting.

BY ORDEROFTHE BOARDOF DIRECTORS

SARAH J. MUGEL

General Counsel and Secretary

January 18, 201922, 2021

Attending the Annual Meeting

Due to concerns relating to COVID-19, National Fuel Gas Company is holding the Annual Meeting in a virtual meeting format only, conducted via live webcast. Stockholders will not be able to attend the meeting in person.

Please visit www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/NFG2021 in order to attend and to participate in the virtual meeting, where you will be prompted to enter the 16-digit control number found on your proxy card or your voting instruction form provided by your broker, bank, or other nominee.

If you receive your Annual Meeting materials electronically and wish to attend the virtual meeting, please follow the instructions provided online for attendance. Once you have joined the virtual meeting, you may vote your shares electronically during the meeting by following the instructions available on the meeting website, although we encourage you to vote in advance of the meeting. Only stockholders or their valid proxy holders may participate in the meeting. If you plan on attending the virtual meeting, we encourage you to allow ample time to log in online and recommend that you do so fifteen minutes before the meeting start time to ensure that you are logged in when the meeting begins.

Important Notice Regarding The Availability Of Proxy Materials For The Stockholder

Meeting To Be Held On March 7, 201911, 2021

The proxy statement and summary annual report to security holders and financial statements

are available on the Internet at

http://investor.nationalfuelgas.com/proxy


YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT

Please vote by telephone, by QR Code or by Internet.

 

Whether or not you plan to attend the meeting, and whatever the number of shares you own, please vote your shares by telephone, by QR Code or by Internet as described in the proxy/voting instruction card and reduce National Fuel Gas Company’s expense in soliciting proxies. Alternatively, you may complete, sign, date and promptly return the enclosed proxy/voting instruction card in the accompanying envelope, which requires no postage if mailed in the United States.

WHY YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT

Q: Who is asking for my vote and why am I receiving this document?

A: The Board of Directors asks that you vote on the matters listed in the Notice of Annual Meeting, which are more fully described in this proxy statement. This proxy statement is a document that Securities and Exchange Commission regulations require we give you when we ask you to sign a proxy designating individuals to vote on your behalf. A proxy, if duly executed and not revoked, will be voted and, if it contains any specific instructions, will be voted in accordance with those instructions.

Q: How many shares are not voted at the Annual Meeting on non-routine matters (proposals other than the ratification of accountant)?

A: At recent Annual Meetings, approximately 19% of our shares have not been voted on non-routine matters. IF YOU HOLD YOUR SHARES AT A BROKERAGE FRIM, YOU MUST TELL YOUR BROKER HOW TO VOTE YOUR SHARES. Since 2010, brokers have not been able to vote customer shares on non-routine matters. Stockholder voting is the primary means by which stockholders can influence a company’s operations and its corporate governance, so your vote is important.

Q: How can I vote?

A: There are four ways to vote by proxy:

 

Vote by Phone by calling 1-800-690-6903: You will need information from your proxy card to vote; have it available and follow the instructions provided.

Vote by scanning the Quick Response CodeLOGO (“QR Code”) on the proxy card: By accessing the QR site through the proxy card you can vote your shares.

Vote by Internet by going to www.proxyvote.com: You will need information from your proxy card to vote; have it available and follow the instructions provided.

Vote by Mail: Complete and return the separate enclosed proxy card in the prepaid and addressed envelope.

You may also vote at the Annual Meeting. However, if you are the beneficial owner of the shares, you must obtain a legal proxy from the stockholder of record, usually your bank or broker. A legal proxy identifies you, states the number of shares you own, and gives you the right to vote those shares. Without a legal proxy we cannot identify you as the owner, and will not know how many shares you have to vote.

 

To attend and vote at the Annual Meeting, you will need the 16-digit control number found on your proxy card or your voting instruction form provided by your broker, bank, or other nominee.

Please visit www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/NFG2021 on the date and at the time specified in the Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders. You will be prompted to enter your 16-digit control number to attend the meeting.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROXY STATEMENT OVERVIEW & FISCAL 2020 SUMMARY

  i

GENERAL INFORMATION

1

• PROPOSAL 1. ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

4

Nominees for Election as Directors at the 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders

4

Continuing Directors Whose Terms Expire in 2023

9

Continuing Director Whose Term Expires in 2022

12

Corporate Governance

16

Diversity

16

Director Independence

16

Board Leadership Structure

16

Annual Meeting Attendance

17

Meetings of the Board of Directors and Standing Committees

17

Method of Evaluating Board and Committee Effectiveness

20

Process for Nominating Directors

20

Charitable Contributions by Company

20

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

21

Risk Oversight

21

Related Person Transactions

21

Code of Ethics

22

Director Compensation

22

Director Compensation Table — Fiscal 2020

23

Audit Fees

24

Audit Committee Report

25

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

27

Equity Compensation Plan Information

30

Executive Compensation

31

Compensation Committee Report

31

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

31

Fiscal 2020 Summary Compensation Table

51

Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal 2020

53

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal 2020 Year-End

54

Option Exercises and Stock Vested in Fiscal 2020

56

Fiscal 2020 Pension Benefits

56

Fiscal 2020 Nonqualified Defined Contribution and Other Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plans

58

Fiscal 2020 Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

59

CEO Pay Ratio

67

Executive Officer and Director Hedging

67

•   PROPOSAL 2. ADVISORY APPROVAL OF NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION

68

•   PROPOSAL 3. APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT OF THE RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION TO DECLASSIFY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

69

•   PROPOSAL 4. RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

70

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING DELIVERY OF STOCKHOLDER DOCUMENTS

71

PROPOSALS OF SECURITY HOLDERS FOR THE 2022 ANNUAL MEETING

71

OTHER BUSINESS

71

WHERE YOU CAN FIND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

72

YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT!

PLEASE VOTE BY PHONE, BY QR CODE OR BY INTERNET, OR COMPLETE, SIGN, DATE AND RETURN YOUR PROXY CARD.


This proxy statement contains certain “forward-looking statements” as defined by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements should be read with the cautionary statements and important factors included under the heading “Safe Harbor for Forward-Looking Statements” in National Fuel Gas Company’s (“National Fuel” or the “Company”) Form 10-K at Item 7 “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and with the information included in the Company’s Form 10-K at Item 1A “Risk Factors”. Forward-looking statements are all statements other than statements of historical fact, including, without limitation, statements regarding future prospects, plans, objectives, goals, projections, estimates of oil and gas quantities, strategies, future events or performance and underlying assumptions, capital structure, anticipated capital expenditures, completion of construction and other projects, projections for pension and other post-retirement benefit obligations, impacts of the adoption of new accounting rules, and possible outcomes of litigation or regulatory proceedings, as well as statements that are identified by the use of the words “anticipates,” “estimates,” “expects,” “forecasts,” “intends,” “plans,” “predicts,” “projects,” “believes,” “seeks,” “will,” “may” and similar expressions.

Proxy Statement Overview & Fiscal 2020 Summary

This overview and summary highlights information contained elsewhere in this proxy statement and also includes certain additional information regarding business performance and corporate responsibility, including environmental, social and governance matters. This overview and summary does not contain all of the information that you should consider, and you should read the Company’s Summary Annual Report and Form 10-K and this entire proxy statement carefully before voting.

Annual Meeting Voting Matters

The table below summarizes the matters that will be subject to the vote of stockholders at the 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of National Fuel Gas Company:

Proposals

Board Vote

Recommendation

Page Number

(for additional details)

1.  Election of Directors

FOR ALL NOMINEESPage 4

2.  Advisory Approval of Named Executive Officer Compensation

FORPage 68

3.  Approval of an Amendment of the Restated Certificate of Incorporation to Declassify the Board of Directors

FORPage 69

4.  Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

FORPage 70

i


Annual Meeting of Stockholders

Ø    Date and Time

March 11, 2021 at 10:30 a.m. Eastern Time

Ø    Website

www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/NFG2021

Ø    Record Date

January 11, 2021

Ø    Voting Details

Stockholders as of the record date are entitled to one vote for each share of common stock for each director nominee and each other proposal to be voted.

Ø    Voting Deadline

Votes must be received by March 10, 2021 (unless attending virtually).

For stock that is held in employee benefit plans votes must be received by March 9, 2021.

Ø    Attending the Virtual

Meeting

National Fuel stockholders as of the record date are entitled to attend the annual meeting virtually. To participate in the meeting, please visit www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/NFG2021, where you will be prompted to enter the 16-digit control number found on your proxy card or your voting instruction form provided by your broker, bank, or other nominee. Please see “Attending the Meeting” on page 2.

National Fuel Gas Company Fiscal 2020 Summary

National Fuel turned a challenging 2020 fiscal year into one of opportunity, with several important milestones achieved. Against the backdrop of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Company completed a highly-strategic Appalachian acquisition, brought online a $129 million pipeline expansion project, and obtained the FERC certificate for its $279 million FM100 Project. We expect these achievements to provide significant growth opportunities in the years ahead. In addition, our utility business completed its annual system modernization program, through which over 150 miles of older vintage pipelines were replaced, driving enhanced safety and further reductions in our greenhouse gas emissions. In September, the Company published its initial Corporate Responsibility Report, an important step in the continuous improvement of our environmental, social, and governance initiatives and disclosures.

These milestones were not possible without the significant efforts of National Fuel’s 2,100 dedicated and hard-working employees, who have continued to meet the increased demands of our business during the pendency of the COVID-19 pandemic. Throughout the year, as we confronted the constantly evolving landscape of the pandemic, as well as significant commodity price headwinds, our integrated, diversified business model continued to provide an important measure of stability and predictability.

As we move into fiscal 2021, we believe that National Fuel is well-positioned for growth, and we expect our Appalachian acquisition, which included significant, highly-economic drilling inventory, as well as the substantial growth of our FERC-regulated pipelines, to drive long-term value for our stockholders. Combining this with a large base of stable, regulated cash flows, we believe that we are poised to generate strong consolidated returns, while maintaining the strength of the Company’s investment-grade balance sheet and our focus on the sustainability of our operations.

ii


2020 Financial and Operating Highlights:

Maintained Continuity of Diversified Businesses While Safely Operating our Integrated Assets: Against the backdrop of the COVID-19 pandemic, National Fuel has not experienced any significant operational or financial impacts, has continued our long-standing focus on safety, achieving a 35% reduction in Occupational Safety and Health Administration (“OSHA”) recordable injuries in our regulated businesses, and has remained committed to our employees, with no furloughs or workforce reductions.

Increased Dividend for 50th Consecutive Year: In June, the Board of Directors increased the Company’s annual dividend rate by 2.3 percent to $1.78 per share, marking a half-century of consecutive dividend increases and our 118th year of uninterrupted dividend payments.

Completion of Significant Appalachian Acquisition: In July, the Company completed an approximately $506 million acquisition of Royal Dutch Shell’s integrated upstream and midstream gathering assets within Appalachia, much of which are contiguous to, and synergistic with, the Company existing’s Tioga County development activities and operations.

Meaningfully Growing Appalachian Natural Gas Production and Gathering Throughput: E&P segment net production increased to 241.5 billion cubic feet equivalent (“Bcfe”), up 14% from the prior year, driving a corresponding 13% increase in Gathering segment throughput.

Increased Proved Reserves: Seneca’s total proved natural gas and crude oil reserves at September 30, 2020 increased to approximately 3.5 trillion cubic feet equivalent, an increase of 12% versus fiscal 2019, driven largely by the Company’s recent Appalachian acquisition, which added 684 billion cubic feet of proved developed and undeveloped natural gas reserves at a cost of $0.36 per thousand cubic feet.

Continued Expansion of Interstate Pipeline Systems: In September, the Empire North project, an approximately $129 million investment by Empire Pipeline, Inc. (“Empire”), was placed into service. Empire North creates 205,000 dekatherms per day of new transportation capacity on the Empire system, providing much-needed natural gas supply to the Northeast U.S., including New York State, as well as Eastern Canada.

Utility Continued Focus on System Improvement: Our Utility segment invested approximately $71 million in modernization and reliability, bringing our 5-year modernization total to over $341 million.

LOGO

iii


Our Commitment to Corporate Responsibility and Sustainability

Sustainability is embodied in the Company’s guiding principles of safety, environmental stewardship, community, innovation, satisfaction, and transparency, which form the foundation of our daily operations. Over the past year, the Company has made significant efforts to ensure its operations have minimal environmental impacts on the communities in which it operates, and that we continue to have positive impacts with the communities and the numerous stakeholders with whom we continuously interact.

Publication of Initial Corporate Responsibility Report: In September, National Fuel issued its first Corporate Responsibility Report (“Report”), which highlights the Company’s environmental, social, and governance initiatives (“ESG”), and enhances our ESG disclosures.

Disclosures Aligned to SASB Standards and GRI Framework: As an integrated, diversified energy company, the Company’s initial Report focused on the relevant Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (“SASB”) disclosures for each of its primary business segments—Gas Utilities and Distributors, Oil & Gas Midstream, and Oil & Gas Exploration and Production. In order to capture appropriate social and governance metrics and disclosures, the Company’s Report also provided supplemental disclosures under the Global Reporting Initiative (“GRI”) framework, including workforce attraction and retention, diversity and development disclosures.

Enhanced Governance of Corporate Responsibility:During fiscal 2020, National Fuel took several significant steps to enhance its governance of ESG matters, moving oversight of corporate responsibility and ESG to the Board’s Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee, creating an executive steering committee of senior Company management who are accountable for integrating applicable sustainability practices in their respective areas, and appointing a Vice President of Corporate Responsibility who is responsible for ESG disclosures and identifying further sustainable business practices for the Company.

Environmental and Social Performance Goals:For fiscal 2021, the Compensation Committee has established short-term performance goals focused on environmental stewardship, including the Company’s greenhouse gas emissions, as well as goals promoting diversity and inclusion among the Company’s workforce.

Furthered Ongoing Utility System Modernization Efforts: Our Utility business completed the replacement of over 150 miles of older vintage main distribution lines within our New York and Pennsylvania service territories, driving enhanced safety and further reductions in our greenhouse gas emissions. Overall, our Utility business has lowered its EPA Subpart W emissions by 13% since the close of calendar 2016, and 60% since the close of calendar 1990.

Participated in the Low-Carbon Resources Initiative (“LCRI”): Our Utility business became an anchor sponsor of the LCRI, a joint effort of The Electric Power Research Institute and the Gas Technology Institute to address the need to accelerate development and demonstration of low- and zero-carbon energy technologies. Over the course of the next five years, the LCRI expects to identify, research, develop, and demonstrate the technology advancements needed to achieve this decarbonized future.

Constructed Company’s First Electric Drive Compressor Station: As part of the Company’s Empire North expansion project, our Pipeline & Storage business placed into service our first electric motor drive compressor station, virtually eliminating emissions from the operation of this 32,000 horsepower facility.

Furthered Participation in the Renewable Natural Gas (“RNG”) Market: Over the course of the past year, our Pipeline & Storage and Utility businesses took meaningful steps to participate in the growing RNG market, including the development of gas quality standards and interconnection agreements to facilitate the transportation of RNG across their respective pipeline networks. In addition, Empire completed the construction of interconnection facilities for

iv


an anaerobic digestion facility in New York, allowing the transportation of RNG produced with dairy and food waste to access the interstate pipeline gird.

Maintained Focus on Water Handling and Water Management: In fiscal 2020, National Fuel recycled 96% of Seneca’s produced fluids, or 5.7 million barrels, plus an additional 1.0 million barrels of fluids that were generated by and received from third-party operators. We manage the movement of approximately 1.1 million barrels of fluid every month, more than 85% of which is transported by Company-owned water pipelines directly to Seneca’s Marcellus and Utica development pads. As a result, Seneca was able to avoid an estimated 100,000 truck trips in fiscal 2020, eliminating the associated air emissions and reducing the impact on local roads and public infrastructure.

Continued Participation in the EPA’sMethane Challenge: Each of the Company’s major operating segments is a participant the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Natural Gas STAR Methane Challenge Program, a voluntary program designed to provide a platform for utilities, pipeline and storage companies, and energy producers to make, track, and communicate commitments to reduce methane emissions. In connection with this program, and in furtherance of our longstanding commitment to safe and responsible operations, the Company continues to analyze new and innovative approaches for further emission reduction and explore the expansion of current best management practices and the applicability of future best practices.

LOGO

Our Commitment to our Employees

At National Fuel, we go above and beyond to create a culture that rewards hard work and supports promotion from within. Our 2,100-plus employees continue to be the most important part of our Company and have made us who we are today.

Committed to Our Workforce: During the COVID-19 pandemic, National Fuel has remained committed to our workforce and has not instituted any furloughs or workforce reductions. With a large portion of employees working remotely, the Company implemented a number of initiatives to provide flexibility to our workforce, including additional paid time off to address child care needs, and encouraging the use of alternative work schedules.

Focused on Workforce Safety: Our efforts during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic have included numerous actions to protect the health and safety of our workers as well as our customers and has enabled us to ensure adequate staffing for provision of essential services. As a result of the pandemic, the Company has instituted telecommuting for all employees, where possible, to minimize employee exposure. For any employees who could not work remotely, the

v


Company: developed COVID-19 reporting and screening procedures; implemented staggered start times and/or satellite work locations, where possible, to allow for social distancing; developed sequestering plans for critical service employees; and provided necessary PPE in line with directives from federal, state, and local agencies.

Achieved Significant Reduction in OSHA Recordable Injuries: During fiscal 2020, National Fuel’s regulated businesses experienced a 35% reduction in OSHA recordable injuries versus the prior fiscal year, an indication of the Company’s continued improvement of our safety culture.

Maintaining our Commitment to Inclusivity and Enhancing Workforce Diversity: As we plan for future human resource needs, National Fuel continues to target a number of diversity-focused groups in our communities for employment opportunities across the organization. In furtherance of our commitment, the Company recently required all officers to participate in racial equity analysis training. In addition, today, four of the Company’s ten designated executive officers are women who hold the following important policy-making positions: President of the Company’s Utility segment; General Counsel and Secretary, who also serves as the Company’s Compliance Officer; Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer; and Controller and Principal Accounting Officer.

LOGO

Our Commitment to our Communities

Going back to the first natural gas well drilled in Dunkirk, N.Y., National Fuel and our predecessor companies have deep roots in both the natural gas industry and in the regions where we operate. Today, National Fuel’s investments and operations continue to contribute significantly to the economic health and vitality of our local communities.

Investing in critical energy infrastructure:Over the last 10 years, we have invested more than $7 billion in energy development, investing in real, long-lived assets that support good-paying jobs and provide a significant tax base for local schools and municipalities.

Large local employer:We employ over 2,100 people, paying nearly $270 million in annual compensation and pension benefits.

Provider of local tax revenues: Over the past five years, we have paid $301 million in state and local property taxes, providing revenues that support school districts and the social services that many in our communities have come to rely on. Additionally, Seneca has paid $47 million over the last five years in Pennsylvania impact fees which support the maintenance and repair of local infrastructure and investment in new community facilities.

Supporter of local vendors and contractors:We support the employment of thousands more in our local communities by using the products and services of local vendors, contractors and labor. Over the last five years, we have paid $529 million and $213 million to local vendors and contractors in New York and Pennsylvania, respectively.

Fair landowner compensation:We provide fair and reasonable compensation to local landowners for acreage leases, mineral rights and pipeline rights of way and easements. Over the

vi


last five years, Seneca has paid local Pennsylvania landowners more than $194 million in royalties on natural gas production.

Charitable giving:Each year, hundreds of National Fuel employees donate thousands of dollars to local and national charitable organizations. The National Fuel Foundation matches dollar for dollar, up to $750 per employee, doubling the impact of each employee’s contribution. Since 2005, our employees and the foundation have given more than $21 million to charitable organizations.

LOGO

Our Diverse, Experienced, and Independent Board of Directors

National Fuel’s commitment to diversity also extends to our Board of Directors, and our Board has continued its efforts to attract qualified, diverse candidates whose expertise and personal characteristics align with the Company’s long-term business strategy.

Increasing Diversity on Our Board of Directors: Our Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee, chaired by Rebecca Ranich, makes recommendations to the full Board on nominees for director positions, and has invited qualified gender and racially diverse candidates to stand for election to the Board, with successful results. Three of the Company’s last six Directors have increased Board diversity.

Diverse and Extensive Experience: The Company’s Board of Directors consists of individuals with extensive and diverse leadership experience within the energy industry, as well as complementary industries, including manufacturing and consulting. Our eleven Board members have experience in the following areas, among others:

¡

CEO/Senior Leadership Position (11)

¡

Energy Industry Experience (10)

¡

Other Public Board of Directors Experience (9)

¡

Legal/Compliance/Enterprise Risk Management (7)

¡

Operational/Safety/Environmental (7)

¡

Consumer/Customer Relations (6)

vii


¡

Federal and State Regulatory/Government Relations (6)

¡

Financial/Accounting (5)

Strong Corporate Governance Practices: Our Board has implemented strong governance practices, including maintaining a significant complement of independent directors (currently nine out of eleven directors), designating a Lead Independent Director, holding regular meetings of the non-management and/or independent directors, separating the roles of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, and providing a process for stockholders meeting certain requirements to have nominees included in the Company’s proxy materials.

LOGO

Proposal 1 — Election of Directors

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR ALL NOMINEES FOR THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS.

Nominees for three-year term:

David H. Anderson — age 59

Principal Occupation: President and Chief Executive Officer of Northwest Natural Holdings Corporation

Expertise: Leadership, Industry, Environmental, SEC Financial Expert

David P. Bauer — age 51

Principal Occupation: President and Chief Executive Officer of National Fuel Gas Company

Expertise: Leadership, Industry, Financial, Regional

Barbara M. Baumann — age 65

Principal Occupation: President, Cross Creek Energy Corporation

Expertise: Leadership, Exploration and Production, Investment Advisory, SEC Financial Expert

Rebecca Ranich — age 63

Principal Occupation: Former Director of Deloitte Consulting, LLP

Expertise: Leadership, Industry, Sustainability, Technology

For complete information on this proposal, please refer to page 4 and following.

viii


Proposal 2 — Advisory Approval of Named Executive Officer Compensation

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE APPROVAL OF THE COMPANY’S NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION.

This proposal allows stockholders to take part in a non-binding, advisory vote to approve the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers. The summary below and the discussion in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis (as well as the proposal for the advisory vote to approve the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers (the “Say-on-Pay” vote)) provide information about the Company’s compensation programs. Unless otherwise indicated, we intend capitalized and abbreviated terms to have the same meaning in this section as in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis.

No Modifications to Fiscal 2020 Compensation

Despite the COVID-19 pandemic, the Compensation Committee did not make any mid-year or end-of-year adjustments to any elements of named executive officer compensation for fiscal 2020. Performance metrics and goals for fiscal 2020 short-term and long-term incentive compensation remained unchanged.

Objectives of the Compensation Committee

When setting compensation for the Company’s executives, the Compensation Committee’s primary goal is to provide balanced incentives for creating value for stockholders in both the near-term and long-term. In order for this to occur, the Compensation Committee awards a combination of cash and equity components that are designed to:

Ø

Focus management efforts on both near-term and long-term drivers of stockholder value, including financial, safety, environmental, and customer service metrics;

Ø

Tie executive compensation to long-term total shareholder return (“TSR”) and long-term total return on capital (“ROC”) by linking a significant portion of named executive officers’ potential compensation to the future price of the Company’s common stock (and the payment of dividends) and the future returns on capital achieved by the Company, both relative to peers; and

Ø

Attract, motivate, reward and retain management talent in the highly competitive energy industry in order to achieve the objectives that contribute to the overall success of the Company.

Elements of Compensation

The Compensation Committee has developed the Company’s compensation policies and procedures to align the interests of executives with those of the Company’s stockholders and, where appropriate, other stakeholders, including customers. The main elements of the executive compensation program are as follows:

Ø

Base Salary (Cash) — Provides a predictable base compensation for day-to-day job performance;

Ø

Short-Term Performance Incentives (Cash) — Utilizes metrics specific to each executive in order to motivate them to deliver near-term financial, safety, environmental, and customer service results, generally over a period that is no longer than two years; and

Ø

Long-Term Performance Incentives (Equity) — Focuses the attention of executives on delivering long-term stockholder value and on maintaining a significant personal investment in the Company through stock ownership.

ix


Executive Compensation Aligned with Stockholders’ Interests

The Company recognizes and rewards executives through compensation arrangements that directly link executive pay to the Company’s performance, and we ensure a strong alignment of interests with our stockholders by including a significant amount of equity in the overall mix of pay. As shown in the chart below, for fiscal 2020, 76% of the target compensation of David Bauer, the Company’s CEO, was at-risk compensation, with 52% tied to equity and 24% tied to short-term performance goals.

LOGO

Key Compensation Features

Ø

Annual performance incentives of the named executive officers are based entirely on objective performance goals;

Ø

Long-term performance incentives are composed entirely of equity;

Ø

Long-term performance goals consist of three-year TSR and three-year total ROC, each relative to a peer group;

Ø

The Company does not provide tax “gross-ups”;

Ø

Named executive officers and other officers are required to meet stock ownership guidelines that range from one to six times base salary (six times for the CEO and three times for other named executive officers);

Ø

Executive officers may not hedge or pledge Company stock;

Ø

Equity incentive plans prohibit the repricing of equity awards without stockholder approval;

Ø

The Compensation Committee engaged two independent compensation consultants to assist in setting compensation;

Ø

All change-in-control agreements are double triggered; and

Ø

The Board has adopted a clawback provision (see “Recovery of Funds” in the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, included as Appendix B to this proxy statement).

x


2020 Say-on-Pay Vote and Stockholder Engagement

The 2020 Say-on-Pay advisory vote yielded a result of approximately 95% of votes cast in support of the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers. The Board generally considered this outcome an indicator of stockholder support for the overall philosophy and structure of the Company’s executive compensation policies and decisions. Given the high approval percentage of the vote, the Compensation Committee did not make any significant changes to the executive compensation program that were based specifically on the results of the 2020 Say-on-Pay advisory vote.

From time to time members of Company management have held in-person and telephonic meetings with some of the Company’s largest stockholders to obtain feedback on matters of interest to them. The Board has directed management to continue to engage as appropriate with interested stockholders, and to inform it of any requests for meetings with members of the Board. The Board and management believe that engagement with stockholders facilitates important dialogue from which we gather various important viewpoints.

The Board of Directors believes that the Company’s compensation policies and procedures, as developed following engagement with stockholders, encourage a culture of pay for performance and are strongly aligned with the interests of the Company’s stockholders. Accordingly, the Board recommends a vote FOR the advisory approval of named executive officer compensation.

For complete information on this proposal, please refer to the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, accompanying compensation tables and related narrative discussion, starting at page 31, and to the proposal at page 68.

Proposal 3 — Approval of an Amendment of the Restated Certificate of Incorporation to Declassify the Board of Directors

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THIS PROPOSAL.

Our Restated Certificate of Incorporation (the “Certificate”) currently provides for a classified board divided into three classes, with approximately one-third of our directors standing for election each year. At last year’s annual meeting, a Company stockholder presented a non-binding proposal requesting that our Board take the steps necessary to declassify the Board and transition to all directors ultimately standing for election annually. After careful consideration, the Board has approved proposed amendments to Article SIXTH of the Certificate to phase out the three-year staggered terms of our directors and transition to the annual election of directors.

If the proposed amendments to the Certificate are approved by stockholders, beginning at the Company’s 2022 annual meeting, directors standing for election will be elected to one-year terms. By the 2024 annual meeting, the Board would be completely declassified and all directors would stand for election annually.

For complete information on this proposal, please refer to page 69.

Proposal 4 — Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR RATIFICATION OF THIS APPOINTMENT.

As a matter of good governance, it is important that stockholders vote to ratify the selection of the Company’s independent auditor. The Company has selected PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s independent auditor for fiscal 2021.

For complete information on this proposal, please refer to page 70.

xi


NATIONAL FUEL GAS COMPANY

6363 MAIN STREET

WILLIAMSVILLE, NEW YORK 14221

PROXY STATEMENT

GENERAL INFORMATION

Introduction

This proxy statement is furnished to the holders of National Fuel Gas Company (“National Fuel” or the “Company”) common stock (the “Common Stock”) in connection with the solicitation of proxies on behalf of the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board of Directors” or the “Board”) for use at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) to be held on March 7, 2019,11, 2021, or any adjournment or postponement thereof. This proxy statement and the accompanying proxy/voting instruction card are first being mailed to stockholders on or about January 18, 2019.22, 2021.

Solicitation of Proxies

All costs of soliciting proxies will be borne by the Company. MacKenzie Partners, Inc., 1407 Broadway, 27th Floor, New York, NY 10018, has been retained to assist in the solicitation of proxies by mail, telephone, and electronic communication and will be compensated in the estimated amount of $18,500 plus reasonableout-of-pocket expenses. A number of regular employees of the Company and its subsidiaries, and one or more retirees of the Company and its subsidiaries, may solicit proxies in person, by telephone or by other methods. Costs, if any, associated with solicitation by retirees are expected to be de minimis.

Record Date, Outstanding Voting Securities and Voting Rights

Only stockholders of record at the close of business on January 7, 2019,11, 2021, will be eligible to vote at the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof. As of that date, 86,278,52091,163,380 shares of Common Stock were issued and outstanding. The holders of 43,139,26145,581,691 shares will constitute a quorum at the meeting.

Each share of Common Stock entitles the holder thereof to one vote with respect to each matter that is subject to a vote at the Annual Meeting. Shares may not be voted unless the owner is present or represented by proxy. In order to grant a proxy, a stockholder can use the telephone, QR Code or Internet voting procedures or return a signed proxy card. All shares that are represented by effective proxies received by the Company in time to be voted shall be voted by the authorized Proxy at the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.

If you hold your shares through a broker, bank or other nominee (in “street name”), you will receive instructions from them on how to vote your shares. If you do not give the broker specific instructions on how you would like your shares to be voted, your broker may only vote your shares on “routine” matters, such as Proposal 54 — Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. However,your broker is prohibited from voting uninstructed shares on“non-routine” matters such asas: Proposal 1 — Election of Directors; Proposal 2 — Advisory Approval of Named Executive Officer Compensation; and Proposal 3 — Approval of the Amended and Restated 2010 Equity Compensation Plan; and Proposal 4 — Approvalan Amendment of the Amended and Restated 2009Non-Employee Director Equity Compensation Plan.Certificate of Incorporation to Declassify the Board of Directors. The absence of voting instruction results in what is called a “brokernon-vote” on those proposals and will not be counted. Your vote is important. PLEASE MAKE YOUR VOICE HEARD BY VOTING YOUR SHARES ON THESE IMPORTANT MATTERS.

Where stockholders direct how their votes shall be cast, shares will be voted in accordance with such directions. Proxies submitted with abstentions and brokernon-votes will be included in determining whether or not a quorum is present. Abstentions and brokernon-votes will not be counted in tabulating

the number of votes cast on proposals submitted to stockholders and therefore will not have the effect of a vote cast for or against any proposal.

The proxy also confers discretionary authority to vote on all matters that may properly come before the Annual Meeting, or any adjournment or postponement thereof, respecting: (i) matters of which the Company did not have timely notice but that may be presented at the meeting; (ii) approval of the minutes of the prior annual meeting of stockholders; (iii) the election of any person as a director if a nominee is unable to serve or for good cause will not serve; (iv) any stockholder proposal omitted from this proxy statement pursuant to Rule14a-8 or14a-9 of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (the “SEC”) proxy rules; and (v) all matters incident to the conduct of the meeting.

With respect to Proposal 1, the affirmative vote of a plurality of the votes cast by the holders of shares of Common Stock entitled to vote is required to elect each of the nominees for director. Approval of each other proposal requires a majority of the votes cast by the holders of shares of Common Stock entitled to vote on the proposal.

Attending the Meeting

You are entitledIn an effort to attendprotect the health and safety of the Company’s stockholders, employees, directors and communities amidst the COVID-19 pandemic, the Company is holding the Annual Meeting if you arein a stockholdervirtual meeting format only on March 11, 2021 at 10:30 a.m. Eastern Time. Stockholders as of the close of business on January 7, 2019,11, 2021, the record date. In orderdate, are entitled to be admitted toparticipate in the Annual Meeting, each stockholderincluding to vote their shares and ask questions.

To participate in the virtual Annual Meeting, please visit www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/NFG2021, where you will be prompted to enter the 16-digit control number found on your proxy card or your voting instruction form provided by your broker, bank, or other nominee. If you receive your Annual Meeting materials electronically and wish to participate in the virtual meeting, please follow the instructions provided online for attendance. Once you have joined the virtual meeting, you may be asked to present valid picture identification, such as driver’s license or passport, and proof of stock ownershipvote your shares electronically during the meeting by following the instructions available on the meeting website.

Questions for the Meeting

Stockholders as of the record date such aswho participate in the enclosed proxy card or a brokerage statement reflecting stock ownership. Cameras, recording devices and other electronic devicesvirtual Annual Meeting using their control number (as described above) will not be permitted athave an opportunity to submit questions during the meeting. The Company will try to answer as many stockholder-submitted questions that comply with the posted rules of conduct as time permits. If the Company receives substantially similar questions, the Company will group such questions together and provide a single response to avoid repetition.

Additional Information about the Meeting

Additional information regarding the rules of conduct and procedures for participating in the virtual Annual Meeting will be posted prior to and during the meeting at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/NFG2021.

Revoking a Proxy

Any stockholder giving a proxy may revoke it at any time prior to the voting thereof by mailing a revocation or a subsequent proxy to National Fuel Gas Company, Attn: Sarah J. Mugel, Secretary of the Company, 6363 Main Street, Williamsville, NY 14221, by voting a subsequent proxy by phone, QR Code or by Internet, or by filing written revocation at the meeting with Ms. Mugel, Secretary of the meeting, or by casting a ballot at the meeting. If you are an employee stockholder or retired employee stockholder, you may revoke voting instructions given to the Trustee by following the instructions under “Employee and Retiree Stockholders” in this proxy statement.

Employee and Retiree Stockholders

If you are a participant in the Company’s Employee Stock Ownership Plan or any of the Company’sTax-Deferred Savings Plans (the “Plans”), the proxy card will also serve as a voting instruction form to instruct Vanguard Fiduciary Trust Company (the “Trustee”) for the Plans, as to how to vote your shares. All shares of Common Stock for which the Trustee has not received timely directions shall be voted by the Trustee in the same proportion as the shares of Common Stock for which the Trustee received timely directions, except in the case where to do so would be inconsistent with the provisions of Title I of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”). If the voting instruction form is returned signed but without directions marked for one or more items, regarding the unmarked items you are instructing the Trustee and the Proxies to voteFOR all of the Director nominees named in this proxy statement, and FOR Proposals 2, 3 4 and 54. Participants in the Plan(s) may also provide those voting instructions by telephone, QR Code or the Internet. Those instructions may be revoked byre-voting or by written notice to the Trustee on or before March 5, 20199, 2021 in care of the following address:

To: Vanguard Fiduciary Trust Co.

c/o National Fuel Gas Company

Attn: Legal Department

6363 Main Street

Williamsville, NY 14221

Multiple Copies of Proxy Statement

The Company has adopted a procedure approved by the SEC called “householding.” Under this procedure, stockholders of record who have the same address and last name may receive only one copy of the proxy statement and the Company’s annual report. However, if any stockholder wishes to revoke consent for householding and receive a separate summary annual report, financial statements or proxy statement for the upcoming Annual Meeting or in the future, he or she may telephone, toll-free,1-866-540-7095. The stockholder will need their12-digit16-digit Investor IDcontrol number and should simply follow the prompts. Stockholders may also write Broadridge Householding Department, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717. Stockholders sharing an address who wish to receive a single set of reports may do so by contacting their banks or brokers if they are the beneficial holders, or by contacting Broadridge at the address provided above if they are the record holders. This procedure will reduce our printing costs and postage fees, and reduce the quantity of paper arriving at your address.

Stockholders who participate in householding will continue to receive separate proxy cards. Householding will not affect your dividend check mailings.

For additional information on householding, please see “IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING DELIVERY OF STOCKHOLDER DOCUMENTS” in this proxy statement.

Other Matters

The Board of Directors does not know of any other matter that will be presented for consideration at the Annual Meeting. If any other matter does properly come before the Annual Meeting, the Proxies will vote in their discretion on such matter.

Annual Report

Mailed herewith is a copy of the Company’s Summary Annual Report for the fiscal year ended September 30, 20182020 (“fiscal 2018”2020”). Also enclosed is a copy of the Company’s Annual Report onForm 10-K for fiscal 2018.2020. The Company will furnish any exhibit to the Form10-K upon request to the Secretary at the Company’s principal office, and upon payment of $5 per exhibit.

PROPOSAL 1. ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Four directors areYour Company’s Board of Directors consists of eleven individuals with extensive and diverse leadership experience within the energy industry as well as complementary industries, including manufacturing and consulting. Our Board members bring insights, experience and perspectives that come with significant tenures in senior leadership positions at major business enterprises. They have experience in the following areas, among others:

CEO/Senior Leadership Position (11)

Energy Industry Experience (10)

Other Public Board of Directors Experience (9)

Legal/Compliance/Enterprise Risk Management (7)

Operational/Safety/Environmental (7)

Consumer/Customer Relations (6)

Federal and State Regulatory/Government Relations (6)

Financial/Accounting (5)

Your Company’s commitment to diversity also extends to the Board of Directors. Your Board has continued its efforts to attract qualified, diverse candidates whose expertise and personal characteristics align with the Company’s long-term business strategy. Our Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee, which makes recommendations to the full Board on nominees for director positions, has invited qualified gender and racially diverse candidates to stand for election to the Board, with successful results. Three of the Company’s last six Directors have increased Board diversity.

Nominees for Election as Directors at the 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders

At the Annual Meeting, four individuals will be elected at the 2019 Annual Meeting.to serve as directors for three-year terms expiring in 2024. The nominees for the four directorships are: David C. Carroll, Steven C. Finch, Joseph N. JaggersH. Anderson, David P. Bauer, Barbara M. Baumann and David F. Smith.Rebecca Ranich. The nomination process is discussed under “Nominating/Corporate Governance”“Process for Nominating Directors” below.

The Company’s Restated Certificate of Incorporation (the “Certificate”), as currently in effect, provides that the Board of Directors shall be divided into three classes, and that each class shall be as nearly equal in number as may be possible. In general, at each annual meeting, the members of the class of directors whose term expires at the annual meeting (or the individuals nominated to succeed them) run for election for a three-year term. Directors of a particular class shall hold office until the annual meeting of the year in which the term of the class expires or, in the case of directors elected by the Board of Directors to fill vacancies or newly-created directorships, until the next annual meeting following their election. In addition, all directors shall hold office until their respective successors are elected and qualify, subject to prior death, resignation, retirement, disqualification or removal from office. Accordingly, Messrs. Carroll, Finch, Jaggers and SmithThe Company’s Certificate also provides that if the number of directors is changed by resolution of the Board, any increase or decrease shall be apportioned by the Board among the classes so as to maintain the number of directors in each class as nearly equal as possible, provided that a decrease in the number of directors may not shorten the term of any incumbent director.

As more fully described in Proposal 3, at the Annual Meeting, stockholders will have been nominated foran opportunity to vote on the Company’s proposal to amend the Certificate to declassify the Board of Directors. If that proposal is approved, the Company will amend the Certificate to phase out the three-year staggered terms of three yearsour directors and until their respective successors shalltransition to the annual election of directors. Because the declassification process, if approved, will commence after the Annual Meeting, the term for directors to be elected and shall qualify.at the Annual Meeting is three years.

The Board of Directors elected Mr. Finch as a director in July 2018. Ronald J. Tanski, who serves as a director and as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and the Board’s Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee recommended Mr. Finch as a candidate for director.

It is intended that the Proxies will vote for the election of Messrs. Carroll, Finch, JaggersMr. Anderson, Mr. Bauer, Ms. Baumann and SmithMs. Ranich as directors, unless they are otherwise directed by the stockholders. Although the Board of Directors has no reason to believe that any of the nominees will be unavailable for election or service, stockholders’ proxies confer discretionary authority upon the Proxies to vote for the election of another nominee for director in the event any nominee is unable to serve, or for good cause will not serve. Messrs. Carroll, Finch, Jaggers and Smith haveEach of the nominees has consented to being named in this proxy statement and to serve if elected.

The affirmative vote of a plurality of the votes cast by the holders of shares of Common Stock entitled to vote is required to elect each of the nominees for director.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTEFOR

THE ELECTION OF EACH OF THE FOUR NOMINEES NAMED BELOW.

David H. Anderson

Portland, Oregon

                Age:* 59                             

Tenure: Director since 2019

Professional Experience:

Mr. Anderson is President and Chief Executive Officer of Northwest Natural Holding Company (“Northwest Holdings”) and Northwest Natural Gas Company, a local distribution company that provides natural gas service to approximately 2.5 million people in Oregon and Southwest Washington. In addition, Northwest Holdings’ subsidiaries provide water distribution and wastewater services to communities throughout the Pacific Northwest and Texas, serving approximately 65,000 people through 26,000 connections. Mr. Anderson has held a series of positions with increasing responsibility at Northwest Holdings since joining the company in 2004, including Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer. Previously, he was Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer at TXU Gas Company and Chief Accounting Officer at TXU Corporation, an energy services company that included electricity generation and the transmission and distribution of electricity and natural gas. Mr. Anderson serves as a director of Northwest Holdings. He is also First Vice Chair of the Board of Directors of the American Gas Association (AGA) through December 31, 2020, and Chair effective January 1, 2021. He is past chairman of the AGA’s Audit Committee, past co-chairperson of the AGA’s Carbon Policy Task Force, a member of the AGA’s Finance Committee and Safety, Resilience/Reliability and Security Task Force, and a board trustee of the American Gas Foundation. Additionally, he serves as a director of the Oregon Business Council. Mr. Anderson also serves on Oregon Governor Kate Brown’s Global Warming Commission and is a member of the Founders’ Circle of SOLVE, an Oregon non-profit dedicated to environmental stewardship.

Qualifications:

Mr. Anderson’s extensive financial and operational experience in the electric and natural gas industries and leadership roles on environmental matters provide the Board with important perspectives with respect to the Company’s business operations, sustainability, and financial positioning. The combined professional skills and energy industry insights Mr. Anderson brings to the Board strengthen the Board’s collective knowledge, capabilities, and experience. Mr. Anderson’s experience in highly regulated industries impacted by emerging climate initiatives enables him to provide valuable perspective and management oversight on subjects including public policy, government relations, and regulatory compliance. In addition, the significant roles he has held in accounting and finance qualify Mr. Anderson as an “Audit Committee Financial Expert” under the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules.

LOGO

Board Committees

Audit

Compensation

Public Company Directorships

Northwest Natural Holding Company

Education

Texas Tech University, B.B.A. in Accounting

Certified Public Accountant (retired)

Chartered Global Management Accountant

*

All ages are as of the Annual Meeting date.

David P. Bauer

Buffalo, New York

                Age: 51                             

Tenure: Director since 2020

Professional Experience:

Mr. Bauer has been President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company since 2019. He previously served as President of National Fuel Gas Supply Corporation, the Company’s principal pipeline and storage subsidiary, from 2016 to 2019, and as Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company from 2010 to 2019. Mr. Bauer joined the Company in 2001, after more than 10 years in public accounting at PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, and served as Assistant Treasurer or Treasurer of the Company’s various operating subsidiaries from 2004 to 2019. He is a director of the American Gas Association, Invest Buffalo Niagara and YMCA Buffalo Niagara, where he chairs the finance committee. He also serves as chairman of the audit committee of D’Youville College and as a member of the Canisius College Business Advisory Council, the Diocese of Buffalo Investment Committee and the Canisius High School Finance and Investment Committee.

Qualifications:

As a member of the Company’s executive team since 2004, Mr. Bauer brings to the Board substantial management experience and in-depth knowledge of the Company’s operations and strategic direction. His oversight of key infrastructure modernization and expansion projects, together with his leadership role in maintaining the Company’s fiscal strength, will assist the Board with investment strategy, capital allocation and risk management. In addition, Mr. Bauer’s deep ties to Western New York, the location of the Company’s corporate headquarters, will enhance the Board’s understanding of local and regional issues.

LOGO

Board Committees

Executive

Financing

Education

Boston College, B.S. in Accounting

Barbara M. Baumann

Denver, Colorado

                Age: 65                             

Tenure: Director since 2020

Professional Experience:

Ms. Baumann is a former BP Amoco executive who currently serves as President and Owner of Cross Creek Energy Corporation, an energy advisory firm with investments in the domestic oil and gas business. Prior to founding her own firm in 2003, Ms. Baumann was Executive Vice President of Associated Energy Managers, a private equity firm investing in energy companies. Ms. Baumann began her 18-year career with Amoco (later BP Amoco) in 1981. She served in various areas of finance and operations, including Chief Financial Officer of Ecova Corporation, Amoco’s wholly-owned environmental remediation business, and Vice President of Amoco’s San Juan Basin business unit. She is a member of the Board of Directors of Devon Energy Corporation and a member of the independent Board of Trustees of Putnam Mutual Funds. In addition, she is a senior advisor for First Reserve Corporation, a private equity firm focused on energy, and serves as a director of privately held companies Ascent Resources and Texas American Resources II (TARC II). Ms. Baumann previously served on the boards of Buckeye Partners, L.P., SM Energy Company, CVR Energy, Inc., UNS Energy Corporation, and privately held Hat Creek Energy Corporation. She is a former board member and treasurer of The Denver Foundation and current member of its investment committee; a member of the finance committee of Children’s Hospital Colorado; and a board member of the National Association of Corporate Directors, Colorado Chapter, where she chairs the Nominating and Governance Committee. She is also a past member and past chair of the Board of Trustees of Mount Holyoke College.

Qualifications:

Ms. Baumann brings to the Board extensive knowledge of the energy industry, including particular expertise in the oil and gas exploration and production business. Over the course of her distinguished career, she has gained broad strategic planning, economic evaluation, operational, natural gas marketing, and human resources management skills and experience, which are important to the oversight of financial, operational, and compensation management functions. She also has significant financial, accounting and risk management experience, qualifying her as an “Audit Committee Financial Expert” under the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules. Ms. Baumann’s service on other public and private company boards enhances her strong corporate governance background, and her position as an independent trustee of a large family of mutual funds provides insight into the perspective of institutional stockholders.

LOGO

Board Committees

Audit

Financing

Public Company Directorships / Private Company Trusteeships

Devon Energy Corporation

Putnam Mutual Funds

Former Public Company Directorships

Buckeye Partner, L.P.

SM Energy Company

CVR Energy, Inc.

UNS Energy Corporation

Education

Mount Holyoke College, B.A.

Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania, MBA

Rebecca Ranich

Baltimore, Maryland

                Age: 62                             

Tenure: Director since 2016

Professional Experience:

Ms. Ranich is a former director at Deloitte Consulting, LLP, where she led the firm’s Energy and Sustainability Investment Advisory Services for public sector clients, providing counsel on more than $1 billion of investments. Her practice focused on strategic energy investments designed to mitigate and manage risks related to energy supply, demand and climate change issues. Preceding her position at Deloitte, Ms. Ranich worked at PSG International, where she was a member of the management team leading negotiations to implement the Trans-Caspian Gas Pipeline, a multi-billion dollar, 1,700-kilometer pipeline project transporting natural gas from Turkmenistan to Turkey. She was previously a Vice President at Michael Baker Corporation, an international engineering, energy and environmental services firm. While at Baker, she held executive responsibility for delivering energy and environmental engineering services in Europe, Russia and the Caspian region, overseeing projects with a construction value in excess of $40 billion. She managed offices in London, Naples, Wiesbaden and Moscow. Ms. Ranich served as a member of the Board of Directors of Questar Corporation from 2013 to 2016, when Questar was acquired by Dominion Resources, Inc. At Questar she was Chair of the Board’s Governance and Nominating Committee. She is a member of the Board of Directors of Cardno Limited, an Australian infrastructure and environmental services company, and a former member of the Supervisory Board at Uniper SE, a German power generation and energy supply chain corporation. She serves as Chair of the Board of the Gas Technology Institute and Chair of its Investment Committee, and she is an advisory board member of Yet Analytics, an xAPI data analytics platform. In addition to being an investor in and advisor to emerging technology companies, Ms. Ranich is a member of the Technology Commercialization Panel for the Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory.

Qualifications:

Ms. Ranich’s wealth of experience and formidable skills in strategic energy investments, project development and risk management contribute significantly to the Board. With her work on sustainable environmental practices and extensive global industry experience, including first-hand involvement in high-risk environments and large-scale projects designed to effect significant advancements in the delivery of energy, Ms. Ranich complements the diverse backgrounds on the Board, adds a keen understanding of risk, and provides a unique global perspective. Ms. Ranich also brings to the Board her successful track record of establishing, building and leading energy-focused businesses.

LOGO

Board Committees

Audit

Nominating/Corporate

Governance, Chair

Public Company Directorships

Cardno Limited

Former Public Company Directorships

Questar Corporation

Uniper SE

Education

Northwestern University, B.A. in Soviet Studies

University of Detroit Mercy, MBA

Nominees for Election asContinuing Directors for Three-YearWhose Terms Expire in 2023

Jeffrey W. Shaw

Highland, Utah

                Age: 62                             

Tenure: Director since 2014

Professional Experience:

Mr. Shaw retired as Chief Executive Officer of Southwest Gas Corporation (“Southwest”) on March 1, 2015. He was named Chief Executive Officer and a director of Southwest in 2004 and also served as President of Southwest at various times from 2003 to 2014. Previously Mr. Shaw, a CPA, held various positions at Southwest, including Director of Internal Audit, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer, Vice President/Controller and Chief Accounting Officer, Vice President and Treasurer, Senior Vice President/Finance and Treasurer, and Senior Vice President/Gas Resources and Pricing. He worked for Arthur Anderson & Co. in its Dallas and Las Vegas offices in the audit division prior to joining Southwest in May of 1988. He is a member of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, the Nevada Society of CPAs and the Leadership Las Vegas Alumni Association. Mr. Shaw is a member of the Advisory Board of the University of Utah David Eccles School of Business and is a member and past Chairman of the Broadcast Leadership Council at Brigham Young University. He is a past director of Southwest Gas Corporation and the American Gas Association, past Chairman and director of the Western Energy Institute and past President and trustee of the Las Vegas Area Council of the Boy Scouts of America.

Qualifications:

Mr. Shaw’s extensive executive management and financial experience at an energy company with regulated natural gas businesses similar to those of the Company provides the Board with valuable perspective and understanding of state regulatory activities. In particular, Mr. Shaw’s accounting and finance background, and the significant roles he has held in these areas over his career, qualify him as an “Audit Committee Financial Expert” under the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and enable him to play a key role in performing the Board’s audit oversight function. In addition, Mr. Shaw’s background and financial expertise contribute to the Board’s understanding and guidance on financial matters. Mr. Shaw is the Company’s Lead Independent Director.

LOGO

Board Committees

Audit, Chair

Nominating/Corporate Governance

Former Public Company Directorships

Southwest Gas Corporation

Education

University of Utah, B.S. in Accounting

Certified Public Accountant

Thomas E. Skains

Charlotte, North Carolina

                Age: 64                             

Tenure: Director since 2016

Professional Experience:

Mr. Skains is the former Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President of Piedmont Natural Gas Company, Inc., serving from 2002 as President and from 2003 as Chairman and CEO, until his retirement in October 2016. Previously, Mr. Skains held various positions at Piedmont, including Chief Operating Officer and Senior Vice President — Marketing and Supply Services. Mr. Skains held positions of increasing responsibility with Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation, which he joined in 1981 as an attorney and served as corporate and senior attorney before being named Vice President in 1986 and Senior Vice President — Transportation and Customer Services in 1989. In October 2016, Mr. Skains became a director at Duke Energy Corporation, where he chairs its Regulatory Policy Committee and serves on its Finance and Risk Management Committee, and where he previously served on its Nuclear Oversight Committee. Mr. Skains has served as a director of Truist Financial Corporation and its predecessor BB&T Corporation since 2009, where he chairs its Executive Committee and serves on its Risk Committee and Nominating and Governance Committee, and where he previously chaired its Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and its Risk Committee. Mr. Skains has also served as a director at Truist Financial Corporation’s subsidiary, Truist Bank (formerly Branch Banking and Trust Company), since 2013, where he chairs its Executive Committee and serves on and previously chaired its Risk Committee. Mr. Skains previously served on the Charlotte Chamber of Commerce Board of Directors and was Chairman in 2015. He also served on the boards of several industry and community organizations, including Gas Technology Institute, the American Gas Association (as Chairman in 2009), the Southern Gas Association (as Chairman in 2006) and the American Gas Foundation (a not-for-profit energy research group).

Qualifications:

Mr. Skains’ strong leadership and strategic management skills provide the Board with a valuable perspective on the complexities, challenges and opportunities facing the natural gas industry. Through his experiences at Piedmont and Transco, Mr. Skains contributes significant knowledge of the legal and regulatory issues encountered by project sponsors in developing natural gas pipeline projects. Mr. Skains brings to the Board extensive knowledge of the natural gas industry and is able to use his legal training and experience as a corporate energy attorney to provide insight on legal and regulatory compliance matters and contribute to corporate governance matters.

LOGO

Board Committees

Compensation

Nominating/Corporate Governance

Public Company Directorships

Duke Energy Corporation

Truist Financial Corporation

Former Public Company Directorships

Piedmont Natural Gas Company, Inc.

Education

Sam Houston State University, B.B.A

University of Houston Law School, J.D.

Ronald J. Tanski

Buffalo, New York

                Age:68

Tenure:Director since 2014

Professional Experience:

Mr. Tanski was President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company from 2013 until his retirement in 2019. He previously served as President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company from 2010 to 2013 and as Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer from 2004 to 2010. Mr. Tanski was President of National Fuel Gas Supply Corporation from 2008 to 2010 and President of National Fuel Gas Distribution Corporation from 2006 to 2008. He was previously Treasurer of those and other subsidiaries of the Company, and he also served in management roles at Seneca Resources Corporation (now Seneca Resources Company, LLC) and Horizon Energy Development, Inc. (sold in 2010). He is a member of the Board of Directors of CMS Energy Corporation. He previously served as a director of the Interstate Natural Gas Association of America (“INGAA”) and was INGAA Chairman in 2015. Mr. Tanski was a director of the American Gas Association and a member of the Council on Accountancy at Canisius College.

Qualifications:

Mr. Tanski has over four decades of industry experience, beginning his career as an attorney for the Company, and thereafter serving in various management capacities across the Company’s diversified energy business. Through his broad range of experience, including numerous senior leadership positions in both the Company’s regulated utility, and interstate natural gas transmission and storage businesses, as well as within the Company’s exploration and production subsidiary, he gained hands-on, practical knowledge about the natural gas industry, and virtually every aspect of the Company’s operations. Mr. Tanski’s role as CEO and substantial management experience with the Company’s subsidiaries, his detailed understanding of the Company’s integrated operations, and in particular, his financial and legal background with the Company, assist the Board with management of the Company’s operations. Mr. Tanski’s leadership roles at the Company during periods of regulatory change and through several commodity price cycles, as well as his participation with industry trade associations, including the prior chairmanship of a national pipeline trade association, also provide important insight into the business climates and regulatory environments in which the Company’s subsidiaries operate.

LOGO

Board Committees

Executive

Financing

Public Company Directorships

CMS Energy Corporation

Education

State University of New

York at Buffalo, B.A. in

Biology

State University of New

York at Buffalo, MBA

State University of New

York at Buffalo School of

Law, J.D.

Continuing Directors Whose Terms Expire in 2022

 

David C. Carroll

Des Plaines, Illinois

 Age:*  62 64                               

Tenure: Director Since:since 2012

Mr. Carroll is the President and CEO of Gas Technology Institute (“GTI”), a position he has held since 2006. From 2001 through 2006, he served as the Vice President of Business Development for GTI. From 1996 to 2001, he worked for Praxair, Inc., serving as Director of Business Development from 1999 to 2001. Prior to that, Mr. Carroll held positions of increasing responsibility with Liquid Carbonic Industries, a subsidiary of Chicago Bridge & Iron, from 1994 to 1996, and Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. from 1980 to 1994. All of these companies are industrial gas producers and manufacturers. He is a trustee of the American Gas Foundation, a member of the Governing Board of Stanford University’s Natural Gas Initiative, and a member of the Society of Gas Lighting. He was also Chairman of the steering committee for the 17th International Conference and Exhibition on Liquefied Natural Gas in Houston (2013). In June 2015, Mr. Carroll was named President of the International Gas Union, a term that concluded in June 2018 as the United States held the 2018 World Gas Conference in Washington, D.C.

 

Professional Experience:

Mr. Carroll is the President and CEO of Gas Technology Institute (“GTI”), a position he has held since 2006. From 2001 through 2006, he served as the Vice President of Business Development for GTI. From 1996 to 2001, he worked for Praxair, Inc., serving as Director of Business Development from 1999 to 2001. Prior to that, Mr. Carroll held positions of increasing responsibility with Liquid Carbonic Industries, a subsidiary of Chicago Bridge & Iron, from 1994 to 1996, and Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. from 1980 to 1994. All of these companies are industrial gas producers and manufacturers. He is a trustee of the American Gas Foundation, a member of the Governing Board of Stanford University’s Natural Gas Initiative, and a member of the Society of Gas Lighting. He was also Chairman of the steering committee for the 17*th International Conference and Exhibition on Liquefied Natural Gas in Houston (2013). In June 2015, Mr. Carroll was named President of the International Gas Union, a term that concluded in June 2018 as the United States held the 2018 World Gas Conference in Washington, D.C

Qualifications:

Mr. Carroll is a highly respected, nationally and internationally recognized leader in the research and development of natural gas technologies and market solutions. His multi-faceted knowledge of the natural gas industry brings economic, technological and leadership experience to the Board. Through his professional career, Mr. Carroll has developed expertise on unconventional gas production, transmission and distribution pipeline integrity and end use technologies as well as insight into market and industry developments and conditions. This unique combination of skills contributes to the Board’s oversight of our integrated natural gas operations, including the deployment of technology to enhance safety and reliability, and provides valuable insight into risks and opportunities for the continued growth of the Company’s various business segments, as well as insight into global energy trends and emerging industries. Mr. Carroll is heavily involved in both the domestic and international natural gas business communities, providing the Board with a broad perspective on emerging technical, regulatory and economic issues, including climate initiatives and the positioning of natural gas among future global energy supplies.

 

All ages are as of the Annual Meeting date.

LOGO

Qualifications

Board Committees

Executive

Nominating/Corporate

Mr. Carroll is a highly respected, nationally and internationally recognized leader in the research and development of natural gas technologies and market solutions. His multi-faceted knowledge of

the natural gas industry brings economic, technological and leadership experience to the Board. Through his professional career, Mr. Carroll has developed expertise on unconventional gas production, transmission and distribution pipeline integrity and end use technologies as well as insight into market and industry developments and conditions. This unique combination of skills contributes to the Board’s oversight of our integrated natural gas operations and provides valuable insight into risks and opportunities for the continued growth of the Company’s various business segments, as well as insight into emerging energy industries. Mr. Carroll is heavily involved in both the domestic and international natural gas business communities, providing the Board with a broad perspective on emerging technical, regulatory and economic issues.

National Fuel Gas Company Board Committees

Executive

Nominating/Corporate Governance

Former Company DirectorshipsCMS Energy Corporation

Versa Power Systems, Inc. (wholly-owned subsidiary of FuelCell Energy, Inc.)

Education

State University of Pittsburgh, B.S.New

York at Buffalo, B.A. in chemical engineering

LehighBiology

State University of New

York at Buffalo, MBA

Stanford University’s Graduate

State University of New

York at Buffalo School of Business, Stanford Executive Program

Law, J.D.

Continuing Directors Whose Terms Expire in 2022

David C. Carroll

Des Plaines, Illinois

                Age: 64                             

Tenure: Director since 2012

Professional Experience:

 

Steven C. Finch

Age:  60Director Since:  2018    

Mr. FinchCarroll is the former Plant ManagerPresident and CEO of the General MotorsGas Technology Institute (“GM”GTI”) Tonawanda Engine Plant, one of Western New York’s largest manufacturers with approximately 1,600 employees. Mr. Finch,, a Western New York native, began his41-year career with GM in 1976position he has held since 2006. From 2001 through 2006, he served as a General Motors Instituteco-op student at the Chevrolet Gear and Axle Plant in Buffalo, N.Y. Over the course of 30 years, he held several assignments with increasing responsibility at various GM facilities outside Buffalo before becoming Tonawanda Engine Plant Manager in 2007. Following his 2017 retirement from GM, Mr. Finch joined the Automobile Association of America Western and Central New York as Senior Vice President of Automotive Services.Business Development for GTI. From 1996 to 2001, he worked for Praxair, Inc., serving as Director of Business Development from 1999 to 2001. Prior to that, Mr. Finch currently serves asCarroll held positions of increasing responsibility with Liquid Carbonic Industries, a subsidiary of Chicago Bridge & Iron, from 1994 to 1996, and Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. from 1980 to 1994. All of these companies are industrial gas producers and manufacturers. He is a trustee of the American Gas Foundation, a member of the Governing Board of Stanford University’s Natural Gas Initiative, and a member of the Society of Gas Lighting. He was also Chairman of the Board of Directorssteering committee for the Buffalo Urban League,17th International Conference and Exhibition on Liquefied Natural Gas in Houston (2013). In June 2015, Mr. Carroll was a previous Chairmannamed President of the Board forInternational Gas Union, a term that concluded in June 2018 as the United WayStates held the 2018 World Gas Conference in Washington, D.C

Qualifications:

Mr. Carroll is a highly respected, nationally and internationally recognized leader in the research and development of Buffalonatural gas technologies and Erie County,market solutions. His multi-faceted knowledge of the natural gas industry brings economic, technological and a previous board member of AAA Western and Central New York.

Qualifications

With a career spanning more than four decades, Mr. Finch has a proven track record of leadership during a period of significant evolution forexperience to the automotive industry. Mr. Finch helped navigate the GM workforce through economic downturn and bankruptcy. After a reorganization, he successfully secured the addition of three new engine product lines, ultimately overseeing investments at the plant totaling more than $3 billion during his10-year tenure.Board. Through his extensive GMprofessional career, Mr. FinchCarroll has developed expansiveexpertise on unconventional gas production, transmission and diverse experience in manufacturingdistribution pipeline integrity and customer relations,end use technologies as well as in capitalinsight into market and labor management. Mr. Finch’s success in managing highly technical operationsindustry developments and delivering a quality product in a safe, environmentally responsible and cost-effective manner has direct application to National Fuel’s work in the energy industry. Mr. Finch’s experience in senior level oversight during periodsconditions. This unique combination of significant industry challenge and disruption provides an important perspective on regulatory and economic issues.

National Fuel Gas Company Board Committees

Audit

Nominating/Corporate Governance

Education

Kettering University (formerly General Motors Institute), B.S. in electrical engineering

Joseph N. Jaggers

Age:  65Director since:  2015    

Mr. Jaggers is the former President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of Jagged Peak Energy Inc., an independent oil and natural gas exploration and production company. Before forming Jagged Peak Energy in 2013, Mr. Jaggers served as President and Chief Executive Officer and as director of Ute Energy, LLC, from 2010 until its sale in 2012. From 2006 to 2010, he served as President and Chief Operating Officer of Bill Barrett Corporation. From 2001 to 2006, he was Vice President, Exploration & Production, for Williams Companies. Previously, he served as President and Chief Operating Officer of Barrett Resources, from 2000 until its sale to Williams in August 2001. From 1981 through 2000, he worked for BP Amoco in various domestic and international assignments of increasing responsibility culminating in executive oversight for the Northern North Sea, one of BP’s largest producing assets at the time. Mr. Jaggers is a past President of the Colorado Oil and Gas Association, past Executive Director of the Independent Producers Association of the Mountain State and an inductee into the Rocky Mountain Oil and Gas Hall of Fame.

Qualifications

With more than 35 years of experience in the oil and gas industry, including a long record of achieving production and reserve growth, Mr. Jaggers has familiarity with market cycles and dynamics andskills contributes to the Board’s oversight of our exploration and production business. Additionally, his substantial executive experience with large, public exploration and production companies combined with his extensive operational experience in diverse producing basins provides the Board with insight in assessing various risks that may affect oil andintegrated natural gas operations, atincluding the Company. With experience as a senior leader in a numberdeployment of explorationtechnology to enhance safety and production companies, Mr. Jaggers adds significant operational depth toreliability, and provides valuable insight into risks and opportunities for the Board as well as an understanding of effective and efficient resource development. These attributes assist the Board in its oversight of the ongoing developmentcontinued growth of the Company’s various oil and gas assets and evaluation of the continued advancement of the Company’s Appalachian drilling program.

National Fuel Gas Company Board Committees

Audit

Compensation

Former Public Company Directorships

Jagged Peak Energy Inc.

Bill Barrett Corporation

Mission Resources Corporation

Education

United States Military Academy at West Point, B.S.

David F. Smith

Age:  65Director since:  2007    

Mr. Smith has been Chairman of the Board of the Company since March 2010 (from March 2013 through March 2014 he served as Executive Chairman of the Board). He also served as Chief Executive Officer of the Company from February 2008 until March 2013; as President of the Company from February 2006 through June 2010; and as Chief Operating Officer of the Company from February 2006 to February 2008. Mr. Smith was also President and/or Chairman of each of the Company’s major subsidiaries over the course of his career. He is a Board member of Gas Technology Institute (Executive Committee and Audit Committee), Emeritus Board member of the State University of New York at Buffalo Law School Dean’s Advisory Council, a former director of the American Gas Association and former Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Business Council of New York State.

Qualifications

Mr. Smith brings to the Board significant industry and Company expertise and leadership experience. His36-year tenure with the Company and time in key leadership positions within all of the Company’s business segments, has resulted in significant knowledge of the Company’s history and strategies during its substantial growth from a regional utility to a much larger diversified energy company. He also brings a long and active participation in industry groups that identify and address important issues facing the Company and has well-established relationships of trust with other industry leaders. In addition, Mr. Smith has deep ties to businesses and civic organizations in Western New York (the location of the Company’s corporate headquarters and most of its business units). His experience as an active participant during decades of regulatory evolution at the state and federal levels provides valuable perspective and insight into the political and regulatory trends impacting the Company’s regulated pipeline, storage and utility businesses.

National Fuel Gas Company Board Committees

Executive, Chair

Financing

Education

State University of New York at Fredonia, B.A in political science

State University of New York at Buffalo School of Law, J.D.

Directors Whose Terms Expire in 2021

Philip C. Ackerman

Age:  75Director since:  1994    

Mr. Ackerman was Chief Executive Officer of the Company from October 2001 to February 2008, Chairman of the Board of the Company from January 2002 to March 2010 and President of the Company from July 1999 to February 2006. Mr. Ackerman also served as the Company’s Principal Financial Officer from 1981 to 2001. He is a past director of the Business Council of New York State, prior Chairman of the Erie County Industrial Development Agency and current member of the Board of Managers of the Buffalo Society of Natural Sciences. Mr. Ackerman is a past director of Associated Electric and Gas Insurance Services Limited, a mutual insurance company that provides insurance coverage and related risk management services to the utility and energy industries.

Qualifications

Mr. Ackerman’s more than 40 years’ involvement with the Company, including his experience as President (or Executive Vice President) of all of the Company’s major subsidiaries and as the Principal Financial Officer of the Company, provides the Board with anin-depth strategic perspective on the Company, as well as an understanding ofinsight into global energy trends and emerging industries. Mr. Carroll is heavily involved in both the Company’s financials. During his tenure with the Company Mr. Ackerman increased its presence in all phases of the energy business; National Fuel grew from a regional utility company with $300 million in assets to a fully integrated energy company with over $5.1 billion in assets. Mr. Ackerman’s experience as a director of Associated Electricdomestic and Gas Insurance Services Limited providesinternational natural gas business communities, providing the Board with a usefulbroad perspective on risksemerging technical, regulatory and managementeconomic issues, including climate initiatives and the positioning of risk in the natural gas industry. Mr. Ackerman is a significant and long-standing retail stockholder, which provides the Board the perspective of the Company’s retail stockholders, who represent a significant portion of the Company’s stockholder ownership.among future global energy supplies.

National Fuel Gas Company

LOGO

Board Committees

Executive

Financing, Chair

Nominating/Corporate

Education

State University of New York at Buffalo, B.S. in accounting

Harvard University Law School, J.D.Governance

 

Stephen E. Ewing

Age:  74Director Since:  2007    ��

Mr. Ewing served as Vice Chairman of DTE Energy Company (“DTE”), a Detroit-based diversified energy company involved in the development and management of energy-related businesses and services nationwide, from November 2005 to December 2006. Two of DTE’s subsidiaries are DTE Electric Company (formerly known as Detroit Edison), one of the nation’s largest electric utilities, and DTE Gas Company (formerly known as Michigan Consolidated Gas Company, or “MichCon”), one of the nation’s largest natural gas local distribution companies. Mr. Ewing also had responsibility for DTE’s exploration and production subsidiary, DTE Gas Resources, with operations in the Antrim and Barnett Shale. He was also, at various times, Group President of the Gas Division at DTE, President and Chief Operating Officer of MCN Energy Group, Inc. (the then parent of MichCon and a company which had utility, pipeline and storage, and exploration and production businesses) and President and Chief Executive Officer of MichCon, until it was acquired by DTE. He was also Chairman of the Board of Directors of the American Gas Association for 2006, a member of the National Petroleum Council, and Chairman of the Midwest Gas Association and the Natural Gas Vehicle Coalition. He is a past trustee and past Chairman of the Board of The Skillman Foundation, anot-for-profit foundation focused on providing education forlow-income children, past director and Chairman of the Auto Club of Michigan and past director and Chairman of the Board of the Auto Club Group (“AAA”).

Qualifications

With his extensive background in executive management at energy companies with regulated businesses, Mr. Ewing provides valuable perspective on the Company’s operations. Through his senior leadership positions at MichCon, MCN Energy and, ultimately, DTE, he has expertise in managing pipeline and utility natural gas operations in the northern U.S. This experience, coupled with his oversight of DTE’s exploration and production subsidiary’s operations in the Antrim and Barnett Shale, provides the Board with significant insight into the Company’s integrated operations and opportunities for further Company growth via strategic upstream and midstream development. In addition, his current position as a director of another northern energy company, CMS Energy, provides a current perspective on natural gas regulation. Mr. Ewing is the Company’s Lead Independent Director.

National Fuel Gas Company Board Committees

Audit

Compensation, Chair

Financing

Current Public Company Directorships

CMSDuke Energy Corporation

Truist Financial Corporation

Former Public Company Directorships

Piedmont Natural Gas Company, Inc.

Education

DePauw University, B.A.

MichiganSam Houston State University, MBAB.B.A

Harvard Advanced Management Program

University of Houston Law School, J.D.

Rebecca Ranich

Age:  61Director since: 2016    

Ms. Ranich is a former director at Deloitte Consulting, LLP, where she led the firm’s EnergyRonald J. Tanski

Buffalo, New York

                Age:68

Tenure:Director since 2014

Professional Experience:

Mr. Tanski was President and Sustainability Investment Advisory Services for public sector clients, providing counsel on more than $1 billion of investments. Her practice focused on strategic energy investments designed to mitigate and manage risks related to energy supply, demand and climate change issues. Preceding her position at Deloitte, Ms. Ranich worked at PSG International, where she was a memberChief Executive Officer of the management team leading negotiationsCompany from 2013 until his retirement in 2019. He previously served as President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company from 2010 to implement the Trans-Caspian2013 and as Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer from 2004 to 2010. Mr. Tanski was President of National Fuel Gas Pipeline, a multi-billion dollar,1,700-kilometer pipeline project transporting natural gasSupply Corporation from Turkmenistan2008 to Turkey. She2010 and President of National Fuel Gas Distribution Corporation from 2006 to 2008. He was previously a Vice PresidentTreasurer of those and other subsidiaries of the Company, and he also served in management roles at Michael BakerSeneca Resources Corporation an international engineering, energy(now Seneca Resources Company, LLC) and environmental services firm. While at Baker, she held executive responsibility for delivering energy and environmental engineering servicesHorizon Energy Development, Inc. (sold in Europe, Russia and the Caspian region, overseeing projects with a construction value in excess of $40 billion. She managed offices in London, Naples, Wiesbaden and Moscow. Ms. Ranich served as2010). He is a member of the Board of Directors of Questar Corporation from 2013 until September 2016, when Questar was acquired by Dominion Resources, Inc. At Questar she was Chair of the Board’s Governance and Nominating Committee. She is a member of the Supervisory Board at Uniper SE, a German power generation and energy supply chain corporation, and the Board of Directors of Cardno Limited, an Australian infrastructure and environmental services company. She serves as vice chair of the Board of the Gas Technology Institute and chair of its Investment Committee, and she is an advisory board member of Yet Analytics, an xAPI data analytics platform. In addition to being an investor in and advisor to emerging technology companies, Ms. Ranich is a member of the Technology Commercialization Panel for the Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory.

Qualifications

Ms. Ranich’s strong background and wealth of experience in strategic energy investments, project development and risk management contribute significantly to the Board. With her work on sustainable environmental practices and strong global industry experience, Ms. Ranich’s skills complement the diverse backgrounds on the Board. Ms. Ranich also brings to the Board her successful track record of establishing, building and leading energy-focused businesses.

National Fuel Gas Company Board Committees

Audit

Nominating/Corporate Governance, Chair

Current Public Company Directorships

Cardno Limited

Uniper SE

Former Public Company Directorships

Questar Corporation

Education

Northwestern University, B.A. in Soviet area studies

University of Detroit Mercy, MBA

Directors Whose Terms Expire in 2020

Jeffrey W. Shaw

Age:  60Director since:  2014    

Mr. Shaw retired as Chief Executive Officer of Southwest Gas Corporation (“Southwest”) on March 1, 2015.CMS Energy Corporation. He was named Chief Executive Officer and a director of Southwest in 2004 and also served as President of Southwest at various times from 2003 to 2014. Previously Mr. Shaw, a CPA, held various positions at Southwest, including Director of Internal Audit, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer, Vice President/Controller and Chief Accounting Officer, Vice President and Treasurer, Senior Vice President/Finance and Treasurer, and Senior Vice President/Gas Resources and Pricing. He worked for Arthur Anderson & Co. in its Dallas and Las Vegas offices in the audit division prior to joining Southwest Gas in May of 1988. He is a member of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, the Nevada Society of CPAs and the Leadership Las Vegas Alumni Association. Mr. Shaw is a member of the Advisory Board of the University of Utah David Eccles School of Business and is a member and past Chairman of the Broadcast Leadership Council at Brigham Young University. He is a past director of Southwest Gas Corporation and the American Gas Association, past Chairman and director of the Western Energy Institute and past President and trustee of the Las Vegas Area Council of the Boy Scouts of America.

Qualifications

Mr. Shaw’s extensive executive management and financial experience at an energy company with regulated natural gas businesses similar to those of the Company provides the Board with valuable perspective and understanding of state regulatory activities. In particular, Mr. Shaw’s accounting and finance background, and the significant roles he has held in these areas over his career, qualify him as an “Audit Committee Financial Expert” under the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and enable him to play a key role in performing the Board’s audit oversight function. In addition, Mr. Shaw’s background and financial expertise contribute to the Board’s understanding and guidance on financial matters.

National Fuel Gas Company Board Committees

Audit, Chair

Nominating/Corporate Governance

Former Public Company Directorships

Southwest Gas Corporation

Education

University of Utah, B.S. in accounting

Certified Public Accountant

Thomas E. Skains

Age: 62Director since:  2016    

Mr. Skains is the former Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President of Piedmont Natural Gas Company, Inc., serving from 2002 as President and from 2003 as Chairman and CEO, until his retirement in October 2016. Previously, Mr. Skains held various positions at Piedmont, including Chief Operating Officer and Senior Vice President — Marketing and Supply Services. Mr. Skains held positions of increasing responsibility with Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation, which he joined in 1981 as an attorney and served as corporate and senior attorney before being named Vice President in 1986 and Senior Vice President — Transportation and Customer Services in 1989. In October 2016, Mr. Skains became a director at Duke Energy Corporation, where he serves on its Regulatory Policy and Operations Committee and its Nuclear Oversight Committee. Mr. Skains haspreviously served as a director of BB&T Corporation since 2009, where he chairs its Executive Committeethe Interstate Natural Gas Association of America (“INGAA”) and serves on its Risk Committee, and where he previously

chaired its Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and its Risk Committee. Mr. Skains has also served as a director at BB&T Corporation’s subsidiary, Branch Banking and Trust Company, since 2013, where he chairs its Executive Committee and serves on and previously chaired its Risk Committee. Mr. Skains previously served on the Charlotte Chamber of Commerce Board of Directors and was INGAA Chairman in 2015. He also served on the boardsMr. Tanski was a director of several industry and community organizations, including Gas Technology Institute, the American Gas Association (as Chairman in 2009),and a member of the Southern Gas Association (as Chairman in 2006) and the American Gas Foundation (anot-for-profit energy research group).Council on Accountancy at Canisius College.

Qualifications

Qualifications:

Mr. Skains’ strongTanski has over four decades of industry experience, beginning his career as an attorney for the Company, and thereafter serving in various management capacities across the Company’s diversified energy business. Through his broad range of experience, including numerous senior leadership positions in both the Company’s regulated utility, and strategic management skills provide the Board with a valuable perspective on the complexities, challenges and opportunities facing theinterstate natural gas industry. Through his experiences at Piedmonttransmission and Transco, Mr. Skains contributes significantstorage businesses, as well as within the Company’s exploration and production subsidiary, he gained hands-on, practical knowledge of the legal and regulatory issues encountered by project sponsors in developing natural gas pipeline projects. Mr. Skains brings to the Board extensive knowledge ofabout the natural gas industry, and is able to usevirtually every aspect of the Company’s operations. Mr. Tanski’s role as CEO and substantial management experience with the Company’s subsidiaries, his detailed understanding of the Company’s integrated operations, and in particular, his financial and legal trainingbackground with the Company, assist the Board with management of the Company’s operations. Mr. Tanski’s leadership roles at the Company during periods of regulatory change and experiencethrough several commodity price cycles, as well as his participation with industry trade associations, including the prior chairmanship of a corporate energy attorney tonational pipeline trade association, also provide important insight on legalinto the business climates and regulatory compliance matters and contribute to corporate governance matters.environments in which the Company’s subsidiaries operate.

National Fuel Gas Company

LOGO

Board Committees

Compensation

Nominating/Corporate GovernanceExecutive

Current Financing

Public Company Directorships

Duke Energy Corporation

BB&T

Truist Financial Corporation

Former Public Company Directorships

Piedmont Natural Gas Company, Inc.

Education

Sam Houston State University, B.B.A.B.B.A

University of Houston Law School, J.D.

Ronald J. Tanski

Buffalo, New York

                Age:68

Tenure:Director since 2014

Age:  66Director since:  2014    

Professional Experience:

Mr. Tanski has beenwas President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company since March 2013. Mr. Tanskifrom 2013 until his retirement in 2019. He previously served as President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company from July 2010 to March 2013 and as Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer from April 2004 to July 2010. Mr. Tanski was President of National Fuel Gas Supply Corporation from July 2008 to July 2010 and President of National Fuel Gas Distribution Corporation from February 2006 to July 2008. He was previously Treasurer of those and other subsidiaries of the Company, and he also served in management roles at Seneca Resources Corporation (now Seneca Resources Company, LLC) and Horizon Energy Development, Inc. (sold in 2010). He is a member of the Board of Directors of CMS Energy Corporation. He previously served as a director of the Interstate Natural Gas Association of America (“INGAA”) and was INGAA Chairman in 2015. Mr. Tanski iswas a director of the American Gas Association and a member of the Council on Accountancy at Canisius College. He also serves as Secretary on the Board of Managers of the Buffalo Museum of Science and as a member of the Executive Committee, and he is a director of Invest Buffalo Niagara.

Qualifications

Qualifications:

Mr. Tanski has been employed byover four decades of industry experience, beginning his career as an attorney for the Company, since 1979.and thereafter serving in various management capacities across the Company’s diversified energy business. Through his broad range of experience, including numerous senior leadership positions in both the Company’s regulated utility, andnon-regulated interstate natural gas transmission and storage businesses, as well as within the Company’s exploration and production subsidiary, he gainedhands-on, practical knowledge about the natural gas industry, and virtually every aspect of the Company’s

operations. Mr. Tanski’s role as CEO and substantial management experience with the Company’s subsidiaries, his detailed understanding of the Company’s integrated operations, and in particular, his financial and legal background with the Company, assist the Board with management of the Company’s operations. Mr. TanskiTanski’s leadership roles at the Company during periods of regulatory change and through several commodity price cycles, as well as his participation with industry trade associations, including the prior chairmanship of a national pipeline trade association, also provide important insight into the business climates and regulatory environments in which the Company’s subsidiaries operate.

LOGO

Board Committees

Executive

Financing

Public Company Directorships

CMS Energy Corporation

Education

State University of New

York at Buffalo, B.A. in

Biology

State University of New

York at Buffalo, MBA

State University of New

York at Buffalo School of

Law, J.D.

Continuing Directors Whose Terms Expire in 2022

David C. Carroll

Des Plaines, Illinois

                Age: 64                             

Tenure: Director since 2012

Professional Experience:

Mr. Carroll is the President and CEO of Gas Technology Institute (“GTI”), a position he has held since 2006. From 2001 through 2006, he served as the Vice President of Business Development for GTI. From 1996 to 2001, he worked for Praxair, Inc., serving as Director of Business Development from 1999 to 2001. Prior to that, Mr. Carroll held positions of increasing responsibility with Liquid Carbonic Industries, a subsidiary of Chicago Bridge & Iron, from 1994 to 1996, and Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. from 1980 to 1994. All of these companies are industrial gas producers and manufacturers. He is a trustee of the American Gas Foundation, a member of the Governing Board of Stanford University’s Natural Gas Initiative, and a member of the Society of Gas Lighting. He was also Chairman of the steering committee for the 17th International Conference and Exhibition on Liquefied Natural Gas in Houston (2013). In June 2015, Mr. Carroll was named President of the International Gas Union, a term that concluded in June 2018 as the United States held the 2018 World Gas Conference in Washington, D.C

Qualifications:

Mr. Carroll is a highly respected, nationally and internationally recognized leader in the research and development of natural gas technologies and market solutions. His multi-faceted knowledge of the natural gas industry brings economic, technological and leadership experience to the Board. Through his professional career, Mr. Carroll has developed expertise on unconventional gas production, transmission and distribution pipeline integrity and end use technologies as well as insight into market and industry developments and conditions. This unique combination of skills contributes to the Board’s oversight of our integrated natural gas operations, including the deployment of technology to enhance safety and reliability, and provides valuable insight into risks and opportunities for the continued growth of the Company’s various business segments, as well as insight into global energy trends and emerging industries. Mr. Carroll is heavily involved in both the domestic and international natural gas business communities, providing the Board with a broad perspective on emerging technical, regulatory and economic issues, including climate initiatives and the positioning of natural gas among future global energy supplies.

LOGO

Board Committees

Executive

Nominating/Corporate

Governance

Former Company Directorships

Versa Power Systems, Inc. (wholly-owned subsidiary of Fuel Cell Energy, Inc.)

Education

University of Pittsburgh, B.S. in Chemical Engineering

Lehigh University, MBA

Stanford University Graduate School of Business, Stanford Executive Program

Steven C. Finch

Buffalo, New York

                Age: 62                             

Tenure: Director since 2018

Professional Experience:

Mr. Finch is the former Plant Manager of the General Motors (“GM”) Tonawanda Engine Plant, one of Western New York’s largest manufacturers with approximately 1,600 employees. Mr. Finch, a Western New York native, began his 41-year career with GM in 1976 as a General Motors Institute co-op student at the Chevrolet Gear and Axle Plant in Buffalo, N.Y. Over the course of 30 years, he held several assignments with increasing responsibility at various GM facilities outside Buffalo before becoming Tonawanda Engine Plant Manager in 2007. Following his 2017 retirement from GM, Mr. Finch joined the Automobile Association of America Western and Central New York as Senior Vice President of Automotive Services. Mr. Finch currently serves as Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Buffalo Urban League and as a member of the Board of Directors of the Community Foundation for Greater Buffalo, serving on its Racial Equity Roundtable initiative. He was a previous Chairman of the Board of the United Way of Buffalo and Erie County, and a previous board member of AAA Western and Central New York.

Qualifications:

With a career spanning more than four decades, Mr. Finch has a proven track record of leadership during a period of significant evolution for the automotive industry. Mr. Finch helped navigate the GM workforce through economic downturn and bankruptcy. After a reorganization, he successfully secured the addition of three new engine product lines, ultimately overseeing investments at the plant totaling more than $3 billion during his 10-year tenure. Through his extensive GM career, Mr. Finch developed expansive and diverse experience in manufacturing and customer relations, as well as in capital and labor management. Mr. Finch’s success in managing highly technical operations and delivering a quality product in a safe, environmentally responsible and cost-effective manner has direct application to National Fuel’s work in the energy industry, including the Company’s focus on employee safety and commitment to the provision of outstanding service to residential customers. Mr. Finch’s experience in senior level oversight during periods of significant industry challenge and disruption provides an important perspective on organizational transformation and the management of regulatory and economic change. Furthermore, Mr. Finch’s strong community presence positions him to provide guidance and insight to the Board on local and regional matters, and provides an important connection between the Company and the communities it serves.

LOGO

Board Committees

Audit

Nominating/Corporate Governance

Education

Kettering University (formerly General Motors Institute), B.S. in Electrical Engineering

Joseph N. Jaggers

Horseshoe Bay, Texas

                Age: 67                             

Tenure: Director since 2015

Professional Experience:

Mr. Jaggers is the founder and former President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of Jagged Peak Energy Inc., formerly an independent oil and natural gas exploration and production company. Before forming Jagged Peak Energy in 2013, Mr. Jaggers served as President and Chief Executive Officer and as director of Ute Energy, LLC, from 2010 until its sale in 2012. From 2006 to 2010, he served as director, President and Chief Operating Officer of Bill Barrett Corporation. From 2001 to 2006, he was Vice President, Exploration & Production, for Williams Companies. Previously, he served as President and Chief Operating Officer of Barrett Resources, from 2000 until its sale to Williams in August 2001. From 1981 through 2000, he worked for BP Amoco in various domestic and international assignments of increasing responsibility culminating in executive oversight for the Northern North Sea, one of BP’s largest producing assets at the time. Mr. Jaggers is a member of the Board of Directors of QEP Resources, Inc. He is past President of the Colorado Oil and Gas Association, past Executive Director of the Independent Producers Association of the Mountain State and an inductee into the Rocky Mountain Oil and Gas Hall of Fame.

Qualifications:

With more than 35 years of experience in the oil and gas industry, including a long record of creating value through efficiently achieving production and reserve growth, Mr. Jaggers has familiarity with market cycles and dynamics and contributes significantly to the Board’s oversight of our exploration and production business. Mr. Jaggers’ extensive operational experience in diverse producing basins provides the Board with substantial insight in assessing various risks that may affect oil and gas operations at the Company. With experience as a senior leader in a number of large, publicly-traded exploration and production companies, Mr. Jaggers adds significant operational depth to the Board as well as an understanding of effective and efficient resource development. These attributes assist the Board in its oversight of the ongoing development of the Company’s various oil and gas assets and evaluation of the continued advancement of the Company’s Appalachian drilling program.

LOGO

Board Committees

Audit

Compensation, Chair

Executive

Public Company Directorships

QEP Resources, Inc.

Former Public Company Directorships

Jagged Peak Energy Inc.

Bill Barrett Corporation

Mission Resources Corporation

Education

United States Military Academy at West Point, B.S.

David F. Smith

Scottsdale, Arizona

                Age: 67                             

Tenure: Director since 2007

Professional Experience:

Mr. Smith has been Chairman of the Board of the Company since 2010 (from 2013 to 2014 he served as Executive Chairman of the Board). He also served as Chief Executive Officer of the Company from 2008 to 2013; as President of the Company from 2006 to 2010; and as Chief Operating Officer of the Company from 2006 to 2008. Mr. Smith was also President and/or Chairman of each of the Company’s major subsidiaries over the course of his career. He is a Board member of Gas Technology Institute (Executive Committee and Audit Committee), Emeritus Board member of the State University of New York at Buffalo Law School Dean’s Advisory Council, a former director of the American Gas Association and former Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Business Council of New York State. He is also past Chairman of the Northeast Gas Association and Buffalo Niagara Enterprise.

Qualifications:

Mr. Smith brings to the Board significant industry and Company expertise and leadership experience. His 36-year tenure with the Company, which included key leadership positions within all of the Company’s business segments has resulted in significant knowledge of the Company’s history and strategies during its substantial growth from a regional utility to a much larger diversified energy company. He also brings a long and active participation in industry groups that identify and address important issues facing the Company and has well-established relationships of trust with other industry leaders. In addition, Mr. Smith has deep ties to businesses and civic organizations in Western New York the(the location of the Company’s corporate headquarters and a numbermost of its significant business units.units). His experience as an active participant during decades of regulatory evolution at the state and federal levels provides valuable perspective and insight into the political and regulatory trends impacting the Company’s regulated interstate pipeline and storage, and utility businesses.

National Fuel Gas Company

LOGO

Board Committees

Executive, Chair

Financing, Chair

Education

State University of New York at Buffalo,Fredonia, B.A. in biologyPolitical

State University of New York at Buffalo, MBAScience

State University of New York at Buffalo School of Law, J.D.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

The Board of Directors is committed to effective corporate governance. The Board has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines that provide a framework for the governance of the Company, and it regularly reviews corporate governance developments. The Board has implemented many strong governance practices, including maintaining a significant complement of independent directors (currently nine out of eleven), designating a Lead Independent Director, holding regular meetings of the non-management and/or independent directors, separating, at the Board’s discretion, the roles of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, and providing a process for stockholders meeting certain requirements to have nominees included in the Company’s proxy materials. In addition, the Company’s Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, which applies to all directors, officers and employees, sets forth standards for conducting business in an honest and ethical manner.

Diversity

National Fuel’s commitment to diversity extends both to its workforce and your Board of Directors. Under the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Board of Directors is required, when selecting candidates for re-election and candidates for Board membership, to consider factors that include diversity of perspectives, including all aspects of diversity, to be brought to the Board by the individual members. In recent years, National Fuel’s Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee, which makes recommendations to the full Board on nominees for director positions, has invited qualified gender and racially diverse candidates to stand for election to the Board, with successful results. The Board will continue its efforts to attract qualified diverse Board candidates whose expertise and personal characteristics align with the Company’s long term business strategy. The Board also believes it noteworthy that Board member Rebecca Ranich serves as Chair of the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee and that women have long occupied National Fuel’s top corporate levels. Today, four of the Company’s ten designated executive officers are women who hold the following important policy-making positions: President of the Company’s Utility segment; General Counsel and Secretary, who also serves as the Company’s Compliance Officer; Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer; and Controller and Principal Accounting Officer.

Director Independence

The Board of Directors has determined that directors Anderson, Baumann, Carroll, Finch, Jaggers, Ranich, Shaw, Skains and Smith are independent, that Mr. Tanski is not independent due to his recent employment relationship with the Company, and that Mr. Bauer is not independent due to his current employment relationship with the Company. The Board of Directors previously determined that Stephen E. Ewing, who retired from the Board March 11, 2020, was independent. The Board’s determinations of director independence were made in accordance with the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”) and SEC regulations. In making its independence determinations, the Board considered that Mr. Carroll is President and Chief Executive Officer of GTI, an organization that receives payments from the Company for dues and fees to support research and development, and that such payments in each of GTI’s last three fiscal years were less than (i) $1,000,000 or (ii) 2% of GTI’s consolidated gross revenues for the applicable fiscal year.

Board Leadership Structure

Non-management directors meet at regularly scheduled executive sessions without management. In addition, the independent directors met during fiscal 2020, in accordance with NYSE listing standards. The sessions were chaired by Stephen E. Ewing, as Lead Independent Director until his retirement from the Board on March 11, 2020, and by Jeffrey W. Shaw, as Lead Independent Director since March 11, 2020.

In March 2020, the Board of Directors re-elected Mr. Smith as Chairman of the Board and re-elected Mr. Bauer as President and Chief Executive Officer. The Board believes that Mr. Smith’s role as

Chairman and Mr. Bauer’s position as Chief Executive Officer constitute an effective leadership model, given Mr. Smith’s past experience in the role of CEO and experience as Chairman of the Board and Mr. Bauer’s recent appointment as CEO. The Board believes this is the optimal leadership structure at this time and reviews and considers this structure at least annually. As in the past, it is the Board’s opinion that the stockholders’ interests are best served by allowing the Board to retain flexibility to determine the optimal organizational structure for the Company at a given time, including whether the roles of Chairman and CEO should be filled by the same person. At times in the past the roles have been separate and at other times they have been combined. The members of the Board possess considerable experience and unique knowledge of the challenges and opportunities the Company faces, have significant industry experience and are in the best position to evaluate its needs and how best to organize the capabilities of the directors and management to meet those needs.

The Board of Directors provides a process for stockholders and other interested parties to send communications to the Board or to certain directors. Communications to the Lead Independent Director, to the non-management directors as a group, or to the entire Board should be addressed as follows: Lead Independent Director, c/o 6363 Main Street, Williamsville, NY 14221. For the present, all stockholder and interested parties’ communications addressed in such manner will go directly to the indicated directors. If the volume of communication becomes such that the Board determines to adopt a process for determining which communications will be relayed to Board members, that process will appear on the Company’s website at www.nationalfuel.com.

Annual Meeting Attendance

Last year, all directors then serving on the Board attended the 2020 Annual Meeting. This year, all directors are expected to attend, via remote communication, the 2021 Annual Meeting.

Meetings of the Board of Directors and Standing Committees

In fiscal 2020, there were five meetings of the Board of Directors. In addition, directors attended meetings of standing or pro tempore committees. The Audit Committee held nine meetings, the Compensation Committee held four meetings, the Executive Committee held two meetings, the Financing Committee held two meetings, and the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee held four meetings. During fiscal 2020, all directors attended at least 75% of the aggregate of meetings of the Board and of the committees of the Board on which they served. In addition, Board members regularly attend meetings of committees on which they do not serve, although committee decision-making is reserved to committee members.

The table below shows the number of committee meetings conducted in fiscal 2020 and the directors who served on these committees as of September 30, 2020.

  BOARD COMMITTEES

DIRECTOR

 Audit Compensation Executive Financing Nominating/
Corporate
Governance

David H. Anderson

 X X   

David P. Bauer

   X X 

Barbara M. Baumann

 X   X 

David C. Carroll

   X  X

Steven C. Finch

 X    X

Joseph N. Jaggers

 X Chair X  

Rebecca Ranich

 X    Chair

Jeffrey W. Shaw

 Chair    X

Thomas E. Skains

  X   X

David F. Smith

   Chair Chair 

Ronald J. Tanski

   X X 

Number of Meetings in Fiscal 2020

 9 4 2 2 4

Audit Committee

The Audit Committee is a separately designated standing audit committee established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). The Audit Committee held nine meetings during fiscal 2020 in order to review the scope and results of the annual audit, to receive reports of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm and chief internal auditor, to monitor compliance with the Company’s Reporting Procedures for Accounting and Auditing Matters (included in this proxy statement as Appendix A), to review the Company’s enterprise risk management program and to prepare a report of the Audit Committee’s findings and recommendations to the Board of Directors. A current copy of the charter of the Audit Committee is available to security holders on the Company’s website at www.nationalfuel.com. The members of the Audit Committee are independent as independence for audit committee members is defined in NYSE listing standards and in SEC regulations. No Audit Committee member simultaneously serves on the audit committees of more than three public companies. The Board limits the number of audit committees on which an Audit Committee member can serve to three, unless the Board has determined that such simultaneous service would not impair the ability of such members to serve effectively. The Company’s Board of Directors has determined that the Company has three audit committee financial experts (as defined by SEC regulations) serving on its Audit Committee, namely Mr. Shaw, Mr. Anderson and Ms. Baumann. The Board has also determined, in its business judgment in accordance with NYSE listing standards, that all members of the Audit Committee are financially literate.

In connection with its review of the Company’s internal audit function, the Audit Committee in 2016 had an external quality assessment performed by IIA Quality Services, LLC under the Institute of Internal Auditors’ (the “IIA”) International Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing (the “Standards”). The assessment concluded that the Company’s Audit Services Department generally conforms to the Standards, the IIA Code of Ethics, and the Definition of Internal Auditing. “Generally conforms” is the IIA’s highest rating. The Standards state that an external quality assessment should be conducted at least once every five years.

Further information relating to the Audit Committee appears in this proxy statement under the headings “Audit Fees” and “Audit Committee Report.”

Compensation Committee

As described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis in this proxy statement, the Compensation Committee held four meetings during fiscal 2020 in order to review and determine the compensation of Company executive officers and to review reports and/or grant awards under the Company’s 2010 Equity Compensation Plan, the 2012 Annual At Risk Compensation Incentive Program (“AARCIP” or the “At Risk Plan”), and the Executive Annual Cash Incentive Program (“EACIP”). The members of the Compensation Committee are independent under NYSE listing standards and “non-employee directors” as defined in SEC regulations. A current copy of the charter of the Compensation Committee is available to security holders on the Company’s website at www.nationalfuel.com.

The Compensation Committee is responsible for various aspects of executive compensation, including approval of the base salaries and incentive compensation of the Company’s executive officers. The Compensation Committee is authorized to evaluate director compensation and make recommendations to the full Board regarding director compensation. The Compensation Committee may form subcommittees and delegate to those subcommittees such authority as the Compensation Committee deems appropriate, other than authority required to be exercised by the Compensation Committee as a whole. The Compensation Committee also administers the Company’s 2010 Equity Compensation Plan, the 1997 Award and Option Plan, and the At Risk Plan and approves performance conditions and target incentives for executive officers who are participants in the EACIP. As described more fully in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the Compensation Committee retained Korn Ferry (a unit of Korn/Ferry International) and Meridian Compensation Partners, LLC, both independent compensation consulting firms, to assist in determining executive compensation. In addition, as set forth in the Compensation Committee’s charter, the Chief Executive Officer may and does make, and the Compensation Committee may and does consider, recommendations regarding the Company’s compensation and employee benefit plans and practices, including the compensation of executive officers other than himself. The Compensation Committee then approves executive compensation as it deems appropriate. The Compensation Committee has assessed the independence of the compensation consultants under NYSE listing standards and has determined their work presents no conflicts of interest under SEC regulations. For more information regarding the role of the compensation consultants and the Chief Executive Officer in determining or recommending the amount or form of executive compensation, see the Compensation Discussion and Analysis.

Executive Committee

The Executive Committee held two meetings during fiscal 2020. The Executive Committee has, and may exercise, the authority of the full Board, except as may be prohibited by New Jersey corporate law (N.J.S.A. § 14A:6-9).

Financing Committee

The Financing Committee held two meetings during fiscal 2020. The Financing Committee may exercise Board authority with respect to specific financing matters for which the Board has delegated responsibility to it.

Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee

All the members of the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee are independent, as independence is defined in NYSE listing standards. The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee makes recommendations to the full Board on nominees for the position of director. The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee also has duties regarding corporate governance matters as required by law, regulation or NYSE rules. Additionally, the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee oversees the Company’s strategy and reporting with respect to corporate responsibility matters, including

environmental, social, and corporate governance (“ESG”) factors, that are of significance to the Company and its stakeholders. The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee provides guidance to management on corporate responsibility issues and makes recommendations to the Board regarding corporate responsibility initiatives and strategies. A current copy of the charter of the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee is available to stockholders on the Company’s website at www.nationalfuel.com and in print to stockholders who request a copy from the Company’s Secretary at its principal office. The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee held four meetings during fiscal 2020.

Method of Evaluating Board and Committee Effectiveness

Annually, the Board and each of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee take part in a self-evaluation process to determine their effectiveness and opportunities for improvement. Questionnaires are provided to each director soliciting comments with respect to dynamics of the full Board and each of the above committees, on which the director serves, as well as director performance and adequacy of Board materials. The confidential responses are summarized for Board and Nominating/Corporate Governance committee review. Board members are requested to report dissatisfaction with individual performance to the Chairman of the Board and the Chairman of the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee. At a Board and Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee meeting, time is allocated to discuss the summary and review any comments or inadequacies.

Process for Nominating Directors

Stockholders may recommend individuals to the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee to consider as potential nominees. Procedures by which stockholders may make such recommendations are set forth in Exhibit B to the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, described in the following paragraph. In addition, the Company’s By-Laws provide a process for stockholders meeting certain requirements to have nominees included in the Company’s proxy materials.

In general, the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee’s charter provides for the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee to develop and recommend to the Board criteria for selecting new director nominees and evaluating unsolicited nominations, which criteria are included in this proxy statement as part of the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines. A current copy of the Corporate Governance Guidelines is included in this proxy statement as Appendix B, and is available to stockholders on the Company’s website at www.nationalfuel.com. Appendix B also addresses the qualifications and skills the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee believes are necessary in a director, and the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee’s consideration of stockholder recommendations for director. Pursuant to the Corporate Governance Guidelines, stockholder recommendations identifying a proposed nominee and setting out his or her qualifications should be delivered to the Company’s Secretary at its principal office no later than September 24, 2021 in order to be eligible for consideration in connection with the 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

Under the process for selecting new Board candidates, the Chairman and the Chief Executive Officer and the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee discuss the need to add a new Board member or to fill a vacancy on the Board. The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee will initiate a search, working with staff support and seeking input from Board members and senior management, hiring a search firm if necessary, and considering candidates recommended by stockholders in accordance with Exhibit B to the Corporate Governance Guidelines.

Charitable Contributions by Company

Within the preceding three years, the Company did not make any charitable contributions to any charitable organization in which a director served as an executive officer which exceeded the greater of $1 million or 2% of the charitable organization’s consolidated gross revenues in a single fiscal year.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

There are no “Compensation Committee interlocks” or “insider participation” which SEC regulations or NYSE listing standards require to be disclosed in this proxy statement.

Risk Oversight

The Board retains oversight of safety, environmental, social, operational and corporate governance risks, among other areas central to corporate responsibility, including strategic, financial and regulatory risks and opportunities. An important aspect of the Board’s oversight role is the enterprise risk management process, under which major enterprise-wide risks have been identified, along with the mitigative measures to address and manage such risks. Management reports quarterly to the Board on significant risk categories. In addition, management provides a detailed presentation on a topic related to one or more risk categories at each Board meeting. Additional review or reporting on enterprise risks is conducted as needed or as requested by the Board. The Board and management consider enterprise risks and opportunities in their strategic and capital spending decision process, and the Board directs management to integrate corporate responsibility concerns into decision-making throughout the organization.

The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee specifically has oversight responsibility for corporate responsibility matters that are significant to the Company and its stakeholders. The Company understands that our stockholders trust us to conduct business consistent with our six guiding principles of safety, environmental stewardship, community, innovation, satisfaction, and transparency. To that end, corporate responsibility and ESG matters are now a standing agenda item at Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee meetings. In September 2020, the Company published our initial Corporate Responsibility Report which built on past disclosures, highlighting the Company’s ESG-related initiatives, programs, and actions.

The Audit Committee discusses guidelines and policies governing management’s process for assessing and managing the Company’s exposure to risk. The Audit Committee also oversees the scope of work of the Audit Services Department, which includes review of the internal audit function’s annual risk-based audit plan. The Audit Services Department considers significant risk categories identified through the enterprise risk management process when creating its internal audit plan. Additionally, in conjunction with its review of the integrity of the Company’s financial statements, the Audit Committee discusses with management major financial risk exposures and the steps taken to monitor and control those exposures.

Related Person Transactions

The Company had no related person transactions in fiscal 2020. The Company’s Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (the “Code of Conduct”) (which is in writing and available to stockholders as described at the end of this proxy statement) identifies the avoidance of any actual or perceived conflicts between personal interests and Company interests as an essential part of the responsibility of the Company’s directors, officers and employees. The Code of Conduct provides that a conflict of interest may arise when a director, officer or employee receives improper personal benefits as a result of his or her position in the Company, or when personal situations tend to influence or compromise a director’s, officer’s or employee’s ability to render impartial business decisions in the best interest of the Company. Potential conflicts of interest under the Code of Conduct would include but not be limited to related person transactions. The Audit Committee administers the Code of Conduct as it relates to the Company’s directors and executive officers.

The Company’s policies and procedures for the review, approval or ratification of related person transactions are set forth in writing in the charter of the Audit Committee. The charter provides that the Audit Committee will review and, if appropriate, approve or ratify any transaction between the Company and a related person which is required to be disclosed under SEC rules. In the course of its review of a

transaction, the Audit Committee will consider the nature of the related person’s interest in the transaction, the material terms of the transaction, the significance of the transaction to the related person and to the Company, whether the transaction would affect the independence of a director, and any other matters the Audit Committee deems appropriate. The Audit Committee will approve or ratify only those transactions that it considers to be in, or not inconsistent with, the best interests of the Company and its stockholders, as the Audit Committee determines in good faith. Any member of the Audit Committee who is a related person with respect to a transaction under review may not participate in the deliberations or vote respecting approval or ratification of the transaction.

Code of Ethics

The Company has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to the Company’s directors, principal executive officer, principal financial officer, controller, other officers and employees that is designed to deter wrongdoing and to promote honest and ethical conduct. The code deals with a variety of corporate matters, including compliance with laws, conflicts of interest, corporate opportunities, use of company resources, fair dealing and confidentiality of company information. The text of the code is available on the Company’s website at www.nationalfuel.com. Upon request, the Company will provide to any person without charge a copy of the code. Requests must be made to the Secretary at the principal offices of the Company.

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

The 2009 Non-Employee Director Equity Compensation Plan was approved at the 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and reapproved at the 2016 and 2019 Annual Meetings of Stockholders (“Director Equity Compensation Plan”). This plan provides for the issuance of shares on a quarterly basis to non-employee directors in such amounts as the Board may determine from time to time. In addition, non-employee directors receive a portion of their compensation in cash, as determined by the Board from time to time. Directors who are not Company employees or retired employees do not participate in any of the Company’s employee benefit or compensation plans. Directors who are current employees receive no compensation for serving as directors.

For the first quarter of fiscal 2020, non-employee directors were paid a cash retainer of $22,500, plus fees for meetings during such quarter of committees on which they served at a rate of $1,500 per meeting. Effective January 1, 2020 (the start of the Company’s second fiscal quarter), the Board eliminated all meeting fees and increased the rate of the cash retainer from $22,500 to $27,500 per quarter, or $110,000 per year. In fiscal 2020, non-employee directors were also paid shares of Common Stock equal in value to approximately $175,000, except that the shares paid to Ms. Baumann and Mr. Ewing were pro-rated based on their period of actual service during fiscal 2020. Common Stock issued to non-employee directors under the Director Equity Compensation Plan is nontransferable until the later of two years from issuance or six months after the recipient’s cessation of service as a director of the Company, except that transferability restrictions lapse upon the death of the recipient.

The Lead Independent Director (Mr. Shaw, effective March 11, 2020) was paid an additional annual retainer of $15,000, and the Chairpersons of the Audit, Compensation and Nominating/Corporate Governance Committees (Mr. Shaw, Mr. Jaggers and Ms. Ranich, respectively) were each paid an additional annual retainer of $15,000. These payments were made in July 2020. Mr. Smith was paid an additional retainer of $20,000 per quarter for his service as Chairman of the Board.

The Company requires that each director, in order to receive compensation for service as a director, must beneficially own at least 2,000 shares of Common Stock at the end of the first year of service as a director, at least 4,000 shares at the end of the second year of service and at least 6,000 shares at the end of the third year of service. All directors are in compliance with this requirement.

The following table sets forth the compensation paid to each non-employee director for service during fiscal 2020:

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION TABLE — FISCAL 2020

Name

  Fees
Earned or
Paid in
Cash
($)(1)
   Stock
Awards
($)(2)
   All Other
Compensation
($)(3)
  Total
($)
 

David H. Anderson

   112,500    175,086   7   287,593 

Barbara M. Baumann

   61,346    97,653   4   159,003 

David C. Carroll

   106,500    175,086   7   281,593 

Stephen E. Ewing

   51,456    77,945   3   129,404 

Steven C. Finch

   111,000    175,086   7   286,093 

Joseph N. Jaggers

   127,500    175,086   7   302,593 

Rebecca Ranich

   126,000    175,086   7   301,093 

Jeffrey W. Shaw

   141,000    175,086   7   316,093 

Thomas E. Skains

   109,500    175,086   7   284,593 

David F. Smith

   185,000    175,086   7   360,093 

Ronald J. Tanski

   105,000    175,086   7   280,093 

(1)

Annual Meeting Attendance

Last year, all directors then serving attendedRepresents the 2018 Annual Meeting, and all or substantially allportion of the directors are expected to do so this year. Aannual retainer paid in cash, plus meeting fees, plus additional retainers, as applicable, for service as a committee Chairperson, Lead Independent Director, or Chairman of the Board of Directors will take placeBoard.

(2)

Represents the aggregate fair value on the same daydate of issuance of the Common Stock issued under the Director Equity Compensation Plan, in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) authoritative guidance for stock compensation. The average of the high and low stock price on each date of issuance was used to compute the fair value. The average prices (and resultant values of the Stock Awards) were as follows: $46.17 for October 1, 2019 (stock in total valued at $43,769.16); $45.69 for January 2, 2020 (stock in total valued at $43,771.02 or, for the same place aspro-rated grant to Mr. Ewing, $34,176.12); $35.715 for March 13, 2020 (stock in total valued at $10,107.345 for the Annual Meetingpro-rated grant to Ms. Baumann); $36.105 for April 1, 2020 (stock in total valued at $43,759.26); and $41.23 for July 1, 2020 (stock in total valued at $43,786.26). As of September 30, 2020, the aggregate shares paid for all years of director service under director compensation plans to directors are expected to attend all meetings. If a director is unable to attend a Board meeting in person, participation by telephone is permitted and in that event the director may not be physically present at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

Director Independence

The Board of Directors has determined that directors Ackerman,Anderson, Baumann, Carroll, Ewing, Finch, Jaggers, Ranich, Shaw, Skains, Smith and Smith are independent,Tanski were 5,173, 2,557, 22,785, 28,178, 8,079, 16,448, 13,962, 19,232, 12,873, 14,654 and that Mr. Tanski is not independent due to his current employment relationship with the Company. The Board of Directors previously determined that Craig G. Matthews, whose service as a director concluded March 8, 2018, was independent. The Board’s determinations of director independence were made in accordance with the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”) and SEC regulations. In making its independence determinations, the Board considered that Mr. Carroll is President and Chief Executive Officer of GTI, an organization that receives payments from the Company for dues and fees to support research and development, and that such payments in each of GTI’s last three fiscal years were less than (i) $1,000,000 or (ii) 2% of GTI’s consolidated gross revenues for the applicable fiscal year. The Board also considered that Mr. Finch is Senior Vice President of AAA Western and Central New York, Inc. (“AAA”), anot-for-profit corporation that maintains several locations in the Company’s utility service territory, and that payments made by AAA to Company affiliates for natural gas service in each of AAA’s last three fiscal years were less than (i) $1,000,000 or (ii) 2% of AAA’s consolidated gross revenues for the applicable fiscal year.5,007, respectively.

Board Leadership Structure

In March 2018, the Board of Directorsre-elected Mr. Smith as Chairman of the Board andre-elected Mr. Tanski as President and Chief Executive Officer. The Board believes that Mr. Smith’s role as Chairman and Mr. Tanski’s position as Chief Executive Officer, since March 2013, is an effective leadership model given Mr. Smith’s past experience in the role of CEO and his experience as Chairman of the Board and Mr. Tanski’s experience as CEO. The Board believes this is the optimal leadership structure at this time and reviews and considers this structure at least annually. As in the past, it is the Board’s opinion that the stockholders’ interests are best served by allowing the Board to retain flexibility to determine the optimal organizational structure for the Company at a given time, including whether the Chairman role should be filled by the CEO who serves on the Board. At times in the past the roles have been separate and at other times they have been combined. The members of the Board possess considerable experience and unique knowledge of the challenges and opportunities the Company faces, have significant industry experience and are in the best position to evaluate its needs and how best to organize the capabilities of the directors and management to meet those needs.

Non-management directors meet at regularly scheduled executive sessions without management. In addition, the independent directors met during fiscal 2018, in accordance with NYSE listing requirements. The sessions were chaired by Stephen E. Ewing, as Lead Independent Director. The Board of Directors provides a process for stockholders and other interested parties to send communications to the Board or to certain directors. Communications to the Lead Independent Director, to thenon-management directors as a group, or to the entire Board should be addressed as follows: Lead Independent Director, c/o 6363 Main Street, Williamsville, NY 14221. For the present, all stockholder and interested parties’ communications addressed in such manner will go directly to the indicated directors. If the volume of communication becomes such that the Board determines to adopt a process for determining which communications will be relayed to Board members, that process will appear on the Company’s website atwww.nationalfuel.com.

Diversity

Under the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Board of Directors is required, when selecting candidates forre-election and candidates for Board membership, to consider factors that include a diversity of experience related to the business segments in which the Company operates, as well as a diversity of perspectives to be brought to the Board by the individual members. During Fiscal 2018, the Board updated the Director Qualifications Guidelines, contained in the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, to clarify that “diversity of perspectives” includes all aspects of diversity. In recent years, National Fuel’s Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee, which makes recommendations to the full Board on nominees for director positions, has invited qualified diverse candidates to stand for election to the Board, with successful results. The Board has approached a number of diverse candidates, with some declining consideration for directorship due to reasons such as restrictions on number of outside public boards and time commitments. The Board will continue its efforts to attract qualified Board Candidates whose expertise and personal characteristics align with the Company’s long term business strategy. The Board also believes it noteworthy that Board member Rebecca Ranich serves as Chair of the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee and that women have long occupied National Fuel’s top corporate levels. Today, four of the Company’s ten designated executive officers are women who hold the following important policy-making positions: Controller and Principal Accounting Officer; Senior Vice President and General Counsel (our chief legal officer), who also serves as the Company’s Compliance Officer and previously served as the Company’s Corporate Secretary; Vice President of Business Development, who oversees many of the Company’snon-exploration and production development plans and who was named President of the Utility segment effective February 1, 2019; and until February  1, 2019, the Company’s Chief Information Officer.

Meetings of the Board of Directors and Standing Committees

In fiscal 2018, there were five meetings of the Board of Directors. In addition, directors attended meetings of standing or pro tempore committees. The Audit Committee held nine meetings, the Compensation Committee held five meetings, and the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee held five meetings. During fiscal 2018, all directors attended at least 75% of the aggregate of meetings of the Board and of the committees of the Board on which they served. In addition, Board members regularly attend meetings of committees on which they do not serve, although committee decision-making is reserved to committee members.

The table below shows the number of committee meetings conducted in fiscal 2018 and the directors who served on these committees as of September 30, 2018.

 

  BOARD COMMITTEES

DIRECTOR

 Audit  Compensation Executive Nominating/
Corporate
Governance

Philip C. Ackerman

   X 

David C. Carroll

   X X

Stephen E. Ewing

  X  Chair  

Steven C. Finch

  X    X

Joseph N. Jaggers

  X  X  

Rebecca Ranich

  X    Chair

Jeffrey W. Shaw

  Chair    X

Thomas E. Skains

  X  X

David F. Smith

   Chair 

Ronald J. Tanski

   X 

Number of Meetings in Fiscal 2018

  9  5 0 5
(3)

Audit

The Audit Committee isRepresents premiums paid on a separately designated standing audit committee established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). The Audit Committee held nine meetings during fiscal 2018 in order to review the scope and results of the annual audit, to receive reports of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm and chief internal auditor, to monitor compliance with the Company’s Reporting Procedures for Accounting and Auditing Matters (included in this proxy statement as Appendix A), to review the Company’s enterprise risk management program and to prepare a report of the Audit Committee’s findings and recommendations to the Board of Directors. The members of the Audit Committee are independent as independence for audit committee members is defined in NYSE listing standards and in SEC regulations. No Audit Committee member simultaneously serves on the audit committees of more than three public companies. The Board limits the number of audit committees onblanket travel insurance policy, which an Audit Committee member can serve to three, unless the Board has determined that such simultaneous service would not impair the ability of such members to serve effectively. The Company’s Board of Directors has determined that the Company has an audit committee financial expert (as defined by SEC regulations) serving on its Audit Committee, namely Mr. Shaw, who is an independent director.

In connection with its review of the Company’s internal audit function, the Audit Committee in 2016 had an external quality assessment performed by IIA Quality Services, LLC under the Institute of Internal Auditors’ (the “IIA”)International Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing(the “Standards”). The assessment concluded that the Company’s Audit Services Department generally conforms to the Standards, the IIA Code of Ethics, and the Definition of Internal Auditing. “Generally conforms” is the IIA’s highest rating. The Standards state that an external quality assessment should be conducted at least once every five years.

Further information relating to the Audit Committee appears in this proxy statement under the headings “Audit Fees” and “Audit Committee Report.” A current copy of the Audit Committee charter is available to security holders on the Company’s website atwww.nationalfuel.com.

Compensation

As described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis in this proxy statement, the Compensation Committee held five meetings during fiscal 2018 in order to review and determine the compensation of Company executive officers and to review reports and/or grant awards under the Company’s 2010 Equity Compensation Plan, the 2012 Annual At Risk Compensation Incentive Program

(“AARCIP” or the “At Risk Plan”), and the Executive Annual Cash Incentive Program (“EACIP”). The members of the Compensation Committee are independent as independence is defined in NYSE listing standards. The members of the Compensation Committee are also“non-employee directors” as defined in SEC regulations and “outside directors” as defined in Federal tax regulations. A current copy of the charter of the Compensation Committee is available to security holders on the Company’s website atwww.nationalfuel.com.

The Compensation Committee is responsible for various aspects of executive compensation, including approval of the base salaries and incentive compensation of the Company’s executive officers. The Compensation Committee is authorized to evaluate director compensation and make recommendations to the full Board regarding director compensation. The Compensation Committee may form subcommittees and delegate to those subcommittees such authority as the Compensation Committee deems appropriate, other than authority required to be exercised by the Compensation Committee as a whole. The Compensation Committee also administers the Company’s 2010 Equity Compensation Plan, the 1997 Award and Option Plan, and the At Risk Plan and approves performance conditions and target incentives for executive officers who are participants in the EACIP. As described more fully in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the Compensation Committee retained Korn Ferry (a unit of Korn/Ferry International) and Meridian Compensation Partners, LLC, both independent compensation consulting firms, to assist in determining executive compensation. In addition, as set forth in the Compensation Committee’s charter, the Chief Executive Officer may and does make, and the Compensation Committee may and does consider, recommendations regarding the Company’s compensation and employee benefit plans and practices, including the compensation of executive officers other than himself. The Compensation Committee then approves executive compensation as it deems appropriate. The Compensation Committee has assessed the independence of the compensation consultants under NYSE listing standards and has determined their work presents no conflicts of interest under SEC regulations.

Executive

The Executive Committee did not meet during fiscal 2018. The Executive Committee has, and may exercise, the authority of the full Board, except as may be prohibited by New Jersey corporate law (N.J.S.A. §14A:6-9).

Nominating/Corporate Governance

All the members of the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee are independent, as independence is defined in NYSE listing standards. The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee makes recommendations to the full Board on nominees for the position of director. The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee also has duties regarding corporate governance matters as required by law, regulation or NYSE rules. The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee held five meetings during fiscal 2018. Stockholders may recommend individuals to the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee to consider as potential nominees. Procedures by which stockholders may make such recommendations are set forth in Exhibit B to the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, described in the following paragraph. In addition, the Company’sBy-Laws provide a process for stockholders meeting certain requirements to have nominees included in the Company’s proxy materials.

In general, the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee’s charter provides for the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee to develop and recommend to the Board criteria for selecting new director nominees and evaluating unsolicited nominations, which criteria are included in this proxy statement as part of the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines. A current copy of the charter of the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee is available to stockholders on the Company’s website atwww.nationalfuel.com and in print to stockholders who request a copy from the Company’s Secretary at its principal office. A current copy of the Corporate Governance Guidelines is included in this proxy statement as Appendix B, and is available to stockholders on the Company’s website atwww.nationalfuel.com. Appendix B also addresses the qualifications and skills the

Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee believes are necessary in a director, and the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee’s consideration of stockholder recommendations for director. Pursuant to the Corporate Governance Guidelines, stockholder recommendations identifying a proposed nominee and setting out his or her qualifications should be delivered to the Company’s Secretary at its principal office no later than September 20, 2019 in order to be eligible for consideration in connection with the 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

Under the process for selecting new Board candidates, the Chairman and the Chief Executive Officer and the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee discuss the need to add a new Board member or to fill a vacancy on the Board. The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee will initiate a search, working with staff support and seeking input from Board members and senior management, hiring a search firm if necessary, and considering candidates recommended by stockholders in accordance with Exhibit B to the Corporate Governance Guidelines.

Method of Evaluating Board and Committee Effectiveness

Annually, the Board and each of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee take part in a self-evaluation process to determine their effectiveness and opportunities for improvement. Questionnaires are provided tocovers each director soliciting comments with respectup to dynamicsa maximum benefit of the full Board and each$500,000. This insurance provides coverage in case of the above committees, on which the director serves, as well as director performance and adequacy of Board materials. The confidential responses are summarized for Board and Nominating/Corporate Governance committee review. Board members are requested to report dissatisfaction with individual performance to the Chairman of the Board and the Chairman of the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee. At a Board and Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee meeting, time is allocated to discuss the summary and review any commentsdeath or inadequacies.

Charitable Contributions by Company

Within the preceding three years, the Company did not make any charitable contributions to any charitable organization in which a director served as an executive officer which exceeded the greater of $1 million or 2% of the charitable organization’s consolidated gross revenues in a single fiscal year.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

There are no “Compensation Committee interlocks” or “insider participation” which SEC regulations or NYSE listing standards require to be disclosed in this proxy statement.

Risk Oversight

The Board retains oversight of safety, environmental, social, cybersecurity and corporate governance risks, among other areas central to corporate responsibility, including strategic, financial and regulatory risks and opportunities. An important aspect of the Board’s oversight role is the enterprise risk management process, under which major enterprise-wide risks have been identified, along with the mitigative measures to address and manage such risks. Management reports quarterly to the Board on significant risk categories. In addition, management provides a detailed presentationinjury while on a topic related to one or more risk categories at each Board meeting. Additional review or reporting on enterprise risks is conducted as needed or as requested by the Board. The Board and management consider enterprise risks and opportunities in their strategic and capital spending decision process, and the Board directs management to integrate corporate responsibility concerns into decision-making throughout the organization.

Related Person Transactions

Thetrip for Company had no related person transactions in fiscal 2018. The Company’s Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (the “Code of Conduct”) (which is in writing and available to stockholders as described at the end of this proxy statement) identifies the avoidance of any actual or perceived conflictsbusiness.

AUDIT FEES

In addition to retaining PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP to report on the annual consolidated financial statements of the Company for fiscal 2020, the Company retained PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP to provide various non-audit services in fiscal 2020. The aggregate fees billed for professional services by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for each of the last two fiscal years were as follows:

between personal interests and Company interests as an essential part of the responsibility of the Company’s directors, officers and employees. The Code of Conduct provides that a conflict of interest may arise when a director, officer or employee receives improper personal benefits as a result of his or her position in the Company, or when personal situations tend to influence or compromise a director’s, officer’s or employee’s ability to render impartial business decisions in the best interest of the Company. Potential conflicts of interest under the Code of Conduct would include but not be limited to related person transactions. The Audit Committee administers the Code of Conduct as it relates to the Company’s directors and executive officers.

The Company’s policies and procedures for the review, approval or ratification of related person transactions are set forth in writing in the charter of the Audit Committee. The charter provides that the Audit Committee will review and, if appropriate, approve or ratify any transaction between the Company and a related person which is required to be disclosed under SEC rules. In the course of its review of a transaction, the Audit Committee will consider the nature of the related person’s interest in the transaction, the material terms of the transaction, the significance of the transaction to the related person and to the Company, whether the transaction would affect the independence of a director, and any other matters the Audit Committee deems appropriate. The Audit Committee will approve or ratify only those transactions that it considers to be in, or not inconsistent with, the best interests of the Company and its stockholders, as the Audit Committee determines in good faith. Any member of the Audit Committee who is a related person with respect to a transaction under review may not participate in the deliberations or vote respecting approval or ratification of the transaction.

Director Compensation

The 2009Non-Employee Director Equity Compensation Plan was approved at the 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and reapproved at the 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (“Director Equity Compensation Plan”). This plan provides for the issuance of shares on a quarterly basis tonon-employee directors in such amounts as the Board may determine from time to time. In addition,non-employee directors receive a portion of their compensation in cash, as determined by the Board from time to time. Directors who are not Company employees or retired employees do not participate in any of the Company’s employee benefit or compensation plans. Directors who are current employees receive no compensation for serving as directors.

For fiscal 2018,non-employee directors were paid a retainer at an annual rate of $90,000 in cash plus shares of Common Stock equal in value to approximately $175,000. Common Stock issued tonon-employee directors under the Director Equity Compensation Plan is nontransferable until the later of two years from issuance or six months after the recipient’s cessation of service as a director of the Company, except that transferability restrictions lapse upon the death of the recipient.

The Company does not paynon-employee directors aper-meeting fee for meetings of the Board, except that eachnon-employee director receives a fee of $1,500 for attendance at any meeting of the Board in excess of six meetings per year. Fees paid tonon-employee directors for meetings of committees on which they serve are $1,500 per meeting. The Lead Independent Director (Mr. Ewing) was paid an additional annual retainer of $15,000, and the Chairpersons of the Audit, Compensation and Nominating/Corporate Governance Committees (Mr. Shaw, Mr. Ewing and Ms. Ranich, respectively) were each paid an additional annual retainer of $15,000. Mr. Smith was paid an additional retainer of $20,000 per quarter for his service as Chairman of the Board.

The Company requires that each director, in order to receive compensation for service as a director, must beneficially own at least 2,000 shares of Common Stock at the end of the first year of service as a director, at least 4,000 shares at the end of the second year of service and at least 6,000 shares at the end of the third year of service. All directors are in compliance with this requirement.

The following table sets forth the compensation paid to eachnon-employee director for service during fiscal 2018:

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION TABLE — FISCAL 2018

Name

 Fees
Earned or
Paid in
Cash
($)(1)
 Stock
Awards
($)(2)
 Option
Awards
($)
 Non-Equity
Incentive
Plan
Compensation
($)
 Change in
Pension Value
and Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
($)
 All Other
Compensation
($)(3)
 Total
($)

Philip C. Ackerman

   90,000   175,103   None   None   N/A   8   265,111

David C. Carroll

   97,500   175,103   None   None   N/A   8   272,611

Stephen E. Ewing

   141,000   175,103   None   None   N/A   8   316,111

Steven C. Finch

   24,310   38,546   None   None   N/A   2   62,858

Joseph N. Jaggers

   111,000   175,103   None   None   N/A   8   286,111

Craig G. Matthews

   55,500   87,536   None   None   N/A   4   143,040

Rebecca Ranich

   118,500   175,103   None   None   N/A   8   293,611

Jeffrey W. Shaw

   126,000   175,103   None   None   N/A   8   301,111

Thomas E. Skains

   102,000   175,103   None   None   N/A   8   277,111

David F. Smith

   170,000   175,103   None   None   N/A   8   345,111

 

(1)

Represents the portion of the annual retainer paid in cash, plus meeting fees, plus additional retainers, as applicable, for service as a committee Chairperson, Lead Independent Director, or Chairman of the Board.

(2)

Represents the aggregate fair value on the date of issuance of the Common Stock issued under the Director Equity Compensation Plan, as required by the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (FASB’s) authoritative guidance for stock compensation. The average of the high and low stock price on each date of issuance was used to compute the fair value. The average prices (and resultant values of the Stock Awards) were as follows: $56.98 for October 2, 2017 (stock in total valued at $43,761); $56.925 for January 2, 2018 (stock in total valued at $43,775); $50.83 for April 2, 2018 (stock in total valued at $43,765); $52.965 for July 2, 2018 (stock in total valued at $43,802); and $54.52 for July 16, 2018 (stock in total valued at $38,546 forpro-rated grant to Mr. Finch). As of September 30, 2018, the aggregate shares paid for all years of director service under director compensation plans to directors Ackerman, Carroll, Ewing, Finch, Jaggers, Matthews, Ranich, Shaw, Skains and Smith were 19,233, 15,413, 23,290, 707, 9,076, 23,997, 6,590, 11,860, 5,501 and 7,282, respectively.

(3)

Represents premiums paid on a blanket travel insurance policy, which covers each director up to a maximum benefit of $500,000. This insurance provides coverage in case of death or injury while on a trip for Company business.

AUDIT FEES

In addition to retaining PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP to report on the annual consolidated financial statements of the Company for fiscal 2018, the Company retained PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP to provide variousnon-audit services in fiscal 2018. The aggregate fees billed for professional services by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for each of the last two fiscal years were as follows:

  2017   2018   2020   2019 

Audit Fees(1)

  $1,774,500   $1,976,100   $2,203,600   $1,872,500 

Audit-Related Fees(2)

  $0   $0   $0   $0 

Tax Fees

        

Tax advice and planning(3)

  $12,000   $31,100   $218,400   $8,200 

Tax compliance(4)

  $18,685   $7,500   $11,450   $41,815 

All Other Fees(5)

  $3,589   $3,589   $2,284   $3,589 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

TOTAL

  $1,808,774   $2,018,289   $2,435,734   $1,926,104 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

 

(1)

Audit Fees include audits of consolidated financial statements and internal control over financial reporting, reviews of financial statements included in quarterly Forms10-Q, comfort letters and consents, and audits of certain of the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiaries to meet statutory or regulatory requirements.

(2)

Audit-Related Fees include audits of certain of the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiaries not required by statute or regulation, and consultations concerning technical financial accounting and reporting standards.

(3)

Tax advice and planning includes consultations on various federal and state tax matters.

(4)

Tax compliance includes tax return preparation and tax audit assistance.

(5)

All Other Fees relate to permissible fees other than those described above and include consulting fees and the software-licensing fee for an accounting and financial reporting research tool.

The Audit Committee’s charter (available on the Company’s website atwww.nationalfuel.com and in print to stockholders who request a copy from the Company’s Secretary at its principal office) references itspre-approval policies and procedures. The Committee haspre-approved the use of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for specific types of services, including various audit and audit-related services and certain tax services, among others. The chair of the Committee and, in his absence, another specified member of the Committee are authorized topre-approve any audit ornon-audit service on behalf of the Committee. Eachpre-approval is to be reported to the full committee at the first regularly scheduled committee meeting following suchpre-approval.

For fiscal 2018, none of the services provided by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP were approved by the Audit Committee in reliance upon the “de minimis exception” contained in Section 202 of Sarbanes-Oxley and codified in Section 10A(i)(1)(B) of the Exchange Act and in 17 CFR210.2-01(c)(7)(i)(C).

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

The Audit Committee is composed solely of five directors who meet the independence and financial literacy requirements of the NYSE and the SEC. The Audit Committee Chairman, Jeffrey W. Shaw, qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by the SEC. The responsibilities of the Audit Committee are set forth in the Audit Committee Charter, last amended June 15, 2017, a copy of which is available on the Company’s website athttps://investor.nationalfuelgas.com/for-investors/corporate-
governance/committee-charters/default.aspx#mem
.

The Audit Committee reviews the integrity of the Company’s financial statements and oversees the scope of work of the Audit Services Department. That scope includes reviewing the accuracy, reliability and integrity of financial and operational information and the means used to identify, measure, classify and report such information. The Audit Committee also directly appoints, retains, compensates, evaluates, terminates and oversees the work of the independent auditor for the purpose of preparing or issuing an audit report or performing other audit, review or attest services for the Company, and such firm must report directly to the Audit Committee. In addition to those responsibilities, with respect to the independent auditor, the Audit Committee:

reviews and evaluates the annual engagement letter, including the independent auditor’s proposed fees;

reviews, evaluates and monitors the annual audit plan and its progression, including the timing and scope of audit activities;

annually reviews and evaluates the qualifications, performance and independence of the independent auditor, including the lead partner, and ensures that the lead partner and any other audit partners are rotated at appropriate intervals in compliance with applicable laws, rules and regulations;

reviews and evaluates the independent auditor report describing internal quality-control procedures and any material issues raised by the most recent internal quality-control review of the independent auditors or outside inquiry or investigation; and

reviews the independent auditor report describing all relationships between the independent auditor and the Company, including a list of the fees billed for each category, in order to assess the independent auditor’s independence.

Management is responsible for the Company’s consolidated financial statements and for establishing, maintaining, and assessing internal control over financial reporting. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, the Company’s independent auditor, is responsible for expressing opinions on the conformityreporting, reviews of financial statements included in quarterly Forms 10-Q, comfort letters and consents, and audits of certain of the Company’s audited financial statements with generally accepted accounting principles and on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.wholly-owned subsidiaries to meet statutory or regulatory requirements.

(2)

As partAudit-Related Fees include audits of its auditor engagement process, the Audit Committee considers whether to rotate the independent auditor. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP has been the Company’s independent auditor since 1941. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP rotates its lead audit engagement partner every five years; the Audit Committee interviews proposed candidates and selects the lead audit engagement partner. The Audit Committee believes that there are significant benefits to having an independent auditor with an extensive history with the Company. These include:

Higher quality audit work and accounting advice, due to the independent auditor’s institutional knowledge of our business and operations, accounting policies and financial systems, and internal control framework; and

Operational efficiencies because of the independent auditor’s history and familiarity with our business.

In fulfilling its responsibilities, the Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed the Company’s audited financial statements for fiscal 2018 with management. The Audit Committee has also reviewed

with management its evaluation of the structure and effectivenesscertain of the Company’s internal control overwholly-owned subsidiaries not required by statute or regulation, and consultations concerning technical financial reporting. The Audit Committee has discussed with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP the matters requiredaccounting and reporting standards.

(3)

Tax advice and planning includes consultations on various federal and state tax matters.

(4)

Tax compliance includes tax return preparation and tax audit assistance.

(5)

All Other Fees relate to be discussed by Auditing Standard No. 1301,Communications with Audit Committees, as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). The Audit Committee has received the written disclosurespermissible fees other than those described above and include consulting fees and the letter from PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP required by Rule 3526,Communication with Audit Committees Concerning Independence, of the PCAOBsoftware-licensing fee for an accounting and has discussed with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP that firm’s independence. The Audit Committee also has considered whether PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP’s level of fees and provision ofnon-audit services to the Company and its affiliates are compatible with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP’s independence and has concluded that PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP is independent from the Company and its management.

Based on the review, discussions and considerations referred to in the preceding paragraph, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited financial statements be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form10-K for fiscal 2018reporting research tool.

The Audit Committee’s charter (available on the Company’s website at www.nationalfuel.com and in print to stockholders who request a copy from the Company’s Secretary at its principal office) references its pre-approval policies and procedures. The Audit Committee has pre-approved the use of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for specific types of services, including various audit and audit-related services and certain tax services, among others. The chair of the Audit Committee and, in his absence, another specified member of the committee are authorized to pre-approve any audit or non-audit service on behalf of the committee. Each pre-approval is to be reported to the full committee at the first regularly scheduled committee meeting following such pre-approval.

For fiscal 2020, none of the services provided by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP were approved by the Audit Committee in reliance upon the “de minimis exception” contained in Section 202 of Sarbanes-Oxley and codified in Section 10A(i)(1)(B) of the Exchange Act and in 17 CFR 210.2-01(c)(7)(i)(C).

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

The Audit Committee is composed solely of six directors who meet the independence and financial literacy requirements of the New York Stock Exchange and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The Audit Committee Chairman, Jeffrey W. Shaw, and members David H. Anderson and Barbara M. Baumann, each qualify as an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by the SEC. The responsibilities of the Audit Committee are set forth in the Audit Committee Charter, last amended June 15, 2017, a copy of which is available on the Company’s website at https://investor.nationalfuelgas.com/governance/governance-guidelines-and-committee-charters/default.aspx.

The Audit Committee reviews the integrity of the Company’s financial statements and discusses with management major financial risk exposures and the steps taken to monitor and control those exposures. The Audit Committee also oversees the scope of work of the Audit Services Department. That scope includes reviewing the accuracy, reliability and integrity of financial and operational information and the means used to identify, measure, classify and report such information. To that end, management reports quarterly to the Board of Directors on significant risk categories identified through the enterprise risk management process, which the Audit Services Department considers when creating its internal audit plan. The Audit Committee also directly appoints, retains, compensates, evaluates, terminates and oversees the work of the independent auditor for the purpose of preparing or issuing an audit report or performing other audit, review or attest services for the Company, and such firm must report directly to the Audit Committee. In addition to those responsibilities, with respect to the independent auditor, the Audit Committee:

reviews and evaluates the annual engagement letter, including the independent auditor’s proposed fees;

reviews, evaluates and monitors the annual audit plan and its progression, including the timing and scope of audit activities;

annually reviews and evaluates the qualifications, performance and independence of the independent auditor, including the lead partner, and ensures that the lead partner and any other audit partners are rotated at appropriate intervals in compliance with applicable laws, rules and regulations;

reviews and evaluates the independent auditor report describing internal quality-control procedures and any material issues raised by the most recent internal quality-control review of the independent auditors or outside inquiry or investigation; and

reviews the independent auditor report describing all relationships between the independent auditor and the Company, including a list of the fees billed for each category, in order to assess the independent auditor’s independence.

Management is responsible for the Company’s consolidated financial statements and for establishing, maintaining, and assessing internal control over financial reporting. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, the Company’s independent auditor, is responsible for expressing opinions on the conformity of the Company’s audited financial statements with generally accepted accounting principles and on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

As part of its auditor engagement process, the Audit Committee considers whether to rotate the independent auditor. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP has been the Company’s independent auditor since 1941. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP rotates its lead audit engagement partner every five years; the Audit Committee interviews proposed candidates and selects the lead audit engagement partner. The Audit Committee believes that there are significant benefits to having an independent auditor with an extensive history with the Company. These include:

Higher quality audit work and accounting advice, due to the independent auditor’s institutional knowledge of our business and operations, accounting policies and financial systems, and internal control framework; and

Operational efficiencies because of the independent auditor’s history and familiarity with our business.

In fulfilling its responsibilities, the Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed the Company’s audited financial statements for fiscal 2020 with management. The Audit Committee has also reviewed with management its evaluation of the structure and effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. The Audit Committee has discussed with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP the matters required to be discussed by the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) and the SEC. The Audit Committee has received the written disclosures and the letter from PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP required by the applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP’s communications with the audit committee concerning independence, and has discussed with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP that firm’s independence. The Audit Committee also has considered whether PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP’s level of fees and provision of non-audit services to the Company and its affiliates are compatible with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP’s independence and has concluded that PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP is independent from the Company and its management.

Based on the review, discussions and considerations referred to in the preceding paragraph, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited financial statements be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2020 for filing with the SEC.

AUDIT COMMITTEE

JEFFREY W. SHAW, Chairman

SDTEPHENAVID E. EH. AWINGNDERSON

BARBARA M. BAUMANN

STEVEN C. FINCH

JOSEPH N. JAGGERS

REBECCA RANICH

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN

BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

The following table sets forth for each current director, each nominee for director, each of the executive officers named in the Fiscal 20182020 Summary Compensation Table, and for all directors, nominees and executive officers as a group, information concerning beneficial ownership of Common Stock. The Common Stock is the only class of Company equity securities outstanding. Unless otherwise stated,noted, to the best of the Company’s knowledge, each person has sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares listed, including shares which the individual has the right to acquire through exercise of stock appreciation rights (“SARs”) but has not done so.listed. Security holdings are as of November 30, 2018.December 10, 2020. As of that date, 91,013,923 shares of Common Stock were issued and outstanding.

 

Name of Beneficial

Owner

 Exercisable
SARs(1)
 Shares Held
in ESOP(2)
 Shares Held in
401(k)
Plan(3)
 Restricted
Stock(4)
 Shares Otherwise
Beneficially Owned(5)
 Percent of
Class(6)
 Exercisable
SARs(1)
 Shares Held
in ESOP(2)
 Shares Held in
401(k)
Plan(3)
 Shares Otherwise
Beneficially Owned(4)
 Percent of
Class(5)

Philip C. Ackerman

 0 0 0 0 619,228(7) *

David H. Anderson

 0 0 0 6,445(6) *

David P. Bauer

 224 0 8,442 0 21,180 * 0 0 11,043 47,444 *

Carl M. Carlotti

 529 135 15,635 0 54,148 *

Barbara M. Baumann

 0 0 0 5,845 *

Karen M. Camiolo

 0 0 15,022 40,609 *

David C. Carroll

 0 0 0 0 17,681 * 0 0 0 26,712(7) *

Stephen E. Ewing

 0 0 0 0 27,270 *

Donna L. DeCarolis

 0 257 20,700 62,919 *

Steven C. Finch

 0 0 0 0 1,512 * 0 0 0 9,192(7) *

Joseph N. Jaggers

 0 0 0 0 10,356 * 0 0 0 18,036 *

John P. McGinnis

 782 0 8,310 20,000 36,422 * 0 0 10,802 93,121(8) *

John R. Pustulka

 9,507 3,843 20,970 0 59,814 * 0 3,927 23,321 114,734 *

Rebecca Ranich

 0 0 0 0 7,717 * 0 0 0 16,091(7) *

Jeffrey W. Shaw

 0 0 0 0 12,740 * 0 0 0 20,420(9) *

Thomas E. Skains

 0 0 0 0 6,381 * 0 0 0 14,061(7) *

David F. Smith

 70,814 1,897 18,883 0 244,413(8) * 0 1,984 20,321 301,987(10) *

Ronald J. Tanski

 2,423 2,974 25,412 0 378,675(9) * 0 2,995 27,610 550,474(11) *

Directors and Executive Officers as a Group (19 Total)

 90,064 12,952 156,924 20,000 1,697,690 2.30%

Directors, Nominees and Executive Officers as a Group (20 Total)

 0 14,495 155,753 1,406,397 1.73%

 

 *

Represents beneficial ownership of less than 1% of issued and outstanding Common Stock.

 

(1)

This column lists shares with respect to which eachA stock appreciation right (“SAR”) granted under an equity compensation plan of the named individuals, and all directors and executive officers as a group (19 individuals), haveCompany in respect of one or more shares of Common Stock generally entitles the holder thereof the right to acquire beneficial ownership within 60 daysreceive, either in Common Stock, or in cash or Common Stock as determined by the Compensation Committee in its discretion, an amount per share of November 30, 2018,Common Stock equal to the excess, if any, of (i) the fair market value of a share of Common Stock on the date the SAR is exercised, over (ii) the grant price of the SAR. As of December 10, 2020, the fair market value of a share of Common Stock was less than the grant price of each outstanding SAR. As a result, no shares were acquirable as of that date through the exercise of SARs granted under the 1997 Award and Option Plan and the 2010 Equity Compensation Plan. The shares included in this column for exercisable SARs equal the number of shares the officer would have received by exercising those SARs on November 30, 2018, when the fair market value was $53.61 per share. Until exercised, SARs have no voting power. The fair market value is the average of the high and low stock price on a specified date.SARs.

 

(2)

This column lists shares held in the National Fuel Gas Company Employee Stock Ownership Plan (“ESOP”). The beneficial owners of these shares have sole voting power with respect to shares held in the ESOP, but do not have investment power respecting most of those shares until they are distributed.

 

(3)

This column lists shares held in the CompanyTax-Deferred Savings Plan forNon-Union Employees (“TDSP”), a 401(k) plan. The beneficial owners of these shares have sole voting and investment power with respect to shares held in the TDSP.

(4)

This column lists shares of restricted stock, certain restrictions on which had not lapsed as of November 30, 2018. Owners of restricted stock have power to vote the shares, but have no investment power with respect to the shares until the restrictions lapse.

(5)

This column includes shares held of record and any shares beneficially owned through a bank, broker or other nominee.

(6)(5)

This column lists the sum of the individual’s (or individuals’) holdings shown on this table, expressed as a percentage of the Company’s outstanding shares.

(6)

Includes 184 shares held through a family trust, as to which Mr. Anderson shares voting and investment power, and 1,088 shares deferred under the individual’s (or individuals’) shares acquirable upon the exercise of SARs.Company’s Non-Employee Directors Deferred Compensation Plan, as to which Mr. Anderson does not have voting or investment power.

 

(7)

Includes 1,0001,088 shares held by Mr. Ackerman’s wife in a trust originally established fordeferred under the benefit of her mother; 8,991 shares held by Mr. Ackerman’s wife as trustee for her sister,Company’s Non-Employee Directors Deferred Compensation Plan, as to which shares Mr. Ackerman disclaims beneficial ownership; 58,250 shares also held in trust; 400,000 shares held in two Grantor Retained Annuity Trusts (200,000 shares each); and 220 shares with respect to which Mr. Ackerman sharesthe director does not have voting andor investment power with his wife.power.

 

(8)

Includes 51,90278,832 shares held through a limited liability company of which Mr. McGinnis and his wife are the sole members, and as to which Mr. McGinnis shares voting and investment power; and 2,520 shares held by Mr. McGinnis and his wife as trustees for a family member, as to which Mr. McGinnis shares voting and investment power.

(9)

Includes 100 shares held through a family trust, as to which Mr. Shaw shares voting and investment power.

(10)

Includes 81,828 shares held through a family partnership, as to which Mr. Smith shares voting and investment power, 50,357 shares owned by Mr. Smith’s wife, as to which Mr. Smith shares voting and investment power, and 1,088 shares deferred under the Company’s Non-Employee Directors Deferred Compensation Plan, as to which Mr. Smith does not have voting or investment power.

 

(9)(11)

Includes 429 shares owned jointly with Mr. Tanski’s wife, as to which Mr. Tanski shares voting and investment power.

As of January 7, 2019,December 10, 2020, each of the following persons is known to the Company to be the beneficial owner of more than five percent of the Common Stock, whichas set forth in a Schedule 13G or Schedule 13D filed with the SEC. The Common Stock is the only class of Company stock outstanding.

 

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner

  Shares Held as
Trustee for Company
Employee Benefit
Plans
 Shares
Otherwise
Beneficially Held
 Percent
of
Class(1)
  Shares Held as
Trustee for Company
Employee Benefit
Plans
 Shares
Otherwise
Beneficially Held
 Percent
of
Class(1)

The Vanguard Group

100 Vanguard Boulevard

Malvern, PA 19355

    2,903,675(2)  8,231,188(3)  12.91%    2,576,438(2)  8,420,713(3)  12.08%

State Street Corporation

One Lincoln Street

Boston, MA 02111

    N/A  9,041,697(4)  9.93%

BlackRock, Inc.

55 East 52nd Street

New York, NY 10055

    N/A  7,193,429(4)  8.34%    N/A  8,773,684(5)  9.64%

Mario J. Gabelli

Gabelli & Company, Inc.

One Corporate Center

Rye, NY 10580

    N/A  6,516,782(5)  7.55%    N/A  4,634,658(6)  5.09%

State Street Corporation

One Lincoln Street

Boston, MA 02111

    N/A  5,487,500(6)  6.36%

Aristotle Capital Management, LLC

11100 Santa Monica Blvd., Suite 1700

Los Angeles, CA 90025

    N/A  4,955,708(7)  5.74%

 

(1)

This column lists the sum of the shares shown on this table, expressed as a percentage of the Company’s outstanding shares at January 7, 2019.December 10, 2020.

 

(2)

This amount represents the shares held by Vanguard Fiduciary Trust Company, a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Vanguard Group, in its capacity as trustee for certain employee benefit plans. Vanguard Fiduciary Trust Company held 2,903,6752,576,438 shares on behalf of the plans as of January 7, 2019,December 10, 2020, all of which have been allocated to plan participants. The plan trustee votes the shares allocated to participant accounts as directed by those participants. Shares held by the trustee on behalf of the plans as to which participants have made no timely voting directions are voted by the trustee in the

same proportion as the shares of Common Stock for which the trustee received timely directions, except in the case where to do so would be inconsistent with provisions of Title I of ERISA. Vanguard Fiduciary Trust Company disclaims beneficial ownership of all shares held in trust by the trustee that have been allocated to the individual accounts of participants in the plans for which directions have been received, pursuant to Rule13d-4 under the Exchange Act.

 

(3)

The number of shares is derived from Amendment No. 57 to Schedule 13G filed on February 9, 201812, 2020 by The Vanguard Group. The filing states that The Vanguard Group has sole voting power with respect to 40,93141,740 shares of Common Stock, shared voting power with respect to 8,16614,135 shares of

Common Stock, sole dispositive power with respect to 8,186,1328,374,770 shares of Common Stock, and shared dispositive power with respect to 45,05645,943 shares of Common Stock.

 

(4)

The number of shares is derived from Amendment No. 5 to Schedule 13G filed on January 25, 2018 by BlackRock, Inc. The filing states that BlackRock has sole voting power with respect to 6,884,131 shares of Common Stock, shared voting power with respect to zero shares of Common Stock, sole dispositive power with respect to 7,193,429 shares of Common Stock, and shared dispositive power with respect to zero shares of Common Stock.

(5)

The number of shares is derived from Amendment No. 12 to Schedule 13D filed on September 21, 2017 by Gabelli Funds, LLC, GAMCO Asset Management Inc., Gabelli & Company Investment Advisers, Inc., MJG Associates, Inc., Gabelli Foundation, Inc.,MJG-IV Limited Partnership, GGCP, Inc., GAMCO Investors, Inc., Associated Capital Group, Inc., and Mario J. Gabelli.

(6)

The number of shares is derived from Schedule 13G filed on February 14, 20182020 by State Street Corporation. The filing states that State Street Corporation has sole voting power with respect to zero shares of Common Stock, shared voting power with respect to 5,487,5008,882,245 shares of Common Stock, sole dispositive power with respect to zero shares of Common Stock, and shared dispositive power with respect to 5,487,5009,041,697 shares of Common Stock. The filing also identifies SSGA Funds Management, Inc. (“SSGA”) as a subsidiary of State Street Corporation and beneficial owner of more than 5% of the Common Stock. SSGA’s shares are included among the 9,041,697 shares beneficially owned by State Street Corporation as reflected in the table. The filing states that SSGA has sole voting power with respect to zero shares of Common Stock, shared voting power with respect to 6,276,070 shares of Common Stock, sole dispositive power with respect to zero shares of Common Stock, and shared dispositive power with respect to 6,305,647 shares of Common Stock.

 

(7)(5)

The number of shares is derived from Amendment No. 8 to Schedule 13G filed on February 14, 201810, 2020 by Aristotle Capital Management, LLC.BlackRock, Inc. The filing states that AristotleBlackRock, Inc. has sole voting power with respect to 3,098,2878,478,379 shares of Common Stock, shared voting power with respect to zero shares of Common Stock, sole dispositive power with respect to 4,955,7088,773,684 shares of Common Stock, and shared dispositive power with respect to zero shares of Common Stock.

(6)

The number of shares is derived from Amendment No. 18 to Schedule 13D filed on July 20, 2020 by Gabelli Funds, LLC, GAMCO Asset Management Inc., Gabelli & Company Investment Advisers, Inc., MJG Associates, Inc., Gabelli Foundation, Inc., GGCP, Inc., GAMCO Investors, Inc., Associated Capital Group, Inc., and Mario J. Gabelli.

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

As of September 30, 20182020

 

Plan category

  Number of securities to be
issued upon exercise of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights
(a)
 Weighted-average exercise
price of outstanding
options, warrants and
rights
(b)
 Number of securities
remaining available for
future issuance under
equity compensation plans
(excluding securities
reflected in column (a))
(c)
  Number of securities to be
issued upon exercise of
outstanding options,
warrants and  rights
(a)
 Weighted-average exercise
price of outstanding
options, warrants  and
rights
(b)
 Number of securities
remaining available for
future issuance under
equity compensation  plans
(excluding securities
reflected in column (a))
(c)

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders

   2,826,984(1) $50.70(2) 1,531,718(3)   2,034,209(1) $56.07(2) 3,453,516(3)

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders

   0 0 0   0 0 0
   

 

  

 

  

 

    

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

   2,826,984 $50.70 1,531,718   2,034,209 $56.07 3,453,516
   

 

  

 

  

 

    

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

(1)

The securities listed in column (a) include 1,282,5801,185,256 shares of Common Stock which would be issued under performance-based awards outstanding at September 30, 20182020 if the maximum level of performance is achieved under those awards. If actual performance falls below the maximum level of performance for these awards, fewer shares would generally be issued. For example, if target performance were achieved, 641,290592,628 shares of Common Stock would be issued under performance-based awards outstanding at September 30, 2018.2020. In that event, the number of shares to be issued noted in column (a) would be 2,185,694.1,441,581.

 

(2)

The weighted-average exercise price in column (b) takes into account outstanding stock appreciation rights. It does not take into account outstanding RSUsrestricted stock units (RSUs) or performance shares.

 

(3)

Of the securities listed in column (c), 53,632232,988 were available at September 30, 20182020 for future issuance pursuant to the Director Equity Compensation Plan and 1,478,0863,220,528 were available for future issuance under the 2010 Equity Compensation Plan. All securities included in column (c) are available for issuance for awards other than options, warrants or rights.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Compensation Committee Report

The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (the “Committee”) has reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis contained in this proxy statement. Based upon this review and discussion, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement and in the Company’s Annual Report on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2018.2020.

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

S. E. EWING, Chairman

J. N. JAGGERS, Chairman

D. H. ANDERSON

T. E. SKAINS

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The Company’s compensation policies and procedures encourage a culture of pay for performance and are strongly aligned with the long-term interests of the Company’s stockholders. This Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”) provides a detailed review of the Company’s executive compensation program, including the goals of the program. The Committee retained two independentprogram, the process for determining compensation consultants, Korn Ferry (“Korn Ferry,” a unitlevels, and analysis of Korn/Ferry International) and Meridian Compensation Partners, LLC (“Meridian”), to assist it in setting and monitoring the program.specific components of compensation, among other things. Overall, the Company’s long-termcompensation policies and practices encourage a culture of pay for performance and total directare strongly aligned with the long-term interests of the Company’s stockholders.

NO MODIFICATIONS TO FISCAL 2020 COMPENSATION

Despite the COVID-19 pandemic, which impacted commodity prices and contributed to lower revenues in the Company’s Exploration and Production segment, the Compensation Committee did not make any mid-year or end-of-year adjustments to any elements of named executive officer compensation are in line with that of its peers.for fiscal 2020. Performance metrics and goals for fiscal 2020 short-term and long-term incentive compensation remained unchanged.

STOCKHOLDER ENGAGEMENT AND ALIGNMENT

20182020 Say-on-Pay Vote and Stockholder Engagement

The 20182020 Say-on-Pay advisory vote yielded a result of approximately 97%95% of votes cast in support of the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers. The Board (including the Compensation Committee) generally considered this outcome an indicator of stockholder support for the overall philosophy and structure of the Company’s executive compensation policies and decisions. As a result,Given the high approval percentage of the vote, the Compensation Committee did not make any significant changes to the executive compensation program that were based specifically on the results of the 20182020 Say-on-Pay advisory vote.

In recent years, including 2018,From time to time members of Company management have heldin-person and telephonic meetings with some of the Company’s largest stockholders to obtain feedback on the Company’s compensation program, among other topics. Severalmatters of the Company’s largest stockholders have informed the Company that scheduling such visits every twointerest to three years is appropriate. Management engages with the Company’s stockholders in telephone conferences and intends to schedulein-person meetings in 2019, if desired.them. The Board has directed management to continue to engage as appropriate with interested stockholders, and to inform it of any requests for meetings with members of the Board. The Board and management believe that engagement with stockholders facilitates important dialogue from which we gather various viewpoints.

Executive Compensation Aligned with Stockholders’ Interests

The Compensation Committee has developed the Company’s compensation policies and procedures to align the interests of executives with those of the Company’s stockholders. ForThe Company recognizes

and rewards executives through compensation arrangements that directly link executive pay to the Company’s performance, and we ensure a strong alignment of interests with our stockholders by including a significant amount of equity in the overall mix of pay. As shown in the chart below, for fiscal 2018, 81%2020, 76% of our CEO’sthe target compensation of David Bauer, the Company’s CEO, wasat-risk compensation, with 52% tied to long-term(3-year)equity and 24% tied to short-term performance or shorter-term business performance, as reflected in the charts below (target compensation consists of base salary, target annual incentive, and grant date fair value of the long-term incentive award).

CEO Compensation Aligned with Shareholders’ Interestsgoals.

 

 

LOGOLOGO

81% Variable Performance Shares Annual lncentive Base Salary Compensation 60% 21% 19% Factors Key Factors 50% Total Return on Capital (3-year average ROC vs. peer group) 50% Total Shareholder Return (3-year TSR vs. peer group) Goals relate to earnings safety and costs 81%features of Target Compensation is Tied to 3-Year Performance or Short-Term Business Performancethe Company’s executive compensation program include the following:

 

*Ø

Fiscal 2018 target compensation for CEOAnnual performance incentives of the named executive officers are based entirely on objective performance goals;

CEO and Other Named Executive Officer Target Compensation

 

Ø

Long-term performance incentives are composed entirely of equity;

 

Ø

Long-term performance goals consist of three-year TSR and three-year total ROC, each relative to a peer group;

LOGO

Ø

The Company does not provide tax “gross-ups”;

Performance Shares 60% Annual Incentive 21% Base Salary 19% President &

Ø

Named executive officers and other officers are required to meet stock ownership guidelines that range from one to six times base salary (six times for the CEO and three times for other named executive officers);

Ø

Executive officers may not hedge or pledge Company stock;

Ø

Equity incentive plans prohibit the repricing of equity awards without stockholder approval;

Ø

The Compensation Committee engages two independent compensation consultants to assist in setting compensation;

Ø

All change-in-control agreements are double  triggered; and

Ø

The Board has adopted a clawback policy (see “Recovery of Funds” in the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, included as Appendix B to this proxy statement).

TSR PERFORMANCE AND CEO 2017 Target Compensation Structure Restricted Stock Units 8% Performance Shares 39% Annual Incentive 24% Base Salary 29% Other Named Executive Officers 2017 Average Target Compensation StructurePAY RELATIVE TO PEERS

Relative Total Shareholder Return

The Company’s TSR forFor the three-yearone-year period ended September 30, 20182020, the Company’s TSR was 18.59%, usingat the 61st percentile of the Korn Ferry peer group selected by the Compensation Committee in September 2019. Under the calculation method specified inused for this relative TSR analysis, starting stock prices are calculated as the awardaverage

closing stock prices for the month of TSR performance shares granted to the named executive officers in the first quarter of fiscal 2016. Under that calculation method, starting andSeptember 2019, ending stock prices are calculated as the average closing stock priceprices for the prior calendar month of September 2020, and dividends are deemed reinvested at eachex-dividend date. The use of average closing stock prices mirrors the calculation method specified for the Company’s TSR performance shares. For the three-year period ended September 30, 2020, using the same calculation method, the Company’s TSR of 18.59% placed the Companywas at the 50th75th percentile of the Korn Ferry peer group used to benchmark fiscal 2016 compensation.

The Company’sone-year TSR for fiscal 2018 was 2.17%, using fiscalyear-end closing market prices and with dividends reinvested at eachex-dividend date. This return placedselected by the Company at the 46th percentile of the Korn Ferry peer group used to benchmark fiscal 2018 compensation.Compensation Committee in September 2017.

CEO Compensation in Alignment withVersus Peers

The Compensation Committee understands the importance of using benchmark data that reflects information from companies with comparable business segments over similar time periods. Reflected in the table below is Korn Ferry’s comparison of fiscal 20172019 total direct compensation for the Company’s CEO, Mr. Tanski,Bauer (modified as described below) against that of CEOs in ourthe Korn Ferry peer group. The target total direct compensation of the Company’s CEO for fiscal 2017, showngroup selected by our Compensation Committee in the table below, was at the 43rd percentile of our peers. Actual total direct compensation, which reflects the results of performance against annual incentive goals, was at the 45th percentile of our peers.

September 2019. Fiscal 20172019 is the most recent complete fiscal year for which proxy statement data is available.It is not possibleavailable for our peers. For this comparison, Korn Ferry used the rate of salary in effect for Mr. Bauer as of his promotion to compare 2018CEO on July 1, 2019 ($800,000). Korn Ferry also applied Mr. Bauer’s fiscal 2019 annual incentive target percentage (75%) to this higher rate of salary, resulting in a higher annual incentive target amount ($600,000). Using these higher salary and annual incentive target amounts, Mr. Bauer’s target total direct compensation againstfor fiscal 2019, as shown in the peer group because almosttwo-thirdstable, was below that of all of our Korn Ferry peers. Applying Mr. Bauer’s 2019 annual incentive achievement percentage (119.70%) to his higher annual incentive target amount, his “actual” total direct compensation for fiscal 2019 (modified as described in this paragraph) was below that of all but one of our Korn Ferry peers. The fiscal 2019 full-year target for total direct compensation of Mr. Bauer’s predecessor, Ronald Tanski (not shown in the table below), would have placed the Company at the 58th percentile of the group maintains a fiscal year based on the calendar year, and will therefore not report 2018 compensation until months after this proxy statement is filed.

same Korn Ferry peers.

 

        

 

CEO & President

 
 Compared to CEO proxy data for fiscal year 20172019 

 

             Total Direct
Compensation
             Total Direct
Compensation

Company

 

Title

 

FYE
Revenue

(millions)

 

Market Cap
as of 9/30/17

(millions)

 

FYE # of

Employees

 Actual Target   Title FYE
Revenue
(millions)
 Market Cap
as of 9/30/19
(millions)
 FYE # of
Employees
 Actual Target  
 

ATMOS ENERGY CORP

 CEO $2,760 $8,893 4,565 $4,583,351 $4,342,068   President, CEO & Director $2,902 $13,462 4,776 $4,856,786 $4,577,330  
 

CABOT OIL & GAS CORP

 Chairman, CEO & President $1,764 $12,372 468 $12,122,248 $10,903,498   Chairman, CEO & President $1,985 $7,351 547 $13,472,009 $12,971,509  

ENERGEN CORP

 Chairman, President & CEO $961 $5,315 390 $6,796,850 $6,341,430  
 

CNX RESOURCES CORP

 President, CEO & Director $1,544 $1,362 467 $8,909,570 $7,661,570  
 

EQT CORP

 President & CEO $3,378 $11,308 2,067 $8,001,614 $6,851,589   President & CEO $3,715 $2,719 647 N/A N/A  
 

MDU RESOURCES GROUP INC

 President & CEO $4,443 $5,068 10,140 $3,674,303 $3,090,046   President, CEO & Director $5,337 $5,611 13,359 $5,292,912 $4,749,392  
 

NEW JERSEY RESOURCES CORP

 Chairman, CEO & President $2,269 $3,648 1,052 $2,575,759 $2,357,459   President & CEO $2,592 $4,069 1,108 $2,779,381 $3,100,006  
 

RANGE RESOURCES CORP

 Chairman, President & CEO $2,611 $4,856 773 $8,505,649 $8,615,649   CEO, President & Director $2,601 $936 655 $8,327,208 $7,784,992  
 

SM ENERGY CO

 President & CEO $1,129 $1,980 635 $7,346,339 $6,812,800   President, CEO & Director $1,524 $1,094 530 $5,494,271 $5,398,381  
 

SOUTHWESTERN ENERGY CO

 President & CEO $3,203 $3,111 1,575 $8,547,712 $8,593,252   President, CEO & Director $3,038 $1,042 923 $10,131,334 $9,956,334  
 

SOUTHWEST GAS HOLDINGS INC

 President & CEO $2,549 $3,695 7,771 $3,495,921 $3,322,671   President, CEO & Director $3,120 $4,946 8,944 $4,028,934 $3,811,927  
 

SPIRE INC

 CEO & President $1,741 $3,603 3,279 $3,211,544 $3,181,544   CEO, President & Director $1,952 $4,433 3,536 $4,117,827 $4,120,527  
 

UGI CORP

 Vice Chair, President & CEO $6,121 $8,124 13,000 $6,476,859 $6,635,265   Chairman & CEO $7,320 $10,504 12,800 $6,226,999 $6,857,138  

WGL HOLDINGS INC

 Chairman & CEO $2,355 $4,313 1,500 $4,032,943 $3,824,362  
 

WHITING PETROLEUM CORP

 President & CEO $1,481 $2,010 830 $5,775,000 $6,116,500   President & CEO $1,572 $728 505 $5,425,392 $5,524,007  
  

Summary Statistics

     
 

75th Percentile

  $3,092 $7,422 4,244 $7,837,795 $6,841,892    $3,120 $5,611 4,776 $8,472,799 $7,692,426  
 

Average

  $2,626 $5,592 3,432 $6,081,864 $5,784,867    $3,016 $4,481 3,754 $6,588,552 $6,376,093  
 

Median

  $2,452 $4,584 1,538 $6,125,930 $6,228,965    $2,601 $4,069 923 $5,459,832 $5,461,194  
 

25th Percentile

  $1,747 $3,614 787 $3,763,963 $3,448,094    $1,952 $1,094 547 $4,672,046 $4,463,129  
  

NATIONAL FUEL GAS CO

 CEO & President $1,580 $4,841 2,100 $5,603,294 $5,324,913   CEO & President $1,693 $4,050 2,107 $2,869,875 $2,751,675  
 

Percentile Rank

 18% 54% 62% 45% 43%   19% 50% 62% 1% Min  

 

LOGOLOGO

 

NOTE:NOTES:

 

-  Total Direct Compensation = base salary + bonus + long-term incentives (target value

-  EQT Corp. CEO (Toby Rice) received $1 in total compensation for cash and grant date value for equity)FY2019. Intended target compensation details are not disclosed in SEC filings.

  

 

 

©® 20182020 Korn Ferry. All rights reserved

 1

OBJECTIVES OF THE NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION PROGRAM

The Company’s named executive officer compensation program is designed to attract, motivate, reward and retain executive talent in order to achieve the objectives that contribute to the overall success of the Company. When setting compensation for the Company’s named executive officers, the Compensation Committee’s primary goal is to provide balanced incentives for creating stockholder value in both the near-term and long-term. The Company providesCompensation Committee awards a totalcombination of cash and equity components that are designed to focus management efforts on drivers of stockholder value, including financial, safety, environmental, and customer service metrics. The Compensation Committee establishes the compensation program established by the Compensation Committee based on its business judgment after consultation with its compensation consultants. Total compensation for named executive officers is comprised ofincludes the following key components, each of which is addressed in greater detail below:

 

Compensation Component

 

Objectives

 

Key Features in 20182020

Base Salary

 

•   Provide a fixed level of pay in recognition ofday-to-day job performance.

 

•   Attract, retain and motivate leadership with compensation reflecting specific responsibilities, experience and effectiveness.

 

•   Targeted range ofGenerally references the 50th to 75th percentile of peer median provided by independent compensation consultants.consultants; may pay greater base salary to attract, retain and motivate executives.

 

•   Adjustments are made based on Compensation Committee members’ business judgment.

 

•   Overall corporate performance is a factorand individual performance are factors for subjective consideration.

Annual Cash Incentive Compensation 

•   Motivate performance toward, and reward achievement on, near-term financial, operating and individual goals.

 

•   Target awards are set as a percentage of base salary.

Long-Term Equity Incentive Compensation 

•   Focus attention on managing the Company from a long-term investor’s perspective to create long-term stockholder value.

 

•   Encourage executives and other managers to have a significant, personal investment in the Company through stock ownership.

 

•   Reward executives for longer-term performance of the Company relative to an industry peer group.

 

•   Long-term compensation denominated in equity.

 

•   For Messrs. Tanski, Pustulka and Carlotti, entire long-term incentive award granted as performance shares.

•   For Messrs. Bauer and McGinnis and Mmes. Camiolo and DeCarolis, two-thirds of long-term incentive award granted as performance shares,one-third as time-based RSUs as an additional retention tool.

•   For Mr. Pustulka, entire long-term incentive award granted as performance shares, to emphasize achievement of performance targets.

 

•   Performance shares split between two distinct performance conditions — three-year TSR and three-year ROC.

 

•   Performance conditions are objective and measured relative to a recognized peer group.

Compensation Component

 

Objectives

 

Key Features in 20182020

Executive Health, Welfare, and Retirement Benefits 

•   Provide executives with reasonable and competitive benefits commensurate with those in the regulated and unregulated energy industry.

 

•   Help the Company attract and retain high-caliber employees in high-level management positions.

 

•   Restore retirement benefits lost under qualified retirement plans as a result of Internal Revenue Code limits.

 

•   Retirement benefits consisting of:

 

1.  a¡   qualified defined contribution plan (401(k));

 

2.  a¡    qualifiednon-contributory defined contribution plan (Retirement Savings Account(retirement savings account or “RSA”) or qualified defined benefit plan (depending on year of hire); and

 

3.  a¡non-qualified executive retirement plan and/ornon-qualified tophat plan, depending on year of hire.

Change in Control Agreements 

•   Help assure that executives direct their attention to their duties, acting in the best interests of stockholders, notwithstanding potential for loss of employment in connection with a Changechange in Control.control.

 

•   Double-trigger provision to avoid providing benefits to officers who continue to enjoy employment with the Company after a Change in Control event.

 

•   No taxgross-up on payment.

 

•   Lump sum severance payment is reduced on apro-rata basis if termination occurs between age 62 and 65.

PROCESS FOR DETERMINING COMPENSATION

Risk Assessment

The Board conducted a risk assessment of the Company’s compensation programs during fiscal 2018.2020. Based on the assessment, the Board concluded that the Company’s compensation policies and practices do not create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.

Role of the Compensation Committee

The Compensation Committee comprises three directors, all of whom have been determined by the Board to be independent. The Compensation Committee administers the Company’s compensation program for named executive officers, setting base salaries and available incentive compensation ranges. The Compensation Committee exercises the authority delegated to it by the stockholders or the Board under the Company’s cash and equity incentive compensation plans, which include:

Cash Compensation PlansPlans/Short-Term Incentive

Short-Term

 

2012 Annual At Risk Compensation Incentive Plan (the “At Risk Plan”), generally for named executive officers

 

Executive Annual Cash Incentive Program (the “EACIP”), generally for other executive officers

Equity Compensation PlansPlans/Long-Term Incentive

Long-Term

 

2010 Equity Compensation Plan

In addition, the Compensation Committee makes recommendations to the Board with respect to the development of incentive compensation plans and equity-based plans and changes in compensation fornon-employee directors.

As described below, the Compensation Committee retained the services of independent compensation consultants to assist the Committeeit in administering the Company’s compensation program. Further, as described earlier in this proxy statement, the members of the Compensation Committee have significant experience in the energy industry and/orand as leaders of major corporations. In these roles, as well as through their experiences with the Company, the Compensation Committee has garnered extensive knowledge regarding the establishment of a competitive and properly focused compensation program for the Company’s named executive officers. In making the decisions discussed below, the Compensation Committee uses its subjective business judgment developed through its years of experience.

Role of the Chief Executive Officer

In making its subjective determinations with respect to named executive officers other than Mr. Tanski, the Chief Executive Officer, the Compensation Committee discusses the information it receives from its compensation consultants with Mr. Tanskithe CEO and seeks his recommendation as to the appropriate base salaries and target short-term and long-term incentive awards for each of these officers, based on Korn Ferry and Meridian recommendations and his assessment of their performance, contributions and abilities. Mr. TanskiThe CEO also provides input to the Compensation Committee’s compensation consultants with regard to the responsibilities of the Company’s named executive officers, to facilitate the consultants’ recommendations and comparisons of such officers and their positions to other positions in the marketplace. Mr. TanskiThe CEO made no recommendations with regard to his own compensation.

Independent Compensation Consultants

The Compensation Committee retains independent compensation consultants to inform its business judgment as to compensation matters, including the selection of peer companies for compensation comparison purposes. The Compensation Committee retained the services of Korn Ferry to benchmark compensation at the Company’s businesses other than its exploration and production business, and Meridian Compensation Partners, LLC (“Meridian”) to benchmark compensation at its exploration and production business.

Determining Our Peers

The Compensation Committee understands the importance of using benchmark data that reflects information from companies with business segments comparable to those of the Company. Because of the Company’s diverse asset mix,selecting an appropriate peer group of companies requires a customized approach that calls for more critical thought than simple selection of a standard industry group, which may include utility companies without a presence in the broader natural gas industry.The Company’s assets span the entire natural gas supplyvalue chain and include exploration and production (“E&P”), pipelineinterstate natural gas transmission and storage, natural gas gathering, and natural gas utility operations. For compensation and performance comparisons, the Compensation Committee utilizes two separate peer groups. The Korn Ferry peer group is the primary peer group against which the Compensation Committee generally benchmarks named executive officer compensation and is intended to include a group of companies that, as a whole, represent our asset mix. Meridian assists in the formulation of a peer group that is targeted to evaluate our E&P business and the compensation of executives who oversee it. Both peer groups may change over time due to corporate transactions or as the Compensation Committee believes is warranted based on its business judgment. The Compensation Committee believes that the peer groups selected with the guidance of Korn Ferry and Meridian include a mix of companies that reflect businesses in which the Company participates, or with which it competes, as reflected in the tables below.

For the purpose of establishing 20182020 compensation, the Compensation Committee reviewed the Korn Ferry peer group listed below. In addition, the Compensation Committee utilized the Korn Ferry peer group for purposes of setting relative performance conditions on long-term incentive awards of performance shares.

Korn Ferry

Korn Ferry assists the Compensation Committee in evaluating and setting compensation for Company officers and officers employed by affiliate companies other than Seneca. Generally, Korn Ferry provides job matching advice to a wide range of companies through detailed position analyses based on proprietary information from multiple participant companies. Korn Ferry provides similar analyses for supervisory positions in the Company’s regulated subsidiaries. Korn Ferry’s job evaluation and benchmarking methodology allows for customizable job descriptions and organizational rankings that are specific to the Company but relative to industry benchmarks.

For Company officers and officers employed by affiliate companies other than Seneca, Korn Ferry provided an analysis of compensation practices with respect to the following forms of compensation compared to similar positions in the general industry and, where appropriate, in the energy industry based on Korn Ferry’s proprietary databases:

 

 1)

Base Salary;

 

 2)

Total Cash Compensation (base salary plus short-term cash incentive); and

 

 3)

Total Direct Compensation (base salary plus short-term cash incentive plus long-term equity incentive).

Korn Ferry also made recommendations on incentive compensation target amounts to the Compensation Committee for:

 

 1)

Short-Term Cash Incentive; and

 

 2)

Long-Term Equity Incentive.

Additionally, Korn Ferry provided a proxy analysis of base salary, incentive targets, total cash compensation, long-term incentive and total direct compensation for the offices of President and CEO of the Company, Chief Operating Officer of the Company, Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, and President of National Fuel Gas Distribution Corporation, based on proxy data for the Company and the 1413 energy companies in the peer group listed below. The Compensation Committee selected these 1413 companies for purposes of establishing compensation for 20182020 because each participated in one or more businesses that are similar to those of the Company:

 

 Korn Ferry — Peer Companies for Fiscal 2018

    Exploration    

    &    

    Production    

    Pipeline    

    &    

    Storage    

    and/or    

    Gathering    

    Natural    

    Gas Utility    

1

Atmos Energy CorporationXX

2

Cabot Oil & Gas CorporationX

3

Energen CorporationX

4

EQT CorporationXX

5

MDU Resources Group, Inc.XX

6

New Jersey Resources CorporationXX

7

Range Resources CorporationX

8

SM Energy CompanyX

9

Southwest Gas CorporationX

10

Southwestern Energy CompanyXX

11

Spire Inc.X

12

UGI CorporationX

13

WGL Holdings, Inc.XX

14  

Whiting Petroleum CorporationX
TOTAL767

      Korn Ferry — Peer Companies for Fiscal 2020

    Exploration    

    &    

    Production    

    Pipeline    

    &    

    Storage    

    and/or    

    Gathering    

    Natural    

    Gas Utility    

1

Atmos Energy Corporation

XX

2

Cabot Oil & Gas Corporation

X

3

CNX Resources Corporation

XX

4

EQT Corporation

X

5

MDU Resources Group, Inc.

XX

6

New Jersey Resources Corporation

XX

7

Range Resources Corporation

X

8

SM Energy Company

X

9

Southwest Gas Holdings, Inc.

X

10

Southwestern Energy Company

XX

11

Spire Inc.

X

12

UGI Corporation

XX

13  

Whiting Petroleum Corporation

X

TOTAL

766

The Compensation Committee reviews the members of the peer group each year and makes such adjustments as it believes are warranted. The Compensation Committee made no revisions torevised the peer group used for purposes of establishing compensation for 2018.2020. In particular, the Compensation Committee removed Energen Corporation, because it was acquired by another company.

Meridian Compensation Partners, LLC

Meridian assists the Compensation Committee in evaluating and setting compensation for employees at Seneca, including Seneca’s President.President, Mr. McGinnis. Meridian also benchmarked the compensation of Mr. Tanski’s compensationBauer, Mr. Pustulka and Mr. Bauer’s compensationMs. Camiolo against the E&P peer group. The Compensation Committee requested these analyses for its use in supplementing the Korn Ferry-provided comparisons due to the importance of the Company’s E&P segment and the contributions of Mr. Tanski’sBauer, Mr. Pustulka and Mr. Bauer’sMs. Camiolo in the management of that segment. The Compensation Committee selected Meridian due to its expertise in E&P industry compensation matters.

Meridian provided an analysis for officers of Seneca and select officers of the Company of compensation practices with respect to the following forms of compensation compared to similar positions in the E&P industry:

 

 1.

Base Salary;

 

 2.

Target Short-Term Incentive;

 

 3.

Target Cash Compensation (base salary plus short-term incentive);

 

 4.

Long-Term Incentive; and

 

 5.

Total Target Compensation (base salary plus short-term and long-term incentive).

The Meridian analysis was based on data from Meridian’s Proprietaryproprietary North America Oil and& Gas Compensation Database,Exploration & Production compensation database, supplemented by published surveypublicly available sources. Meridian compiled data and available proxy data, from 15with respect to 16 E&P companies chosen by the Compensation Committee based on certain criteria, such as revenues, assets, and the nature of each company’s operations, in the E&P segment of the energy industry, that made them relatively comparable to Seneca, in terms of operations, and similar in size to Seneca or the operations at Seneca.Company. The companies in the15-member16-member peer group rangeranged in size from approximately $3.0$1.1 billion to $155 million$9.8 billion in revenuesassets (with a median of $720 million)$4.3 billion). By comparison, at the time the peer group was selected, Seneca’s assets and fromthe Company’s consolidated assets totaled approximately $15.7$2.0 and $6.5 billion, to $0.9 billion in asset size (with a median of $4.7 billion).respectively. The peer group is:

 

  Meridian Compensation Partners — Peer E&P Companies for Fiscal 2018  Meridian Compensation Partners — Peer E&P Companies for Fiscal 2020

1

  Callon Petroleum Company  9  Oasis Petroleum  Bonanza Creek Energy, Inc.  9  Montage Resources Corporation

2

  Cimarex Energy Co.  10  Parsley Energy, Inc.  Callon Petroleum Company  10  Oasis Petroleum Inc.

3

  Comstock Resources Inc.  11  PDC Energy  Cimarex Energy Co.  11  Parsley Energy, Inc.

4

  Eclipse Resources Corporation  12  Range Resources Corporation  Comstock Resources Inc.  12  PDC Energy, Inc.

5

  EP Energy Corporation  13  Sanchez Energy Corporation  Gulfport Energy Corporation  13  Range Resources Corporation

6

  EQT Corporation  14  SM Energy Company  HighPoint Resources Corporation  14  Roan Resources, Inc.

7

  Jones Energy, Inc.  15  Southwestern Energy Company  Jagged Peak Energy Inc.  15  SM Energy Company

8

  Laredo Petroleum, Inc.        Matador Resources Company  16  Southwestern Energy Company

The Compensation Committee reviews the members of this E&P peer group from time to time and makes adjustments as it believes are warranted. For purposes of establishing compensation for 2018,2020, the Compensation Committee reviewed the peer group and determined to remove Antero ResourcesSanchez Energy Corporation Carrizo Oil & Gas, Inc. and Halcon Resources Corporation as a result of corporate restructuring ordue to their bankruptcies and SRC Energy Inc. due to non-participation in Meridian’s annual compensation survey. The Compensation Committee added Callon Petroleum CompanyBonanza Creek Energy, Inc., HighPoint Resources Corporation, Jagged Peak Energy Inc. and Cimarex Energy Co.Roan Resources, Inc., each of which conducts exploration and production activities in U.S. shale formations.based on the criteria noted above.

FISCAL 20182020 TOTAL COMPENSATION

Base Salary

Base salaries provide a predictable base compensation forday-to-day job performance. The Compensation Committee reviews named executive officer base salaries at calendaryear-end and adjusts them, if it deems appropriate in its subjective business judgment, following review of its compensation consultants’ competitive analyses and, with respect to named executive officers other than the CEO, upon consideration of the recommendations of the CEO. In addition, base salary may be adjusted during the calendar year when changes in responsibility occur. Base salary is not adjusted based on specific objective financial results, although overall corporate performance is reviewed by the Compensation Committee in its decision making process. The Compensation Committee does not use formulas; rather, it exercises its business judgment.

In establishing the base salary amount, the Compensation Committee generally references the 50th percentile of the Korn Ferry Energy Industry survey data. In its subjective business judgment, the Compensation Committee may pay between the 50th and 75th percentiles of the Korn Ferry data or a greater amountsalary if it is necessary to attract, retain and motivate the individuals responsible for the success of the business enterprise. The Compensation Committee considers overall corporate performance and an individual’s specific responsibilities, experience (including time in position) and effectiveness and makes adjustments based on the Committee members’ business judgment and, for named executive officers other than the CEO, the CEO’s recommendations.

In setting Mr. Tanski’sBauer’s base salary for calendar year 2018,2020, the Compensation Committee consideredreferenced the Korn Ferry report indicating Mr. Tanski’sBauer’s then-current base salary was atbelow the 50th25th percentile of Korn Ferry’s Energy Industry market data. For January 1, 2018,Considering Mr. Bauer’s recent promotion, in July 2019, to the

position of CEO, the Compensation Committee increased Mr. Tanski’shis base salary to $1,050,000, slightly abovea rate generally in line with the 50th25th percentile mark. The Compensation Committee structured the increase as the first step of a planned two-year process to raise Mr. Bauer’s salary to the 50th percentile level.

In determining Mr. Bauer’sMs. Camiolo’s base salary for calendar year 2018,2020, the Compensation Committee referenced the Korn Ferry report and increased Mr. Bauer’sMs. Camiolo’s salary to a level that approximatedslightly above the Energy Industry 50th50th percentile for positionsprincipal accounting officers. This level maintained Ms. Camiolo’s positioning as of similar scope. This actionher promotion in July 2019. The increase followed discussion with Mr. Tanski of Mr. Bauer’s specificBauer regarding Ms. Camiolo’s responsibilities, experienceeffectiveness and effectiveness as Principal Financial Officer of the Company and President of Supply Corporation.experience.

For calendar year 2018,2020, upon review of the Korn Ferry report and consultation with Mr. Tanski,Bauer, the Compensation Committee increased Mr. Pustulka’s base salary to a level slightly below the Energy Industry 50th percentile for positions comparable to his position as Chief Operating Officer, which he assumed in February 2016.Officer. The increase recognized Mr. Pustulka’s performance managing the operations and development plans of the Company.

For calendar year 2018,2020, consistent with the Compensation Committee’s past practice regarding the President of Seneca, the Compensation Committee increased Mr. McGinnis’ base salary to a level above the 75th75th percentile of the Meridian survey data for chief operating officers of independent exploration and production company peers, but below the 50th percentile of the Meridian survey data for chief executive officers of those peers. Given the size and importance to the Company of the E&P segment and the highly competitive nature of the Marcellus and Utica shales, the Compensation Committee generally sets the base salary of Seneca’s president above the 75th75th percentile of the Meridian survey data. Thedata for chief operating officers of independent exploration and production peers. However, the long-term incentive compensation opportunities for Mr. McGinnis and other employees in the E & P&P segment have tended to rank below independent exploration and production benchmarks to reflect the relative stability of the positions of these employees due to being part of awithin the Company’s diversified and integrated holding company system. Considering base salary, annual incentive and long-term incentive, Mr. McGinnis’ target compensation falls at the 50th percentile of the Meridian survey data for chief operating officers of independent E&P peers. The Compensation Committee’s action on Mr. McGinnis’ salary followed discussion with Mr. TanskiBauer of Mr. McGinnis’ responsibilities, experience and effectiveness.

For calendar year 2018,2020, following discussion with Mr. Tanski,Bauer regarding Ms. DeCarolis’ responsibilities, experience and effectiveness, the Compensation Committee increased Mr. Carlotti’sher base salary to an amount that approximatedin line with the Energy Industry 50th percentile for positions comparable to hisher position as President of Distribution Corporation. The increase was based on the Committee’s and Mr. Tanski’s assessment of Mr. Carlotti’s attention to customer service, safety and oversight ofday-to-day operations, budget and cost control at the utilityCompany’s Utility segment.

On October 31, 2018, Mr. Carlotti provided notice to the Company of his intention to retire, effective February 1, 2019.

The fiscal 20182020 base salaries paid to the named executive officers are shown in the Fiscal 20182020 Summary Compensation Table under the “Salary” column within this proxy statement.

Annual Cash Incentive

The Company provides an annual cash incentive to its executives to motivate their performance over a short term (which is generally considered to be no longer than two years). Early in the fiscal year, the Compensation Committee establishes for each named executive officer a target amount for the annual cash incentive, stated as a percentage of base salary. Executives typicallySubject to the limitations described in this paragraph, executives generally can earn up to 200% oftwo times the target percentage, based on performance on written goals, provided that thegoals. The maximum payment may not exceed the lesser of (i) two times the executive’s base salary, or (ii) two million dollars. In addition, because earnings-related goals take into account performance over two fiscal years, as described below, performance below the maximum level on an earnings-related goal in the first year will negate the possibility of achieving maximum performance on the averaged two-year goal. For participants in the EACIP, the CEO has broad discretion to reduce the amount otherwise payable as annual cash incentive based on such factors as the CEO may determine.

Target Award Levels

In considering target award levels for the annual cash incentive for 2018,fiscal 2020, the Compensation Committee took into account the recommendations of Korn Ferry and Meridian based on reviews of competitive market practices, and the recommendations of Mr. TanskiBauer with respect to named executive officers other than himself. The Compensation Committee exercised its business judgment and set target awards as follows:

 

Named Executive Officer

  Target
(As a Percentage of Base Salary)

Mr. Tanski

110%

Mr. Bauer

    70100%

Ms. Camiolo

50%

Mr. Pustulka

    100%

Mr. McGinnis

    85%

Mr. CarlottiMs. DeCarolis

    7075%

These target awards were consistent with the prior year, except that Mr. Bauer’s target award level increased from 75% to 100% of base salary, reflecting his promotion in 2019 to the office of CEO.

Fiscal Year 2020 Performance Goals

Based upon discussions with Mr. TanskiBauer and upon review of forecasted financial and operational data, the Compensation Committee approved for each named executive officer a set of particular performance goals for the 20182020 fiscal year. Certain goals overlapped among named executive officers; for example, each named executive officer had a goal tied to consolidated EBITDA and to safety. Incentive payments are based upon performance against the stated goals. For eachEach of the named executive officers participated in the AARCIP, under which 100% of the target incentive wasis made dependent on objective performance criteria. All performance criteria applicable to a particular executive are communicated to that executive in writing at the time the criteria are established.

Two-Year Averaging of Earnings-Related Goals

The earnings-related goals established by the Compensation Committee are structured so as to average current-year and prior-year performance. As a result, earnings performance in any given year will impact compensation over two years, mitigating against a potential incentive to pursue short-term results at the expense of longer-term value. In the Company’s E&P segment, for example, a low commodity price environment can militate in favor of scaling back drilling plans, a change that can negatively affect near-term earnings but enhance longer-term value. The Compensation Committee endeavors to incentivize strong short-term results without encouraging activity that is not economic under prevailing market conditions. Averaging earnings-related goals over two years helps to balance those two objectives. The Compensation Committee also sets targets based on the current fiscal year’s financial forecast. Thus, the current year’s targets may be lower (or higher) than the prior year’s actual results (to which the averaging applies). In this way, the impact of lower (or higher) natural gas commodity prices on the Company’s earnings affects the target levels from one year to the next. The use of a two-year averaging technique for earnings-related goals will impact the performance percentage points earned on those goals in a given year, but over time and all other things being equal, it will not change the cumulative performance percentage points earned for actual performance.

The types of objective goals approved for fiscal 20182020 and the purpose of the goals are set forth in the following table:

 

Goals

 

 

Purpose

 

Earnings-related goals (EBITDA) 

To focus executives’ attention on the Company’s overall profitability, as well as the profitability of certain segments, as appropriate. Performance is averaged with the prior year’s performance to mitigate against short-term action to impact one year’s earnings.

 

Health, safety and environmental goals 

To focus executives’ attention on employee, customer and public safety, environmental compliancestewardship and operational efficiency.

 

Expense goals 

To focus executives’ attention on controlling expense.

 

Customer service goals 

To encourage continued excellence in Utility customer service.

 

Operations assessment goals

To encourage operational efficiency and safety.

To determine the annual cash incentive award payout based on stated performance objectives, the weight assigned to each goal is multiplied by the percentage of the goal achieved to calculate a weighted percentage for each goal. Once the weighted percentage for each goal is determined, the percentages are totaled. That total weighted percentage is multiplied by the target award to arrive at the total incentive payment amount.

The fiscal 20182020 annual cash incentives actually earned by the named executive officers are shown in the Fiscal 20182020 Summary Compensation Table in the“Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column. For each named executive officer, the amount earned was based on performance against objective goals established in thepre-established first quarter of the fiscal year. The fiscal 2020 EBITDA goals were designed to average fiscal 2020 performance criteria.with the prior year’s performance on EBITDA goals. The incentive payments made to the named executive officers were approved by the Compensation Committee.

The following chart identifies the goals assigned to each of the named executive officers for the 20182020 fiscal year, the percentage of each goal achieved, the weight assigned to each goal, and the weighted percentage achieved for each goal. Also noted is each named executive officer’s target percentage of base salary, maximum percentage of base salary, total weighted percentage achieved, target amount, and actual incentive payout. Following the chart, numbered sequentially to match the appearance of the performance objective in the chart, is a summary of what the objective was at the threshold level, target level and maximum level of performance, and a summary of actual performance. Where a target level of performance is stated as a range, achievement at any point within the range will result in the same contribution to the total payout. With regard to EBITDA goals, performance is averaged with the prior year’s performance as a mechanism to mitigate against short-term action to impact one year’s earnings.

 

Annual Cash Incentive
Annual Cash IncentiveAnnual Cash Incentive
ExecutiveExecutive Ronald J. Tanski  David P. Bauer  John R. Pustulka  John P. McGinnis  Carl M. Carlotti Executive David P. Bauer Karen M. Camiolo John R. Pustulka John P. McGinnis Donna L. DeCarolis
Target % of Base SalaryTarget % of Base Salary 110%  70%  100%  85%  70% Target % of Base Salary 100% 50% 100% 85% 75%
Maximum % of Base SalaryMaximum % of Base Salary 192%  140%  200%  170%  140% Maximum % of Base Salary 200% 100% 200% 170% 150%
Fiscal 2018 GoalsFiscal 2018 Goals %
Achvd
  Wght  Wghtd %
Achvd
  %
Achvd
  Wght  Wghtd %
Achvd
  %
Achvd
  Wght  Wghtd %
Achvd
  %
Achvd
  Wght  Wghtd %
Achvd
  %
Achvd
  Wght  Wghtd %
Achvd
 Fiscal 2018 Goals %
Achvd
 Wght Wghtd %
Achvd
 %
Achvd
 Wght Wghtd %
Achvd
 %
Achvd
 Wght Wghtd %
Achvd
 %
Achvd
 Wght Wghtd %
Achvd
 %
Achvd
 Wght Wghtd %
Achvd

1.

 Consolidated EBITDA*  122     0.25   30.50      122     0.25   30.50      122     0.25   30.50      122     0.25   30.50      122     0.25   30.50      Consolidated EBITDA* 98 0.25 24.50   98 0.25 24.50   98 0.25 24.50     98 0.25 24.50   98 0.25 24.50

2.

 Regulated EBITDA*  88     0.20   17.60      88     0.25   22.00      88     0.25   22.00           88     0.25   22.00      Regulated EBITDA* 142 0.20 28.40 142 0.20 28.40 142 0.20 28.40       142 0.25 35.50

3.

 Seneca EBITDA*  140     0.20   28.00      140     0.15   21.00      140     0.20   28.00      140     0.25   35.00           Seneca/Midstream EBITDA**   89 0.20 17.80   89 0.20 17.80   89 0.20 17.80     89 0.25 22.25      

4.

 Health, Safety and Environmental  100     0.10   10.00      100     0.10   10.00      100     0.10   10.00      100     0.10   10.00      100     0.10   10.00      Safety 200 0.15 30.00 200 0.15 30.00 200 0.15 30.00       200 0.15 30.00

5.

 Safety  200     0.10   20.00      200     0.10   20.00      200     0.10   20.00           200     0.10   20.00      Operational Safety and Methane Emissions Reduction 200 0.10 20.00       200 0.15 30.00       200 0.20 40.00

6.

 Operational Safety Measures and Leak Reduction           200     0.10   20.00           200     0.20   40.00      Seneca F&D Cost   0 0.10   0.00     0 0.10   0.00         0 0.20   0.00      

7.

 Seneca F&D Cost  200     0.15   30.00      200     0.15   30.00           200     0.20   40.00           Seneca LOE                   167 0.10 16.70      

8.

 Seneca LOE                200     0.10   20.00           Seneca G&A                   189 0.10 18.90      

9.

 Seneca G&A                128     0.10   12.80           Customer Service       158 0.10 15.80             158 0.15 23.70

10.

 Distribution Customer Service                                 167     0.10   16.70      Seneca Operations Assessment             100 0.05   5.00            

11.

 Seneca Operations Assessment and Safety                   100 0.10 10.00      
 Total Weighted % Achieved  136.10%   133.50%   130.5%   148.30%   139.20%  

Total Weighted % Achieved

 120.70% 116.50% 135.70% 92.35% 153.70%
 Target  $1,146,750   $411,250   $731,250   $553,563   $387,625  

Target

 $875,000 $212,375 $827,500 $613,063 $439,688
 Annual Cash Incentive  $1,560,727   $549,019  $954,281   $820,933   $539,574  

Annual Cash Incentive

 $1,056,125 $247,417 $1,122,918 $566,163 $675,800

 

*

Reflects an average of 20182020 performance and 20172019 performance.

**

Reflects an average of Seneca/Midstream 2020 performance and Seneca 2019 performance. Midstream refers to National Fuel Gas Midstream Company, LLC, the subsidiary that conducts the Company’s natural gas gathering operations.

Performance Measure Threshold Target Maximum Actual Performance
1. Consolidated EBITDA – In determining final performance level, the results of this goal are averaged with the prior year results on the consolidated EBITDA goal. $652725 Million $736780-799 Million$872 Million $810 Million20182020 Consolidated EBITDA=$724770 Million; performance level of 93%91%;2-year average of performance levels=(93%(91%+151%104%)/2=122%98%
2. Regulated EBITDA – In determining final performance level, the results of this goal are averaged with the prior year results on the regulated companies EBITDA goal. $324328 Million $334343-347 Million$368 Million $357 Million20182020 Regulated EBITDA=$329360 Million; performance level of 75%162%;2-year average of performance levels=(75%(162%+100%121%)/2=88%142%
3. SenecaSeneca/Midstream EBITDA – In determining final performance level, the results of this goal are averaged with the prior year results on the Seneca EBITDA goal. $247404 Million $308444-459 Million$511 Million $353 Million2018 Seneca2020 Seneca/Midstream EBITDA=$313416 Million; performance level of 111%65%;2-year average of performance levels=(111%(65%+169%112%)/2=140%89%
4. Health, Safety and Environmental (HSE) – To promote continued importance of safety,safety; measured by participation in HSE meetings.Same as TargetAt least 6 HSEHealth, Safety and Environmental (HSE) meetings,Same as TargetAt least 6 HSE meetings
5.Safety – Measured and by number of OSHA recordable injuries in the utility and pipeline divisions. At least 6 HSE meetings and safety performance at or better than3-year average goal in any divisionAt or better than3-year average in any
2 divisions
 At theleast 6 HSE meetings and safety performance at or better than goal in any two divisionsAt least 6 HSE meetings and safety performance at combined averagelevel of 3.253.08 or less Combined average =At least 6 HSE meetings and safety performance at combined level of 3.08 or less
6.5. Operational Safety Measures and LeakMethane Emissions Reduction – Measured by the Utility segment’s operational safety performance standards in New York and outstanding leaks reduction. Complete 2 of 3 Public Service Commission (PSC) Safety Performance Standards Complete all 3 PSC Safety Performance Standards OR any 2 PSCSafety Performance Standards and Outstanding Leaks Reduction Complete all 3 PSCSafety Performance Standards and Outstanding Leaks Reduction Completed all 3 PSCSafety Performance Standards and Outstanding Leaks Reduction
7.6. Seneca Finding and Development Cost (per thousand cubic feet equivalent (Mcfe)) $1.04/0.99/Mcfe $0.75/0.72/Mcfe $0.58/Mcfe $0.57/McfeDid not meet threshold
8.7. Seneca Lease Operating Expense (per Mcfe) $0.98/0.91/Mcfe$0.87-0.88/Mcfe$0.84/Mcfe $0.94/Mcfe$0.91/Mcfe$0.91/0.85/Mcfe
9.8. Seneca General and Administrative Expense excluding certain expenses related to joint venture or development agreements and acquisition or divestiture transactions $64.071.0 Million $61.766.5-68.5 Million$63 Million $57 Million$60.463.4 Million
10.9. Distribution Customer Service – Measured by average of performance
levels on residential satisfaction rates andnon-emergency appointments kept.
 Residential Satisfaction RateRates in NY and PA are 85%, or PA is 85% ORNon-Emergency Appointments Kept are 98% in NY or 96%and 98% in PA Residential Satisfaction Rates in NY and PA are 91%92%, andNon-Emergency Appointments Kept are 98% in NY and 96%98% in PA Residential Satisfaction Rates in NY and PA are greater than 95%at least 96%, andNon-Emergency Appointments Kept are at least 99%99.7% in NY and at least 98%99.8% in PA Residential Satisfaction Rates in NY and PA between target and maximum performance levels, andlevels; Non-Emergency Appointments Kept in NY and PA atbetween target and maximum performance levels
10.Seneca Operations Assessment – Measured by assessments completed.Complete 1 of 2 operations assessmentsComplete 2 operations assessmentsPerformance capped at TargetCompleted 2 operations assessments
11.Seneca Operations Assessment and Safety – Measured by participation in HSE meetings and assessments completed.At least 6 HSE meetingsAt least 6 HSE meetings and complete 2 operations assessmentsPerformance capped at TargetAt least 6 HSE meetings and completed 2 operations assessments

Preview of Fiscal Year 2021 Performance Goals

Based upon discussions with Mr. Bauer and upon review of forecasted financial data, the Compensation Committee approved for each named executive officer a set of particular performance goals for the 2021 fiscal year. These goals are aligned with the Company’s strategic business plans, as well as its on-going corporate responsibility efforts, including environmental, social and governance matters. The types of objective goals approved for fiscal 2021 include the following:

Earnings-related goals (EBITDA), which serve to focus executives’ attention on the Company’s overall profitability, as well as the profitability of certain segments, as appropriate;

Health, safety and environmental goals, which serve to focus executives’ attention on employee, customer and public safety and environmental stewardship, including methane and greenhouse gas emissions and operational efficiency;

Diversity and inclusion goal, which serves to focus executives’ attention to build upon and maintain efforts to create an inclusive workplace and a diverse workforce;

Customer service goals, which encourage continued excellence in Utility customer service; and

Expense goals, which serve to focus executives’ attention on controlling expense.

Information regarding performance on these goals will be described in the Company’s proxy statement to be filed following the completion of the 2021 fiscal year.

Discretionary Bonus

On December 4, 2018,10, 2020, the Compensation Committee authorized the followinga discretionary bonusesbonus to the named executive officers: R. J. Tanski, $73,392; D. P. Bauer, $31, 872; J. R. Pustulka, $56,672; J. P.Mr. McGinnis $5,536; and C. M. Carlotti, $30,041, forin the aggregate amount of $197,513 across$100,000, in recognition of his work on the entire named executive officer group.Company’s acquisition of upstream and midstream gathering assets in Appalachia from a subsidiary of Royal Dutch Shell. The discretionary bonuses offset an unforeseen negative impact onnon-equity incentive plan compensation resulting fromacquired assets, valued at approximately $506 million, are largely contiguous to, and synergistic with, the Tax CutsCompany’s existing development activities and Jobs Act of 2017 (the Act). Regulatory adjustments recorded by the Company in accordance with state utility commission orders issued in the wake of the Act reduced Utility segment revenues.operations. As a result, performance on EBITDA goals, both for the Company’s regulated businesses andacquisition provides the consolidated Company was negatively impacted, even though the Act hadwith a significant positive effect onstrategic opportunity to further its integrated development approach in the Company’s consolidated net income and the regulatory adjustments by state utility commissions were fully offset by a reduction in corporate income tax liabilities.region.

Long-Term Incentive Compensation

The Compensation Committee uses its business judgment to establish target long-term incentive awards, taking into account the recommendations of its compensation consultants based on reviews of competitive market practices, and the recommendations of Mr. Tanskithe CEO with respect to named executive officers other than himself. Such awards are intended to focus attention on managing the Company from a long-term investor’s perspective. In addition, the Compensation Committee wishes to encourage officers and other managers to have a significant, personal investment in the Company through stock ownership. The Compensation Committee typically makes equity awards on an annual basis in December, but has not established a policy to make grants at a specific meeting, to allow flexibility to review and evaluate appropriate equity grant practices.

InFiscal Year 2020 Awards

The Compensation Committee established fiscal years 2016, 20172020 target long-term incentive awards for the named executive officers at or below the 50th percentile of market data for comparable positions. For Mr. Bauer, the Compensation Committee targeted the 25th percentile, given his recent promotion to the office of CEO. For the other named executive officers, the Compensation Committee set targets ranging from approximately 80% to 100% of the 50th percentile mark.

For Mr. Bauer and 2018,each of the other named executive officers other than Mr. Pustulka, the Compensation Committee granted Messrs. Tanski, Pustulka and Carlotti a long-term incentive award entirely in the form of performance shares. The Committee adopted this practice to focus attention on the achievement of performance targets. For Messrs. Bauer and McGinnis, the Committee grantedtwo-thirds of the fiscal 2020 long-term incentive award in the form of

performance shares, andone-third in the form of time-vested RSUs, which serve as an additional retention tool. For eachMr. Pustulka, the Compensation Committee granted a long-term incentive award entirely in the form of performance shares. The Compensation Committee made that determination to focus attention on the achievement of performance targets, and in recognition of the fact that retention incentives such as time-vested RSUs can have a lesser impact with respect to long-tenured executives.

As in prior years, the performance shares awarded in fiscal 2020 to the named executive officer, the performance sharesofficers are split evenly between relative TSR and relative ROC performance conditions, as described below, whichbelow. The performance conditions are to be achieved over a three-year performance cycle.cycle that started October 1, 2019 and concludes September 30, 2022.

The Compensation Committee established the performance condition for one set of performance shares awarded in fiscal 2020 as the Company’s three-year TSR over the performance cycle as compared to the same metric for companies in the Korn Ferry peer group, as calculated based on the data reported for each company in the Bloomberg online database. Starting and ending stock prices over the performance cycle are calculated as the average closing stock priceprices for the prior calendar month withimmediately preceding the start of the performance cycle; ending stock prices are calculated as the average closing stock prices for the calendar month concluding the performance cycle; and dividends are deemed reinvested in each company’s securities at eachex-dividend date. The Compensation Committee linked the awards to relative levels of performance, which results in the vesting and payment of a percentage of the target number of performance shares depending on the Company’s percentile rank in the Korn Ferry peer group, as follows:

 

Relative TSR Goal

  Percentage of
Target Opportunity Paid

Company’s Percentile Ranking

30th or below

    0%

40th

    50%

50th

    100%

70th

    150%

90th or above

    200%

If the Company’s three-year TSR is negative (less than 0.0), the percentage of target opportunity paid is capped at 100%, regardless of the Company’s percentile ranking. For performance between two established performance levels, the percentage of target opportunity paid is determined by straight line mathematical interpolation.

With respect to the TSR performance shares granted in fiscal 2016, which had a performance cycle covering fiscal years 2016 through 2018, the Company performed at the 50th percentile, which resulted in a payout of 100% of the target opportunity.

The Compensation Committee established the performance condition for the second set of performance shares awarded in fiscal 2020 as the Company’s three-year ROC over the performance cycle as compared to the same metric for companies in the Korn Ferry peer group. ROC for the Company or any member of the peer group means the average of the returns on capital for each twelve month period corresponding to each of the Company’s fiscal years during the performance cycle, calculated based on the data reported for that company in the Bloomberg database. The Compensation Committee linked the awards to relative levels of performance, which results in the vesting and payment of a percentage of the target number of performance shares depending on the Company’s percentile rank in the Korn Ferry peer group, as follows:

 

Relative ROC Goal

  Percentage of
Target Opportunity Paid

Company’s Percentile Ranking

<45th

    0%

45th

    50%

60th

    100%

75th

    150%

100th

    200%

If the Company’s three-year ROC is negative (less than 0.0), the percentage of target opportunity paid is capped at 100%, regardless of the Company’s percentile ranking. For performance between two established performance levels, the percentage of target opportunity paid is determined by mathematical interpolation.

With respect to the ROC performance shares granted in fiscal 2016, which had a performance cycle covering fiscal years 2016 through 2018, the Company performed at the 66.67 percentile, which resulted in a payout of 122.23% of the target opportunity.

No dividend equivalents are provided in respect of any performance shares.

Each of the time-based RSU awards granted to Messrs.Mr. Bauer, Ms. Camiolo, Mr. McGinnis and McGinnisMs. DeCarolis in fiscal years 2016, 2017 and 20182020 vests in three equal annual installments beginning on the first anniversary of the date of grant. No dividend equivalents are provided in respect of any RSUs.

The performance shares and time-based RSUs granted to the named executive officers in fiscal 20182020 are set out in the Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal 20182020 Table within this proxy statement.

Performance on Past Awards

With respect to the performance shares granted in fiscal 2018, which had a performance cycle covering fiscal years 2018 through 2020, the Compensation Committee had established a 14-member peer group. Two of the companies in that peer group were acquired during the course of the performance cycle, and those companies therefore dropped out of the peer group. The Company’s performance was ranked against that of the 12 companies remaining in the peer group at September 30, 2020. With respect to TSR, the Company outperformed nine of the 12 companies, placing it at the 75th percentile. Pursuant to the TSR performance share payout scale, performance at the 75th percentile generally would have translated to a payout of 162.5% of the target opportunity. However, because the Company’s three-year total shareholder return was negative (as was that of 11 of the 12 companies in the peer group), the payout was capped at 100% of the target opportunity. Regarding ROC, the Company outperformed 7 of the 12 companies, placing it at the 58.33 percentile. Pursuant to the ROC performance share payout scale, performance at the 58.33 percentile resulted in a payout of 94.43% of the target opportunity.

The Company’s performance on the last five completed TSR and ROC performance share grants is summarized in the table below.

Grant Date
(fiscal year)
 

Performance

Cycle

(fiscal years)

 TSR ROC
 Relative
Performance
 Percentile Payout
Percentage
 Relative
Performance
 Percentile Payout
Percentage

2018

 2018 – 2020 outperformed
9 of 12
 75.00 100.00
(capped)
 outperformed
7 of 12
 58.33 94.43

2017

 2017 – 2019 outperformed
6 of 12
 50.00 100.00 outperformed
10 of 12
 83.33 166.66

2016

 2016 – 2018 outperformed
6 of 12
 50.00 100.00 outperformed
8 of 12
 66.67 122.23

2015

 2015 – 2017 outperformed
7 of 13
 53.85 100.00
(capped)
 outperformed
7 of 13
 53.85 79.50

2014

 2014 – 2016 outperformed
7 of 13
 53.85 100.00
(capped)
 outperformed
4 of 13
 30.77 0.00
 

 

 

  

 

 

 Average 56.54 100.00 Average 58.59 92.56

EMPLOYEE BENEFITS

Retirement Benefits

The Company maintains four plans that provide retirement benefits: (i) a qualified defined contribution retirement plan whichthat includes a traditional 401(k) benefit as well as a Retirement Savings Account (“RSA”) benefitand, for certain eligible employees (in other words, those hired at various points in 2003 and thereafter, depending on employee type),a retirement savings account (“RSA”) benefit; (ii) a qualified defined benefit retirement plan (forfor those hired prior to various points in 2003),2003; (iii) anon-qualified defined benefit executive retirement plan (availableavailable only to selectedselect officers promoted prior to 2002)2002; and (iv) anon-qualified tophat plan. These plans help the Company attract and retain high caliber employees in high-level management positions and, in the case of thenon-qualified plans, restore retirement benefits lost to employees under the qualified retirement plans as a result of the effect of the Internal Revenue

Code limits and the qualified plans’ limits on compensation considered and benefits provided under such qualified plans. The employee benefits for named executive officers employed prior to 2003 differ from those made available to those employed during or after that year. The Company made changes to its programs that reflected a shift in competitive practices away from certain types of retirement benefits, but generally grandfathered existing employees (including named executive officers) who were then in service in the benefits programs that are commensurate with those in the regulated energy industry.

Messrs. Tanski, PustulkaMr. Bauer and CarlottiMs. Camiolo are eligible to participate in the qualified defined contribution retirementtraditional 401(k) plan, (traditional 401(k)), the qualified defined benefit retirement plan and both of thenon-qualified plans.tophat plan. Mr. Pustulka and Ms. DeCarolis are eligible to participate in those three plans plus the non-qualified executive retirement plan. Mr. McGinnis is eligible to participate in the qualified defined contribution retirementtraditional 401(k) plan, (traditional 401(k), including the additional RSA benefit)benefit, and thenon-qualified tophat plan. Mr. Bauer is eligible to participate in the qualified defined contribution retirement plan (traditional 401(k)), the qualified defined benefit retirement plan and thenon-qualified tophat plan. These benefits are described in more detail in the sectionsections entitled “Fiscal 20182020 Pension Benefits” and “Fiscal 2020 Nonqualified Defined Contribution and Other Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plans” within this proxy statement.

Executive Life Insurance

In 2004, the Committee authorizedThe Company maintains an insurance program known as the “ExecutiveLife Insurance Plan.” UnderExecutive officers who have reached age 50 are eligible to participate in this plan, upon specific direction of the Company’s CEO, when an executive officer reaches age 50,under which the Company wouldwill pay the premium, generally in an amount up to $15,000 per year, of a life insurance policy or policies to be owned by the executive officer, in an amount up to $15,000 per year.officer. The payment is taxable income to the executive officer and ceases when the executive officer’s employment ceases. The Committee authorized this plan as a replacement for its prior practiceIn fiscal 2020 each of providing split dollar life insurance agreements to designatedthe named executive officers. The Committee replaced the split dollar arrangement with the current plan because the Company was prohibited by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act from making premium payments on certain split dollar policies due to their nature as loans. Messrs. Tanski, Pustulka, Carlotti and McGinnis are covered byofficers participated in the ExecutiveLife Insurance Plan. Mr. Bauer is not a participant in this Plan.

Executive Perquisites

The Company offers a limited number of perquisites to our named executive officers. The basis for offering these perquisites is to enhance the Company’s ability to attract and retain highly qualified persons and also to assist the officer in conducting business on behalf of the Company. For certain items, the perquisite is incidental to other business-related use. For example, the Company shares an arena suite with a local law firm for the local professional hockey team. The Company also has additional season tickets for seats for both the local professional hockey and football teams. The Company made these investments as a result of specific drives by the Buffalo, New York business community to support the retention of these professional athletic teams in the Buffalo area. These suites are primarily used for Company business. On the occasions when the suites are not used for Company business, the named executive officers as well as other employees are permitted personal use.

The Company offers named executive officers tax preparation advice, in part to assure the Company that its officers are properly reporting compensation. The Company makes contributions for the named executive officers’ long-term disability plans. The Company also pays the costs of spouses accompanying named executive officers to certain of the Board of Directors and industry meetings and functions, as well as blanket travel insurance for the named executive officer and spouse.

CHANGE IN CONTROL ARRANGEMENTS

The Company’s named executive officers serve at the pleasure of the Board of Directors and are not employed pursuant to employment agreements. Each of the named executive officers is a party to an Employment Continuation and Noncompetition Agreement with the Company, which would become effective upon a Change in Control of the Company.

The Company and the Compensation Committee believe that these agreements are required for the attraction and retention of the executive talent needed to achieve corporate objectives and to assure that named executive officers direct their attention to their duties, acting in the best interests of the stockholders, notwithstanding the potential for loss of employment in connection with a Change in Control.

The agreement contains a “double-trigger” provision that provides payment only if employment terminates within three years following a Change in Control, as defined in the agreement, either by the Company other than for cause or by the named executive officer for good reason. The Compensation Committee believes this

structure strikes a balance between the incentive and the executive attraction and retention efforts described above, without providing Change in Control benefits to named executive officers who continue to enjoy employment with the Company in the event of a Change in Control transaction.

The payment is generally calculated by multiplying 1.99 by the sum of the named executive officer’s current base salary plus the average of the annual short-term incentive compensation payment for the previous two fiscal years. The 1.99 multiplier is reduced on apro-rata basis if termination occurs between age 62 and age 65, at which point no amount is payable. If payment is triggered, certain health benefits are continued for the earlier of 18 months following termination or the date other similar coverage becomes available.

The agreement contains a restrictive covenant whereby the named executive officer may, upon termination following a Change in Control, choose to refrain from being employed by or otherwise serving as an agent, consultant, partner or major stockholder of a business engaged in activity that is competitive with that of the Company or its subsidiaries. If the named executive officer so chooses to be bound by this restrictive covenant, an additional payment is made in the amount of one times the sum of current base salary plus the average of the annual short-term incentive compensation payment for the previous two fiscal years. The Compensation Committee and the Company believe this is an appropriate payment in exchange for the named executive officer’s agreement to thenon-compete covenant. There is nogross-up for taxes on either payment.

If a named executive officer experiences a qualifying termination of employment within a specific time following a Change in Control of the Company, many of the components of total compensation described above become immediately vested or paid out in a lump sum. More detail about these items and calculations as of September 28, 2018,30, 2020, are set forth in the section entitled “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control” within this proxy statement.

STOCK OWNERSHIP GUIDELINES

In an effort to emphasize the importance of stock ownership and in consultation with the Compensation Committee, the Company maintains Common Stock ownership guidelines for officers, ranging from one times base salary for junior officers to six times base salary at the CEO level. Generally, officers are expected to meet the guidelines within five years following promotion. The CEOMr. Bauer holds approximately 212.8 times his base salary as of November 30, 2018.December 10, 2020, and generally is expected to reach six times base salary by July 1, 2024, five years after his promotion to CEO. All other named executive officers, meetfor whom the requirement is three times base salary, exceed their ownership requirements or expect to do so within five years from promotion.requirements. Other employees receiving equity awards are encouraged to retain their Common Stock for long-term investment. The Board and management believe that employees who are stockholders perform their jobs in a manner that considers the long-term interests of the stockholders. Company directors are also subject to ownership requirements, as noted previously in this proxy statement.

TAX AND ACCOUNTING CONSIDERATIONS

In designing the Company’s compensation program, general consideration is given to the accounting treatment of the awards made to our named executive officers and pertinent tax law provisions. Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), generally prohibits the Company from deducting compensation paid in excess of $1 million per year to certain covered officers (including, beginning for 2018, certain former named executive officers). Historically, an exception was available for compensation that qualifiesqualified as “qualified performance-based compensation” within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code, but the exception has now beenwas repealed by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of

2017 (the “Tax Cut Act”), effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017, unless certain transition relief for certain compensation arrangements in place as of November 2, 2017 is available. In general, the Compensation Committee has historically intended for the short-term cash incentive compensation payable under the At Risk Plan and the long-term equity awards to qualify for thisthe performance-based exception. However, there may have been cases whereDue to the Committee electedcontinued importance and benefit to award compensation that was not (or will not be) deductible (or was not able to award compensation that was or will be deductible), if the Committee considered such compensation to be consistent with its philosophy and in the best interests of the Company and its

stockholders or ifof awarding compensation that is structured to properly incentivize our named executive officers, the performance-based exception was otherwise unavailable. Furthermore,Compensation Committee believes that it is in the Company’s best interests to retain flexibility in awarding compensation, even if the Company intendedsome awards may be non-deductible compensation expenses to grant compensation that qualifies for the performance-based exception, it cannot guarantee that such compensation will so qualify or ultimately will be deductible by the Company. The Company has also designed its compensation program with the intent that any awards granted thereunder will either be exempt from, or comply with the applicable requirements under, Section 409A of the Code.

Fiscal 20182020 Summary Compensation Table

The following table sets forth a summary of the fiscal 20182020 compensation of the Company’s CEO, Principal Financial Officer and of each of the three most highly compensated executive officers other than the CEO and Principal Financial Officer. The compensation reflected for each officer was for the officer’s services provided in all capacities to the Company and its subsidiaries.

 

Name and Principal

Position

 Fiscal
Year
 Salary
($)
 Bonus
($)(1)
 Stock
Awards
($)(2)
 Option
Awards
($)
 Non-Equity
Incentive
Plan
Compensation
($)(3)
 Change in
Pension
Value
and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
($)(4)
 All Other
Compensation
($)(5)
 Total
($)

Ronald J. Tanski

President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company

   

2018

2017

2016


   

1,042,500

1,010,000

972,500


   

73,392

N/A

N/A


   

3,277,447

3,254,412

2,769,023


   

0

0

0


   

1,560,727

1,338,881

1,717,022


   

1,945,027

1,851,383

1,486,028


   

185,084

169,472

191,453


   

8,084,177

7,624,148

7,136,026


David P. Bauer

Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company; President of National Fuel Gas Supply Corporation

   

2018

2017

2016


   

587,500

537,500

459,537


   

31,872

N/A

N/A


   

724,657

704,902

336,072


   

0

0

0


   

549,019

544,246

333,508


   

268,191

253,874

330,362


   

68,805

65,674

48,558


   

2,230,044

2,106,196

1,508,037


John R. Pustulka

   2018   731,250   56,672   1,445,921   0   954,281   813,346   118,864   4,120,334

Chief Operating Officer of the Company

   2017   660,000   N/A   1,281,395   0   731,214   615,496   112,764   3,400,869
   2016   591,250   N/A   695,834   0   745,596   934,996   98,038   3,065,714

John P. McGinnis

   2018   651,250   5,536   1,159,482   0   820,933   N/A   123,469   2,760,670

President of Seneca Resources Company, LLC

   
2017
2016

   
600,000
457,917

   
N/A
68,688

   
961,113
747,834

   
0
0

   
776,250
206,750

   

N/A

N/A


   
117,596
82,103

   
2,454,959
1,563,292

Carl M. Carlotti

   2018   553,750   30,041   674,810   0   539,574   982,231   80,565   2,860,971

President of National Fuel Gas Distribution Corporation

   
2017
2016

   
526,250
447,743

   
N/A
N/A

   
696,472
538,092

   
0
0

   
501,543
525,135

   
809,829
591,081

   
86,854
73,384

   
2,620,948
2,175,435

Name and Principal

Position

 Fiscal
Year
  Salary
($)
  Bonus
($)
  Stock
Awards
($)(1)
  Option
Awards
($)
  Non-Equity
Incentive
Plan
Compensation
($)(2)
  Change in
Pension
Value
and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
($)(3)
  All Other
Compensation
($)(4)
  Total
($)
 

David P. Bauer

President and Chief
Executive Officer

  

2020

2019

2018

 

 

 

  

875,000

667,500

587,500

 

 

 

  

0

0

31,872

 

 

 

  

1,945,917

1,351,675

724,657

 

 

 

  

0

0

0

 

 

 

  

1,056,125

599,248

549,019

 

 

 

  

937,392

817,243

268,191

 

 

 

  

145,481

75,817

68,805

 

 

 

  

4,959,915

3,511,483

2,230,044

 

 

 

Karen M. Camiolo

Treasurer and Principal
Financial Officer

  

2020

2019

 

 

  

424,749

390,250

 

 

  

0

96,997

 

 

  

370,176

226,032

 

 

  

0

0

 

 

  

247,417

180,003

 

 

  

338,162

518,593

 

 

  

55,336

54,869

 

 

  

1,435,840

1,466,744

 

 

John R. Pustulka

  2020   827,500   0   2,079,813   0   1,122,918   922,119   135,017   5,087,367 

Chief Operating Officer

  2019   780,000   0   1,858,759   0   933,270   1,243,401   120,783   4,936,213 
  2018   731,250   56,672   1,445,921   0   954,281   813,346   118,864   4,120,334 

John P. McGinnis

  2020   721,250   100,000   1,696,682   0   566,163   0   109,579   3,193,674 

President of Seneca
Resources Company, LLC

  

2019

2018

 

 

  

686,250

651,250

 

 

  

0

5,536

 

 

  

1,591,000

1,159,482

 

 

  

0

0

 

 

  

681,601

820,933

 

 

  

0

0

 

 

  

120,952

123,469

 

 

  

3,079,803

2,760,670

 

 

Donna L. DeCarolis

President of National
Fuel Gas Distribution Corporation

  

2020

2019

 

 

  

586,250

470,142

 

 

  

0

0

 

 

  

810,762

725,326

 

 

  

0

0

 

 

  

675,800

482,542

 

 

  

1,326,938

848,014

 

 

  

90,547

72,168

 

 

  

3,490,297

2,598,192

 

 

 

(1)

Please refer to the Compensation Discussion and Analysis for information about the discretionary bonus.

(2)

The stock award values for fiscal 20182020 show the aggregate grant date fair value of performance shares and, where applicable, time-based RSUs.RSUs, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. For information on the valuation assumptions and performance conditions with respect to these awards, refer to Note A under the heading “Stock-Based Compensation” and Note EH under the heading “Stock Award Plans” in the Company’s financial statements in its Form10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 20182020 (“20182020 Form10-K”). The grant date fair value of performance shares reflects an estimate that 100% of the performance shares awarded will vest at the end of the three-year performance period. The actual percentage to vest will be determined following fiscal 2020.2022. The grant date fair value of performance sharesstock awards granted in fiscal 2018,2020, assuming the highest level of performance for performance shares (200%), is $6,554,894 for Mr. Tanski, $963,811$3,260,455 for Mr. Bauer, $2,891,841$620,241 for Ms. Camiolo, $4,159,627 for Mr. Pustulka, $1,542,220$2,842,862 for Mr. McGinnis and $1,349,621$1,358,465 for Mr. Carlotti.Ms. DeCarolis.

 

(3)(2)

For fiscal 2018,2020, this column reflects compensation under the At Risk Plan. Please refer to the Compensation Discussion and Analysis for additional information about the At Risk Plan, including information regarding the performance conditions applicable to the awards.

 

(4)(3)

This column represents, for fiscal 2018,2020, the actuarial increase in the present value of the named executive officer’sofficers’ benefits under all pension plans maintained by the Company, determined using interest rate and mortality rate assumptions consistent with those used in the Company’s financial statements in its 20182020 Form10-K, as described in Note H,K, “Retirement Plan and Other Post-Retirement Benefits.” The amountamounts for Mr. Bauer and Ms. Camiolo also includesinclude the actuarial increase in the present value of histheir respective retirement-related tophat benefitbenefits under thenon-qualified tophat plan. These amounts may include amounts which the named executive officer may not currently be entitled to receive because such amounts are not vested as of September 30, 2018, 20172020, 2019 and 2016,2018, respectively. For fiscal 2018, the amount includes2020, there were no above-market earnings under the Deferred Compensation Plan for Mr. Pustulka of $904.Plan. See the narrative, tables and notes to the sections entitled “Fiscal 20182020 Pension Benefits” and “Fiscal 20182020 Nonqualified Defined Contribution and Other Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plans” within this proxy statement for more information.

 

(5)(4)

See the All Other Compensation Table below for more information.

The following table describes each component of the All Other Compensation column in the Fiscal 20182020 Summary Compensation Table for fiscal 2018:2020:

 

Description

 Ronald J.
Tanski
($)
 David P.
Bauer
($)
 John R.
Pustulka
($)
 John P.
McGinnis
($)
 Carl M.
Carlotti
($)
  David P.
Bauer
($)
 Karen M.
Camiolo
($)
 John R.
Pustulka
($)
 John P.
McGinnis
($)
 Donna L.
DeCarolis
($)
 

Defined Contributions(a)

 16,425  16,425  16,425  27,375  16,425  17,025  17,025  17,025  28,375  17,025 

401(k) Tophat(b)

 139,619  51,516  84,332  22,475  49,049  98,343  23,240  99,750  26,075  58,423 

RSA Tophat(c)

 0  0  0  47,821  0  0  0  0  40,030  0 

Employee Stock Ownership Plan (“ESOP”) Supplemental Payment(d)

 2,191  0  3,016  0  0  0  0  3,143  0  0 

Life Insurance(e)

 15,000  773  15,000  15,000  15,000  30,000  15,000  15,000  15,000  15,000 

Travel Accident Insurance(f)

 110  91  91  91  91  113  71  99  99  99 

Perquisites(g)

 11,739  N/A  N/A  10,707  N/A  N/A  N/A  N/A  N/A  N/A 

Total

 185,084  68,805  118,864  123,469  80,565  145,481  55,336  135,017  109,579  90,547 

 

a)

Represents the Company contributions to the 401(k) plan accounts of the named executive officers. Each named executive officer receives a Company match of up to 6% within the 401(k) plan on the lesser of base salary or the IRS annual compensation limit. In addition, Mr. McGinnis is a participant in the Company’s RSA benefit within the 401(k) plan, pursuant to which he receives a Company contribution of 4% on the portion of his base salary plus annual bonus that does not exceed the IRS annual compensation limit.

 

b)

Each named executive officer is prohibited from receiving the full 401(k) Company match due to the IRS annual compensation limit. The 401(k) tophat benefit gives each named executive officer except Mr. McGinnis a Company match on the following forms of compensation: (1) base salary that exceeds the IRS annual compensation limit, and (2) At Risk Plan payment. For Mr. McGinnis, the 401(k) tophat benefit is based on the portion of base salary that exceeds the IRS annual compensation limit.

 

c)

Represents the Company contributions on Mr. McGinnis’ base salary plus At Risk Plan payment that exceeded the IRS annual compensation limit.

 

d)

All management participants who were hired prior to December 31, 1986 participate in the ESOP, which pays dividends to the participants on the Common Stock held in the plan. The participant doesParticipants who were hired prior to 1983 did not have the option to reinvest these dividends.dividends on shares acquired prior to 1983. The formula for the supplemental payment was designed to result in aggregate supplemental payments to thepre-1983 participants approximating the amount the Company saved in corporate income taxes by prohibiting the reinvestment of dividends. The ESOP is a qualified benefit plan that was frozen in 1987 and closed to future participants.

 

e)

Represents the Company-paid life insurance premiums on behalf of Messrs. Tanski, Pustulka, McGinnis and Carlottieach named executive officer under the ExecutiveLife Insurance Plan. For Mr. Bauer this representsbecame a participant in the Company-paid insurance premiums underplan in the National Fuel Gas Company Group Life Insurance Plan.latter part of calendar 2019, and both the Company’s calendar 2019 payment and calendar 2020 payment fell within the Company’s 2020 fiscal year.

 

f)

Represents the premiums paid for the blanket travel insurance policy, which provides a death benefit to beneficiaries of an officer if the officer dies while traveling on business.

 

g)

Perquisites for Mr. Tanski consist of tax preparation and advice, personal use of Company purchased tickets to attend local sporting, entertainment ornot-for-profit events, attendance at Company and industry events for a family member, blanket travel insurance for personal travel, and long-term disability contributions paid by National Fuel. Perquisites for Mr. McGinnis consist of the same types of benefits, with the exception of tickets to sporting, entertainment ornon-for-profit events. Perquisites for each of Messrs. Bauer, Pustulka and Carlottinamed executive officer were less than $10,000.$10,000 in the aggregate.

Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal 20182020

The following table sets forth information with respect to awards granted to the named executive officers during fiscal 20182020 under the At Risk Plan and the 2010 Equity Compensation Plan. Please refer to the CD&A within this proxy statement for additional information regarding these plans.

 

     

 

Estimated Possible

Payouts Under
Non-Equity Incentive Plan
Awards

 

 

Estimated Future

Payouts Under
Equity Incentive Plan
Awards

 All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number of
Shares of
Stock or
Units
(#)
 Grant Date
Fair Value of
Stock and
Option
Awards
($)(5)
   

 

Estimated Possible

Payouts Under
Non-Equity Incentive Plan
Awards

 

 

Estimated Future

Payouts Under
Equity Incentive Plan
Awards

  All Other
Stock

Awards:
Number of
Shares of
Stock or
Units
(#)
 Grant Date
Fair Value of
Stock and
Option
Awards
($)(1)
 

Name

 Note Grant
Date
 Threshold
($)
 Target
($)
 Maximum
($)
 Threshold
(#)
 Target
(#)
 Maximum
(#)
 Note Grant
Date
 Threshold
($)
 Target
($)
 Maximum
($)
 Threshold
(#)
 Target
(#)
 Maximum
(#)
 

Ronald J. Tanski

 (1) 12/20/17    16,081 32,162 64,324  1,596,661

David P. Bauer

 (2) 12/9/19  318,500  875,000  1,499,750      
 (2) 12/20/17    9,198 32,162 64,324  1,680,786 (3) 12/9/19     7,586  15,171  30,342   604,383 
 (3) 12/20/17 524,925 1,146,750 2,000,000      (4) 12/9/19     584  15,171  30,342   710,155 
 (5) 12/9/19        15,176  631,379 

David P. Bauer

 (1) 12/20/17    2,365 4,729 9,458  234,768

Karen M. Camiolo

 (2) 12/9/19  77,305  212,375  364,011      
 (2) 12/20/17    1,352 4,729 9,458  247,138 (3) 12/9/19     1,443  2,886  5,772   114,973 
 (3) 12/20/17 181,156 411,250 822,500      (4) 12/9/19     111  2,886  5,772   135,094 
 (4) 12/20/17       4,731 242,752 (5) 12/9/19        2,887  120,109 

John R. Pustulka

 (1) 12/20/17    7,095 14,189 28,378  704,403 (2) 12/9/19  301,210  827,500  1,376,960      
 (2) 12/20/17    4,058 14,189 28,378  741,517 (3) 12/9/19     12,002  24,003  48,006   956,233 
 (3) 12/20/17 353,011 731,250 1,462,500      (4) 12/9/19     924  24,003  48,006   1,123,580 

John P. McGinnis

 (1) 12/20/17    3,784 7,567 15,134  375,659 (2) 12/9/19  165,527  613,063  1,023,815      
 (2) 12/20/17    2,164 7,567 15,134  395,451 (3) 12/9/19     6,614  13,228  26,456   526,978 
 (3) 12/20/17 221,425 553,563 1,107,126      (4) 12/9/19     509  13,228  26,456   619,203 
 (4) 12/20/17       7,569 388,372 (5) 12/9/19        13,232  550,501 

Carl M. Carlotti

 (1) 12/20/17    3,311 6,622 13,244  328,745

Donna L. DeCarolis

 (2) 12/9/19  124,212  439,688  783,744      
 (2) 12/20/17    1,894 6,622 13,244  346,066 (3) 12/9/19     3,161  6,321  12,642   251,816 
 (3) 12/20/17 121,617 387,625 775,250      (4) 12/9/19     243  6,321  12,642   295,886 
 (5) 12/9/19        6,323  263,060 

 

(1)

The ROCequity award values reflect the fair value of performance shares awarded to executive officers on December 20, 2017 generally vestand, where applicable, RSUs at the enddate of a three-yeargrant, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. For performance cycle (October 1, 2017 through September 30, 2020), subjectshares, values are based on the probable outcome of the applicable performance condition. Refer to the achievement of a performance condition tied to relative total return on capital. Please refer to the narrative disclosureNote A under the “National Fuel Gas Company 2010 Equity Compensation Plan” section within this proxy statement for additional information onheading “Stock-Based Compensation” and Note H under the performance condition and vesting terms.heading “Stock Award Plans” in the Company’s financial statements in its 2020 Form 10-K.

 

(2)

The TSR performance shares awarded to executive officers on December 20, 2017 generally vest at the end of a three-year performance cycle (October 1, 2017 through September 30, 2020), subject to the achievement of a performance condition tied to relative total shareholder return. The threshold number represents a payout of approximately 28.6% of the target opportunity, which would result from performance at approximately the 35.71 percentile. Performance at the 35.71 percentile would be the lowest achievable percentile above the 30th percentile, assuming no changes to the14-member peer group. Please refer to the narrative disclosure under the “National Fuel Gas Company 2010 Equity Compensation Plan” section within this proxy statement for additional information on the performance condition and vesting terms.

(3)

This row represents the annual cash incentive opportunity set in fiscal 20182020 under the At Risk Plan. The amount actually paid for fiscal 20182020 is set forth in the Fiscal 20182020 Summary Compensation Table under the“Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column. Please refer to the CD&A for additional information about the performance conditions applicable to each payment.

 

(3)

The ROC performance shares awarded to named executive officers on December 9, 2019 generally vest at the end of a three-year performance cycle (October 1, 2019 through September 30, 2022), subject to the achievement of a performance condition tied to relative total return on capital. Please refer to the narrative disclosure under the “Long-Term Incentive Compensation” section within this proxy statement for additional information on the performance condition and vesting terms.

(4)

The restricted stock units (RSUs) shownTSR performance shares awarded to named executive officers on December 9, 2019 generally vest at the end of a three-year performance cycle (October 1, 2019 through September 30, 2022), subject to the achievement of a performance condition tied to relative total shareholder return. The threshold number represents a payout of approximately 3.85% of the target opportunity, which would result from performance at approximately the 30.77 percentile. Performance at the 30.77 percentile would be the lowest achievable percentile above the 30th percentile, assuming no changes to the 13-member peer group. Please refer to the narrative disclosure under the “Long-Term Incentive Compensation” section within this tableproxy statement for additional information on the performance condition and vesting terms.

(5)

The RSUs granted on December 9, 2019 to Mr. Bauer, Ms. Camiolo, Mr. McGinnis and Ms. DeCarolis were granted to Messrs. Bauer and McGinnis under the Company’s 2010 Equity Compensation Plan and generally vest inone-third increments on the first three anniversaries of the date of grant. Please refer to the narrative disclosure under the “Fiscal 20182020 Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control” section within this proxy statement for additional information regarding termination prior to and after the vest date of the RSUs.

(5)

The equity award values reflect the fair value of performance shares and, where applicable, RSUs at the date of grant. For performance shares, values are based on the probable outcome of the applicable performance condition. Refer to Note A under the heading “Stock-Based Compensation” and Note E under the heading “Stock Award Plans” in the Company’s financial statements in its 2018 Form10-K.

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal 20182020 Year-End

The following table sets forth, on anaward-by-award basis for each of the named executive officers, the number of securities underlying unexercised SARs, the total number and aggregate market value of shares of unvested restricted stock, and the number and market value of unvested RSUs and performance shares, as of September 30, 2018.2020. The table also provides the grant price, which is the fair market value (the average of the high and low) on the grant date, and the date of expiration of each unexercised SAR.

 

 Option Awards Stock Awards   Option Awards Stock Awards 

Name

 Grant
Date
 Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Exercisable
(1)
 Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Unexercisable
 Option
Exercise
Price
($)(2)
 Option
Expiration
Date
 Number of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested
(#)(3)
 Market
Value of
Shares
or Units
of Stock
That
Have
Not
Vested
($)(3)
 Equity
Incentive
Plan

Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights
That Have
Not Vested
(#)(4)
 Equity
Incentive
Plan

Awards:
Market or
Payout
Value of
Unearned
Shares,
Units
or Other
Rights
That Have
Not Vested
($)(4)
 Grant
Date
 Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Exercisable
 Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Unexercisable
 Option
Exercise
Price
($)(1)
 Option
Expiration
Date
 Number of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested
(#)(2)
 Market
Value of
Shares
or Units
of Stock
That
Have
Not
Vested
($)(2)
 Equity
Incentive
Plan

Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights
That  Have
Not Vested
(#)(3)
 Equity
Incentive
Plan

Awards:
Market or
Payout
Value of
Unearned
Shares,
Units
or  Other
Rights
That Have
Not Vested
($)(3)
 

Ronald J. Tanski

 03/11/10 70,000 0 52.10 03/11/2020 0 0 0 0

David P. Bauer

 12/20/10  5,000  0  63.87  12/20/2020  0  0  0  0 
 12/20/10 25,000 0 63.87 12/20/2020 0 0 0 0 12/19/11  5,000  0  55.09  12/19/2021  0  0  0  0 
 12/19/11 25,000 0 55.09 12/19/2021 0 0 0 0 12/19/12  10,629  0  53.05  12/19/2022  0  0  0  0 
 12/19/12 42,953 0 53.05 12/19/2022 0 0 0 0 12/20/17(4)  0  0  0  N/A  0  0  4,729  191,950 
 12/17/15(5) 0 0 0 N/A 0 0 90,158 5,054,257 12/20/17(5)  0  0  0  N/A  0  0  4,729  191,950 
 12/17/15(6) 0 0 0 N/A 0 0 45,079 2,527,129 12/20/17(6)  0  0  0  N/A  1,577  64,010  0  0 
 12/15/16(5) 0 0 0 N/A 0 0 57,708 3,235,110 12/19/18(4)  0  0  0  N/A  0  0  5,200  211,068 
 12/15/16(6) 0 0 0 N/A 0 0 28,854 1,617,555 12/19/18(5)  0  0  0  N/A  0  0  5,200  211,068 
 12/20/17(5) 0 0 0 N/A 0 0 64,324 3,606,003 12/19/18(6)  0  0  0  N/A  3,467  140,726  0  0 
 12/20/17(6) 0 0 0 N/A 0 0 16,081 901,501 7/1/19(6)  0  0  0  N/A  10,821  439,224  0  0 
 12/9/19(4)  0  0  0  N/A  0  0  15,171  615,791 

David P. Bauer

 03/11/10 4,000 0 52.10 03/11/2020 0 0 0 0
 12/20/10 5,000 0 63.87 12/20/2020 0 0 0 0 12/9/19(5)  0  0  0  N/A  0  0  15,171  615,791 
 12/9/19(6)  0  0  0  N/A  15,176  615,994  0  0 

Karen M. Camiolo

 12/20/10  2,500  0  63.87  12/20/2020  0  0  0  0 
 12/19/11 5,000 0 55.09 12/19/2021 0 0 0 0 12/19/11  2,500  0  55.09  12/19/2021  0  0  0  0 
 12/19/12 10,629 0 53.05 12/19/2022 0 0 0 0 12/19/12  5,465  0  53.05  12/19/2022  0  0  0  0 
 12/17/15(5) 0 0 0 N/A 0 0 6,846 383,787 12/20/17(4)  0  0  0  N/A  0  0  1,415  57,435 
 12/17/15(6) 0 0 0 N/A 0 0 3,423 191,893 12/20/17(5)  0  0  0  N/A  0  0  1,415  57,435 
 12/17/15(7) 0 0 0 N/A 1,142 64,021 0 0 12/20/17(6)  0  0  0  N/A  472  19,158  0  0 
 12/15/16(5) 0 0 0 N/A 0 0 8,464 474,492 12/19/18(4)  0  0  0  N/A  0  0  1,391  56,461 
 12/15/16(6) 0 0 0 N/A 0 0 4,232 237,246 12/19/18(5)  0  0  0  N/A  0  0  1,391  56,461 
 12/15/16(7) 0 0 0 N/A 2,822 158,201 0 0 12/19/18(6)  0  0  0  N/A  928  37,688  0  0 
 12/20/17(5) 0 0 0 N/A 0 0 9,458 530,215 12/9/19(4)  0  0  0  N/A  0  0  2,886  117,143 
 12/20/17(6) 0 0 0 N/A 0 0 2,365 132,554 12/9/19(5)  0  0  0  N/A  0  0  2,886  117,143 
 12/20/17(7) 0 0 0 N/A 4,731 265,220 0 0 12/9/19(6)  0  0  0  N/A  2,887  117,183  0  0 

John R. Pustulka

 12/22/08 20,000 0 29.88 12/22/2018 0 0 0 0 12/20/10  15,000  0  63.87  12/20/2020  0  0  0  0 
 03/11/10 15,000 0 52.10 03/11/2020 0 0 0 0 12/19/11  15,000  0  55.09  12/19/2021  0  0  0  0 
 12/20/10 15,000 0 63.87 12/20/2020 0 0 0 0 12/19/12  22,121  0  53.05  12/19/2022  0  0  0  0 
 12/19/11 15,000 0 55.09 12/19/2021 0 0 0 0 12/20/17(4)  0  0  0  N/A  0  0  14,189  575,932 
 12/19/12 22,121 0 53.05 12/19/2022 0 0 0 0 12/20/17(5)  0  0  0  N/A  0  0  14,189  575,932 
 12/17/15(5) 0 0 0 N/A 0 0 22,656 1,270,095 12/19/18(4)  0  0  0  N/A  0  0  16,694  677,609 
 12/17/15(6) 0 0 0 N/A 0 0 11,328 635,048 12/19/18(5)  0  0  0  N/A  0  0  16,694  677,609 
 12/15/16(5) 0 0 0 N/A 0 0 22,722 1,273,795 12/9/19(4)  0  0  0  N/A  0  0  24,003  974,282 
 12/15/16(6) 0 0 0 N/A 0 0 11,361 636,898 12/9/19(5)  0  0  0  N/A  0  0  24,003  974,282 
 12/20/17(5) 0 0 0 N/A 0 0 28,378 1,590,871
 12/20/17(6) 0 0 0 N/A 0 0 7,095 397,718

John P. McGinnis

 09/17/09 0 0 0 N/A 20,000 1,121,200 0 0 09/17/09  0  0  0  N/A  20,000  811,800  0  0 
 03/11/10 20,000 0 52.10 03/11/2020 0 0 0 0 12/20/10  7,500  0  63.87  12/20/2020  0  0  0  0 
 12/20/10 7,500 0 63.87 12/20/2020 0 0 0 0 12/19/12  20,802  0  53.05  12/19/2022  0  0  0  0 
 12/19/12 20,802 0 53.05 12/19/2022 0 0 0 0 12/20/17(4)  0  0  0  N/A  0  0  7,567  307,145 
 12/17/15(5) 0 0 0 N/A 0 0 15,234 854,018 12/20/17(5)  0  0  0  N/A  0  0  7,567  307,145 
 12/17/15(6) 0 0 0 N/A 0 0 7,617 427,009 12/20/17(6)  0  0  0  N/A  2,523  102,409  0  0 
 12/17/15(7) 0 0 0 N/A 2,540 142,392 0 0 12/19/18(4)  0  0  0  N/A  0  0  9,790  397,376 
 12/15/16(5) 0 0 0 N/A 0 0 11,540 646,932 12/19/18(5)  0  0  0  N/A  0  0  9,790  397,376 
 12/15/16(6) 0 0 0 N/A 0 0 5,770 323,466 12/19/18(6)  0  0  0  N/A  6,529  265,012  0  0 
 12/15/16(7) 0 0 0 N/A 3,848 215,719 0 0 12/9/19(4)  0  0  0  N/A  0  0  13,228  536,925 
 12/20/17(5) 0 0 0 N/A 0 0 15,134 848,412 12/9/19(5)  0  0  0  N/A  0  0  13,228  536,925 
 12/20/17(6) 0 0 0 N/A 0 0 3,784 212,103 12/9/19(6)  0  0  0  N/A  13,232  537,087  0  0 
 12/20/17(7) 0 0 0 N/A 7,569 424,318 0 0

 Option Awards Stock Awards   Option Awards Stock Awards 

Name

 Grant
Date
 Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Exercisable
(1)
 Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Unexercisable
 Option
Exercise
Price
($)(2)
 Option
Expiration
Date
 Number of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested
(#)(3)
 Market
Value of
Shares
or Units
of Stock
That
Have
Not
Vested
($)(3)
 Equity
Incentive
Plan

Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights
That Have
Not Vested
(#)(4)
 Equity
Incentive
Plan

Awards:
Market or
Payout
Value of
Unearned
Shares,
Units
or Other
Rights
That Have
Not Vested
($)(4)
 Grant
Date
 Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Exercisable
 Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Unexercisable
 Option
Exercise
Price
($)(1)
 Option
Expiration
Date
 Number of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested
(#)(2)
 Market
Value of
Shares
or Units
of Stock
That
Have
Not
Vested
($)(2)
 Equity
Incentive
Plan

Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights
That  Have
Not Vested
(#)(3)
 Equity
Incentive
Plan

Awards:
Market or
Payout
Value of
Unearned
Shares,
Units
or  Other
Rights
That Have
Not Vested
($)(3)
 

Carl M. Carlotti

 03/11/10 15,000 0 52.10 03/11/2020 0 0 0 0

Donna L. DeCarolis

 12/20/10  2,000  0  63.87  12/20/2020  0  0  0  0 
 12/20/10 5,000 0 63.87 12/20/2020 0 0 0 0 12/19/11  2,000  0  55.09  12/19/2021  0  0  0  0 
 12/19/11 5,000 0 55.09 12/19/2021 0 0 0 0 12/19/12  4,940  0  53.05  12/19/2022  0  0  0  0 
 12/19/12 10,170 0 53.05 12/19/2022 0 0 0 0 12/20/17(4)  0  0  0  N/A  0  0  999  40,549 
 12/17/15(5) 0 0 0 N/A 0 0 17,520 982,171 12/20/17(5)  0  0  0  N/A  0  0  999  40,549 
 12/17/15(6) 0 0 0 N/A 0 0 8,760 491,086 12/20/17(6)  0  0  0  N/A  334  13,557  0  0 
 12/15/16(5) 0 0 0 N/A 0 0 12,350 692,341 12/19/18(4)  0  0  0  N/A  0  0  4,463  181,153 
 12/15/16(6) 0 0 0 N/A 0 0 6,175 346,171 12/19/18(5)  0  0  0  N/A  0  0  4,463  181,153 
 12/20/17(5) 0 0 0 N/A 0 0 13,244 742,459 12/19/18(6)  0  0  0  N/A  2,977  120,836  0  0 
 12/20/17(6) 0 0 0 N/A 0 0 3,311 185,615 12/9/19(4)  0  0  0  N/A  0  0  6,321  256,569 
 12/9/19(5)  0  0  0  N/A  0  0  6,321  256,569 
 12/9/19(6)  0  0  0  N/A  6,323  256,651  0  0 

 

(1)

SARs granted on December 22, 2008 vested over a period of three years inone-third increments at each anniversary date of the awards subject to the fulfillment of performance conditions.

SARs granted on March 11, 2010 vested inone-third increments on the dates the Company’s Form10-K was filed for fiscal 2010, 2011 and 2012 subject to the fulfillment of performance conditions.

SARs granted on December 20, 2010 vested over a period of three years inone-third increments at each anniversary date of the awards.

SARs granted on December 19, 2011 vested over a period of three years inone-third increments at each anniversary date of the awards and became exercisable on December 19, 2014.

SARs granted on December 19, 2012 vested over a period of three years inone-third increments at each anniversary date of the awards.

(2)

Awards were granted at an exercise price equal to the fair market value on the grant date.

 

(3)(2)

The stock awards granted to Mr. McGinnis consist in part of an award of 20,000 shares of restricted stock which were granted on September 17, 2009 that generally will vestand which vested on November 14, 2020, subject to Mr. McGinnis’ continued employment.2020. The market value of the 20,000 shares is based on the closing market price ($40.59) of the Common Stock as of September 30, 2020.

 

  

The restricted stock unitsRSUs awarded to Mr. Bauer, Ms. Camiolo, Mr. McGinnis and Ms. DeCarolis on December 17, 2015,20, 2017, December 15, 201619, 2018 and December 20, 20179, 2019 generally vest over a period of three years inone-third increments at each anniversary date of the awards. The RSUs awarded to Mr. Bauer on July 1, 2019 generally vest in one-half increments on the third and fourth anniversaries of the award. The market value represents the total number of unvested RSUs multiplied by the closing market price ($56.06)40.59) of the Common Stock as of September 28, 2018.30, 2020.

 

(4)(3)

The performance shares awarded on December 17, 2015,20, 2017, December 15, 201619, 2018 and December 20, 20179, 2019 generally vest after the end of three-year performance cycles ending September 30, 2018,2020, September 30, 20192021 and September 30, 2020,2022, respectively, subject to the achievement of a performance condition based on ROC or TSR.

 

  

Estimated performance through September 30, 20182020 for each of the outstanding ROC performance share awards granted on December 17, 2015, December 15, 2016 and December 20, 2017 was above targetthreshold but below maximum.target. Accordingly, the estimated number of unearned ROC performance shares is reported at the maximumtarget amount of 200%100% of each award.

 

  

Estimated performance through September 30, 20182020 for theneach of the outstanding TSR performance share awards was as follows: forcapped at the award granted on December 17, 2015, at target; for the award granted on December 15, 2016, above threshold and below target; and for the award granted on December 20, 2017, at threshold.target level payout. Accordingly, the estimated number of unearned TSR performance shares is reported at the target amount of 100% of the December 17, 2015 and December 15, 2016 awards, and at 50% of the December 20, 2017each award.

 

  

As explained in the CD&A, actual performance over the full three-year performance cycle could result in a lesser or greater payout. The market value of the unearned performance shares represents the estimated number of shares multiplied by the closing market price of the Common Stock as of September 28, 201830, 2020 ($56.06)40.59). Please refer to the narrative disclosure under the “National Fuel Gas Company 2010 Equity Compensation Plan”“Long-Term Incentive Compensation” section within this proxy statement for additional information on the performance conditions and vesting terms.

 

(5)(4)

ROC performance shares.

 

(6)(5)

TSR performance shares.

 

(7)(6)

Restricted stock units.RSUs.

Option Exercises and Stock Vested in Fiscal 20182020

The following table sets forth, as to each named executive officer, information with respect to exercises of SARs and vesting of RSUs and performance shares during the fiscal year.

 

  Option Awards   Stock Awards   Option Awards   Stock Awards 

Name

  Number of
Shares
Acquired on
Exercise
(#)(1)
   Value
Realized
on
Exercise
($)(2)
   Number of
Shares
Acquired on
Vesting
(#)
   Value
Realized
on
Vesting
($)(3)
   Number of
Shares
Acquired on
Exercise
(#)(1)
   Value
Realized
on
Exercise
($)(2)
   Number of
Shares
Acquired on
Vesting
(#)
   Value
Realized
on
Vesting
($)(3)
 

Ronald J. Tanski

   90,000    2,342,250    26,420    1,517,706 

David P. Bauer

   7,166    157,037    5,566    316,242    0    0    16,006    730,859 

Karen M. Camiolo

   0    0    4,406    201,233 

John R. Pustulka

   4,166    9,482    6,475    371,957    0    0    30,295    1,366,456 

John P. McGinnis

   4,166    9,482    9,975    566,899    0    0    23,097    1,056,817 

Carl M. Carlotti

   0    0    2,732    156,941 

Donna L. DeCarolis

   0    0    4,772    219,727 

 

(1)

Represents the aggregate number of shares of Common Stock as to which awards were exercised.

 

(2)

Represents the aggregate difference between the exercise or grant price and the fair market value of the Common Stock at exercise.

 

(3)

Represents the fair market value of the Common Stock on the vest date multiplied by the number of restricted shares, RSUs or performance shares that vested.

Fiscal 20182020 Pension Benefits

The following table sets forth information with respect to the pension benefits as of September 30, 20182020 of each of the named executive officers. The Company sponsors a non-qualified executive retirement plan, a qualified pensionretirement plan, and anon-qualified supplemental benefit plan in which thetophat plan. The named executive officers participate except as notedin these plans to the extent indicated below.

 

Name

  

Plan Name

  Number of
Years
Credited
Service
(#)(1)
  Present Value
of
Accumulated
Benefit
($)(1)
  Payments
During
Last
Fiscal Year
($)
  

Plan Name

  Number of
Years
Credited
Service
(#)(1)
  Present Value
of
Accumulated
Benefit
($)(1)
   Payments
During
Last
Fiscal Year
($)
 

Ronald J. Tanski

  Executive Retirement Plan  39   16,233,572   0

David P. Bauer

  

Executive Retirement Plan

  N/A   N/A    N/A 
  National Fuel Gas Company  38   1,951,429   0  

Retirement Plan

  18   1,070,722    0 
  Retirement Plan          

Retirement-Related Tophat

  18   2,345,648    0 

David P. Bauer

  Executive Retirement Plan  N/A   N/A   N/A

(not a participant in the ERP)

  National Fuel Gas Company  16   614,746   0

Karen M. Camiolo

  

Executive Retirement Plan

  N/A   N/A    N/A 
  Retirement Plan          

Retirement Plan

  25   1,848,259    0 
  Retirement-Related Tophat  16   1,046,989   0  

Retirement-Related Tophat

  25   1,622,063    0 

John R. Pustulka

  Executive Retirement Plan  40   7,932,894   0  

Executive Retirement Plan

  40   9,845,837    0 
  National Fuel Gas Company  40   2,028,210   0  

Retirement Plan

  40   2,280,787    0 
  Retirement Plan          

Retirement-Related Tophat

  N/A   N/A    N/A 

John P. McGinnis

  Executive Retirement Plan  N/A   N/A   N/A  

Executive Retirement Plan

  N/A   N/A    N/A 

(not a participant in either plan)

  National Fuel Gas Company  N/A   N/A   N/A
  Retirement Plan          

Retirement Plan

  N/A   N/A    N/A 
  

Retirement-Related Tophat

  N/A   N/A    N/A 

Carl M. Carlotti

  Executive Retirement Plan  33   4,070,061   0

Donna L. DeCarolis

  

Executive Retirement Plan

  38   3,129,187    0 
  National Fuel Gas Company  32   1,782,873   0  

Retirement Plan

  37   2,732,311    0 
  Retirement Plan          

Retirement-Related Tophat

  N/A   N/A    N/A 

 

(1)

For actuarial assumptions, please refer to Note H,K, Retirement Plan and Other Post-Retirement Benefits, to the Company’s 20182020 Form10-K. The Executive Retirement Plan recognizes all yearsparticipants’ first year of service, whereasbut the National Fuel Gas Company Retirement Plan excludes the first year of service.year. Benefit service under each plan is capped at 40 years.

Retirement Plan

The National Fuel Gas Company Retirement Plan (the “Retirement Plan”) is atax-qualified defined benefit plan. The base benefit under the Retirement Plan is a life annuity that is calculated by multiplying the employee’s final average pay by 1.5% and then multiplying such product by the employee’s years of credited service up to a maximum of 40 years. Final average pay is the average of the participant’s total pay during the five consecutive years of highest pay from the last ten years of participation. Total pay only includes base salary, certain lump sum payments, and annual At Risk Plan and EACIP payments. Credited service is the period that an employee is a participant in the planRetirement Plan and receives pay from the Company or one of its participating subsidiaries.

The Retirement Plan provides unreduced retirement benefits at or after age 65, or, for participants with at least ten years of service, at or after age 60. Participants may otherwise retire with no reduction in their accrued benefit on or after the date on which the sum of their age plus years of service equals ninety (“rule of 90”). Participants who are at least age 55 with 10 years of service and who do not meet the rule of 90 are eligible for and may commence early retirement with a benefit reduction of .4167% per whole month prior to age 60. The Retirement Plan does not permit the granting of extra years of credited service to the participants. The retirement benefit is available as a single life annuity or in various other annuity forms, including joint and survivor and term-certain annuities. All are calculated on an actuarially equivalent basis using a 6% interest rate and theRP-2014 Mortality Table for healthy annuitants blended 50% male and 50% female.

Messrs. Tanski,Ms. Camiolo, Mr. Pustulka and CarlottiMs. DeCarolis are currently eligible for an unreduced benefit. Mr. Bauer is a participant in the Retirement Plan, but is not yet eligible for either an unreduced or reduced retirement benefit. Mr. McGinnis is not a participant in the Retirement Plan.

Executive Retirement Plan

The National Fuel Gas Company and Participating Subsidiaries Executive Retirement Plan (the “ERP”) is anon-qualified defined benefit plan. Although the CEO of the Company is authorized to designate all participants of the ERP, no such designation has occurred since 2001.

The ERP provides atwo-part benefit: a tophat benefit and a supplemental benefit. The tophat benefit makes an ERP participant whole for any reduction in the regular pension he or she receives under the Retirement Plan resulting from Internal Revenue Code limitations. The supplemental benefit provides an additional retirement benefit to the Retirement Plan. Participants in the Retirement Plan who are not designated to participate in the ERP will receive a retirement-related tophat benefit under a separate Tophat Plan (discussed below under Fiscal 2018“Fiscal 2020 Nonqualified Defined Contribution and Other Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plans)Plans”), if appropriate based on the Internal Revenue Code limitations.

The tophat benefit under the ERP vests in the same manner and subject to the same service requirements that apply to the Retirement Plan. The supplemental benefit under the ERP vests at age 55 and completion of five years of credited service. An ERP participant who vests in the tophat benefit, but does not vest in the supplemental benefit, receives only a tophat benefit. A participant who is vested in both the tophat benefit and the supplemental benefit and who terminates service with the Company before age 65 receives the tophat benefit and a portion of the supplemental benefit that is based upon the participant’s age and years of credited service. For the Executive Retirement Plan,ERP, credited service is the number of years the participant has been employed by the Company or one of its participating subsidiaries, not to exceed 40 years.

The tophat benefit is stated as a life annuity that is calculated as the difference between (a) and (b), where (a) is the benefit the ERP participant would have received under the Retirement Plan but for the limitations imposed by the Internal Revenue Code and (b) is the base benefit the participant receives under the Retirement Plan.

Assuming retirement at age 65, the supplemental benefit is stated as a life annuity that is calculated using the following formula:

(a) 1.97% of final average pay for each year of service not in excess of 30 years; plus

(b) 1.32% of final average pay for each of the next 10 years of service that are in excess of 30 (but not to exceed 10); minus

(c) 1.25% of an assumed Social Security benefit (calculated as if the participant had no future wages) for each year of service not in excess of 40 years; minus

(d) the participant’s base benefit under the Retirement Plan; minus

(e) the participant’s tophat benefit.

Final average pay under the ERP is the same as under the Retirement Plan, but without the compensation limitations imposed by the Internal Revenue Code.

If a participant retires on or after age 62, but before age 65, the supplemental benefit is reduced by 1/2 of 1% for each whole month prior to age 65. If a participant retires before age 62, the supplemental benefit is further reduced by 1% for each whole month between age 55 years and 2 months and age 62. Furthermore, the member’s supplemental benefit shall be increased by .125% for each whole calendar month by which a member’s years of service exceed 30, subject to a maximum of 40 years.

The normal form of benefit under the ERP is a four-year period certain annuity that is actuarially equivalent to thelump-sum present value (calculated using the most recently published mortality table that is generally accepted by American actuaries and reasonably applicable to the ERP, and a 6six percent discount rate) of the sum of the participant’s tophat benefit and supplemental benefit (if the participant is vested therein). Other available forms of payment include single life,ten-year period certain and life, and joint and survivor annuities.

Fiscal 20182020 Nonqualified Defined Contribution and Other Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plans

The Deferred Compensation Plan (the “DCP”) is anon-qualified deferred compensation plan, which was instituted for certain high-level management employees of the Company and certain subsidiaries. The DCP is not an active plan and has been closed with no deferrals since July 31, 2002. The purpose of the DCP was to provide retirement/savings financial planning opportunities, which were not available to the officers in the qualified retirement plans due to Internal Revenue Code limitations. All account balances are subject to the general creditors of the Company.

DCP participants were able to defer receipt of portions of their salaries and bonuses, to be paid to them following retirement, termination of employment, death or earlier in certain circumstances. The participants were eligible to elect a “Savings” and/or a “Retirement” account. The participant signed a contract selecting the amount to be deferred for the upcoming deferral period, the type of account (Savings and/or Retirement), annuity term (5, 10 or 15 years) if a Retirement account and up to three payment dates with percentages and/or dollar amounts if a Savings account. The annuity for the Retirement account is determined by setting the interest rate on all outstanding balances at 135% of the average of the Moody’s Index (as defined below) in effect for the60-month period that ends with the month preceding the month of retirement.

Beginning with deferrals after May 1, 1994, the participants could select a Savings and/or a Retirement account. The two investment choices were the Moody’s Composite Average of Yields on

Corporate Bonds (“Moody’s Index”) in effect for the month of May prior to the plan year beginning August 1 and a return equal to the total return of the Standard and Poor’s 500 stock index minus 1.2% per annum (“S&P 500 Minus 1.2% Election”). The participant could select either the Moody’s Index or the S&P 500 Minus 1.2% Election, but not both within the same account. In addition, participants with deferrals after May 1, 1994 could elect to defer their Savings and Retirement account balance past their retirement date, but not past age 70.

The DCP deferral contract indicates the participant’s investment selection and future payouts or retirement choices regarding the term of the annuity (5, 10 or 15 years). A participant who selected the S&P 500 Minus 1.2% Election for his Retirement account may, after he reaches age 55, switch once to the Moody’s Index. For a participant who retires and elected to invest in the S&P 500 Minus 1.2% Election, the investment’s return will assume the Moody’s Index six months prior to his retirement date in order to determine the final benefit.

The Company also maintains anon-qualified Tophat Plan (the “Tophat Plan”) that provides restoration of benefits lost under the Retirement Plan (see Fiscal 20182020 Pension Benefits) and/or theTax-Deferred Savings Plan (the 401(k) plan) due to the effect of Internal Revenue Code limits. See notes (b) and (c) under the All Other Compensation Table. The Company pays the 401(k) tophat benefit and the RSA tophat benefit under the Tophat Plan no later than March 15 of the calendar year following the year in which the benefits were earned.

The following table reflects the contributions, earnings, distributions and total balance of the DCP and the 401(k) and RSA benefits under the Tophat Plan:

Fiscal 2020 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

 

Name

  Executive
Contributions
in Last FY
($)
  Registrant
Contributions
in Last FY
($)(1)
  Aggregate
Earnings (Loss)
in Last FY
($)(2)
  Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distributions
($)(3)
  Aggregate
Balance at
Last FYE
($)(4)
  Executive
Contributions
in Last FY
($)
   Registrant
Contributions
in Last FY
($)(1)
   Aggregate
Earnings (Loss)
in Last FY
($)(2)
   Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distributions
($)(3)
   Aggregate
Balance at
Last FYE
($)(4)
 

Ronald J. Tanski — Tophat Plan

   0   139,619   0   125,133   128,369

David P. Bauer — Tophat Plan

   0   51,516   0   49,205   47,316   0    98,343    0    61,205    90,543 

Karen M. Camiolo — Tophat Plan

   0    23,240    0    23,645    21,215 

John R. Pustulka — Tophat Plan

   0   84,332   0   67,873   78,257   0    99,750    0    86,396    92,100 

— DCP

   0   0   15,386   0   188,850   0    0    15,532    0    211,627 

John P. McGinnis — Tophat Plan

   0   70,296   0   65,717   61,421   0    66,105    0    68,472    55,730 

Carl M. Carlotti — Tophat Plan

   0   49,049   0   45,818   45,074

Donna L. DeCarolis — Tophat Plan

   0    58,423    0    43,713    54,448 

 

(1)

All amounts in this column are reported as fiscal 20182020 compensation in the Fiscal 20182020 Summary Compensation Table. Refer to notes (b) and (c) to the All Other Compensation Table.

 

(2)

This column represents the net earnings during the fiscal year for the DCP. Mr. Pustulka’s earnings includeFor fiscal 2020, there were no above-market earnings associated withunder the Moody’s Index of $904, which amount is reflectedDCP and, therefore, the amounts in this column are not disclosed in the “Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings” column of the Fiscal 20182020 Summary Compensation Table.

 

(3)

This column represents the annual payment of the 401(k) and RSA benefits under the Tophat Plan for the calendar year ended December 31, 2017,2019, which were paid in January 2018.2020.

 

(4)

This column includes the balance of the 401(k) and RSA benefits under the Tophat Plan for each named executive officer and the DCP balance for Mr. Pustulka, the only named executive officer in the DCP. These balances reflect amounts previously reported as compensation to the named executive officers in the Company’s Summary Compensation Tables for prior years.

Fiscal 20182020 Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

The information below describes and quantifies certain compensation that would become payable under existing plans and arrangements if the named executive officers’ employment had terminated on September 28, 201830, 2020 (the last business day of the Company’s fiscal year), assuming each named executive officer’s compensation and service levels as of that date and, if applicable, based on the closing price of the Common Stock on that date ($56.0640.59 per share). These benefits are in addition to benefits available

generally to most salaried employees. Due to the number of factors that affect the nature and amount of any benefit provided upon the events discussed below, any actual amounts paid or distributed in the future may be different from the amounts contained in the following tables. Factors that could affect these amounts include the timing during the year of any such event, the market value of the Common Stock and the named executive officer’s age.

National Fuel Gas Company 1997 Award and Option Plan

Awards outstanding to named executive officers at September 28, 201830, 2020 under the National Fuel Gas Company 1997 Award and Option Plan included SARs (all of which were vested) and restricted stock.

Stock Appreciation Rights (SARs) — A change in ownership and certain terminations within three years following a change in control, as described below, will trigger payment of the value of vested SARs.

Restricted Stock — Mr. McGinnis was awarded 20,000 shares of restricted stock on September 17, 2009. The vesting restrictions on these shares lapselapsed on November 14, 2020. In the eventIf Mr. McGinnis’ employment terminateshad terminated by reason of death or disability on September 30, 2020, the restrictions will lapse. The estimated value of the 20,000 shares of restricted stock upon death or disability on September 28, 2018 would have been $1,121,200 based on the closing price of the Common Stock onlapsed at that date.

Iftime. In addition, if a change in ownership had occurred on September 28, 201830, 2020 or Mr. McGinnis had been terminated due to a change in control as described below, the restrictions on his restricted stock would have lapsed. The estimated value of the 20,000 shares of restricted stock on September 30, 2020 was $811,800, based on the closing price of the Common Stock on that date.

Change in Ownership and Change inControl— If there is a change in ownership or a named executive officer’s employment terminates within three years following a change in control, unless the termination is due to death, disability, retirement, cause, or resignation by the named executive officer other than for good reason, then all terms and conditions on outstanding awards would lapse, and all unvested awards become vested. In addition, any outstanding awards are cashed out based on the fair market value of the Common Stock.

The following table represents the estimated values of already vested SARs outstanding to the named executive officers under this planthe 1997 Award and Option Plan did not have any value as of September 28, 2018.30, 2020, as the grant price of the SARs exceeded the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on that date.

Name

 Payment Due on
Already Vested
SARs ($)
 

Name

 Payment Due on
Already Vested
SARs ($)

Ronald J. Tanski

   24,250 

John P. McGinnis

   0

David P. Bauer

   4,850 

Carl M. Carlotti

   4,850

John R. Pustulka

   538,150   

Under the 1997 Award and Option Plan, “change in ownership” means a change which results in the Common Stock ceasing to be actively traded on a national securities exchange or the National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotation System.

A “change in control” generally occurs when (a) any person other than the Company, a subsidiary or any employee benefit plan sponsored by the Company is the beneficial owner, directly or indirectly, of twenty percent (20%) or more of the voting power of the outstanding stock of the Company; (b) a consolidation or merger occurs and the persons who, immediately prior to the consolidation or merger, held the capital stock of the Company do not hold, immediately following, (i) at least a majority of the stock entitled to vote in the election of directors of the surviving corporation, or (ii) stock in the surviving corporation that represents at least 50% of the fair market value of all classes of stock of that entity, in either case, in substantially the same proportionate ownership as immediately before the consolidation or merger; (c) there is any sale, lease, exchange or other transfer of all or substantially all the assets of the Company; or (d) individuals who constituted the Board of Directors of the Company on January 1, 1997 (the “Incumbent Board”) have ceased to constitute at least a majority, provided that any person becoming a director subsequent to January 1, 1997, whose election, or nomination for election by the Company’s stockholders, was approved by a vote of at least three-quarters of the directors comprising the Incumbent Board, shall be considered as though such person was a member of the Incumbent Board.

“Good reason” means a good faith determination made by a named executive officer that the Company has materially reduced the responsibilities, prestige or scope of the named executive officer’s position. Examples include the assignment to the named executive officer of duties inconsistent with the named executive officer’s position, assignment of the executive to another place of employment more

than 30 miles from the named executive officer’s current place of employment, or reduction in the named executive officer’s total compensation or benefits. The named executive officer must specify the event relied upon for his or her determination by written notice to the Board of Directors within six months after the occurrence of the event.

National Fuel Gas Company 2010 Equity Compensation Plan

Awards outstanding to named executive officers at September 28, 201830, 2020 under the National Fuel Gas Company 2010 Equity Compensation Plan included SARs (all of which were vested), Performance Sharesperformance shares and RSUs.

SARs — In connection with a change in control as described below, the Compensation Committee may provide that each SAR shall be canceled in exchange for a cash payment equal to the excess of fair market value over the grant price of the SAR.

Performance Shares — Termination of employment due to death, disability or retirement, or due to a divestiture by the Company of one or more subsidiaries that does not amount to a change in control, results in the vesting of a conditional right. Payment of the Performance Sharesperformance shares remains subject to satisfaction of the applicable performance conditions, and the named executive officer would be entitled to a distribution of the same number of performance shares that would be payable for the performance period had the named executive officer’s service with the Company continued until the end of the applicable performance period,pro-rated to reflect the time period from the commencement of the performance period through the date of termination.

The following table represents the estimated value of Performance Sharesperformance shares at September 28, 2018,30, 2020, assuming a qualifying termination on that date, performance at the target level of performance, and the closing price of the Common Stock on that date.

 

Name

 Value of
Performance
Shares
($)
 

Name

 Value of
Performance
Shares
($)
 Value of
Performance
Shares
($)
 

Name

 Value of
Performance
Shares
($)
 

Ronald J. Tanski

 8,412,999 

John P. McGinnis

 1,568,110

David P. Bauer

 876,853 

Carl M. Carlotti

 1,691,218 1,075,851  

John P. McGinnis

 1,502,075 

Karen M. Camiolo

 268,247  

Donna L. DeCarolis

 493,681 

John R. Pustulka

 2,649,582   2,704,864   

In connection with a change in control as described below, Performance Sharesperformance shares are deemed earned at the target level of performance, and the Compensation Committee may provide that the Performance Sharesperformance shares be settled in cash.

Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) — Termination of employment due to death, disability, or retirement, or due to a divestiture by the Company of one or more subsidiaries that does not amount to a change in control, results in the vesting of RSUs.

The following table represents the estimated value of RSUs at September 28, 2018,30, 2020, assuming a qualifying termination on that date and the closing price of the Common Stock on that date.

 

Name

 Value of RSUs
($)
 

Name

 Value of RSUs
($)
 Value of RSUs
($)
 

Name

 Value of RSUs
($)
 

Ronald J. Tanski

 0 

John P. McGinnis

 782,429

David P. Bauer

 487,442 

Carl M. Carlotti

 0 1,259,954  

John P. McGinnis

 904,508 

Karen M. Camiolo

 174,009  

Donna L. DeCarolis

 391,044 

John R. Pustulka

 0   N/A   

Change in Control — If there is a change in control, no acceleration of exercisability, vesting, cash settlement or other payment shall occur with respect to any award if the Compensation Committee reasonably determines in good faith, prior to the change in control, that the award will be honored or

assumed, or new rights substituted (an “Alternative Award”), by the named executive officer’s employer following the change in control; provided that any Alternative Award must:

a)(a) be based on stock traded on an established U.S. securities market;

b)(b) provide the named executive officer with substantially equivalent rights, entitlements and economic value; and

c)(c) provide that, if the named executive officer’s employment is involuntarily terminated (other than for cause) or is constructively terminated, in either case within 24 months after the change in control, then all of the named executive officer’s awards shall vest and be paid in cash or immediately transferable, publicly-traded securities in an amount equal to, in the case of a SAR, the excess of the fair market value on the date of termination over the grant price, and in the case of other awards, the fair market value of the number of shares of stock subject to the award.

If the Compensation Committee cannot make the above determination, then: each SAR then outstanding shall be exercisable regardless of the exercise schedule otherwise applicable; each outstanding RSU shall become fully vested and payable; and each outstanding performance share award shall be deemed earned at the target level of performance for the award. In addition, in connection with a change in control, the Compensation Committee may provide that each SAR shall be canceled in exchange for a cash payment equal to the excess of fair market value over the grant price of the SAR. The Compensation Committee may also direct that each RSU and performance share shall be settled in cash with its value determined based on the value received by stockholders in the change in control transaction.

The following table represents the value of awards outstanding under the 2010 Equity Compensation Plan which, upon a change in control as of September 28, 2018,30, 2020, would have been exercisable (in the case of SARs), would have become vested and payable (in the case of RSUs), or would have been deemed earned at the target level of performance (in the case of Performance Shares)performance shares), in each case, assuming an Alternative Award is not provided. The amounts below are based on the closing price of the Common Stock on September 28, 2018.30, 2020.

 

Name

 Payment Due on
Vested & Unvested
Awards ($)
 

Name

 Payment Due on
Vested & Unvested
Awards ($)
 Payment Due on
Vested & Unvested
Awards ($)
 

Name

 Payment Due on
Vested & Unvested
Awards ($)
 

Ronald J. Tanski

 12,302,075 

John P. McGinnis

 3,273,710

David P. Bauer

 1,923,822 

Carl M. Carlotti

 2,507,033 3,297,572  

John P. McGinnis

 3,387,400 

Karen M. Camiolo

 636,087  

Donna L. DeCarolis

 1,347,586 

John R. Pustulka

 4,260,856   4,455,646   

The 2010 Equity Compensation Plan provides that, if a named executive officer engages in any business or activity competitive with that of the Company, without the Company’s written consent, or the named executive officer performs any act that is against the best interests of the Company, all unexercised, unearned or unpaid awards are forfeited.

For purposes of this section, “change in control” has a meaning similar to the definition of change in control set out in the “National Fuel Gas Company 1997 Award and Option Plan” section. The main difference is that the 2010 Equity Compensation Plan provides that a change in control shall be deemed to have occurred at such time as individuals who constitute the Board of Directors of the Company at the beginning of the twelve-month period ended on the date of determination (the “Incumbent Board”) have ceased to constitute at least a majority, provided that any person becoming a director subsequent to that date whose election, or nomination for election by the Company’s stockholders, was approved by a vote of at least three-quarters of the directors comprising the Incumbent Board, shall be considered as though such person was a member of the Incumbent Board.

National Fuel Gas Company Tophat Plan

Under the Company’s Tophat Plan, the Company restores to the named executive officers benefits that may be lost under the Company’s qualified retirement benefit plans (Retirement Plan, traditional 401(k) and RSA) due to the Internal Revenue Code or qualified plan limits.

The following table represents the aggregate amount payable for the 401(k) tophat benefit and RSA tophat benefit if termination occurred September 28, 201830, 2020 due to retirement, death, disability, or involuntary termination (other than for cause), or if there was a change in control and the Company terminated the named executive officer without cause or the named executive officer terminated for good reason.

 

Name

 Payment ($) 

Name

 Payment ($) Payment ($) 

Name

 Payment ($) 

Ronald J. Tanski

 128,369 

John P. McGinnis

 61,421

David P. Bauer

 47,316 

Carl M. Carlotti

 45,074 90,543  

John P. McGinnis

 55,730 

Karen M. Camiolo

 21,215  

Donna L. DeCarolis

 54,448 

John R. Pustulka

 78,257   92,100   

The value of the tophat benefits for all other forms of termination for Messrs. Tanski,Mr. Bauer, Ms. Camiolo, Mr. Pustulka, Mr. McGinnis and CarlottiMs. DeCarolis would have been $34,725, $14,375, $21,000, $28,583$27,175, $6,370, $24,725, $33,083 and $12,700,$13,900, respectively.

Deferred Compensation Plan (the “DCP”)

Mr. Pustulka is the only named executive officer who is a participant in the DCP. Under the DCP, in the event of a termination for any reason, other than death or retirement, prior to a change in control, the participant is entitled to receive his or her retirement account balance in the form of a lump sum payment. (Note,Note, the term “change in control” under the DCP has a similar definition as provided in the 2010 Equity Compensation Plan, discussed above, except in the DCP the reference period for changes in the Board of Directors is 24 months.) Mr. Pustulka’s retirement account balance at September 28, 201830, 2020 was $188,850.$211,627.

In the case of retirement, including disability retirement, at any time, a participant in the DCP is entitled to a monthly payment (a15-year annuity, unless the participant elected to receive a5- or10-year annuity) beginning the first of the month following retirement based on his retirement account balance. If the participant dies before the commencement of the retirement annuity, the entire DCP balance will be paid in full as a lump sum payment to the participant’s beneficiary. If the participant dies after commencement of the annuity, the annuity will continue to be paid to the participant’s beneficiary for the remainder of its original term.

If termination is due to retirement or disability, the final account balance is calculated with a plan-mandated switch to the Moody’s index rate six months prior to retirement or disability for those participants who elected a return based on the S&P 500 Minus 1.2% Election. For those participants, DCP retirement and disability benefits will be different than DCP benefits provided upon death or voluntary termination other than retirement. Upon retirement or disability, Mr. Pustulka would have received aten-year annuity of $2,624$2,601 per month for the first five years, then $1,222$1,319 per month thereafter, with a present value of $182,858.$191,955.

Employment Continuation and Noncompetition Agreement

Pursuant to each named executive officer’s Employment Continuation and Noncompetition Agreement with the Company, if there is a change in control, and the named executive officer remains employed thereafter, the named executive officer’s annual salary and employee benefits are preserved for at least three years at the levels then in effect. The agreement also provides for a severance benefit and the continuation of health, welfare and fringe benefits, as described below.

Severance Benefit

 — In the event of termination of a named executive officer within three years of a change in control without cause or by the named executive officer for good reason, the named executive

officer is entitled to a single lump sum cash payment equal to 1.99 times the sum of the named executive officer’s annual base salary and the average of the annual cash bonus for the previous two fiscal years. The 1.99 multiplier is reduced on apro-rata basis if termination occurs between age 62 and age 65, at which point no amount is payable. The named executive officers are also entitled to their base salary through the date of

termination and to any vested benefits under the employee benefit plans, including any compensation previously deferred and not yet paid and any amounts payable pursuant to any agreement with the named executive officer.

The following table represents the estimated severance benefit payable as a lump sum payment.

Name

 Payment ($)  

Name

 Payment ($) 

David P. Bauer

  2,933,527  

John P. McGinnis

  2,947,721 

Karen M. Camiolo

  1,384,043  

Donna L. DeCarolis

  1,848,254 

John R. Pustulka

  N/A   

“Cause” means the named executive’s gross misconduct, fraud or dishonesty, which has resulted or is likely to result in material economic damage to the Company or its subsidiaries as determined in good faith by a vote of at leasttwo-thirds of thenon-employee directors of the Company at a meeting of the Board.

“Change in control” generally occurs when: (a) any person (as such term is used in Section 13(d) of the 1934 Act) is the beneficial owner, directly or indirectly, of 20% or more of the outstanding stock of the Company; (b) a consolidation or merger occurs and the persons who, immediately prior to the consolidation or merger, held the capital stock of the Company do not hold, immediately following, (i) the same proportionate ownership of common stock of the surviving corporation (where the Company is not the surviving corporation), or (ii) at least a majority of the common stock of the Company (where the Company is the surviving corporation); (c) there is any sale, lease, exchange or other transfer of all or substantially all the assets of the Company; or (d) there is a change in the majority of the members of the Board of Directors of the Company within a24-month period, unless the election or nomination for election by the Company’s stockholders of each new director was approved by the vote of at leasttwo-thirds of the directors then still in office who were in office at the beginning of the24-month period. However, Mr. McGinnis’ agreement provides, in place of the above, that a Change in Control occurs if the Company ceases to own more than 50% ownership of Seneca, or if the Company sells, leases, exchanges or otherwise transfers all or substantially all the assets of Seneca.

“Good reason” means there is a material diminution in the named executive officer’s responsibilities, base compensation or budget, or in the responsibilities of the person to whom the named executive officer is required to report. “Good reason” also means a requirement that the named executive officer relocate to an office outside the United States or more than 30 miles from the location at which the executive performed his services immediately prior to the change in control, or any other action or inaction that constitutes a material breach by the Company of the agreement. The Company has a period of 30 days to cure any acts which would otherwise give the executive the right to terminate his employment for good reason.

The following table represents the estimated severance benefit payable as a lump sum payment.

Name

 Payment ($)  

Name

 Payment ($) 

Ronald J. Tanski

  0  

John P. McGinnis

  2,359,830 

David P. Bauer

  2,067,365  

Carl M. Carlotti

  1,121,615 

John R. Pustulka

  0   

Continuation of Health, Welfare and Fringe Benefits

 — In addition to the severance payment, named executive officers who have not reached age 65 will be entitled to continued participation in the Company’s employee and executive health, welfare and fringe benefit plans and arrangements, excluding any vacation benefits, for eighteen months following termination (or, in the case of Mr. McGinnis, until the end of the second calendar year following termination for purposes of anynon-health-related benefit) or until the named executive officer becomes eligible for comparable benefits at a subsequent employer. The estimated value of the continuation of health benefits due to a qualifying termination of employment of an eligible named executive officer following a change in control is $36,748.$41,496 for family coverage or $15,385 for single coverage. This amount was based on 18 months of COBRA rates for the medical, drug and dental benefits. During fiscal 2018,2020, Mr. Bauer, Ms. Camiolo, Mr. McGinnis and Mr. CarlottiMs. DeCarolis participated in an arrangement providing for an allowance related to tax preparation and financial

planning, and received a payment for life insurance under the ExecutiveLife Insurance Plan. The estimated value of the continuation of these benefits at the same rates for eighteen months is $20,346$19,515 for Mr. Bauer, $19,635 for Ms. Camiolo, $20,573 for Mr. McGinnis and $21,705$20,499 for Mr. Carlotti.

Ms. DeCarolis.

The Employment Continuation and Noncompetition Agreements also provide as follows:

Retirement — Except for Mr. McGinnis, if the named executive officer is at leastfifty-two years old at the date of termination, the named executive officer will be deemed to have earned and be vested in the retirement benefits that are payable to the named executive officer under the Company retirement plans. Mr. McGinnis is vested in his benefit in the RSA.

Termination for Cause or the Executive Voluntarily Terminates — If the named executive officer’s employment is terminated for cause, death, disability, or the named executive officer voluntarily terminates his or her employment other than for good reason, the named executive officer will not be entitled to the severance benefit discussed above. The named executive officer (or his or her beneficiary) will be entitled to his or her base salary through the date of termination and to any vested benefits under the employee benefit plans, including any compensation previously deferred and not yet paid and any amounts payable pursuant to any agreement between the named executive officer and the Company. The named executive officer will also be entitled to any other benefits provided in the Company’s plans for death or disability.

Non-competition — Unless the named executive officer has elected not to be bound by thenon-compete provisions of the agreement, the Company will make a lump sum payment within 30 days following the named executive officer’s date of termination equal to one times the sum of (i) the named executive officer’s annual base salary and (ii) the average of the annual cash bonus for the previous two fiscal years. Thenon-compete payment will not be paid to the named executive officer if his or her employment is terminated by reason of death, disability, cause, or disability.retirement.

Under thenon-compete provisions of the agreement, the named executive officer may not, during the one year period following termination, directly or indirectly engage in, become employed by, serve as an agent or consultant to, or become a partner, principal or stockholder (other than a holder of less than 1% of the outstanding voting shares of any publicly held company) of any business or entity that is engaged in any activity which is competitive with the business of the Company or its subsidiaries or affiliates in any geographic area in which the Company or its subsidiaries are engaged in competitive business.

The following table represents the estimatednon-compete payment payable upon termination following a change in control as compensation for the covenant not to compete for all forms of termination except for death, disability, cause or retirement.

 

Name

 Payment ($) 

Name

 Payment ($)  Payment ($) 

Name

 Payment ($) 

Ronald J. Tanski

 2,577,952  

John P. McGinnis

 1,185,844 

David P. Bauer

 1,038,877  

Carl M. Carlotti

 1,073,339  1,474,134  

John P. McGinnis

 1,481,267 

Karen M. Camiolo

 695,495  

Donna L. DeCarolis

 928,771 

John R. Pustulka

 1,488,405    1,783,776   

National Fuel Gas Company and Participating Subsidiaries Executive Retirement Plan (the “ERP”)

Mr. Bauer, Ms. Camiolo and Mr. McGinnis are not participants in the ERP and will not receive any benefit under this plan upon termination. Under the ERP, no benefits will be payable to a named executive officer whose employment is terminated or could have been terminated for serious, willful misconduct in respect of his or her obligations to the Company, including the commission of a felony or a perpetration of a common law fraud damaging to the Company.

In addition, except when a change in control has already occurred, rights under the ERP are forfeited if the named executive officer is employed by anyone who engages in a business competitive with the Company; engages, or advises or assists others engaged in such business; endeavors to interfere with the

relations between the Company and any customer; or engages in any activity the committee administering the ERP (“ERP Committee”) deems detrimental to the Company’s best interests. From and after 60 days following cessation of such activity by the named executive officer and provision of written notice to the ERP Committee, the right to receive benefits under the ERP will be restored, unless the ERP Committee determines that the prior activity caused substantial damage to the Company.

The following table gives the estimated value of the first payment payable under the ERP that would have been due for all forms of termination except for death or termination for cause.

 

Name

  Payment ($) 

Ronald J. Tanski

4,420,402

John R. Pustulka

   2,160,1272,681,021 

Carl M. CarlottiDonna L. DeCarolis

   1,133,992858,635 

The default form of benefit payment to the named executive officers is a four-year certain annuity; therefore, if a payment is shown above, three additional payments of the same amount would be made under the ERP, one in each of the next three years as elected by the named executive officer.

If termination is due to death, a reduced payment will be calculated as a straight life annuity payment to the named executive officer’s surviving spouse/beneficiary until his or her death. The first annualized reduced payment would be $717,108 for Mr. Tanski, $350,431$457,789 for Mr. Pustulka and $175,075$111,716 for Mr. Carlotti.Ms. DeCarolis.

Post-Employment Benefits for John P. McGinnis

To the extent John P. McGinnis is employed by Seneca or another Company subsidiary until and including November 14, 2020, post-employmentPost-employment medical and prescription drug benefits will be provided to Mr. McGinnis subject to the same terms and conditions including the same monthly cost and with the same levels and types of benefits, as applicable to then-retiring officers of the Company’s utility subsidiary.subsidiary, including the same monthly cost and same levels and types of benefits. Mr. McGinnis will forfeit these benefits if he resigns before November 14, 2020 or if the Company or one of its subsidiaries terminates his employment at any time.

Summary of Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

The following table provides estimated values of total benefits for each named executive officer if termination had occurred on September 28, 2018.30, 2020. As disclosed in the table above under “National Fuel Gas Company and Participating Subsidiaries Executive Retirement Plan (the “ERP”),” the ERP benefit included in the following estimated values represents the first payment due upon termination.

 

  Potential Payments Upon Termination Other than in
Connection with a Change in Control
  Potential Payments Upon Termination
Following a Change in Control
  Potential Payments Upon Termination Other than in
Connection with a Change in Control
   Potential Payments Upon Termination
Following a Change in Control
 

Executive Benefits

and Payments

Upon Termination

For:

  Voluntary
Termination
($)
  Retirement
($)(1)
  Death
($)
  Disability
($)
  Company
Terminates
Without
Cause
and/or
Executive
Terminates
for Good
Reason
($)
  Company
Terminates
for Cause
($)
  Executive
Terminates
Voluntarily
Other
than for
Good
Reason
($)
  Voluntary
Termination
($)
   Retirement
($)(1)
   Death
($)
   Disability
($)
   Company
Terminates
Without
Cause
and/or
Executive
Terminates
for Good
Reason
($)
   Company
Terminates
for Cause
($)
   Executive
Terminates
Voluntarily
Other
than for
Good
Reason
($)
 

Ronald J. Tanski

   4,455,127   12,961,770   9,258,476   12,961,770   19,453,048   2,612,677   7,033,079

David P. Bauer

   14,375   N/A   1,411,611   1,411,611   5,118,978   1,053,252   1,540,694   27,175    N/A    2,426,349    2,426,349    7,856,788    1,501,309    2,761,263 

Karen M. Camiolo

   6,370    289,461    463,470    463,470    2,771,863    701,869    875,878 

John R. Pustulka

   2,369,977   5,070,824   3,267,120   5,070,824   8,714,645   1,698,255   3,858,382   2,917,373    5,669,939    3,446,379    5,699,939    9,224,169    2,020,128    4,701,149 

John P. McGinnis

   28,583   61,421   3,533,161   3,533,161   8,059,098   1,214,427   1,996,856   33,083    55,730    3,274,111    3,274,111    8,745,985    1,514,350    2,418,858 

Carl M. Carlotti

   1,146,692   2,870,284   1,911,367   2,870,284   5,944,355   1,086,039   2,220,031

Donna L. DeCarolis

   872,535    1,406,766    1,050,891    1,797,810    5,099,691    942,671    2,192,350 

 

(1)

“Retirement” will be “N/A” if the named executive officer was not eligible to retire on September 28, 2018.30, 2020. In that case, the Company would have accrued benefits payable to the named executive officer; the accrued amounts are included in the other columns for the different types of terminations.

CEO Pay Ratio

Pursuant to SEC rules, we are providing information about the relationship of the annual total compensation of Mr. Tanski,Bauer, our President and Chief Executive Officer, and the median of the annual total compensation of all of our employees other than Mr. Tanski.Bauer. We identified our median employee by

examining fiscal year base wages plus cash bonuses of all individuals employed by us and our consolidated subsidiaries on September 30, 20182020 (other than Mr. Tanski)Bauer), whether full-time, part-time, or on a seasonal or temporary basis. We annualized wages and salaries for all permanent employees, as permitted by SEC rules. Once we identified our median employee, we added together all of the elements of that employee’s compensation for fiscal 20182020 in the same way that we calculate the annual total compensation of our named executive officers in the Summary Compensation Table.

For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2018:2020:

 

the median of the annual total compensation of all employees of the Company other than the CEO was reasonably estimated to be $82,858;$77,963;

 

the annual total compensation of the CEO was $8,084,177;$4,959,915; and

 

based on this information, the ratio of the annual total compensation of the CEO to the median of the annual total compensation of all other employees is estimated to be 9864 to 1.

Executive Officer and Director Hedging

The Company’s policy regarding hedging or offsetting any decrease in the market value of Company securities is set forth in the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, included as Appendix B to this proxy statement (see “Hedging or Pledging of Company Stock”). The policy applies to the Company’s directors and executive officers. Under the policy, the Company’s directors and executive officers should not purchase or sell options on Company stock, and should not engage in short sales with respect to Company common stock. Trading by the Company’s executive officers and directors in puts, calls, straddles, equity swaps or other derivative securities that are directly linked to Company stock is prohibited. Further, the Company’s directors and executive officers may not pledge Company equity as security for an extension of credit. In addition, the Company’s insider trading policy prohibits employees, officers and directors, when in possession of material nonpublic information, from conducting any open market or private purchase or sale of Company securities, or any derivative of such a security whether or not issued by the Company (“put” or “call” options, equity swaps, collars, prepaid variable forward sales contracts, exchange funds, etc., that are designed to hedge a Company security). The insider trading policy also provides that any purchases or sales of Company securities intended by an employee, officer or director to qualify as transactions pursuant to a “Rule 10b5-1 plan” must occur without entrance into or alteration of a hedging transaction or position with respect to the Company securities that are subject to the plan.

PROPOSAL 2. ADVISORY APPROVAL OF NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION

COMPENSATION

In accordance with Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, we are asking stockholders for approval of the following advisory resolution on executive compensation:

“RESOLVED, that the compensation paid to the Company’s named executive officers, as disclosed herein pursuant to Item 402 of RegulationS-K and described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, accompanying compensation tables and related narrative discussion, is hereby approved.APPROVED.

This proposal allows stockholders to take part in anon-binding, advisory vote to approve the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers. The Board recommends a voteFOR this resolution because it believes that the Company’s compensation policies and procedures encourage a culture of pay for performance and are strongly aligned with the interests of the Company’s stockholders.

Fiscal 2018 was another successful year with strong financial and operational results for National Fuel. Over the course of the year, our Exploration & Production subsidiary, Seneca Resources Company, LLC (“Seneca”), set company records for production and proved reserves. Seneca’s production increase also drove the continued growth of our Gathering subsidiary, National Fuel Gas Midstream Company, LLC, which set a company record for throughput in 2018. Lower taxes from tax legislation enacted in late calendar 2017 served as a tailwind throughout the year, helping to offset the decline in realized natural gas pricing experienced by Seneca.

Despite significant regulatory hurdles placed in our path by state regulators over the past couple of years, our FERC-regulated Pipeline & Storage business continued to create meaningful opportunities for further expansion that leverage the location of our existing asset base. In May 2018, we announced our FM100 Project, which in conjunction with a third-party downstream interstate pipeline project, will provide an important outlet for Seneca’s growing production in the Appalachian basin, allowing it to reach premium markets. We are targeting the close of calendar 2021 for the startup of this 330,000 dekatherm per day project. Our Utility business continued to deliver consistent and predictable earnings while providing safe and reliable service for the 750,200 customers located in our Western New York and Northwest Pennsylvania service territories.

As we look into 2019 and beyond, we have significant opportunities in front of us to invest in our regulated businesses, expanding and modernizing our transmission, storage and distribution assets. In the Exploration and Production business, Seneca’s acreage position remains one of the largest in the basin and, as a provenlow-cost producer, with the vast majority of our natural gas rights owned in fee, we have the ability to capitalize on opportunities as pricing and returns warrant. Ourco-development of the Marcellus and Utica shales, along with owning and efficiently operating the associated gathering infrastructure, allows us to achieve enhanced returns.

We expect Seneca production and Gathering segment revenue growth to be driven by a third drilling rig that Seneca added in May 2018. We will continue our transition to development of the Utica Shale in our Western Development Area (“WDA”), returning to existing Marcellus pads to drill new wells in the deeper Utica formation. By utilizing existing infrastructure to support Seneca’s growing production, we expect to drive enhanced consolidated upstream and midstream returns and minimize our environmental footprint. In our Eastern Development Area (“EDA”), the commissioning of the Atlantic Sunrise project in October 2018 has provided the Company with an important avenue to further develop our acreage in Lycoming County, Pennsylvania, one of the most prolific positions in Appalachia.

2018 Financial and Operating Highlights:

Increased Dividend for 48th Consecutive Year: In June, the Board of Directors increased the Company’s annual dividend rate by 2.4% to $1.70 per share, marking the 48th year of consecutive dividend increases and 116th year of uninterrupted dividend payments. The financial stability afforded by our integrated operations supports the Company’s dividend.

Generated Significant Free Cash Flow: The Company’s net cash provided from operating activities totaled $613.6 million in fiscal 2018, and our net cash used in investing activities was $528.9 million. The excess cash flow was the result of the Company’s efforts to prudently manage and mitigate financial risks and efficiently allocate capital for reinvestment in the business.

Continued Appalachian Natural Gas Production Growth: Seneca generated net production of 178.1 billion cubic feet equivalent (“Bcfe”) in fiscal 2018, an increase of 2.6 percent versus the prior year. The increase was driven by higher natural gas production in Appalachia, which increased 4.2 percent versus 2017. The higher output was also the primary driver of the Gathering segment’s performance in fiscal 2018, which saw a 2 percent throughput increase. With the anticipation of additional pipeline capacity out of the basin in late calendar 2021, the Company returned to athree-rig program for the first time since January 2016.

Increased Proved Reserves: Seneca’s total proved natural gas and crude oil reserves at September 30, 2018 increased 17 percent to 2,523 Bcfe from 2,154 Bcfe at September 30, 2017.

Continued Development of the Utica Shale in Appalachia: In fiscal 2018, Seneca made significant progress in the testing and appraisal of the Utica shale in both the Company’s WDA and EDA operations in Pennsylvania. Seneca now has 11 Utica wells producing in the WDA, and an additional500-plus locations prospective for Utica development in this area. Additionally, Seneca resumed Utica development in the EDA (Tioga County) during the third quarter of fiscal 2018, where it has over 40 Utica locations remaining. As of September 30, 2018, nearly 20 percent of the Company’s proved reserves are in the Utica Shale formation.

Continued Expansion of Interstate Pipeline Systems: In fiscal 2018, Empire Pipeline, Inc. (“Empire”) filed its application with the FERC for authorization to construct its Empire North Project. With an estimated capital cost of $145 million and a targetin-service date in the second half of fiscal 2020, this fully-subscribed project is designed to provide 205,000 Dth/day of incremental firm transportation capacity from Tioga County, Pennsylvania to markets along Empire’s interstate pipeline system. Additionally, in May 2018, National Fuel Gas Supply Corporation (“Supply Corporation”) executed a long-term precedent agreement with Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC (“Transco”), under which Transco will lease 330,000 Dth/day of incremental capacity created by an expansion component of Supply Corporation’s FM100 Project. The FM100 Project has an estimated capital cost of $280 million and a targetin-service date of late calendar year 2021. Transco will utilize this leased capacity to provide Seneca with 330,000 Dth/day of incremental firm transportation from the WDA and EDA to premiumMid-Atlantic markets connected to Zone 6 of the Transco pipeline system.

Supply Corporation and Empire also continue to pursue the development of, and remain committed to, the Northern Access Project, an approximately $500 million expansion of their respective pipeline systems in New York and Pennsylvania, which would move 490,000 Dth/day of Seneca’s WDA production to interconnections with Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, L.L.C. and TransCanada Corporation. In August 2018, the Company received a favorable decision from the FERC, finding that the New York Department of Environmental Conservation waived its authority to act on our application for a water quality certification. In light of ongoing legal actions and the need to complete project development activities in advance of construction, the targetin-service date for Northern Access is no earlier than the first half of fiscal 2022.

Utility Continued Focus on System Improvement: In fiscal 2018, the Utility segment invested $69.9 million in the safety and reliability of its system, replacing 153 miles of older pipelines in New York and Pennsylvania. The Company’s replacement of aging natural gas infrastructure improves safety and reliability of the system and leads to fewer leaks, directly resulting in lower greenhouse gas emissions. In addition, through the efforts of its dedicated employees, our Utility continued to provide exceptional customer service and recorded high levels of customer satisfaction in both states.

LOGO

Ongoing Development Plans

National Fuel remains committed to its long-term strategy of safe and financially prudent development of its natural gas assets in Appalachia via its integrated business model. Our capital intensive operations require a focus on strategic initiatives, including those between subsidiaries, which may take several years from business planning through completion. The results of this focus include:

Ongoing Major Interstate Pipeline Expansion and Modernization Projects: As Seneca continues to develop its vast acreage position in the WDA, the Company is working to build the pipeline infrastructure necessary to move Seneca and third-party production from Pennsylvania to premium markets outside of the Appalachian basin. While Supply Corporation and Empire remain involved in various legal challenges to move forward construction of their Northern Access expansion project, the Company has continued to develop new projects to leverage its existing assets in Appalachia to move production to demand centers, including the FM100 (330,000 Dth/day), Empire North (205,000 Dth/day), and Line N to Monaca projects (133,000 Dth/day). Collectively, these projects represent investments of approximately $450 million by our Pipeline & Storage business.

Additionally, the Pipeline & Storage segment expects to continue its accelerated system modernization efforts over the next two to four years. Investments in system modernization, such as pipeline replacement and compression facility upgrades, are designed in a manner that will enhance safety and reliability and reduce environmental impact.

Integrated Upstream and Midstream Development in Appalachia:The Company continues to execute a multi-year plan to develop and grow our upstream and midstream assets in Appalachia. The strategy leverages the exceptional resource potential within our 785,000 net acres in the Marcellus and Utica shales, the geographic integration of our valuable pipeline footprint in Appalachia, and the operational and financial synergies that are generated from the Company’s integrated business structure. With the addition of a third drilling rig in fiscal 2018, the Company expects ongoing production growth and Gathering segment revenue growth over the next several years.

Investment in Safe and Reliable Utility System:The Company’s Utility segment will continue to direct capital spending to pipeline repair, replacement and maintenance to support its statutory obligation to provide safe and reliable service for our customers.

Acceptance of the EPA’sMethane Challenge:The Company recently announced its participation in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Natural Gas STAR Methane Challenge Program, a voluntary program designed to provide a platform for utilities, pipeline and storage companies, and energy producers to make, track, and communicate commitments to reduce methane emissions. In connection with this program, and in furtherance of our longstanding commitment to safe and responsible operations, the Company will analyze new and innovative approaches for further emission reduction and explore the expansion of current best management practices and the applicability of future best practices.

CEO Compensation in Alignment with Peers

As described in the 2018 Financial and Operating Highlights above, fiscal 2018 was another strong year financially and operationally for National Fuel. CEO compensation is targeted to be within the 50th to 75th percentiles of the Korn Ferry Energy Industry market data. The Compensation Committee understands the importance of using benchmark data that reflects information from companies with comparable business segments over similar time periods. Reflected in the table below is Korn Ferry’s comparison of fiscal 2017 total direct compensation for the Company’s CEO (Mr. Tanski) against that of CEOs in our Korn Ferry peer group. The Company’s CEO target total direct compensation, shown in the table below, is in line with that of our peers (43rd percentile). Actual total direct compensation, which includes compensation resulting from performance against annual incentive goals, was at the 45th percentile of our peers.

Fiscal 2017 is the most recent complete fiscal year for which proxy statement data is available. Fiscal 2018 compensation cannot yet be accurately compared to peers because 2018 compensation data for most of those peers is not yet available.

CEO & President

Compared to CEO proxy data for fiscal year 2017

               Total Direct
Compensation

Company

 

Title

 

FYE
Revenue

(millions)

 

Market Cap
as of 9/30/17

(millions)

 

FYE # of

Employees

 Actual Target  

ATMOS ENERGY CORP

 CEO $2,760 $8,893 4,565 $4,583,351 $4,342,068  

CABOT OIL & GAS CORP

 Chairman, CEO & President $1,764 $12,372 468 $12,122,248 $10,903,498  

ENERGEN CORP

 Chairman, President & CEO $961 $5,315 390 $6,796,850 $6,341,430  

EQT CORP

 President & CEO $3,378 $11,308 2,067 $8,001,614 $6,851,589  

MDU RESOURCES GROUP INC

 President & CEO $4,443 $5,068 10,140 $3,674,303 $3,090,046  

NEW JERSEY RESOURCES CORP

 Chairman, CEO & President $2,269 $3,648 1,052 $2,575,759 $2,357,459  

RANGE RESOURCES CORP

 Chairman, President & CEO $2,611 $4,856 773 $8,505,649 $8,615,649  

SM ENERGY CO

 President & CEO $1,129 $1,980 635 $7,346,339 $6,812,800  

SOUTHWESTERN ENERGY CO

 President & CEO $3,203 $3,111 1,575 $8,547,712 $8,593,252  

SOUTHWEST GAS HOLDINGS INC

 President & CEO $2,549 $3,695 7,771 $3,495,921 $3,322,671  

SPIRE INC

 CEO & President $1,741 $3,603 3,279 $3,211,544 $3,181,544  

UGI CORP

 Vice Chair, President & CEO $6,121 $8,124 13,000 $6,476,859 $6,635,265  

WGL HOLDINGS INC

 Chairman & CEO $2,355 $4,313 1,500 $4,032,943 $3,824,362  

WHITING PETROLEUM CORP

 President & CEO $1,481 $2,010 830 $5,775,000 $6,116,500  

Summary Statistics

            

75th Percentile

  $3,092 $7,422 4,244 $7,837,795 $6,841,892  

Average

  $2,626 $5,592 3,432 $6,081,864 $5,784,867  

Median

  $2,452 $4,584 1,538 $6,125,930 $6,228,965  

25th Percentile

  $1,747 $3,614 787 $3,763,963 $3,448,094  

NATIONAL FUEL GAS CO

 CEO & President $1,580 $4,841 2,100 $5,603,294 $5,324,913  

Percentile Rank

   18% 54% 62% 45% 43%  

LOGO

NOTE:

Total Direct Compensation = base salary + bonus + long-term incentives (target value for cash and grant date value for equity)

© 2018 Korn Ferry. All rights reserved

1

As a result of stockholder feedback, the Company has fully transitioned its long-term incentive program from one awarded partially in cash to one awarded fully in equity. For the Company’s CEO and certain other named executive officers, 100 percent of the long-term incentive award is performance-based relative to the Korn Ferry peer group.

Compensation Summary and Overview

Objectives of the Compensation Committee

When setting compensation for the Company’s executives, the Compensation Committee’s primary goal is to provide balanced incentives for creating value for stockholders in both the near-term and long-term. In order for this to occur, the Compensation Committee awards a combination of cash and equity components that are designed to:

Ø

Focus management efforts on both near-term and long-term drivers of stockholder value;

Ø

Tie executive compensation to long-term TSR and long-term total ROC by linking a significant portion of an executive officer’s potential compensation to the future price of the Company’s common stock and the future returns on capital achieved by the Company, both relative to peers; and

Ø

Attract, motivate, reward and retain management talent in the highly competitive energy industry in order to achieve the objectives that contribute to the overall success of the Company.

Elements of Compensation

The Compensation Committee has developed the Company’s compensation policies and procedures to align the interests of executives with those of the Company’s stockholders and, where appropriate, other stakeholders, including customers. The main elements of the executive compensation program are as follows:

Ø

Base Salary (Cash) — Provides a predictable base compensation forday-to-day job performance;

Ø

Short-Term Performance Incentives (Cash) — Utilizes metrics specific to each executive in order to motivate them to deliver near-term financial, safety, environmental, and customer service results, generally over a period that is no longer than two years; and

Ø

Long-Term Performance Incentives (Equity) — Focuses the attention of executives on delivering long-term stockholder value and on maintaining a significant personal investment in the Company through stock ownership.

For fiscal 2018, 81% of our CEO’s target compensation was tied to long-term(3-year) performance or shorter-term business performance, as reflected in the charts below (target compensation consists of base salary, target annual incentive, and grant date fair value of the long-term incentive award).

CEO Compensation Aligned with Shareholders’ Interests

LOGO

81% Variable Compensation Key Factors Performance Shares 60% 50% Total Return on Capital (3-year average ROC vs. peer group) 50% Total Shareholder Return (3-year TSR vs. peer group) Annual Incentive 21% Goals relate to earnings, safety and costs 81% of Target Compensation is Tied to 3-Year Performance Base Salary 81% of Target Compensation is Tied to 3-Year Performance or Short-Term Business Performance

*

Fiscal 2018 target compensation for CEO

CEO and Other Named Executive Officer Target Compensation

LOGO

President & CEO 2018 T:n"get Compensation Structure Performance Shares 60% Annual Incentive 21% Base Salary 19% Other Named Executive Officers' 2018 Average Target Compensation Structure Restricted Stock Units 8% Performance Shares 39% Annual Incentive 24% Base Salary 29%

Key Compensation Features

Ø

Annual performance incentives of the named executive officers are based on objective performance goals;

Ø

Long-term performance incentives are composed entirely of equity;

Ø

Long-term performance goals consist of three-year total shareholder return (“TSR”) and three-year total return on capital (“ROC”), each relative to a peer group;

Ø

The Company does not provide tax“gross-ups”;

Ø

Named executive officers and other officers are required to meet stock ownership guidelines that range from one to six times base salary;

Ø

Executive officers may not hedge or pledge Company stock;

Ø

Equity incentive plans prohibit the repricing of equity awards without stockholder approval;

Ø

The Committee engaged two independent compensation consultants to assist in setting compensation;

Ø

Allchange-in-control agreements are double triggered; and

Ø

The Board has adopted a clawback provision (see “Recovery of Funds” in the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, included as Appendix B to this proxy statement).

2018Say-on-Pay Vote and Stockholder Engagement

The 2018Say-on-Pay advisory vote yielded a result of approximately 97% of votes cast in support of the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers. The Board considered this outcome an indicator of stockholder support for the overall philosophy and structure of the Company’s executive compensation policies and decisions. As a result, the Committee did not make any significant changes to the executive compensation program that were based specifically on the results of the 2018Say-on-Pay advisory vote.

In recent years, including 2018, members of Company management have heldin-person meetings with some of the Company’s largest stockholders to obtain feedback on the Company’s compensation program, among other topics. Several of the Company’s largest stockholders have informed the Company that scheduling such visits every two to three years is appropriate. Management engages with the Company’s stockholders in telephone conferences and intends to schedulein-person meetings in 2019, if desired. The Board has directed management to continue to engage as appropriate with interested stockholders, and to inform it of any requests for meetings with members of the Board. The Board and management believe that engagement with stockholders facilitates important dialogue from which we gather various important viewpoints.

Additional Information

The Company’s executive compensation is described and explained in the CD&A, in the tabular disclosure starting with the Fiscal 20182020 Summary Compensation Table, and in the Proxy Statement Overview & Summary included at the front of this proxy statement. We urge stockholders to carefully review this information to understand how the Company’s executive compensation is designed and how it compares with other similar companies.

Approval of this proposal requires a majority of the votes cast with respect to this proposal. Thisnon-binding, advisory vote is currently scheduled to be conducted every year, and it is anticipated that the nextnon-binding advisory vote will take place at the 20202022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Consistent with SEC rules, the vote on this proposal is advisory and is not binding on the Board. The vote on this proposal will not be construed as overruling any decision by the Board.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTEFOR APPROVAL OF THE

COMPANY’S NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION.

PROPOSAL 3. APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT OF THE AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION TO DECLASSIFY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

2010 EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN

We are seeking your approvalOur Restated Certificate of Incorporation (the “Certificate”) currently provides for a classified board divided into three classes, with each class serving a staggered three-year term. Under this board structure, approximately one-third of our directors stand for election each year. As the Company operates an integrated natural gas business that spans the entirety of the amendedenergy value chain, including the exploration and restated National Fuel Gasproduction, gathering, pipeline and storage, and utility industries, each with planning horizons well in excess of one year, the Company 2010 Equity Compensation Plan (the “Plan”)believes that its current board structure appropriately allows our directors to focus on the long-term interests of our business and of all of its stockholders.

The Company acknowledges that many of its stockholders support the annual election of all directors, and is mindful of the evolving landscape of corporate governance practices. At last year’s annual meeting, a Company stockholder presented a non-binding proposal requesting that our Board take the steps necessary to declassify the Board and transition to all directors ultimately standing for election annually. The proposal requested that declassification be completed in a manner that would not affect the purposesunexpired terms of increasingdirectors who were previously elected by the Company’s stockholders.

After careful consideration by the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee and the full Board, the Board has approved proposed amendments to Article SIXTH of the Certificate to phase out the three-year staggered terms of our directors and transition to the annual election of directors. While the Board continues to recognize that there can be benefits to the Company, its stockholders and other stakeholders from a classified board, the Board also recognizes that annually elected boards are perceived by many stockholders as a way to increase the accountability of directors to stockholders. In addition, the Board feels that it is important to consider the views of the Company’s stockholders as it continuously evaluates and develops its corporate governance practices. These proposed amendments would not take effect unless they are first approved by the requisite vote of our stockholders.

If the proposed amendments to the Certificate are approved, beginning at the Company’s 2022 annual meeting, directors standing for election at such meeting will be elected to one-year terms. Directors elected to three-year terms prior to the effectiveness of the amendments, including directors elected at the 2020 and 2021 annual meetings, would complete the three-year terms for which they were elected, and thereafter would be eligible for annual re-election. Beginning with the 2024 annual meeting, the Board would be completely declassified and all directors would stand for election annually. Directors elected by the Board to fill newly created directorships resulting from an increase in the number of shares authorized for issuance underdirectors or any vacancies on the PlanBoard would serve until the next annual meeting, and upon election by an additional 2,700,000 shares of our Common Stock, par value $1.00 per share, and extending the termination datestockholders, until the completion of the Plan by five years. The summary of the Plan that follows is not intended to be exhaustive and is qualified in its entirety by theunexpired terms of the Plan,class in which the vacancy was filled, if applicable.

Approving the amendments requires the affirmative vote of a copymajority of whichvotes cast by the holders of shares entitled to vote on this proposal. The full text of the proposed amendments is included atattached as Appendix C to this proxy statement.

Note that Proposal 4If stockholders approve this proposal, Article SIXTH of this proxy statement seeks your approval of an increase in the number of shares of our Common Stock toCertificate will be made available for issuance under another plan, namely, the amended and restated National Fuel Gasas shown in Appendix C to this proxy statement. If stockholders approve this proposal, the Company 2009Non-Employee Director Equity Compensation Plan. We urge you to read both this Proposal 3 and Proposal 4 carefully.

Equity is the Sole Componentwill file a Certificate of Long-Term Incentive Compensation

We traditionally have structured a portion of our management’s compensation in the form of equity awards that directly align the interests of key executives and other key management employeesAmendment with the interestsNew Jersey Department of the Company’s stockholders in growingTreasury following the market value of the Company. In recent years, consistent with feedback received from stockholders, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (consisting solely of independent Directors) has structured long-term incentive compensation opportunities entirely in the form of equity awards. Our current approach and philosophy with respect to the grant of such equity awards is summarized in this proxy statement under the heading “Compensation Discussion and Analysis.” Actual grants made to our named executive officers in our last completed fiscal year are listed in the Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table, and the outstanding equity awards held by our named executive officers as of September 30, 2018 are listed in the Outstanding Equity Awards Table.

The Company’s use of equity as the sole component of long-term incentives better aligns the Company’s compensation policies and procedures with the long-term interests of the Company’s stockholders. These efforts naturally result in additional shares being used against the currently authorized number of shares to grant. Moreover, all of the types of equity currently being granted under the Plan are subject to the 1.8 multiplier discussed below.

Approval to Increase Shares Available to Grant

We are seeking approval of an increase by 2,700,000 in the number of shares authorized for issuance under the Plan to continue this strategy. As of September 30, 2018, we had available 1,478,086 shares for future awards. We believe this is an insufficient amount to attract and retain needed talent on a going-forward basis, particularly as equity awards have become more common in the energy industry.

As initially approved by stockholders in 2010, the Plan authorized the grant of awards in respect of a total of 3,000,000 shares. In 2015, stockholders approved an amendment to the Plan to make an additional 3,000,000 shares available for awards. The Plan is designed to efficiently utilize the authorized shares by debiting the pool of shares allocated to the Plan by 1 share for each share subject to a stock option or stock appreciation right (“SAR”) granted under the Plan, and by 1.8 shares for each share subject to any other type of award (such as RSUs and performance shares) granted under the Plan (“Fungible Share Counting”). Thus, for example, an option or SAR grant in respect of 1,000 shares counts as relating to only 1,000 shares, while an award of 1,000 RSUs would count against the shares available for awards as though pertaining to 1,800 shares. An award of 1,000 performance shares, if designed to result in a payout of up to 2,000 shares of Common Stock upon achievement of maximum performance, would count against the shares available for awards as though pertaining to 3,600 shares. This formula affords us greater flexibility in designing awards under the Plan, while at the same time giving appropriate weight to the financial accounting costs and the dilutive effects of these awards. This formula will apply to the additional shares for which approval is being sought.

In arriving at the maximum number of additional shares to be sought, the Board determined that targeting our projected needs over the next three to five years struck the appropriate balance between the need to incent and retain key management personnel and the dilutive effect on stockholders of the additional shares authorized. In reaching this conclusion, the Board considered theso-called “overhang” related to the Plan and the 1997 Award and Option Plan. As noted in the “Equity Compensation Plan Information” table on page 24, at the end of fiscal 2018 there were 2,826,984 shares in the aggregate committed to awards outstanding under these plans (approximately 3.29% of our outstanding Common Stock at September 30, 2018). With respect to these awards, 1,299,088 shares related to then outstanding SARs (which SARs had a weighted average grant price of $50.70 and a weighted average remaining term of 1.77 years), 245,316 shares related to then outstanding RSUs, and 1,282,580 shares related to then outstanding performance shares (determined assuming achievement at the maximum level of performance). The total shares of Common Stock committed to outstanding awards under the 1997 Award and Option Plan and the Plan (2,826,984), plus the number of shares of Common Stock remaining available for future awards under the Plan (1,478,086), plus the proposed additional shares of Common Stock to be made available for future awards under the Plan (2,7000,000), represent a total potential overhang of 7,005,070 shares (8.15%) under the 1997 Award and Option Plan and the Plan.

The table set forth below illustrates the utilization of the shares previously authorized under the Plan over the last three completed fiscal years. To have the rate of utilization compare on a consistent basis, the shares are shown as a percentage of the weighted average shares outstanding both as of the immediately preceding fiscal year and as of the fiscal year in which the grants were made.

Fiscal Year Ended

 Number of Shares
Charged Against Plan
Limit With Respect to
Stock Option/SAR
Awards
 Number of Shares
Charged Against Plan
Limit With Respect to
Full Value Awards(1)
 Percentage of
Weighted Average
Common Shares
Outstanding
Represented by Such
Awards as of  the
Immediately Prior
Fiscal Year
 Percentage of
Weighted Average
Common Shares
Outstanding
Represented by Such
Awards as of
the  Fiscal Year in Which
the Awards Were Made

September 30, 2016

   0   803,511   0.95%   0.95%

September 30, 2017

   0   488,324   0.58%   0.57%

September 30, 2018

   0   536,868   0.63%   0.63%

Average Percentage

       0.72%   0.71%

The numbers shown in this table for grants of full value awards reflect the 1.8 to 1 ratio described above and the following performance parameters. The shares listed in the table with respect to performance shares granted in fiscal 2016 (which had a three-year performance cycle covering fiscal years 2016 through 2018) are based on the level of performance actually achieved. The shares listed in the table with respect to performance shares granted in fiscal 2017 and fiscal 2018 (which have three-year performance cycles ending September 30, 2019 and September 30, 2020, respectively) are based on the number of shares that would be payable in respect of such awards upon the achievement of the target level of performance. The actual number of shares issuable in respect of fiscal 2017 and fiscal 2018 performance share awards may be greater or lesser depending on whether actual achievement of the performance objectives is greater or lesser than target. If performance occurs at the maximum level for fiscal 2017 and fiscal 2018 performance share awards, the number of shares charged against the plan limit for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2017 and 2018 noted in the above table would be 819,790 and 912,326, respectively; the percentages for fiscal 2017 would be 0.97% and 0.96%, respectively; the percentages for fiscal 2018 would be 1.07% and 1.06%, respectively; and the average percentages would be 1.00% and 0.99%, respectively.

(1)

Full value awards include grants of RSUs and performance shares.

As of December 31, 2018, the closing price of the Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange was $51.18.

Approval to Extend Plan Termination Date

We are seeking approval of a five-year extension of the automatic termination date of the Plan. As previously approved by our stockholders, the Plan provides that it will continue in effect, unless sooner terminated pursuant to its terms, until the tenth anniversary of the effective date. The effective date was March 11, 2010, the date on which the Plan was initially approved by the Company’s stockholders. Accordingly, the current automatic termination date is March 11, 2020. We are seeking to extend this termination date by five years, to March 11, 2025. We believe that the Plan has served its intended purposes well and will continue to do so over the next five to six years.

Principal Terms of the Plan

The principal terms of the Plan, as amended to increase the number of shares authorized for issuance thereunder and to extend the Plan’s termination date, are summarized below. In evaluating this Proposal 3, stockholders should consider all factors set forth under this Proposal 3.

2021 annual meeting. If stockholders do not reapproveapprove this proposal, the Plan, the Plan will continue in effect as last approved by stockholders (that is, the number of shares available for issuance will not be increased and the termination date will not be extended).

Administration

The Plan generally provides for administration by the Committee. Among the powers granted to the Committee (which are further described in the Plan) are the authority to interpret the Plan, establish administrative rules, regulations and procedures, select employeespresent classification of the Company and its subsidiaries to receive awards, determine the form, amount and other terms and conditions of an award, grant waivers of Plan terms and conditions or modify awards (subject to the terms of the Plan), and take all action it deems advisable for the proper administration of the Plan. The Plan authorizes the Committee to delegate its authority and duties under the Plan, in certain circumstances and subject to limitations described in the Plan, to the Chief Executive Officer and other senior officers of the Company.

Eligibility for Participation

All officers or other management employees of the Company or a subsidiary of the Company are eligible to be selected to participate in the Plan. In fiscal 2018, the Committee granted awards to 36 officers and 77 other management employees. The Committee has the discretion to choose which eligible individuals shall receive awards under the Plan, as well as the type, number and terms of the awards. The basis for participation in the Plan is selection for participation by the Committee.

Amendment, Modification and Termination of Plan

The Board or the Committee may amend or modify the plan, provided that, without the approval of stockholders, no amendment may: (i) materially increase the benefits to the participants of the Plan, (ii) increase the number of shares subject to the Plan or the individual award limitations (described below), (iii) modify the class of persons eligible for participation in the Plan, or (iv) materially modify the Plan in any other way that would require stockholder approval. Unless otherwise terminated earlier, the Plan, as amended to extend the termination date by five years, will automatically terminate on March 11, 2025, which is the fifteenth anniversary of the date on which the Plan was initially approved by the Company’s stockholders. The Board or Committee may at any time in its sole discretion, for any reason, terminate or suspend the Plan.

Shares Available for Grant

As amended to increase the current share authorization of 6,000,000 shares by a subsequent 2,700,000 shares, the Plan authorizes for issuance a maximum of 8,700,000 shares of Common Stock of

the Company, plus the number of shares subject to awards (or any portion of awards) issued under either the 1997 Award and Option Plan or the Plan that, from and after March 11, 2010, lapse or are cancelled, forfeited, terminated or otherwise settled without the issuance of Common Stock. Shares are counted against the Plan limit (and added back to the Plan) using the Fungible Share Counting described above. If an award is issued in tandem with any other award (such that it is only possible to benefit under either but not both awards), the shares subject to such awards will be counted only once against such limit, based on the award that represents the greatest allocation of shares for this purpose.

The following shares of Common Stock may not again be made available for reissuance as awards under the Plan: (i) shares of Common Stock not issued or delivered as a result of the net settlement of an outstanding stock appreciation right or option, (ii) shares of Common Stock used to pay the exercise price or withholding taxes related to an outstanding award, or (iii) shares of Common Stock repurchased on the open market with the proceeds of the option exercise price.

No participant in the Plan may receive awards of options and/or stock appreciation rights (“SARs”) covering more than 750,000 shares of Common Stock of the Company in any calendar year. Additionally, under the Plan as originally adopted, awards granted to an “Executive Officer” (as defined in the Plan) during any 12-month period, other than options or SARs, that were intended when granted to be “other performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m) of the Code generally could not exceed 375,000 shares underlying any performance share award, or $2,500,000 underlying any performance unit award, although amounts actually payable in respect of such awards could be up to twice the initial award, if there were superior achievement of the applicable performance goals.

Section 162(m) of the Code was amended, effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017, to eliminate the exception to its limitation previously available for “other performance-based compensation,” except to the extent such compensation is provided pursuant to a binding written agreement in effect on November 2, 2017. Thus, under current law, any award granted under the Plan after November 2, 2017 and payable after the Company’s 2018 fiscal year cannot be “other performance-based compensation,” and the corresponding limitation on the number of shares granted will not have any practical effect. Accordingly, we have modified Section 5(b)(ii) of the Plan to indicate that the share limit related to “other performance-based compensation” will be effective only if an exception for such compensation is “available under applicable law.” To be clear, stockholders are not being asked to approve the Plan (or any of its provisions) for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Code or the performance-based exception. As a result of the amendment of Section 162(m) of the Code, we do not currently anticipate that we would be able to make any future grants under the Plan that will be intended to qualify for the performance-based exception.

The maximum limits of stock underlying awards (including the aggregate Plan limit and individual participant limits) are subject to equitable adjustment as further described in the Plan in the event of any stock dividend, stock split or share combination in respect of, or extraordinary cash dividend on, our Common Stock or any recapitalization, reorganization, merger, consolidation, split-up, spin-off, combination, dissolution, liquidation, exchange of shares, warrants or rights offering to purchase our Common Stock at a price substantially below fair market value (as defined in the Plan), or other similar event affecting the Common Stock (an “Adjustment Event”).

Types of Awards

The Plan provides for the grant of any or all of the following types of awards: (i) stock options, including incentive stock options (as defined in Section 422 of the Code) that are subject to additional limitations under the Plan, (ii) SARs, (iii) restricted shares of our Common Stock (“Restricted Stock”), (iv) RSUs, (v)��performance shares, (vi) performance-based dollar denominated awards (“performance units”), and (vii) certain other stock-based awards. Such awards may be granted singly or in combination, as determined by the Committee.

(a) Stock Options

Under the Plan, the Committee may grant awards to participants in the form of stock options to purchase shares of the Company’s Common Stock. Stock options may benon-qualified stock options or incentive stock options, except that no option that is intended to be an incentive stock option may be granted under the Plan after March 10, 2020 (the tenth anniversary of the date the Plan became effective upon its initial approval by our stockholders). Unless the award notice provides otherwise, each option would be anon-qualified option. The Committee determines the number of shares subject to the option, the manner and time that the option may be exercised and the exercise price per share of Common Stock subject to the option. In no event, however, may the exercise price of a stock option be less than the fair market value of the Company’s Common Stock on the date of the stock option’s grant.

Dividend Equivalents may not be paid on stock options, and stock options may not be repriced (as further described in the Plan). Stock options will expire no later than the tenth anniversary of the date granted.

Unless the award notice provides otherwise, each option will vest in three equal annual installments, subject to the participant’s continued employment with the Company or subsidiary through such date (except as provided below). The Committee may provide that options may also become exercisable, in whole or in part, upon the occurrence of any event specified in the Plan or other condition specified by the Committee at or after the grant date of the applicable option. In its discretion, the Committee may establish in the award notice, conditions based on performance goals (in lieu of, or in addition to,time-based vesting) with respect to the exercisability of any option. Unless the award notice provides otherwise:

(i)

if a participant’s employment with the Company or a subsidiary terminates for Cause (as defined in the Plan), all options, vested or unvested, shall be forfeited and cancelled,

(ii)

upon the termination of a participant’s employment with the Company or a subsidiary due to death or disability (as defined in the Plan), or on or after his or her 60th birthday other than for Cause (“Retirement”), all outstanding options shall immediately vest and remain exercisable for a period equal to five years or, if earlier, until the original expiration date of the option,

(iii)

if a participant’s employment with the Company or subsidiary terminates due to the divestiture by the Company of one or more subsidiaries or other business segments, divisions or operations in a transaction that does not otherwise qualify as a Change in Control (a “Divestiture”), all outstanding options shall immediately vest and remain exercisable for a period equal to three years following the Divestiture or, if earlier, until the original expiration date of the option,

(iv)

if a participant’s employment with the Company or a subsidiary terminates without cause due to a reduction in force or similar downsizing at the Company or any subsidiary unit that affects a significant number of employees (a “Reduction in Force”), all unvested options shall be cancelled and forfeited and all vested options shall remain exercisable until the first anniversary of the date of the participant’s termination of service or, if earlier, the original expiration date of the option, and

(v)

if a participant’s employment with the Company or a subsidiary terminates for any other reason, all unvested options are cancelled and forfeited and any vested options remain exercisable for a period of 90 days after such termination or, if earlier, the original expiration date of the option.

Upon exercise of a stock option, the exercise price may, at the discretion of the Committee, be paid by a participant in cash or its equivalent, shares of Common Stock or Restricted Stock, or a combination thereof (or by other arrangements as the Committee may deem appropriate). The Plan allows options to be exercised using the “cashless exercise” of options by payment of the exercise price from the sale proceeds of a portion of the shares otherwise receivable upon exercise of the option and by net settlement, whereby the appreciation, if any, in value of the shares as to which the stock option is being

exercised above the exercise price set at the date of grant is issued in shares without any other payment in respect of the exercise price. The Company may not make a loan to a participant to facilitate such participant’s exercise of any of his or her options or payment of taxes.

(b) Stock Appreciation Rights

Under the Plan, the Committee may grant awards to participants in the form of SARs, which may be granted on a stand-alone basis or in tandem with another award granted under the Plan (for example, SARS may be granted in tandem with an option award). A SAR is a right to receive a payment in cash, in shares of Common Stock or in a combination thereof, as determined by the Committee, equal to the appreciation, if any, in the fair market value of a stated number of shares of Common Stock from the SAR’s exercise price to the fair market value on the date the SAR is exercised. The Committee determines the number of shares subject to the SAR, the manner and time that the SAR may be exercised and the exercise price of the SAR. The exercise price related to a SAR must be at least equal to the fair market value of our Common Stock on the date the SAR is granted. If a SAR is to be paid in cash, the Committee may also establish in the applicable award notice a maximum amount per share which will be payable upon the exercise of such SAR.

Dividend Equivalents may not be paid on SARs, and SARs may not be repriced (as described in the Plan). SARs will expire no later than the tenth anniversary of the date granted.

Unless otherwise provided in the award notice, SARs become exercisable in three equal annual installments, subject to the participant’s continued employment with the Company or a subsidiary through such date (except as provided below). SARs may also become exercisable, in whole or in part, upon the occurrence of any event or events as specified in the Plan or specified by the Committee, in its discretion, either at or after the grant date of the applicable SARs. In its discretion, the Committee may also establish conditions based on performance goals (in lieu of, or in addition to, time based vesting) with respect to the exercisability of any SARs. Unless the award notice provides otherwise:

(i)

if a participant’s employment with the Company or a subsidiary terminates for Cause, all SARs, vested or unvested, shall be forfeited and cancelled,

(ii)

if a participant’s employment with the Company or a subsidiary terminates due to death, disability, or Retirement, all outstanding SARs shall immediately vest and remain exercisable for a period equal to five years or, if earlier, until the original expiration date of the SAR,

(iii)

if a participant’s employment with the Company or subsidiary terminates due to Divestiture, all outstanding SARs shall immediately vest and remain exercisable for a period equal to three years following the Divestiture or, if earlier, until the original expiration date of the SAR,

(iv)

if a participant’s employment with the Company or a subsidiary terminates due to a Reduction in Force, all unvested SARs shall be cancelled and forfeited and all vested SARs shall remain exercisable until the first anniversary of the date of the participant’s termination of service or, if earlier, the original expiration date of the SAR, and

(v)

if a participant’s employment with the Company or a subsidiary terminates for any other reason, all unvested SARs are cancelled and forfeited and any vested SARs remain exercisable for a period of 90 days after such termination or, if earlier, the original expiration date of the SAR.

Any SAR not already exercised shall be deemed to be exercised at the close of business on the scheduled expiration date of such SAR, if at such time the SAR by its terms remains exercisable and, if so exercised, would result in a payment to the holder of such SAR.

(c) Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Unit Awards

The Plan authorizes the Committee to grant awards to participants in the form of Restricted Stock and RSUs. Such awards will be subject to such restrictions, terms and conditions as the Committee

deems appropriate, including restrictions on transferability and continued employment. The lapsing of restrictions associated with such awards may be conditioned upon the passage of time while employed and/or the attainment of one or more performance goals.

The restricted period may lapse with respect to portions of Restricted Stock and RSUs on a pro rata basis, or it may lapse at one time with respect to all Restricted Stock and RSUs in an award. The restricted period will also lapse, in whole or in part, upon the occurrence of any event or events, including a Change in Control, specified in the Plan. Unless the Committee determines otherwise at or after grant, (1) the restricted period with respect to Restricted Stock and RSUs that vest solely based on the passage of time while employed shall lapse in three approximately equal annual installments on the first through third anniversaries of the grant date, and (2) the restricted period with respect to Restricted Stock and RSUs that vest upon the satisfaction of performance goals shall lapse, to the extent performance goals have been achieved, not earlier than one year after the commencement of the applicable performance cycle. Unless the award notice provides otherwise,

(i)

upon termination of a participant’s employment due to death, disability, Retirement, or a Divestiture, all restrictions relating to Restricted Stock and RSUs lapse and such awards become immediately vested, and

(ii)

upon termination of a participant’s employment due to a Reduction in Force, for Cause or for any other reason, all Restricted Stock and RSUs for which the restricted period has not lapsed are immediately forfeited.

Unless the Committee determines otherwise, if an award is granted in the form of Restricted Stock, the participant will have all the rights of a stockholder with respect to such shares, including the rights to vote and to receive dividends. A participant who is awarded RSUs will not have voting rights with respect to such RSUs. The Committee shall determine whether dividend equivalents will be provided in respect of any RSU award, the manner in which any such dividend equivalent will be deemed invested, the time or times at which such dividend equivalent shall be deemed payable and any other terms and conditions thereon that the Committee shall deem appropriate.

At the expiration of the restricted period for any outstanding Restricted Stock, the Company shall evidence the issuance of such shares free of any restrictions imposed under the Plan. At the expiration of the restricted period with respect to any outstanding RSU, the participant shall receive, in the Committee’s discretion, one share of Common Stock, a cash payment equal to the fair market value of the underlying share of Common Stock as of the payment date or any combination of cash and Common Stock equal to that fair market value.

(d) Performance Shares and Performance Units

Under the Plan, the Committee may grant awards to participants in the form of performance shares or performance units. Vesting of these awards is generally contingent upon the attainment of specified performance goals over a period to be determined by the Committee. Performance shares and performance units may also become earned and vested based on the occurrence of any event or events, including a Change in Control, as the Committee determines, either at or after the grant date. Unless otherwise determined by the Committee, the performance cycle for performance shares and performance units is three years, and may not be less than one year. Except in the case of awards to Executive Officers intended to be “other performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m)(4) of the Code, the Committee may adjust the performance goals for any performance cycle as it deems equitable in recognition of events impacting the comparability of the Company’s results of operations or financial condition, changes in applicable tax laws or accounting principles, or such other factors as the Committee may determine. The performance goals to be achieved during a performance cycle and the measure of whether and to what degree such objectives have been attained will also be determined by the Committee. With respect to performance units, the Committee also retains the discretion, even after the award is made, to establish written rules or procedures that have the effect of limiting the amount payable to each participant to an amount that is less than the maximum amount otherwise authorized.

Unless the Committee determines otherwise at or after grant,

(i)

upon the termination of a participant’s employment due to death or disability, Retirement or a Divestiture, the participant will be entitled to receive the number of shares or cash value he or she would have received with respect to performance awards had the participant remained employed with the Company through the end of the performance cycle,pro-rated to reflect the actual time that the participant was employed by the Company during the performance cycle, and

(ii)

upon the termination of a participant’s employment due to a Reduction in Force, for Cause or for any other reason not described in clause (i) above, any performance award for which the performance cycle has not yet been completed shall be cancelled and forfeited.

No shares of Common Stock will be issued at the time a performance share award is made, and the Company is not required to set aside a fund for the payment of performance shares or performance units. No dividend equivalents will be paid or payable on any performance shares or performance units before they become earned and vested.

Payment of both performance shares and performance units may be made in the form of cash, shares of Common Stock or in a combination thereof, with the value or number of shares payable to be determined based on the fair market value of the Common Stock on the date the Committee certifies the extent to which performance goals have been attained.

(d) Other Stock-Based Awards

The Committee may grant other stock-based awards in accordance with the Plan. Other stock-based awards may take such form of an interest in the Common Stock, the value of a specified number of shares of Common Stock or any combination thereof as the Committee determines, including outright awards of Common Stock in satisfaction of an obligation of an employer in respect of compensation that would otherwise be payable to a participant in cash (each, a “Cash Settlement Award”). The number of shares of Common Stock that may be subject to other stock-based awards will not exceed five percent (5%) of the shares authorized for issuance under the Plan, except that, the number of other stock-based awards that are Cash Settlement Awards shall not be subject to, or otherwise counted against, the foregoing 5% limit. In addition to any other terms and conditions that may be specified by the Committee, each other stock-based award shall specify the impact of a termination of service upon the rights of a participant in respect of such award. At the discretion of the Committee, such conditions may be the same as apply with respect to Restricted Stock or RSUs, or may contain terms that are more or less favorable to the participant. The terms of any other stock-based award need not be uniform in application to all (or any class of) participants, and each other stock-based award granted to any participant (whether or not at the same time) may have different terms. Any such other stock-based award shall be evidenced by an award notice which specifies the terms and conditions applicable thereto.

Performance Measures

The performance measure(s) to be used for performance share awards and performance units (and any other award to which the Committee attaches performance goals) shall include one or more of the following as applied to the Company or any subsidiary, or a combination of subsidiaries, whether on a relative or a comparative basis: (i) earnings per share, (ii) net income (before or after taxes), (iii) return measures (including, but not limited to, return on assets, equity or sales), (iv) cash flow return on investments which equals net cash flows divided by owners’ equity, (v) earnings before or after taxes, depreciation and/or amortization, (vi) gross revenues, (vii) operating income (before or after taxes), (viii) total shareholder return, (ix) corporate performance indicators (indices based on the level of certain expenses, certain objectively measurable operational events or certain services provided to customers), (x) cash generation, profit and/or revenue targets, (xi) growth measures, including revenue growth, reserve growth or reserve replacement, whether or not as compared to a peer group or other benchmark,

and/or (xii) share price (including, but not limited to, growth measures and total shareholder return). The Plan allows the Committee to exclude the effect of changes in accounting standards and other events specified by the Committee (such as write-offs, capital gains and losses, and acquisitions and dispositions of businesses) that may impact the comparability of results of operations or financial condition in setting performance goals using these performance measures, and in determining actual performance relative to these performance measures.

Other Terms of Awards

Awards under the Plan will generally be evidenced by an award notice. Upon grant of any award, the Committee may, by way of the award notice or otherwise, establish such other terms and conditions governing the grant of such award as are not inconsistent with the Plan. The Committee generally may unilaterally amend any award if such amendment is not adverse to the participant (unless the Committee determines that such amendment is necessary or advisable to comply with applicable law as a result of changes in law or regulation or to avoid the imposition of an additional tax, interest or penalty under Section 409A of the Code). The Company may deduct from any payment under the Plan the amount of any applicable income and employment taxes, or may require the participant to pay such taxes as a condition to making such payment. Subject to the terms of the Plan, a participant may pay the amount of such taxes required to be withheld from any award, in whole or in part, by requesting that the Company withhold from any payment of Common Stock due as a result of such award, or by delivering to the Company, shares of Common Stock with a fair market value not in excess of the amount of the applicable withholding taxes.

Nonassignability

Except as otherwise provided in an award notice, no awards under the Plan may be transferred (except by will or the laws of descent and distribution), and during a participant’s lifetime may be exercised only by the participant except that, the Committee may permit awards to be transferred to: (i) members of a participant’s immediate family as defined in Rule 16a-1 of the Exchange Act or any successor rule or regulation (or a participant’s former spouse, niece or nephew), or (ii) a trust in which these persons have more than fifty percent of the beneficial interest (a “Trust”) and any other entity in which these persons (or the participant) own more than fifty percent of the voting interests (“Permitted Transferees”), provided that (a) there is no consideration for such transfer and (b) the Plan’s transferability provisions do not prohibit the transfer of an award from a Trust back to a participant to whom the award was originally granted, in accordance with the terms of the Trust. Following transfer, any awards continue to be subject to the same terms and conditions as were applicable immediately prior to transfer and, except that, for events related to the termination of employment of the participant, the term “participant” will refer to the transferor.

Change in Control

In the event of a “Change in Control” (as that term is defined below), outstanding awards will vest and become fully exercisable if such awards are not assumed or substituted with new ones by the surviving entity (as further described below). Specifically, the plan provides that: (i) each outstanding option and SAR shall become fully exercisable, (ii) the restricted period shall lapse as to each share of outstanding Restricted Stock then outstanding, (iii) each outstanding RSU shall become fully vested and payable, (iv) each outstanding performance share award and performance unit award shall be deemed earned at the target level of performance for such award, and (v) each outstanding other stock-based award shall become fully vested and payable.

In addition, in connection with a Change in Control, the Committee may, in its discretion, provide that each option and/or SAR shall be canceled in exchange for a payment per share in cash (“Settlement Payment”) in an amount equal to the excess, if any, of the fair market value over the exercise price of the option or grant price of the SAR. Should the Committee authorize any Settlement Payments in respect of

options, the Committee may determine that any options which have an exercise price per share below the fair market value will be deemed cancelled and satisfied in full for a deemed Settlement Payment of zero. The Committee may also decide that each restricted stock unit, other stock-based award, performance share and/or performance unit shall be settled in cash with its value determined based on the value received by the stockholders in any transaction that itself constitutes a Change in Control.

If the Committee reasonably determines in good faith, prior to the occurrence of a Change in Control, that outstanding awards under the Plan shall be honored or assumed, or new rights substituted therefore immediately following the Change in Control, the outstanding awards will not vest as described above. However, such new award must: (i) be based on stock which is traded on an established U.S. securities market, (ii) provide the participant with rights and entitlements substantially equivalent to or better than those applicable to the outstanding award under the Plan, (iii) have substantially equivalent economic value as the outstanding awards (as described in the Plan), and (iv) provide that the awards will vest (as described in the Plan) in the event that, during the24-month period following the Change in Control, the participant’s employment or service is involuntarily terminated for any reason (including, but not limited to a termination due to death or disability) other than for Cause, or the participant’s employment or service is “Constructively Terminated” (as defined below).

If any award granted under the Plan and outstanding at the time of a Change in Control is treated as “deferred compensation” under Section 409A of the Code, and not exempt from its requirements, no acceleration of payment of such award shall be made upon a Change in Control, even if such award vests and becomes fully exercisable upon a Change in Control, unless such event is also a change in the ownership or effective control of the corporation, or in the ownership of a substantial portion of the assets of the corporation within the meaning of Section 409A of the Code. In such case, such award will be paid out at the date or event that such award would have been payable without regard to the occurrence of such Change in Control.

For purposes of the Plan, a Change in Control shall occur whenever (in each case, as further described in the Plan):

(i)

any person, other than the Company, one of our subsidiaries, or any employee benefit plan or plans sponsored by the Company or any such subsidiary, is or has become the beneficial owner of twenty percent (20%) or more of the combined voting power of the outstanding securities of the Company ordinarily having the right to vote at the election of directors, or more than twenty percent (20%) of the fair market value of all classes of the Company’s outstanding stock,

(ii)

the consummation of

(a)

any consolidation or merger of the Company immediately following which the persons who, immediately prior to the consolidation or merger, held the capital stock of the Company do not hold, immediately following such transaction, (x) at least a majority of the stock ordinarily entitled to vote in the election of directors of the corporation surviving such consolidation or merger (or the ultimate parent corporation in an unbroken chain which owns, directly or indirectly, a majority of the capital stock of such entity) or (y) stock in the entity described in subclause (x) above that represents at least 50% of the fair market value of all classes of stock of such entity, in either case, in substantially the same proportionate ownership as such persons held immediately before such consolidation or merger, or

(b)

any sale, lease, exchange or other transfer (in one transaction or a series of related transactions) of all or substantially all the assets of the Company, or

(iii)

individuals who constituted the Board at the beginning of a 12 month period (the “Incumbent Board”) have ceased for any reason to constitute at least a majority thereof, provided that any person who becomes a director and whose election, or nomination for election, was approved by a vote of at least three-quarters (3/4) of the directors comprising the Incumbent Board shall be considered as though such person were a member of the Incumbent Board.

A participant in the Plan shall undergo a “Constructive Termination” if, without the participant’s written consent, the participant terminates employment or service within 120 days following either (x) a material reduction in the participant’s base salary or a participant’s incentive compensation opportunity, or (y) the relocation of the participant’s principal place of employment or service to a location more than 35 miles away from the participant’s prior principal place of employment or service.

Adjustment of Shares Available

In the event of the occurrence of an Adjustment Event, equitable adjustment will be made by the Committee, in its discretion, in: (i) the aggregate number of shares of Common Stock available for awards under the Plan, (ii) the aggregate limitations on the number of shares that may be awarded as a particular type of award or that may be awarded to any particular participant in any particular period under the Plan and (iii) the aggregate number of shares subject to outstanding awards and the respective exercise prices or grant prices applicable to outstanding awards.

U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences

This is a brief summary of some of the U.S. federal income tax consequences of certain transactions under the Plan based on U.S. federal income tax laws in effect. This summary, which is presented for the information of stockholders considering how to vote on this proposal and not for Plan participants, is not intended to be complete and does not describe federal taxes other than income taxes (such as Medicare and Social Security taxes), state, local or foreign tax consequences.

A participant who is granted an incentive stock option is not required to recognize taxable income at the time of the grant or at the time of exercise. If a participant does not dispose of the shares acquired pursuant to the exercise of an incentive stock option before the later of two years from the date of grant of the option and one year from the transfer of the shares to him, any gain or loss realized on a subsequent disposition of the shares will be treated as long-term capital gain or loss.

If a participant disposes of the shares received upon the exercise of any incentive stock option either (i) within one year of the transfer of the shares to him or her or (ii) within two years after the incentive stock option was granted, the participant will generally recognize ordinary compensation income equal to the lesser of (a) the excess of the fair market value of the shares on the date the incentive stock option was exercised over the purchase price paid for the shares upon exercise, and (b) the amount of gain realized on the sale.

A participant who is granted anon-qualified stock option does not have taxable income at the time of grant, but does have taxable ordinary income at the time of exercise equal to the difference between the exercise price of the shares and the market value of the shares on the date of exercise.

The grant of a SAR will produce no federal tax consequences for the participant or the Company. The exercise of a SAR results in taxable ordinary income to the participant, equal to the amount of cash received and the fair market value of any shares received on the exercise.

A participant who is granted shares of Restricted Stock will not be required to recognize taxable income at the time of the grant, assuming that the restrictions constitute a substantial risk of forfeiture for federal income tax purposes. When such restrictions lapse, the participant will recognize taxable income in an amount equal to the excess of the fair market value of the shares at such time over the amount, if any, paid for such shares. However, a recipient who so elects under Section 83(b) of the Code within 30 days of the date of transfer of the shares will have taxable ordinary income on the date of transfer of the shares equal to the excess of the fair market value of such shares (determined without regard to the Restrictions) over the purchase price, if any, of such Restricted Stock. If a Section 83(b) election has not been made, any dividends received with respect to Restricted Stock that are subject to the restrictions generally will be treated as compensation that is taxable as ordinary income to the recipient.

A participant who is granted RSUs will generally be subject to tax at ordinary income rates on the fair market value of unrestricted shares of Common Stock on the date that such shares are transferred to the

participant under the award (reduced by any amount paid by the participant for such RSUs), and the capital gains/loss holding period for such shares will also commence on such date.

A participant who is granted a performance share or performance unit will not be required to recognize taxable income at the time of the grant. A participant will be required to recognize ordinary income either at the time the award vests or is paid, depending upon the terms and conditions of the award.

To the extent that a participant recognizes ordinary income in the circumstances described above, the Company or the subsidiary for which the participant performs services will be entitled to a corresponding deduction provided that, among other things, the income meets the test of reasonableness, is an ordinary and necessary business expense, is not an “excess parachute payment” within the meaning of Section 280G of the Code and is not disallowed by the $1 million limitation on certain executive compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code.

New Plan Benefits

Awards under the Plan are made at the discretion of the Committee. While the Committee has established guidelines for making awards to the Company’s executive officers, the number of shares that are granted subject to any award is subject to a number of variables, including the value of the Common Stock at or about the time the award is granted. Therefore, the awards that may be made under the Plan at a future date are not currently determinable. Accordingly, in accordance with the interpretations of the SEC staff, no new plan benefit table is required with respect to the Plan.

We intend to file a Registration Statement on FormS-8 relating to the issuance of the additional shares of Common Stock under the Plan with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), as soon as practicable after approval of Proposal 3 by our stockholders. The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast with respect to the approval of the Plan is required for approval of the proposed amendments to the Plan.continue.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTEFOR THIS PROPOSAL.

PROPOSAL 4. APPROVAL OF THE AMENDED AND RESTATED

2009NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN

We are seeking your approval of the amended and restated National Fuel Gas Company 2009Non-Employee Director Equity Compensation Plan (the “Director Plan”) for the purpose of increasing the number of shares authorized for issuance under the Director Plan by an additional 250,000 shares of our Common Stock, par value $1.00 per share. The summary of the Director Plan that follows is not intended to be exhaustive and is qualified in its entirety by the terms of the Director Plan, a copy of which is included at Appendix D to this proxy statement.

Note that Proposal 3 of this proxy statement seeks your approval of an increase in the number of shares of our Common Stock to be made available for issuance under another plan, namely, the amended and restated National Fuel Gas Company 2010 Equity Compensation Plan. We urge you to read both Proposal 3 and this Proposal 4 carefully.

The Board of Directors believes that the Company’s ability to attract and retain highly qualifiednon-employee directors is critical to the Company’s long-term success. The Board also wishes to encourage individual directors to acquire a proprietary interest in the long-term success of the Company, thereby aligning their financial interests with those of the Company’s stockholders. The Director Plan is designed to serve these purposes.

The Director Plan provides for the issuance of shares of Common Stock tonon-employee directors, as compensation in whole or in part for their service on the Board. The Director Plan initially became effective as of March 12, 2009, the date of the Company’s 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, upon approval of the Company’s stockholders at such meeting. As last approved by stockholders in 2016, the Director Plan authorized the issuance of a total of 200,000 shares.

We are seeking stockholder approval to make an additional 250,000 shares of Common Stock available for issuance under the Director Plan. As of September 30, 2018, we had issued 146,368 of the 200,000 shares previously approved by stockholders for issuance. As of December 31, 2018, the closing price of the Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange was $51.18.

We believe the addition of 250,000 shares to the Director Plan will enable us to continue to attract and retain highly qualifiednon-employee directors. The 250,000 shares we seek to add to the Director Plan equal approximately 0.29% of the 85,956,814 shares of Common Stock issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2018. As of that date, the total number of shares of Common Stock remaining available under the Director Plan (53,632), plus the proposed additional shares of Common Stock to be made available for future issuance under the Director Plan (250,000), represent a total potential overhang of 303,632 shares (0.35%) under the Director Plan. The shares of Common Stock available for issuance under the Plan may be authorized and unissued shares or treasury shares.

The Company currently has ten directors, all of whom arenon-employee directors except Ronald Tanski, the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer. Each of the ninenon-employee directors receives shares under the Director Plan, and the basis for their participation is their status asnon-employee directors. The compensation of the Company’s directors is discussed in considerable detail under Proposal 1 of this proxy statement. In fiscal years 2018, 2017 and 2016, the Company issued an aggregate of 28,044 shares, 24,028 shares and 18,184 shares, respectively, under the Director Plan. The shares issued under the Director Plan represented 0.03% of the Company’s weighted average shares outstanding for each of fiscal years 2018 and 2017, and 0.02% of the Company’s weighted average shares outstanding for fiscal year 2016.

Shares will be issued under the Director Plan on a quarterly basis, in advance (as of the first business day of the quarter). The Board will determine from time to time in its discretion the value of the shares or the number of shares to be issued per quarter, provided that the aggregate number of shares to be issued to any onenon-employee director in any12-month period may not exceed 5,000. The number of shares to be issued to a participant will be prorated as applicable for the quarter in which the participant joins the Board and the quarter in which the participant is scheduled to retire or resign from the Board. Shares will

not be issued under the Director Plan to anynon-employee director who declines receipt of the shares or whose compensation is otherwise determined by written agreement between the Company and thenon-employee director.

The number of shares available for issuance under the Director Plan is subject to adjustment in the event certain transactions occur. For example, in the event of changes in the Common Stock by reason of a Common Stock dividend, stock split, reverse stock split or other combination, the Board will make appropriate adjustment in the aggregate number of shares available under the Director Plan and in the rate of payment of shares under the Director Plan, as further described in the Director Plan. In the event of a merger or consolidation, reorganization, reclassification of the Common Stock, spinoff of a significant asset or other changes in the capitalization of the Company, the Board may make appropriate provision with respect to shares issued under the Director Plan for (i) the substitution, on an equitable basis, of appropriate stock or other securities or consideration to which holders of Common Stock will be entitled pursuant to such transaction, or (ii) adjustment in the number of shares available for issuance under the Director Plan and in the rate of payment of shares under the Director Plan, in each case, as deemed appropriate by the Board, and as further described in the Director Plan.

Each share of Common Stock issued to anon-employee director under the Director Plan will benon-transferable until the later of two years after its issuance or six months after thenon-employee director’s cessation of service on the Board, except as follows. Upon anon-employee director’s death, whether in office or after his or her service as a director ceases, all restrictions on transferability imposed under the Director Plan will lapse.

Non-employee directors will be entitled to all of the rights of stockholders with respect to shares issued under the Director Plan, including the right to vote the shares, the right to receive dividends and the right to reinvest dividends, outside of the Director Plan, into additional shares of Common Stock. Shares issued under the Director Plan will not be subject to forfeiture or cancellation for any reason.

The Board will administer the Director Plan and will have the authority to interpret the Director Plan, establish administrative rules, grant waivers of Director Plan terms and conditions and take other actions it deems advisable, subject to the terms of the Director Plan. The Board’s determinations with respect to the Director Plan will be made by a majority of the Board and will be final, binding and conclusive.

The Board may suspend or terminate the Director Plan at any time. In addition, the Board generally may amend the Director Plan, subject to the terms of the Director Plan. Any amendment to the Director Plan will be subject to stockholder approval (i) at the discretion of the Board, and (ii) to the extent that stockholder approval may be required by law or under the applicable requirements of the New York Stock Exchange or any other exchange on which the Common Stock is listed to trade. Unless earlier terminated by the Board, the Director Plan will expire when all of the shares available for issuance under the Director Plan have been issued. The expiration of the Director Plan will not adversely affect the rights of any participant without such participant’s consent.

The Director Plan is not the only means of compensatingnon-employee directors for their service on the Board. The Board may continue to provide, outside of the Director Plan, for payment ofnon-equity compensation for such service, including cash, on terms and in amounts as determined by the Board in its discretion.

U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences

This is a brief summary of some of the U.S. federal income tax consequences of certain transactions under the Director Plan based on U.S. federal income tax laws in effect. This summary, which is presented for the information of stockholders considering how to vote on this proposal and not for Director Plan participants, is not intended to be complete and does not describe federal taxes other than income taxes (such as Medicare and Social Security taxes), state, local or foreign tax consequences. The recipient of shares under the Director Plan generally will be subject to tax at ordinary income rates at the fair market value of the shares at the time of issuance.

New Plan Benefits

Shares are issued under the Director Plan, which was last approved by stockholders at the Company’s 2016 Annual Meeting, as determined by the Board, which reviews the level of director compensation at least every other year with the assistance of Korn Ferry, its compensation advisor. The Board determined the current rate of equity compensation in March 2017, and may make changes to that rate from time to time in its discretion, subject to the 5,000 shareper-director annual limit described above. In determining director compensation, the Board reviews a number of factors, including but not limited to director compensation at peer companies. The Director Plan does not include a formula or other objective criteria to determine the rate of equity compensation or the number of shares to be issued, and there are no outstanding grants or awards under the Director Plan that require stockholder approval to be effective. Accordingly, the shares that may be issued under the Director Plan at a future date are not currently determinable, and in accordance with the interpretations of the SEC staff, no new plan benefits table is required with respect to the Director Plan.

Registration with the SEC

Shares issued under the Director Plan are issued in reliance on the exemption from registration under Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act as transactions not involving a public offering. It is possible that the Company may determine in the future to change its practice of reliance on the exemption and file a Registration Statement on Form S-8 relating to the issuance of shares under the Director Plan.

The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast with respect to the approval of the Director Plan is required for approval of the proposed amendment to the Director Plan.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTEFOR THIS PROPOSAL.

PROPOSAL 5.4. RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT

REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

At the Annual Meeting, stockholders will be asked to ratify the Audit Committee’s appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm for the Company’s fiscal year ending September 30, 20192021 (“fiscal 2019”2021”). The independent registered public accounting firm will examine the financial statements of the Company and its subsidiaries and report upon the annual consolidated financial statements for fiscal 2019.2021. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP served as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2018.2020.

One or more representatives of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP are expected to attend the Annual Meeting. They will have an opportunity to make a statement if they wish and are expected to be available to respond to appropriate stockholder questions.

The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast with respect to the ratification of the appointment of the independent registered public accounting firm by the holders of shares of Common Stock entitled to vote is required for ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm.

If the necessary votes are not received, the Audit Committee will reconsider whether to retain PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP and may retain PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP or appoint another independent registered public accounting firm, without resubmitting the matter to stockholders. Even if the appointment is ratified, the Audit Committee in its discretion may appoint a different independent registered public accounting firm at any time during the year if it determines that such a change would be in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders. Unless they are otherwise directed by the stockholders, the Proxies intend to vote for ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTEFOR RATIFICATION OF

THIS APPOINTMENT.

SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires the Company’s directors and officers, and persons who own more than 10% of a registered class of the Company’s equity securities, to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the SEC and the NYSE. Directors, officers and greater-than 10% stockholders are required by SEC regulation to furnish the Company with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file. Based solely on review of information furnished to the Company, reports filed through the Company and/or written representations that no Form 5 was required, the Company believes that all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to its officers, directors and greater-than 10% beneficial owners were complied with during fiscal 2018.

CODE OF ETHICS

The Company has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to the Company’s directors, principal executive officer, principal financial officer, controller, other officers and employees that is designed to deter wrongdoing and to promote honest and ethical conduct. The text of the code of ethics is available on the Company’s website atwww.nationalfuel.com. Upon request, the Company will provide to any person without charge a copy of the code of ethics. Requests must be made to the Secretary at the principal offices of the Company.

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING DELIVERY OF STOCKHOLDER DOCUMENTS

Only one copy of this proxy statement, the Company’s Summary Annual Report and financial statements for the 20182020 fiscal year are being delivered to some multiple stockholders who share an address unless the Company has received contrary instructions from one or more of the stockholders. A separate proxy card and a separate notice of the Annual Meeting are being included for each account at the shared address.

Registered stockholders who share an address and would like to receive a separate annual report to stockholders and/or a separate proxy statement for the Annual Meeting or future Annual Meetings of Stockholders, or have questions regarding the householding process, may call Broadridge, toll-free at1-866-540-7095. You will need your12-digit16-digit Investor IDcontrol number. Simply follow the prompts. You may also write to Broadridge Householding Department, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717. Promptly upon request, additional copies of the Company’s Summary Annual Report and financial statements for fiscal 20182020 and separate proxy statements for the Annual Meeting will be sent. By contacting Broadridge, registered stockholders sharing an address can also request delivery of a single copy of annual reports to stockholders or proxy statements in the future if registered stockholders at the shared address are receiving multiple copies.

Many brokerage firms and other holders of record have also instituted householding procedures. If your family has one or more “street name” account under which you beneficially own shares of Common Stock, you may have received householding information from your broker, financial institution or other nominee in the past. Please contact the holder of record directly if you have questions, require additional copies of this proxy statement or our Summary Annual Report to Stockholders and financial statements for fiscal 20182020 or wish to revoke your decision to household and thereby receive multiple copies. You should also contact the holder of record if you wish to institute householding and see the section “Multiple Copies of Proxy Statement” within this proxy statement. These options are available to you at any time.

PROPOSALS OF SECURITY HOLDERS FOR THE 20202022 ANNUAL MEETING

Proposals that security holders intend to present at the 20202022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders must be received by the Secretary at the principal offices of the Company no later than September 20, 2019,24, 2021, in

order to be considered for inclusion, pursuant to SEC Rule14a-8 under the Exchange Act, in the Company’s proxy statement and proxy for that meeting. Notice of a stockholder proposal submitted outside the processes of SEC Rule14a-8 under the Exchange Act, or a notice of a stockholder’s intent to nominate one or more directors, for consideration at the 20202022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, shall be considered untimely unless received by the Secretary at the Company’s principal office between October 9, 201912, 2021 and November 8, 2019.11, 2021.

OTHER BUSINESS

The Board of Directors does not know of any business that will be presented for consideration at the Annual Meeting except as set forth above. However, if any other business is properly brought before the Annual Meeting, or any adjournment or postponement thereof, the Proxies will vote in regard thereto according to their discretion.

WHERE YOU CAN FIND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

We file periodic reports and other information with the SEC. Our SEC filings are available to the public at the SEC’s website atwww.sec.gov and at the Company’s website atwww.nationalfuel.com.

Statements contained in this proxy statement, or in any document incorporated in this proxy statement by reference regarding the contents of any contract or other document, are not necessarily complete and each such statement is qualified in its entirety by reference to that contract or other document filed as an exhibit with the SEC. The SEC allows the Company to incorporate by reference the information that it files with the SEC. Incorporation by reference means that the Company can disclose important information to you by referring you to other documents filed separately with the SEC that are legally considered to be part of this document, and such documents are automatically updated and superseded by this proxy statement. Later information that is filed by the Company with the SEC will automatically update and supersede the information in this document.

BY ORDEROFTHE BOARDOF DIRECTORS

SARAH J. MUGEL

General Counsel and Secretary

January 18, 201922, 2021

APPENDIX A TO PROXY STATEMENT

NATIONAL FUEL GAS COMPANY

REPORTING PROCEDURES FOR ACCOUNTING AND AUDITING MATTERS

 

I.

Purpose

National Fuel Gas Company (“Company”) has a longstanding commitment to comply with federal and state securities laws and regulations, accounting standards, accounting controls and audit practices. In furtherance of this commitment, the Audit Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors has established these Reporting Procedures for Accounting and Auditing Matters (“Procedures”), which provide for (i) the receipt, retention, and treatment of complaints received by the Company regarding accounting, internal accounting controls, or auditing matters; and (ii) the confidential, anonymous submission by employees of the Company of concerns regarding accounting or auditing matters.

 

II.

Scope

These Procedures apply to all employees of all divisions and subsidiaries of the Company.

 

III.

Procedures

 

 A.

Making a Report of Accounting and Auditing Matters

 

 1.

An employee with a concern or complaint regarding accounting, internal accounting controls, or auditing matters (collectively “Accounting and Auditing Matters”) may report such concerns, on a confidential and anonymous basis if the employee so desires, as follows:

 

 a.

Via the Company’s dedicated toll-free hotline ((1-800-605-1338)1-800-605-1338) operated by a third party service company; or

 

 b.

Via the Company’s dedicated website (www.natfuelgas.ethicspoint.com) operated by a third party service company; or

c.

In writing in a sealed envelope addressed to the Chairman of the Audit Committee, National Fuel Gas Company, 6363 Main Street, Williamsville, New York 14221. The sealed envelope should be labeled with a legend such as:“Submitted pursuant to the Reporting Procedures for Accounting and Auditing Matters.”

 

 2.

A sufficiently detailed description of the factual basis for the report should be given in order to allow appropriate investigation into the matter.

 

 B.

Treatment of Reports

 

 1.

All reports will be forwarded to the Chairman of Audit Committee, the Chief Auditor, and General Counsel.

 

 2.

Upon receipt of a report, the Chief Auditor will determine whether the complaint pertains to Accounting and Auditing Matters. If the report does not pertain to Accounting and Auditing Matters, the Chief Auditor and General Counsel will decide together on the appropriate disposition.

 

 3.

Reports relating to Accounting and Auditing Matters will be promptly investigated by the Chief Auditor under the Audit Committee’s direction and oversight, and may involve the assistance of other Company resources as needed. To the fullest extent possible, such investigations and reports will be kept confidential.

 

 4.

If the results of an investigation indicate that corrective action is required, the Audit Committee will decide what steps should be taken to rectify the problem and reduce the likelihood of recurrence, and may also recommend appropriate discipline.

 5.

No person making a report under these Procedures shall be subject to retaliation because of making a good faith report. In addition, any employee of the Company responsible for

retaliating against individuals who in good faith report concerns regarding Accounting and Auditing Matters will be subject to disciplinary action, up to and including termination. Any employee making a bad faith report, including a report made for the purpose of harassing or maliciously injuring the subject of the report, will be subject to disciplinary action, up to and including termination.

 

 C.

Retention of Reports and Investigation Documents

The Chief Auditor will maintain, in accordance with the Company’s document retention policy, a complete record of all reports received (including those determined not to pertain to Accounting and Auditing Matters), all records associated with reports of Accounting and Auditing Matters, the treatment of reports of Accounting and Auditing Matters under these Procedures, and the ultimate disposition of Accounting and Auditing Matters reports. In addition, the Chief Auditor shall prepare an update on the status of (i) all reports of Accounting and Auditing Matters under investigation, and (ii) those reports of Accounting and Auditing Matters whose investigation has been concluded since the previous status update. Status updates shall be provided as required to the Chairman of the Audit Committee and shall be provided on at least a quarterly basis for the entire Audit Committee.

 

IV.

Administration of Procedures

The Audit Committee is the issuer and owner of these Procedures. These Procedures shall be subject to periodic review and revision by the Audit Committee as necessary or appropriate. The Audit Committee, in consultation with the Company’s Chief Auditor, shall have the authority to make any interpretations regarding the operation of these Procedures.

APPENDIX B TO PROXY STATEMENT

NATIONAL FUEL GAS COMPANY

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE GUIDELINES

AMENDED EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2019JUNE 11, 2020

The business of National Fuel Gas Company (the “Company”) is conducted by its employees, managers and officers, under the oversight of the Board of Directors (the “Board”), in order to serve the long-term interests of its stockholders. The Board and management recognize that the long-term interests of stockholders are served by considering the interests of customers, employees and the communities in which the Company operates. In addition, the Board requires directors, officers and employees to comply with all legal and regulatory requirements and to adhere to the highest ethical standards in the performance of their duties. To help discharge its responsibilities, the Board has adopted the following guidelines on corporate governance matters.

 

1.

Board Ofof Directors

The Board shall consist of a number of directors, not less than seven nor more than eleven, as determined by a majority vote of the full Board.

The business and affairs of the Company shall be managed by or under the direction of the Board, acting as a body, in accordance withSection 14A:6-1 of the New Jersey Business Corporation Act. Individual directors shall have no authority to act for or on behalf of the Company without the express authorization of the Board, or as may be provided by law, the Certificate of Incorporation or theBy-Laws.

 

2.

Independent Directors

A majority of the Board must qualify as independent directors under the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange. The Board will annually review the relationship that each director has with the Company (either directly or as a partner, shareholder or officer of an organization that has a relationship with the Company). All determinations of director independence will be disclosed in the Company’s annual proxy statement.

 

3.

Director Qualifications

The Board, with input from the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee, is responsible for periodically determining the appropriate skills, perspectives, experiences, and characteristics required of Board candidates, taking into account the Company’s needs and currentmake-up of the Board. This assessment should include knowledge, experience, and skills in areas critical to understanding the Company and its business; personal characteristics, such as integrity and judgment; and candidates’ commitments to the boards of other publicly-held companies. Each Board member is expected to ensure that other existing and planned future commitments do not materially interfere with the member’s service as a director and that he or she devotes the time necessary to discharge his or her duties as a director.

The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for periodically reviewing these qualification guidelines and recommending modifications, as appropriate. The Board believes the qualification guidelines included asExhibit A are currently appropriate, but it may change these guidelines as the Company’s and Board’s needs warrant.

Directors are expected to carry out the functions of the Board in a professional and diligent manner, and to spend the time and effort necessary to properly discharge such responsibilities. Accordingly, a director is expected to regularly attend meetings of the Board and Committees on which such director sits, with the understanding that on occasion a director may be unable to attend a meeting. A director who is unable to attend a meeting is expected to notify the Chairman of the Board or the Chair of the appropriate Committee in advance of such meeting. A director is also expected to review provided materials in advance of a meeting.

4.

Selection of New Directors

The Board is responsible for selecting Board candidates and nominating them for election by the stockholders and for filling vacancies on the Board. The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee will recommend to the Board nominees for election, including, as appropriate, incumbent directors forre-election.

Stockholders may propose candidates for consideration by the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee in accordance with the Process for Identifying and Evaluating Nominees for Director included asExhibit B. In addition, the Company’sBy-Laws provide a process for stockholders meeting certain requirements to have nominees included in the Company’s proxy materials.

In recommending individuals for nomination, the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee will seek the input of the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer and will evaluate candidates using the qualification guidelines included asExhibit A and the Process for Identifying and Evaluating Nominees for Director included asExhibit B, as they may be supplemented from time to time. Once a candidate is selected to join the Board, the Chairman of the Board and/or the Chair of the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee will extend the invitation to join the Board on the Board’s behalf.

 

5.

Term Limits

The Board does not believe it should limit the number of terms for which an individual may serve as a director. While term limits could help ensure fresh ideas, they also would force the Board to lose the contributions of directors who have developed an insight into the Company. This insight and continuity of directors is an advantage, not a disadvantage. As an alternative to term limits, the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee will review a director’s continuation on the Board whenever the director experiences a change in professional responsibilities, as a way to assure that the director’s skills and experience continue to match the needs of the Board. In addition, in connection with nomination of the slate of directors that the Board proposes for election by stockholders each year, the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee will considerre-nominated directors’ continuation on the Board and take steps as may be appropriate to ensure that the Board maintains an openness to new ideas.

A director shall normally serve on the Board for a three-year term, except that subject to paragraph 7,8, a director appointed to fill a vacancy shall stand for election at the next annual meeting of stockholders.

In an uncontested election of directors, a nominee for director who fails to receive a majority “FOR” vote of votes cast, as defined under New Jersey law, for election in accordance with the Company’sBy-Laws is expected to tender, promptly following certification of the stockholder vote, his or her resignation from the Board, which resignation may be conditioned upon Board acceptance of the resignation.

The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee will consider the tendered resignation of a director who fails to receive a majority of votes cast for election, as well as any other offer to resign that is conditioned upon Board acceptance, and recommend to the Board whether or not to accept such resignation. The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee in deciding what action to recommend, and the Board in deciding what action to take, may consider any factors they deem relevant. The director whose resignation is under consideration shall abstain from participating in any decision of the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee or the Board regarding such resignation. If the Board does not accept the resignation, the director will continue to serve until his or her successor is elected and qualified. The Board shall publicly disclose its decision regarding a resignation tendered by a director who fails to receive a majority of votes cast for election within 90 days after certification of the stockholder vote.

 

6.

Change in Professional Responsibilities

It is the view of the Board that each director who experiences a change in his or her business or professional affiliation or responsibilities should bring this change to the attention of the Board and

should offer to resign. The Board does not believe that each director who retires or has a change in position or responsibilities should necessarily leave the Board. The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee will, however, review the continued appropriateness of Board membership under these circumstances and make a recommendation to the Board.

This same guideline applies to any inside directors, including the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, in the event he or she no longer serves in that position.

 

7.

Service on Other Boards

It is the view of the Board that directors are expected to ensure that other commitments, including other board memberships, do not interfere with their duties and responsibilities as members of the Board. Current directors should notify the Chief Executive Officer or Corporate Secretary, who in turn will notify the Chair of the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee, when considering a request for service on the board of any other public company or other for-profit entity. The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee, in consultation with the Chief Executive Officer (or the Corporate Secretary, in the case of the Chief Executive Officer who is the subject of the request), will consider potential conflicts of interest and whether the service would interfere with such director’s ability to properly discharge his or her duties. The Committee will make a recommendation to the Board, and the Board, exercising its business judgement, will consider any further action.

8.

Director Age

A Company director must submit his or her resignation from the Board at the annual meeting of stockholders immediately following his or her 75th birthday. Directors may stand forre-election even though this guideline would prevent them from completing a full term.

 

8.9.

Board Leadership

 

 A.

Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer

1. The Chairman of the Board, who may also be the Chief Executive Officer, shall be a director and preside at all meetings of the Board and meetings of the stockholders. The Chairman of the Board is chosen on an annual basis by at least a majority vote of the remaining directors.

2. The Chief Executive Officer, who may also be the Chairman of the Board, shall be appointed by the Board and serve at the pleasure of the Board.

 

 B.

Lead Independent Director

The Lead Independent Director will preside at all meetings of thenon-management directors at which he or she is present and all meetings of the independent directors at which he or she is present. The Lead Independent Director will perform such other functions as the Board may direct. The Lead Independent Director is chosen on an annual basis by at least a majority vote of the remaining directors.

 

 C.

Succession Planning and Leadership Development

Each year, the Chief Executive Officer will report to the Compensation Committee on succession planning and his or her recommendation as to a potential successor, along with a review of any development plans recommended for such individuals. The Committee will make an annual report to the Board on succession planning, and the Board will work with the Committee to evaluate potential successors to the Chief Executive Officer. When the Compensation Committee and the Board review management succession plans for the Chief Executive Officer, they will consider succession in the event of an emergency or retirement of the Chief Executive Officer. The Committee and the Board will also review succession candidates for executive officers other than the Chief Executive Officer and other senior managers as it deems appropriate.

9.10.

Board Committees

 

 A.

Number of Committees

Currently there are five Committees: Executive, Audit, Compensation, Nominating/Corporate Governance, and Financing. The Board believes the current Committee structure is appropriate. From time to time, depending upon the circumstances, the Board may form a new Committee or disband a current Committee.

 

 B.

Assignment of Committee Members

The Board appoints members of the Committees on an annual basis. Vacancies in the Committees will be filled by the Board. In making assignments to the Committees, only independent directors may

serve on the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, or the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee, and at least one member of the Audit Committee must have accounting or financial management experience, as defined by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission rules or as required under applicable New York Stock Exchange listing requirements. Additionally, a member of the Audit Committee may not sit on more than three other Audit Committees of other public companies, unless the Board determines that such commitments would not impair his or her effective service to the Company.

The Board will take into account tenure on a Committee and give consideration to rotating Committee members periodically, but the Board does not feel that rotation should be mandated as a policy.

 

 C.

Committee Charters and Authority

The Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee, each have a written charter, which has been approved by the Board. Each charter delegates certain responsibilities to the respective Committee.

The Executive Committee may exercise Board authority with respect to matters other than those for which action of the full Board is required under applicable law. The Financing Committee may exercise Board authority with respect to specific matters for which the Board has delegated responsibility to it.

Unless delegated to one of the Committees either in the Charter, theBy-Laws, a resolution of the Board or a vote of stockholders, each Committee shall make recommendations to the Board and the Board will consider and approve the recommendations. The Committee charters may be changed from time to time by approval of the Board.

 

10.11.

Board Meetings

 

 A.

Number of Meetings

The Board has at least four scheduled meetings per year at which it reviews and discusses reports by management on the performance of the Company, its plans and prospects, as well as immediate issues facing the Company.

 

 B.

Role of the Chairman of the Board

The Chairman of the Board shall preside at all meetings of the Board. The Chairman of the Board shall determine the agenda for all Board meetings with the assistance of the Chief Executive Officer. Each director shall be entitled to suggest the inclusion of items on the agenda, with the final determination of the agenda to be made by the Chairman of the Board. The Chairman of the Board shall also determine the timing and length of Board meetings, and the time to be devoted to each topic on the agenda. All procedural matters with respect to the conduct of Board meetings shall be determined by the

Chairman of the Board, including whether any individuals other than Board members shall be invited to attend and/or participate in all or any portion of any meetings, and the conditions of such individuals’ attendance and/or participation. In the absence of the Chairman of the Board, the Chief Executive Officer shall exercise all powers and authority conferred herein.

 

 C.

Distribution of Board Materials in Advance

Materials for review, discussion and/or action of the Board should be distributed to Board members in advance of meetings whenever practicable.

 

 D.

Non-Management Director Meetings/Independent Director Meetings

Thenon-management directors will meet at regularly scheduled executive sessions without management. The Audit Committee Chair, Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee Chair and

Compensation Committee Chair may call thenon-management directors to additional sessions without management. The independent directors will meet in executive session without management at least once per year. The Board shall not take formal actions at meetings of thenon-management directors or independent directors, although the participating directors may make recommendations for consideration by the full Board.

 

11.12.

Confidentiality

Pursuant to their fiduciary duties, directors are required to protect and hold confidential allnon-public information obtained by reason of their directorship position absent the express or implied permission of the Board of Directors to disclose such information or the written agreement of the Company to permit disclosure. No director shall use Confidential Information for his or her own personal benefit or to benefit persons or entities outside the Company. No director shall disclose Confidential Information outside the Company, either during or after his or her service as a director of the Company, except (i) with authorization of the Board of Directors, (ii) as may be permitted by written agreement with the Company, or (iii) as may be otherwise required by law.

“Confidential Information” is allnon-public information entrusted to or obtained by a director by reason of his or her position as a director of the Company. It includes, but is not limited to,non-public information that might be of use to competitors or harmful to the Company or its customers if disclosed, such as

 

information about the Company’s financial condition, results of operations, prospects, plans, objectives or strategies, and information relating to mergers and acquisitions, stock splits, stock repurchases, divestitures and other transactions;

 

trade secrets, information or techniques, marketing and research and development information, drilling and exploration data, information concerning customers, suppliers, producers and joint venture partners, payroll and benefits information, current/past employee information, technical and computer/software related information, and legal information;

 

information about discussions and deliberations relating to business issues and decisions, between and among employees, officers and directors.

To promote a free and unfettered exchange of ideas among directors, the directors will treat all discussions and deliberations that take place at Board meetings as confidential unless disclosure of those discussions is otherwise required by law or permitted by written agreement with the Company. No video or electronic recording of Board proceedings shall be made without the consent of the Chairman of the Board and a majority of the Board.

 

12.13.

Board and Committee Performance Evaluations

The Board and the Audit, Compensation and Nominating/Corporate Governance Committees will perform an annual self-evaluation. Each year the directors will provide assessments of the effectiveness of

the Board, and the members of the Audit, Compensation and Nominating/Corporate Governance Committees will provide assessments of the effectiveness of their respective committees. These evaluations will be submitted to the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee which will review them and determine if any additional evaluation is necessary. If the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee determines that additional evaluation is necessary, it may elect to have such evaluation performed internally, or by an independent corporate governance expert. The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee will report all evaluation results to the Board and make recommendations for areas which, in its judgment, require improvement.

 

13.14.

Board Compensation

The Board’s compensation philosophy is that directors (other than those who are also salaried officers of the Company or any of its subsidiaries) are entitled to receive reasonable compensation for

their services and reimbursement for certain expenses, as may be determined by the Board. The Compensation Committee shall have the responsibility for recommending to the Board changes in compensation levels fornon-employee directors. In discharging this duty, the Committee shall be guided by four general principles: compensation should fairly pay directors for work required; compensation should attract and retain highly qualified candidates for Board membership; compensation should align directors’ interests with the long-term interests of stockholders; and compensation should be transparent and as simple as possible within the limitations of tax and legal considerations.

Reasonable compensation also may be paid to any person (other than a salaried officer or employee of the Company or any of its subsidiaries) formally requested by the Board to attend a meeting.

 

14.15.

Board Access to Company Officers

Board members will have access to all officers of National Fuel Gas Company. Independent Board members may consult with such officers without senior corporate management present. Members of committees of the Board will also have such access to management as is provided in committee charters or as may otherwise be authorized by the Board. Management is encouraged to invite Company personnel to any Board meeting at which their presence and expertise would help the Board to have a full understanding of matters being considered and to introduce managers with significant potential.

 

15.16.

Access to Independent Advisors

The Board shall have the power at any time by majority vote to retain independent outside financial, legal or other advisors, at the Company’s expense.

 

16.17.

Director Contact with the Company’s Constituencies

Except as otherwise required by New York Stock Exchange listing standards or applicable law, or as authorized by the Board, communications with parties external to the Company (including but not limited to stockholders, the media, attorneys, vendors, service providers, etc.) shall be the responsibility of the Chief Executive Officer or delegated by the Chief Executive Officer to the appropriate area of the Company. The directors will be consulted from time to time for their advice, as the Chief Executive Officer so determines.

 

17.18.

Director Orientation and Continuing Education

All directors, upon their initial appointment to the Board, shall attend an educational session, thereby enabling them to better perform their duties and recognize and deal with various issues that may arise during their tenure as directors. Subsequently, the directors shall attend ongoing educational programs related to their Board service as the Board deems appropriate.

18.19.

Risk Oversight and Oversight of Environmental,Corporate Responsibility (Environmental, Social and Corporate GovernanceGovernance) Concerns

The Board retains risk oversight and general oversight of corporate responsibility, including environmental, social and corporate governance (“ESG”), concerns, and any related health and safety issues that might arise from the Company’s operations rather than delegating that responsibilityoperations. The Board’s Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee will oversee and provide guidance to a Committee ofmanagement concerning the Board.Company’s strategy and reporting with respect to ESG concerns. Management is expected to integrate these corporate responsibility concernsconsiderations into decision-making throughout the organization.

 

19.20.

Recovery of Funds

If the Company is required to restate its financial results due to material noncompliance with any financial reporting requirement under the securities laws as a result of misconduct by a current or former executive officer, the Board would exercise its business judgment to determine what action it believes is appropriate to address the conduct, prevent its recurrence, and impose such discipline as would be appropriate. In addition to other potential action, the Board may, in its discretion after considering the

costs and benefits of doing so, seek to recover that portion of any incentive-based compensation received by such officer (including compensation received upon exercise or payment of stock options and other equity awards) during the three-year period preceding the date on which the Company was required to prepare the accounting restatement, which exceeds the amount or value that the Board determines would have been payable or received in respect of such incentive awards had the revised financial statement(s) reflected in the restatement been applied to determine the incentive compensation or been available to the market at the time of exercise or payment of any incentive award. Subject to any limits imposed by applicable law, the Board may seek to recover such excess compensation by requiring the officer to pay such amount to the Company; byset-off; by reducing future compensation; or by such other means or combination of means as the Board determines to be appropriate.

 

20.21.

Hedging or Pledging of Company Stock

It is the view of the Board that directors and executive officers should not purchase or sell options on Company stock, nor engage in short sales with respect to Company common stock. Trading by executive officers and directors in puts, calls, straddles, equity swaps or other derivative securities that are directly linked to Company stock is prohibited. Directors and executive officers may not pledge Company equity as security for an extension of credit.

 

21.22.

Amendment and Interpretation

These Guidelines are in addition to and are not intended to change or interpret any federal or state law or regulation, or the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation orBy-Laws or any Committee Charter reviewed and approved by the Board. The Guidelines are subject to modification from time to time by the Board.

EXHIBIT A

TO

NATIONAL FUEL GAS COMPANY

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE GUIDELINES

NATIONAL FUEL GAS COMPANY

DIRECTOR QUALIFICATION GUIDELINES

The Board of Directors in considering qualifications of directors standing forre-election and candidates for Board membership will consider the following factors, in addition to those other factors it may deem relevant:

1. Strong management experience, ideally with major public companies.

2. Other areas of expertise or experience that are desirable given the Company’s business and the currentmake-up of the Board, such as expertise or experience in: the natural gas industry, information technology businesses, manufacturing, financial or investment banking, scientific research and development, senior level government experience, and academic administration or teaching.

3. Desirability of range in age, so that retirements are staggered to permit replacement of directors of desired skills and experience in a way that will permit appropriate continuity of Board members.

4. Independence, as defined by the Board.

5. Diversity of perspectives, including all aspects of diversity, brought to the Board by individual members.

6. Knowledge and skills in accounting and finance, business judgment, general management practices, crisis response and management, industry knowledge and leadership.

7. Personal characteristics matching the Company’s values, such as integrity, accountability, financial literacy, and high performance standards.

8. Additional characteristics, such as:

a.) willingness to commit the time required to fully discharge their responsibilities to the Board, including the time to prepare for Board and Committee meetings by reviewing the material supplied before each meeting;

b.) commitment to attend a minimum of 75% of meetings;

c.) ability and willingness to represent the stockholders’ long and short-term interests;

d.) awareness of the Company’s responsibilities to its customers, employees, suppliers, regulatory bodies, and the communities in which it operates; and

e.) willingness to advance their opinions, but once a decision is made by a majority of the Board, a willingness to support the majority decision assuming questions of ethics or propriety are not involved.

9. The number of commitments to other entities, with one of the more important factors being the number of other public-company boards on which the individual serves.

10. In order to qualify for election as a director, a nominee must be a stockholder of the Company.

EXHIBIT B

TO

NATIONAL FUEL GAS COMPANY

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE GUIDELINES

NATIONAL FUEL GAS COMPANY

NOMINATING/CORPORATE GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE

Process for Identifying and Evaluating Nominees for Director

1. The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee (the Committee) will observe the following procedures in identifying and evaluating candidates for election to the Company’s Board of Directors.

2. The Company believes that the continuing service of qualified incumbents promotes stability and continuity in the boardroom, contributing to the Board’s ability to work as a collective body, while giving the Company the benefit of the familiarity and insight into the Company’s affairs that its directors have accumulated during their tenure. Accordingly, the process of the Committee for identifying nominees shall reflect the Company’s practice ofre-nominating incumbent directors who continue to satisfy the Board’s criteria for membership on the Board, whom the Committee believes continue to make important contributions to the Board and who consent to continue their service on the Board.

3. Consistent with this policy, in considering candidates for election at annual meetings of stockholders, the Committee will consider the incumbent directors whose terms expire at the upcoming meeting and who wish to continue their service on the Board.

4. The Board will evaluate the qualifications and performance of the incumbent directors who desire to continue their service. In particular, as to each such incumbent director, the Committee will —

 

 (a)

consider if the director continues to satisfy the Director Qualification Guidelines which are Exhibit A to the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines;

 

 (b)

review any prior assessments of the performance of the director during the preceding term made by the Committee; and

 

 (c)

determine whether there exist any special, countervailing considerations againstre-nomination of the director.

5. If the Committee determines that:

 

 (a)

an incumbent director consenting tore-nomination continues to be qualified and has satisfactorily performed his or her duties as a director during the preceding term; and

 

 (b)

there exist no reasons, including considerations relating to the composition and functional needs of the Board as a whole, why in the Committee’s view the incumbent should not bere-nominated, the Committee will, absent special circumstances, propose the incumbent director forre-nomination.

6. The Committee will identify and evaluate new candidates for election to the Board, including for the purpose of filling vacancies arising by reason of the resignation, retirement, removal, death or disability of an incumbent director or the desire of the directors to expand the size of the Board.

7. The Committee will accept recommendations for nominees from persons that the Committee believes are likely to be familiar with qualified candidates. These persons may include members of the Board, including members of the Committee, and management of the Company. The Committee may also determine to engage a professional search firm to assist in identifying qualified candidates. If such a firm is engaged, the Committee shall set its fees and the scope of its engagement.

8. As to each recommended candidate that the Committee believes merits consideration, the Committee will:

 

 (a)

cause to be assembled information concerning the background and qualifications of the candidate;

 (b)

determine if the candidate satisfies the Director Qualification Guidelines which are Exhibit A to the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines; if so, then

 

 (c)

consider the contribution that the candidate can be expected to make to the overall functioning of the Board.

9. The Committee shall solicit the views of the Chief Executive Officer and the Chairman of the Board, and the views of such other persons as the committee deems appropriate, regarding the qualifications and suitability of candidates to be nominated as directors.

10. In its discretion, the Committee may designate one or more of its members (or the entire Committee) to interview any proposed candidate.

11. Based on all available information and relevant considerations, the Committee will select a candidate who, in the view of the Committee, is suited for membership on the Board. The Committee will then recommend to the Board that the candidate be nominated. The Board would then, if it chooses, nominate the candidate by a resolution adopted by the Board at a meeting or by unanimous written consent.

12. Stockholders may propose candidates for consideration by the Committee by communication directed to the Company’s Secretary at its principal office, received not less than 120 calendar days before the anniversary date of the Company’s proxy statement released to stockholders in connection with the previous year’s annual meeting of stockholders. However, if the date of the annual meeting is changed more than 30 days from the date corresponding to the date of the prior year’s annual meeting, then a stockholder’s communication must be received not later than the close of business on the tenth day following the date on which notice of the meeting is given by the Company (or, if earlier, by the tenth day following public disclosure of the new date of the annual meeting). The communication must include all information relating to such person that is required to be disclosed in solicitations of proxies for election of directors in an election contest, or is otherwise required, in each case under applicable SEC regulations, including such person’s written consent to be named in the proxy statement as a nominee and to serving as a director if elected. In making its selection, the Committee will evaluate candidates proposed by stockholders owning at least five percent (5%) of the Company’s outstanding Common Stock, under criteria similar to the evaluation of other candidates. The Committee shall have no obligation whatsoever to consider other unsolicited recommendations received from stockholders proposing candidates for the Board. The Committee may consider, as one of the factors in its evaluation of stockholder recommended nominees, the size and duration of the interest of the recommending stockholder or stockholder group in the equity of the Company, and the candidate’s relationship to that stockholder or group, in order to determine whether the candidate can effectively represent the interests of all stockholders. The Committee may also consider the extent to which the recommending stockholder or group intends to continue holding its interest in the Company, including, in the case of nominees recommended for election at an annual meeting of stockholders, whether the recommending stockholder intends to continue holding its interest at least through the time of such annual meeting.

APPENDIX C TO PROXY STATEMENT

TEXT OF PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO ARTICLE SIXTH OF THE

RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION, AS AMENDED,

OF NATIONAL FUEL GAS COMPANY

2010 EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANARTICLE SIXTH

Amended and Restated December 5, 2018

SECTION 1

PURPOSEBoard of Directors

The purposebusiness and affairs of this corporation shall be managedbyunder the Plan isdirection of a Board of Directors. The number of directors (exclusive of directors, if any, to is advancebe elected by the interestsholders of the Company and its stockholders by (i) incentivizing superior performanceshares of Employees of the Company and its Subsidiaries by means of a long term, equity based compensation program and (ii) enhancing the ability of the Company and its Subsidiaries to attract and retain in its employ highly qualified persons for the successful conduct of their businesses.

SECTION 2

DEFINITIONS

Adjustment Event” means any stock dividend, stock split or share combination in respect of, or extraordinary cash dividend on,Preferred Stock, voting separately from the Common Stock oras provided in any recapitalization, reorganization, merger, consolidation,split-up,spin-off, combination, dissolution, liquidation, exchangeamendment creating any series of shares, warrants or rights offeringPreferred Stock) shall be not less than7seven nor more than 11, the exact number of directors to purchase Common Stock atbe determined from time to time by a price substantially below Fair Market Value, or other similar event affectingresolution adopted by the Common Stock.affirmative vote of a majority of the entire Board of Directors.

Alternative Award” has the meaning ascribed to it in Section 12The directors of this Plan.corporation elected prior to the 2024 annual meeting of stockholdersshall be divided into three classes, designated Class I, Class II and Class III, respectively. Each such class shall be as nearly equal in number as may be possible. Except as otherwise provided in this Article SIXTH, directors of each such class shall hold office for a term expiring at the annual meeting of stockholders held in the third year following the year of their election and until their respective successors shall be elected and shall qualify, subject to prior death, resignation, retirement, disqualification or removal from office. Until the classification of the board and its directors terminates at the 2024annual meeting of stockholders, stockholders shall continue to be entitled to remove directors solely for cause. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the directors elected at each annual meeting of stockholders, commencing with the annual meeting in 2022, shall hold office for a term expiring at the next annual meeting of stockholders and until their respective successors shall be elected and shall qualify, subject to prior death, resignation, retirement, disqualification or removal from office.

Award”meansAt the 1985 annual meeting of stockholders, Class I directors shall be elected for a one-year term, Class II directors for a two-year term and Class III directors for a three–year term. At each succeeding annual meeting of stockholders beginning in 1986, the successors to the class of directors whose term expires at that annual meeting shall be elected for a three-year term, and successors to directors of any grant of an Option, a SAR, a Restricted Stock Unit, Restricted Stock, a Performance Award or Other Stock-Based Award under this Plan.

“Award Notice”means a notice from the Company to a Participant,other class, including directors elected in electronic or written form, that sets forth the terms and conditions of an Award, in addition to those terms and conditions establishedany such class by this Plan and by the Committee’s exercise of its administrative powers.

“Board”means the Board of Directors of the Company.

“Cause”means (i) the willful and continued failure by an Employee (regardless of the Employee’s age) to substantially perform his duties with his Employer after written warnings specifically identifying the lack of substantial performance are delivered to him by his Employer,fill one or (ii) the willful engaging by an Employee (regardless of the Employee’s age) in illegal conduct which is materially and demonstrably injurious to the Companymore vacancies or a Subsidiary.

“Change in Control”newly-created directorships, shall be deemed to have occurred at such time as:

(i) any “person” withinelected for the meaningremaining term of Section 13(d) ofthat class. If the Exchange Act, other than the Company, a Subsidiary, or any employee benefit plan or plans sponsored by the Company or any Subsidiary, is or has become the “beneficial owner,” as defined inRule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act, directly or indirectly, of twenty percent (20%) or more of the combined voting power of the outstanding securities of the Company ordinarily having the right to vote at the electionnumber of directors or more than twenty percent (20%) of the fair market value of all classes of the Company’s outstanding stock;

(ii) consummation of any consolidation or merger immediately following which the persons who, immediately prior to the consolidation or merger, held the capital stock of the Company do not hold, immediately following such transaction, (x) at least a majority of the stock ordinarily entitled to vote in the election of directors of the corporation surviving such consolidation or merger (or of the ultimate parent corporation in an unbroken chain which owns, directly or indirectly, a majority of the capital stock of such entity) or (y) stock in the entity described in subclause (x) that represents at

least 50% of the fair market value of all classes of stock of such entity, in either case, in substantially the same proportionate ownership as such persons held immediately before such consolidation or merger,

(iii) any sale, lease, exchange or other transfer (in one transaction or a series of related transactions) of all or substantially all the assets of the Company; or

(iv) individuals who constitute the Board at the beginning of the 12 month period ended on the date of determination (the “Incumbent Board”) have ceased for any reason to constitute at least a majority thereof, provided that any person becoming a director subsequent to such date whose election, or nomination for electionis changed by the Company’s stockholders, was approved by a vote of at least 75% of the directors then comprising the Incumbent Board (either by specific vote or by approval of the proxy statement of the Company in which such person is named as nominee for director without objection to such nomination) shall be, for purposes of this Plan, considered as though such person were a member of the Incumbent Board.

“Code”means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended from time to time.

“Committee”means the Compensation Committeeresolution of the Board of Directors pursuant to this Article SIXTH, any increase or such other committee designateddecrease shall be apportioned by the Board authorizedof Directors among the classes, if applicable, so as to administermaintain the Plan.number of directors in each class as nearly equal as possible, but in no case shall a decrease in the number of directors shorten the term of any incumbent director.

Common Stock” meansAny newly-created directorship resulting from an increase in the common stocknumber of directors by resolution of the Company.

“Company”means National Fuel Gas Company.

Disability”, with respectBoard of Directors pursuant to any Participant occurs, unless otherwise provided for in an Award Notice, when and if, as a result of disease, injury or mental disorder, the Participant is incapable of engaging in regular employment or occupation with the Company or a Subsidiary and if and so long as the Social Security Administration has determined that the Participant is disabled; provided that, the Participant will notthis Article SIXTH may be considered to have a Disability under the Plan if the condition giving rise to the disability (i) was contracted, suffered or incurred by reason of being or having been engaged in any criminal or illegal activity, (ii) resulted from the Participant’s habitual drunkenness or narcotic or drug addiction, (iii) resulted from an intentionally self-inflicted injury or (iv) resulted from service in the armed forces for which a military allowance or pension is paid.

Dividend Equivalents” means an amount equal to the regular cash dividends paid by the Company upon one share of Common Stock.

Effective Date” means the date following adoption of this Plan by the Board, on which this Plan is approvedfilled by a majority of the votes cast at a duly constituted meeting of the shareholders of the Company.

“Employee”means an officer or other management employee of the Company or Subsidiary.

Employer” means, with respect to any Employee or Participant, whichever of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries employs such person.

“Exchange Act”means the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended from time to time.

Executive Officer” means any “officer” within the meaning ofRule 16a-1(f) promulgated under the Exchange Act.

“Fair Market Value”of a share of Common Stock on any date means the average of the high and low sales prices of a share of Common Stock as reflecteddirectors then in the next day reports of the high and low sales prices of a share of Company Common Stock, as reported on either www.bloomberg.com or www.yahoo.com (or, if no such shares were publicly traded on that date, the next preceding date that such shares were so traded); provided, however, that if shares of Common Stock shall not have been traded for more than five (5) trading days immediately preceding such date, Fair Market Value shall mean the closing priceoffice. Any vacancy on the immediately preceding date on which stock transactions were so reported.

“Grant Price”means, with respect to a SAR,the Fair Market ValueBoard of a share of Common Stock measured as of the date the SAR is granted to a Participant or such greater amount as shall be determined by the Committee and specified in the applicable Award Notice.

ISO” means an Option that is an “incentive stock option” within the meaning of section 422 of the Code.

“Nonqualified Stock Option”means an Option that is not an ISO.

“Option”means the right to purchase Common Stock at a stated price for a specified period of time. For purposes of the Plan, an Option may be either (i) an ISO or (ii) Nonqualified Stock Option.

“Other Stock-Based Award”means an Award made pursuant to, and in accordance with the requirements of Section 10 of the Plan.

“Participant”means any individual to whom an Award has been granted by the Committee under this Plan.

Performance Awards” means Awards of Performance Shares or Performance Units, or any other Award granted under this Plan, the vesting of which is conditioned upon attainment of Performance Goals.

Performance Cycle”means the period selected by the Committee during which the performance of the Company or any Subsidiary or unit thereof or any individual is measured for the purpose of determining the extent to which an Award subject to Performance Goals has been earned.

Performance Goals” means the objectives for the Company, any Subsidiary or business unit thereof, or Participant that may be established by the Committee for a Performance Cycle with respect to any performance-based Awards contingently granted under the Plan. The performance measure(s) to be used for purposes of Awards granted under the Plan shall include one or more measures chosen from among the following, as applied to the Company or to any Subsidiary or combination of Subsidiaries, whether on a relative or a comparative basis: (i) earnings per share, (ii) net income (before or after taxes), (iii) return measures (including, but not limited to, return on assets, equity or sales), (iv) cash flow return on investments which equals net cash flows divided by owners equity, (v) earnings before or after taxes, depreciation and/or amortization; (vi) gross revenues, (vii) operating income (before or after taxes); (viii) total shareholder return, (vi) corporate performance indicators (indices based on the level of certain expenses, certain objectively measurable operational events or certain services provided to customers), (x) cash generation, profit and/or revenue targets, (xi) growth measures, including revenue growth, reserve growth or reserve replacement, whether or not as compared to a peer group or other benchmark and/or (xii) share price (including, but not limited to, growth measures and total shareholder return). In setting performance goals using these performance measures, and in determining actual performance relative to these performance measures, the Committee may exclude the effect of changes in accounting standards and events impacting the comparability of results of operations or financial condition, as specified by the Committee, such as write-offs, capital gains and losses, and acquisitions and dispositions of businesses.

Performance Shares” means an Award constituting units denominated in Common Stock, the number of which such units may be adjusted over a Performance Cycle based upon the extent to which Performance Goals have been satisfied.

Performance Unit” means a dollar denominated unit (or a unit denominated in the Participant’s local currency) granted pursuant the Plan, payable upon the extent of the achievement of the applicable Performance Goals.

Permitted Transferees” has the meaning ascribed to it in Section 14 of this Plan.

“Plan”means this National Fuel Gas Company 2010 Equity Compensation Plan. Any reference in the Plan to a Section or paragraph number refers to that portion of the Plan.

Restricted Period” means the period of time during which Restricted Stock Units or shares of Restricted Stock are subject to forfeiture or restrictions on transfer (if applicable) pursuant to Section 8 of the Plan.

Restricted Stock” means Common Stock awarded to a Participant pursuant to the Plan that is subject to forfeiture and restrictions on transferability in accordance with Section 8 of the Plan.

Restricted Stock Unit” means a Participant’s right to receive, pursuant to Section 8 of this Plan, one share of Common Stock (or the equivalent value thereof in cash), at the end of a specified period of time, which right is subject to forfeiture in accordance with Section 8 of the Plan.

Retirement” means, unless another definition is incorporated into the applicable Award Notice, a termination of the Participant’s employment or service at or after the Participant reaches age 60, but not including a termination for Cause.

Section 409A” means Section 409A of the Code and the applicable rules, regulations and guidance promulgated thereunder.

Settlement Payment” has the meaning ascribed to it in Section 12 of this Plan.

“Stock Appreciation Right” or “SAR”means a stock appreciation right granted under Section 7 of the Plan in respect of one or more shares of Common Stock that entitles the holder thereof to receive, in cash or Common Stock as determined by the Committee in its discretion (which discretion may be exercised at or after grant, including after exercise of the SAR), an amount per share of Common Stock equal to the excess, if any, of the Fair Market Value on the date the SAR is exercised over the Grant Price.

“Subsidiary”means a corporation or other business entity in which the Company directly or indirectly has an ownership interest of more than fifty percent (50%).

Trust” has the meaning ascribed to it in Section 14(a) of the Plan.

SECTION 3

ADMINISTRATION

(a)Administration. The Plan shall be administered by the Committee. The Committee shall have sole and complete authority to (i) interpret the Plan and Awards made under the Plan, including by resolving any omission or correcting any defect in the Plan or any Award, (ii) establish such administrative rules, regulations and procedures as it deems necessary or appropriate for the proper administration of the Plan, (iii) select the Employees to receive Awards under the Plan, (iv) determine the form of each Award, the number of shares subject to each Award and all the terms and conditions of each Award, (v) determine whether Awards are to be granted singly, in combination or in the alternative, (vi) grant waivers of Plan terms and conditions (vii) modify an Award, to the extent permissible by applicable law, including without limitation Section 409A, and (viii) take any and all other action it deems advisable for the proper administration of the Plan. Notwithstanding the foregoing, without the express approval of stockholders, the Committee shall not have the authority to grant Awards in replacement of Awards previously granted under the Plan. All determinations of the Committee shall be final, binding and conclusive.

(b) Delegation by the Committee. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Plan or an Award Notice, but subject to applicable law, the Committee, in its discretion, may delegate its authority and duties under the Plan to the Chief Executive Officer or to other senior officers of the Company, provided, however, that only the Committee may select and grant Awards and render other decisions as to the timing, pricing and amount of Awards to Participants who are Executive Officers.

(c) Indemnification. No member of the Committee shall be personally liable for any act, omission or determination relating to the Plan, and the Company shall indemnify and hold harmless each member of the Committee and each other director or employee of the Company to whom any duty or power relating

to the administration or interpretation of the Plan has been delegated, against any cost or expense (including counsel fees) or liability (including any sum paid in settlement of a claim with the approval of the Committee) arising out of any action, omission or determination related to the Plan, if, in any case, such member, director or employee made or took such action, omission, or determination in good faith and in a manner such person reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the Company and, with respect to any criminal action or proceeding, such person had no reasonable cause to believe his or her conduct was unlawful.

(d) 409A Compliance. The Plan is intended to be administered in a manner consistent with the requirements, where applicable, of Section 409A. Where reasonably possible and practicable, the Plan shall be administered in a manner to avoid the imposition on Participants of immediate tax recognition and additional taxes pursuant to Section 409A. Notwithstanding the foregoing, neither the Company nor the Committee, nor any of the Company’s directors, officers or employees shall have any liability to any person in the event Section 409A applies to any such Award in a manner that results in adverse tax consequences for the Participant or any of his beneficiaries or transferees.

SECTION 4

ELIGIBILITY

The Committee may grant an Award pursuant to the Plan to any Employee it shall designate. The Committee may grant any or all of the Awards specified herein to any particular Participant (subject to the applicable limitations set forth in the Plan). Receipt of an Award of one type, or in any year or other period, shall neither entitle an Employee to receive, nor disqualify an Employee from receiving, another type of Award, or an Award in any future year or period. An Award may be made for one year or multiple years without regard to whether any other type of Award is made for the same year or years.

SECTION 5

SHARES AVAILABLE FOR AWARDS

(a) Number. Subject to the provisions of this Section 5, the maximum number of shares of Common Stock that are available for Awards under the Plan shall not exceed eight million, seven hundred thousand (8,700,000) shares. For purposes of determining compliance with the limit set forth in this Section 5(a), any shares subject to an Award which is (i) an Option or SAR shall be counted against this limit as one (1) share for every share subject to such Award, and (ii) not an Option or SAR shall be counted against such limit as 1.8 shares for every share subject to such Award. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if an Award is issued in tandem with any other Award (such that it is only possible to benefit under either but not both Awards), the shares subject to such Awards shall be counted only once against such limit, based on the Award that represents the greatest allocation of shares for this purpose.

(b) Individual Limitations. Subject to the provisions of Section 5(d), the following individual Award limits apply:

(i) Options, SARs. No Participant may receive in any calendar year a grant of Options and/or SARs in respect of more than 750,000 shares of Common Stock.

(ii) Performance-Based Limitations. To the extent that any Award, other than an Option or SAR, granted to an Executive Officer is intended to satisfy the requirements of Code section 162(m)(4)(C) as “other performance-based compensation,” if available under applicable law, the maximum aggregate amount of such Award(s) granted to such Participant in any 12 month period shall not exceed 375,000 shares with respect to any Performance Share Award or $2,500,000 with respect to any Performance Unit Award; provided, however, that the amount of shares or cash payable in respect of any such Award upon superior achievement in respect of the applicable Performance Goal may equal up to twice the amount specified above.

(c) Canceled, Terminated, or Forfeited Awards, etc. Any shares of Common Stock subject to an Award (or any portion thereof) which for any reason lapses, is canceled, forfeited or terminated or otherwise is

settled without the issuance of Common Stock shall be available for future grants under the Plan. The number of shares available for grant pursuant to the immediately preceding sentence shall be determined based on the number of shares counted against the limit in Section 5(a) with respect to the grant of the corresponding Award. Similarly, any shares subject to an award previously granted under the 1997 Award and Option Plan which for any reason lapses, is canceled, forfeited or terminated or otherwise is settled without the issuance of Common Stock, in each such case after the Effective Date, shall be available for future grants under the Plan in addition to those shares made available under Section 5(a). Notwithstanding the foregoing, the following shares of Common Stock shall not be available for the grant of Awards under the Plan: (i) shares of Common Stock not issued or delivered as a result of the net settlement of a Stock Appreciation Right or Option, (ii) shares of Common Stock used to pay the exercise price or withholding taxes related to an Award, or (iii) shares of Common Stock repurchased on the open market with the proceeds from the exercise of any Option.

(d) Adjustment in Capitalization. In the event of any Adjustment Event, (i) the aggregate number of shares of Common Stock available for Awards under this Section 5, (ii) the aggregate limitations on the number of shares that may be awarded as a particular type of Award or that may be awarded to any particular Participant in any particular period under Section 5(c) and (iii) the aggregate number of shares subject to outstanding Awards and the respective exercise prices or Grant Prices applicable to outstanding Awards shall be equitably adjusted by the Committee, in its discretion, with respect to such Adjustment Event. To the extent deemed equitable and appropriate by the Committee and subject to any required action by shareholders of the Company or of any successor in interest to the Company or any direct or indirect parent corporation of the Company or any such successor, in any Adjustment Event that is a merger, consolidation, reorganization, liquidation, dissolution or similar transaction, any Award granted under the Plan shall be deemed to pertain to the securities and other property, including cash, to which a holder of the number of shares of Common Stock covered by the Award would have been entitled to receive in connection with such Adjustment Event. Any determination made by the Committee pursuant to this Section 5(d) shall be final, binding and conclusive.

SECTION 6

STOCK OPTIONS

(a) Grants. ISOs and Nonqualified Stock Options may be granted to Participants at such time or times as shall be determined by the Committee. Except as otherwise provided herein, the Committee shall have complete discretion in determining the number of Options, if any, to be granted to a Participant, provided that ISOs may only be granted to eligible Participants who satisfy the requirements for eligibility set forth under section 424 of the Code, and further provided that Dividend Equivalents shall not be paid or payable on any Option. The grant date of an Option under the Plan will be the date on which the Option is awarded by the Committee, or a specified date in the future including a date relating to the satisfaction of any condition or conditions to the effectiveness of such grant as the Committee shall specify in its sole discretion. Each Option shall be evidenced by an Award Notice that shall specify the type of Option granted, the exercise price, the duration of the Option, the number of shares of Common Stock to which the Option pertains, the conditions upon which the Option or any part thereof shall become vested or exercisable and such other terms and conditions not inconsistent with the Plan as the Committee shall determine. An Award Notice which does not specify the type of Option granted shall be deemed to specify that each Option granted in that Award Notice shall be a Nonqualified Stock Option.

(b) Exercise Price; No Repricing. The price at which Common Stock may be purchased upon exercise of an Option shall be established by the Committee, but such price shall not be less than the Fair Market Value of the Common Stock on the grant date of the Option. The Committee shall not have the right to reprice an Option under this Plan, including by (i) amending an Option to reduce its exercise price, (ii) canceling an Option at a time when its exercise price exceeds the Fair Market Value of one share in exchange for an Option, SAR, Restricted Stock, Stock Unit or other equity award, unless the cancellation or exchange occurs in connection with a merger, acquisition,spin-off or other similar corporate

transaction or (iii) taking any other action that is treated as a repricing under generally accepted accounting principles, provided, however, that adjustments pursuant to Section 5(d) shall not be deemed to be a repricing that is prohibited by this Section 6(b).

(c) Vesting and Exercisability. Unless otherwise provided in Section 11 hereof or in the Participant’s Award Notice, each Option awarded to a Participant under the Plan shall become vested and exercisable in three equal annual installments, subject to the Participant’s continued employment with the Company or Subsidiary through such date. The Committee may provide that Options may also become exercisable, in whole or in part, upon the occurrence of any event specified in the Plan or other condition specified by the Committee at or after the grant date of the applicable Option. In its discretion, the Committee may establish in the Award Notice, conditions based on Performance Goals (in lieu of, or in addition to, time-based vesting) with respect to the exercisability of any Option. No Option shall be exercisable after the tenth anniversary of its grant date.

(d) ISOs. Notwithstanding anything in the Plan to the contrary, no Option that is intended to be an ISO may be granted after the tenth anniversary of the Effective Date of the Plan. No term of this Plan relating to ISOs shall be interpreted, amended or altered, nor shall any discretion or authority granted under the Plan be so exercised, so as to disqualify the ISO or the Plan under Section 422 of the Code, or, without the consent of any Participant affected thereby, to disqualify any ISO under such Section 422. The number of shares of Common Stock that shall be available for ISOs granted under the Plan is three million (3,000,000) shares.

(e) Payment. The Committee shall establish procedures governing the exercise of Options. No shares shall be delivered pursuant to any exercise of an Option unless arrangements satisfactory to the Committee have been made to assure full payment of the exercise price therefore. Payment of the exercise price of an Option may be paid (i) in cash or its equivalent, (ii) by exchanging shares of Common Stock or shares of Restricted Stock, (iii) a combination of the foregoing or (iv) pursuant to such other arrangements as the Committee may deem appropriate, including a cashless exercise program. The Committee, in its sole discretion, may adopt administrative rules, regulations or procedures with respect to any method of exercising an Option, including pursuant to a cashless exercise program, if permitted. The Company may not make a loan to a Participant to facilitate such Participant’s exercise of any of his or her Options or payment of taxes.

SECTION 7

STOCK APPRECIATION RIGHTS

(a) Grants. Awards may be granted in the form of Stock Appreciation Rights and may be granted to any Employee at such time or times as shall be determined by the Committee. Stock Appreciation Rights may be granted on a stand-alone basis or in tandem with another Award granted under the Plan. The grant date of a Stock Appreciation Right under the Plan will be the date on which the Stock Appreciation Right is awarded by the Committee, or a specified date in the future, including a date relating to the satisfaction of any such condition or conditions to the effectiveness of such grant as the Committee shall specify in its sole discretion. Stock Appreciation Rights shall be evidenced by an Award Notice, whether as part of an Award Notice governing the terms of the Options, if any, to which such Stock Appreciation Rights relate or pursuant to a separate Award Notice with respect to freestanding Stock Appreciation Rights, in each case containing such provisions not inconsistent with the Plan as the Committee shall determine, provided that Dividend Equivalents shall not be paid or payable on any Stock Appreciation Right.

(b) Terms and Conditions of SARs. Except as otherwise determined by the Committee at or after grant and subject to the Participant’s continued employment or service with the Company or a Subsidiary through such date, each Stock Appreciation Right awarded to a Participant under the Plan shall become vested and exercisable in accordance with the vesting schedule provided in the applicable Award Notice, but in no event later than ten years from the date of grant. Unless otherwise provided in Section 11 hereof

or in the Participant’s Award Notice, each SAR awarded to a Participant under the Plan shall become vested and exercisable in three equal annual installments, subject to the Participant’s continued employment with the Company or Subsidiary through such date. Stock Appreciation Rights may also become exercisable, in whole or in part, upon the occurrence of any event or events as specified in the Plan or specified by the Committee, in its discretion, either at or after the grant date of the applicable Stock Appreciation Right. In its discretion, the Committee may also establish conditions based on Performance Goals (in lieu of, or in addition to, time based vesting) with respect to the exercisability of any Stock Appreciation Rights. No Stock Appreciation Rights shall be exercisable after the tenth anniversary of their grant date. The Committee may impose such conditions with respect to the exercise of Stock Appreciation Rights, including without limitation, any conditions relating to the application of federal or state securities laws, as it may deem necessary or advisable. Notwithstanding the foregoing sentence, the Committee shall not have the right to reprice a SAR under this Plan, including by (i) amending a SAR to reduce its Grant Price, (ii) canceling a SAR at a time when its Grant Price exceeds the Fair Market Value of one share in exchange for an Option, SAR, Restricted Stock, Stock Unit or other equity award, unless the cancellation or exchange occurs in connection with a merger, acquisition,spin-off or other similar corporate transaction or (iii) taking any other action that is treated as a repricing under generally accepted accounting principles, provided, however, that adjustments pursuant to Section 5(d) shall not be deemed to be a repricing that is prohibited by this Section 7(b).

(c) Deemed Exercise. Any SAR not already exercised shall be deemed to be exercised at the close of business on the scheduled expiration date of such SAR, if at such time the SAR by its terms remains exercisable and, if so exercised, would result in a payment to the holder of such SAR.

(d) Payment of SAR Amount. Upon exercise of a SAR, the holder shall be entitled to receive payment, in cash, in shares of Common Stock or in a combination thereof, as determined by the Committee, of an amount determined by multiplying:

(i) the excess, if any, of the Fair Market Value at the date of exercise over the Grant Price, by

(ii) the number of shares of Common Stock with respect to which the SARs are then being exercised; provided that, at the time of grant with respect to any SAR payable in cash, the Committee may establish in the Award Notice, in its sole discretion, a maximum amount per share which will be payable upon the exercise of such SAR.

SECTION 8

RESTRICTED STOCK; RESTRICTED STOCK UNITS

(a) Grants. Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units may be granted to Participants at such time or times as shall be determined by the Committee. The grant date of any Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Units under the Plan will be the date on which such Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Units are awarded by the Committee, or a specified date in the future, including a date related to the satisfaction of any such condition or conditions to the effectiveness of such grant as the Committee shall specify in its sole discretion. Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units shall be evidenced by an Award Notice that shall specify (i) the number of shares of Restricted Stock and the number of Restricted Stock Units to be granted to each Participant, (ii) the applicable Restricted Period(s) and (iii) such other terms and conditions, not inconsistent with the Plan, as the Committee shall determine. Any shares of Restricted Stock granted under the Plan may be evidenced in such manner as the Company deems appropriate, including, without limitation, book-entry registration of the shares on the Company’s books and records or the issuance of a stock certificate or certificates that shall be held in the custody of the Secretary of the Company until the Restricted Period applicable to the Award lapses.

(b) Vesting. Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units granted to Participants under the Plan shall be subject to a Restricted Period established pursuant to the terms of the Plan or by the Committee. Except as otherwise specified in the Plan or determined by the Committee at or after grant, the Restricted Period with respect to Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units that vest (i) solely based on the

passage of time and the continued performance of services shall lapse in three approximately equal annual installments on the first through third anniversaries of the grant date and (ii) upon the satisfaction of Performance Goals shall lapse, to the extent Performance Goals have been achieved, not earlier than one year after the commencement of the applicable Performance Cycle. The Restricted Period applicable to any Restricted Stock grant or Restricted Stock Award shall be specified in the Participant’s Award Notice. The Restricted Period may lapse with respect to portions of Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units on a pro rata basis, or it may lapse at one time with respect to all Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units in an Award. The Restricted Period shall also lapse, in whole or in part, upon the occurrence of any event or events, including a Change in Control, specified in the Plan.

(c) Settlement of Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units. At the expiration of the Restricted Period for any outstanding Restricted Stock Awards, the Company shall evidence the lapse of the restrictions applicable to the Restricted Stock Award and shall, upon request, deliver stock certificates evidencing the shares related to such Restricted Stock Awards to the Participant or the Participant’s legal representative (or otherwise evidence the issuance of such shares free of any restrictions imposed under the Plan). At the expiration of the Restricted Period with respect to any outstanding Restricted Stock Unit, the Participant shall receive, in the Committee’s discretion (i) a cash payment equal to the Fair Market Value of the underlying share of Common Stock as of such payment date, (ii) one share of Common Stock or (iii) any combination of cash and Common Stock.

(d) Restrictions on Transferability. Shares of Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units may not be sold, assigned, transferred, pledged, hypothecated or otherwise encumbered by the Participant during the Restricted Period, except that the Committee may permit (on such terms and conditions as it shall establish) shares of Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units to be transferred during the Restricted Periods to a Permitted Transferee, in accordance with Section 14(a), provided that any shares of Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Units so transferred shall remain subject to the provisions of this Section 8.

(e) Rights as a Shareholder. Except for the restrictions set forth herein and unless otherwise determined by the Committee, the Participant shall have all the rights of a shareholder with respect to shares of Restricted Stock, including but not limited to, the right to vote and the right to receive dividends. A Participant shall not have any right, in respect of Restricted Stock Units awarded pursuant to the Plan, to vote on any matter submitted to the Company’s stockholders until such time as the shares of Common Stock attributable to such Restricted Stock Units have been issued. The Committee shall determine whether Dividend Equivalents will be provided in respect of any Restricted Stock Unit Award, the manner in which any such Dividend Equivalents will be deemed invested, the time or times at which such Dividend Equivalents shall be deemed payable, and any other terms and conditions thereon that the Committee shall deem appropriate.

(f) Legending. To the extent that certificates are issued to a Participant in respect of shares of Restricted Stock awarded under the Plan (or in the event that such Restricted Stock are held electronically), such shares shall be registered in the name of the Participant and shall have such legends (or account restrictions) reflecting the restrictions of such Awards in such manner as the Committee may deem appropriate.

SECTION 9

PERFORMANCE SHARES AND PERFORMANCE UNITS

(a) Generally. Awards may be granted in the form of Performance Shares and Performance Units and may be granted to Participants at such time or times as shall be determined by the Committee. The Committee shall have the authority to determine the Participants who shall receive Performance Shares and Performance Units, the number of Performance Shares and the number and value of Performance Units each Participant receives for each or any Performance Cycle, and the Performance Goals applicable in respect of such Performance Shares and Performance Units for each Performance Cycle. The

Committee shall determine the duration of each Performance Cycle (the duration of Performance Cycles may differ from each other), and there may be more than one Performance Cycle in existence at any one time. Unless otherwise determined by the Committee, the Performance Cycle for Performance Shares and Performance Units shall be three years, and shall in no event be less than one year. The Committee shall be entitled to make such rules, determinations and adjustments as it deems appropriate with respect to any Participant who becomes eligible to receive a performance-based Award after the commencement of a Performance Cycle. Performance Shares and Performance Units shall be evidenced by an Award Notice that shall specify the number of Performance Shares and the number and value of Performance Units awarded to the Participant, the Performance Goals applicable thereto, and such other terms and conditions not inconsistent with the Plan as the Committee shall determine, provided that no Dividend Equivalents shall be paid or payable on any Performance Shares or Performance Units before they become earned and vested. No shares of Common Stock will be issued at the time an Award of Performance Shares is made, and the Company shall not be required to set aside a fund for the payment of Performance Shares or Performance Units.

(b) Earned Performance Shares and Performance Units. Performance Shares and Performance Units shall become earned and vested, in whole or in part, based upon the attainment of specified Performance Goals or the occurrence of any event or events including a Change in Control, as the Committee shall determine, either at or after the grant date. In addition to the achievement of the specified Performance Goals, the Committee may, in the Award Notice, condition payment of Performance Shares and Performance Units on such conditions as the Committee shall specify. The Committee may also require the completion of a minimum period of service (in addition to the achievement of any applicable Performance Goals) as a condition to the vesting of any Performance Share or Performance Unit Award.

(c) Performance Goals. Performance Goals shall be determined by the Committee, in its discretion, and shall be set out in the Award Notice. Except in the case of Awards to Executive Officers intended to be “other performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m)(4) of the Code, the Committee may also adjust the Performance Goals for any Performance Cycle as it deems equitable in recognition of events impacting the comparability of the Company’s results of operations or financial condition, changes in applicable tax laws or accounting principles, or such other factors as the Committee may determine. Notwithstanding anything contained in the Plan to the contrary, to the extent the Committee intends that an Award granted to an Executive Officer qualify as “other performance-based compensation” within the meaning of Section 162(m)(4)(c) of the Code, the Committee shall (i) specify and approve the specific terms of any Performance Goals with respect to such Awards in writing no later than ninety (90) days from the commencement of the Performance Cycle to which the Performance Goals relate, and (ii) not be entitled to exercise any subsequent discretion otherwise authorized under the Plan (such as the right to authorize payout at a level above that dictated by the achievement of the relevant Performance Goals) with respect to such Award if the ability to exercise discretion (as opposed to the exercise of such discretion) would cause such Award to fail to qualify as other performance-based compensation.

(d) Negative Discretion. Notwithstanding anything in this Section 9 to the contrary, with respect to any Performance Unit Awards, the Committee shall have the right to establish written rules or procedures that have the effect of limiting the amount payable to each Participant to an amount that is less than the maximum amount otherwise authorized.

(e) Certification of Attainment of Performance Goals. As soon as practicable after the end of a Performance Cycle and prior to any payment or vesting in respect of such Performance Cycle, the Committee shall certify in writing the number of any Performance Shares and the number and value of any Performance Units which have been earned or vested on the basis of performance in relation to the established Performance Goals.

(f) Payment of Awards. Payment or delivery of Common Stock with respect to earned Performance Shares and earned Performance Units shall be distributed to the Participant or, if the Participant has died, to the Participant’s legal representative, as soon as practicable after the expiration of the Performance

Cycle and the Committee’s certification under Section 9(e) above, provided that payment or delivery of Common Stock with respect to earned Performance Shares and earned Performance Units shall not be distributed to a Participant until any other conditions on payment of such Awards established by the Committee have been satisfied. The Committee shall determine whether earned Performance Shares and the value of earned Performance Units are to be distributed in the form of cash, shares of Common Stock or in a combination thereof, with the value or number of shares payable to be determined based on the Fair Market Value of the Common Stock on the date of the Committee’s certification under Section 9(e) above. The Committee shall have the right to impose whatever conditions it deems appropriate with respect to the award or delivery of shares of Common Stock, including conditioning the vesting of such shares on the performance of additional service.

SECTION 10

OTHER STOCK-BASED AWARDS

The Committee may grant Other Stock-Based Awards in accordance with this Section 10. Other Stock-Based Awards may take such form of an interest in the Common Stock, the value of a specified number of shares of Common Stock or any combination thereof as the Committee shall determine, including outright awards of Common Stock in satisfaction of an obligation of an Employer in respect of compensation that would otherwise be payable to an Employee in cash (each, a “Cash Settlement Award”). The number of shares of Common Stock that may be subject to Other Stock-Based Awards shall not exceed five percent (5%) of the shares authorized for issuance under Section 5(a) hereof, except that, the number of Other Stock-Based Awards that are Cash Settlement Awards shall not be subject to, or otherwise counted against, the foregoing 5% limit. In addition to any other terms and conditions that may be specified by the Committee, each Other Stock-Based Award shall specify the impact of a termination of service upon the rights of a Participant in respect of such Award. At the discretion of the Committee, such conditions may be the same as apply with respect to Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Units, or may contain terms that are more or less favorable to the Participant. The terms of any Other Stock-Based Award need not be uniform in application to all (or any class of) Participants, and each Other Stock-Based Award granted to any Participant (whether or not at the same time) may have different terms. Any such Other Stock-Based Award shall be evidenced by an Award Notice which specifies the terms and conditions applicable thereto.

SECTION 11

TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT

(a) Termination Due to Death, Disability, Retirement. Unless otherwise determined by the Committee at or after the time the Award is granted and set forth in the Award Notice, if a Participant’s employment or service terminates due to the Participant’s death, Disability or Retirement:

(i) Performance Awards. With respect to Performance Awards, the Participant or Participant’s designated beneficiary, as the case may be, shall be entitled to a distribution of, and such Performance Awards shall be deemed vested to the extent of, the same number or value of Performance Awards that would have been payable for the Performance Cycle had the Participant’s service with the Company or Subsidiary continued until the end of the applicable Performance Cycle,pro-rated to reflect the time period from the commencement of the Performance Cycle through the date of the termination of the Participant’s service with the Company or Subsidiary. Any Common Stock issuable in respect of such Performance Awards or value of Performance Awards payable in cash that become payable in accordance with the preceding sentence shall be paid on the date the Performance Award would have been paid had the Participant remained employed through the end of the Performance Cycle.

(ii) Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Unit Awards. Unless otherwise specified by the Committee in the corresponding Award Notice, all outstanding Awards of Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units shall become immediately and fully vested, regardless of the extent to which

otherwise vested as of the date of such termination of service or employment. Any Common Stock issuable or cash payable in respect of any Restricted Stock Units that vest pursuant to the preceding sentence shall be paid on the date the Restricted Stock Units would have been paid had the Participant remained employed through the end of the Restricted Period.

(iii) Options/SARs. Unless otherwise specified by the Committee in the corresponding Award Notice, all outstanding Options and SARs shall become immediately and fully exercisable, regardless of the extent to which they are otherwise exercisable as of the date of such termination of service or employment. Unless otherwise specified by the Committee in the corresponding Award Notice, all outstanding Options and SARs awarded to a Participant whose employment terminates due to death, Disability or Retirement shall remain exercisable by the Participant, his legal representative or his Permitted Transferee, until the fifth anniversary of the date of the Participant’s termination of service or the Award’s original expiration date, whichever is earlier, after which date any unexercised Options and SARs shall terminate.

(b) Termination for Cause. Unless otherwise determined by the Committee at or after the grant date and set forth in the Award Notice covering such Award, if a Participant’s employment or service terminates for Cause, all Options and SARs, whether vested or unvested, and all other Awards that are unvested, unexercisable or with respect to which the Restricted Period has not lapsed shall be immediately forfeited and cancelled, effective as of the date of the Participant’s termination of service.

(c) Termination due to a Divestiture. Unless otherwise specified by the Committee in the corresponding Award Notice, if a Participant’s employment or service terminates due to the divestiture by the Company of one or more Subsidiaries or other business segments, divisions or operations in a transaction that does not otherwise qualify as a Change in Control:

(i) Performance Awards. With respect to Performance Awards, the Participant shall be entitled to a distribution of, and such Performance Awards shall be deemed vested to the extent of, the same number or value of Performance Awards that would have been payable for the Performance Cycle had the Participant’s service with the Company or Subsidiary continued until the end of the applicable Performance Cycle,pro-rated to reflect the time period from the commencement of the Performance Cycle through the date of the termination of the Participant’s service due to the divestiture (including a termination of serviceDirectors occurring by reason of the sale of a Subsidiary). Any Common Stock issuable in respect of such Performance Awards or value of Performance Awards payable in cash that become payable in accordance with the preceding sentence shall be paid on the date the Performance Award would have been paid had the Participant remained employed through the end of the Performance Cycle.

(ii) Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Unit Awards. Unless otherwise specified by the Committee in the corresponding Award Notice, all outstanding Awards of Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units shall become immediately and fully vested, regardless of the extent to which otherwise vested as of the date of such termination of service or employment due to such divestiture. Any Common Stock issuable or cash payable in respect of any Restricted Stock Units that vest pursuant to the preceding sentence shall be paid promptly (but in no event later than 60 days) after the date of such divestiture.

(iii) Options/SARs: Unless otherwise specified by the Committee in the corresponding Award Notice, all outstanding Options and SARs shall become immediately and fully exercisable, regardless of the extent to which they are otherwise exercisable as of the date of such termination of service or employment due to the divestiture and shall remain exercisable until the third anniversary of the date of such divestiture or the Award’s original expiration date, whichever is earlier, after which date any unexercised Options and SARs shall terminate.

(d) Termination due to a Reduction in Force. Unless otherwise specified by the Committee in the corresponding Award Notice (or after the date of the issuance of such Award Notice, if more favorable to

the Participant), if a Participant’s employment or service terminates without Cause due to a reduction in force or similar downsizing at the Company or any Subsidiary unit that affects a significant number of employees, all Awards that are unvested, unexercisable or with respect to which the Restricted Period has not lapsed, and Performance Awards for which the applicable Performance Cycle has not been completed, shall be immediately forfeited and cancelled, effective as of the date of the Participant’s termination of service. Unless otherwise specified by the Committee in the corresponding Award Notice, any Option or SAR that is vested not later than the date of termination shall remain exercisable until the first anniversary of the date of the Participant’s termination of service or the Award’s original expiration date, whichever is earlier, after which date any unexercised Option or SAR shall terminate.

(e) Termination for any Other Reason. Unless otherwise determined by the Committee at or after the time the Award is granted, and except as may otherwise be provided in any agreement to which the Company and a Participant are parties, if a Participant’s employment or service with the Company or a Subsidiary is terminated for any reason, other than death, Disability, Retirement, Cause, divestiture or reductionan increase in force, all Options and SARs that are not exercisable, and all other Awards that have not vested or become payable, as of the date of such termination shall be immediately forfeited and cancelled, effective as of the date of the Participant’s termination of service. Unless otherwise specified in the Participant’s Award Notice, and except as may otherwise be provided in any agreement to which the Company and a Participant are parties, any Options and SARs awarded to a Participant whose employment or service with the Company or a Subsidiary terminates other than due to death, Disability, Retirement or Cause (including, without limitation, by reason of the fact that an entity that employs or employed the Participant ceases to be a Subsidiary) that are exercisable as of such termination shall remain exercisable for 90 days thereafter, or until the Award’s original expiration date, whichever is earlier, after which date any unexercised Options and SARs shall terminate.

SECTION 12

CHANGE IN CONTROL

(a) Accelerated Vesting and Payment. Subject to the provisions of Section 12(b) below, in the event of a Change in Control (i) each Option and SAR then outstanding shall be fully exercisable regardless of the exercise schedule otherwise applicable to such Option and/or SAR, (ii) the Restricted Period shall lapse as to each share of Restricted Stock then outstanding, (iii) each outstanding Restricted Stock Unit shall become fully vested and payable, (iv) each outstanding Performance Share Award and Performance Unit Award shall be deemed earned at the target level of performance for such Award, and (v) each outstanding Other Stock-Based Award shall become fully vested and payable. In addition, in connection with such a Change in Control, the Committee may, in its discretion, provide that each Option and/or SAR shall, upon the occurrence of such Change in Control, be canceled in exchange for a payment per share in cash (the “Settlement Payment”) in an amount equal to the excess, if any, of the Fair Market Value over the exercise price of such Option or the Grant Price of such SAR. Should the Committee authorize any Settlement Payments in respect of Options, the Committee may determine that any Options which have an exercise price per share below the Fair Market Value shall be deemed cancelled and satisfied in full for a deemed Settlement Payment of zero. The Committee may also direct that each Restricted Stock Unit, Other Stock-Based Award, Performance Share and/or Performance Unit shall be settled in cash with its value determined based on the value received by the shareholders in any transaction that itself constitutes a Change in Control.

(b) Alternative Awards. Notwithstanding Section 12(a), no cancellation, acceleration of exercisability, vesting, cash settlement or other payment shall occur with respect to any Award if the Committee reasonably determines in good faith, prior to the occurrence of a Change in Control, that such Award shall be honored or assumed, or new rights substituted therefor (such honored, assumed or substituted award hereinafter called an “Alternative Award”), by a Participant’s employer (or the parent or an affiliate of such employer) immediately following the Change in Control;provided that any such Alternative Award must:

(i) be based on stock which is traded on an established U.S. securities market;

(ii) provide such Participant with rights and entitlements substantially equivalent to or better than the rights, terms and conditions applicable under such Award, including, but not limited to, an identical or better exercise or vesting schedule and identical or better timing and methods of payment;

(iii) have substantially equivalent economic value to such Award (determined at the time of the Change in Control and using valuation principles permitted under Treas. Reg.§ 1.424-1); and

(iv) have terms and conditions which provide that in the event that, during the24-month period following the Change in Control, the Participant’s employment or service is involuntarily terminated for any reason (including, but not limited to a termination due to death or Disability) other than for Cause or Constructively Terminated (as defined below), all of such Participant’s Options and/or SARs shall be deemed immediately and fully exercisable, the Restricted Period shall lapse as to each of the Participant’s outstanding Restricted Stock awards, each of the Participant’s outstanding Restricted Stock Unit Awards and Other Stock-Based Awards shall be payable in full and each such Alternative Award shall be settled for a payment per each share of stock subject to the Alternative Award in cash, in immediately transferable, publicly traded securities or in a combination thereof, in an amount equal to, in the case of an Option or SAR, the excess of the fair market value of such stock on the date of the Participant’s termination over the corresponding exercise or base price per share and, in the case of any Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Unit, or Other Stock-Based Award, the fair market value of the number of shares of stock subject or related thereto.

(c) Constructive Termination. For purposes of Section 12(b)(iv), a Participant’s employment or service shalldirectors as aforesaid, may be deemed to have been Constructively Terminated if, without the Participant’s written consent, the Participant terminates employment or service within 120 days following either (x) a material reduction in the Participant’s base salary or a Participant’s incentive compensation opportunity, or (y) the relocation of the Participant’s principal place of employment or service to a location more than 35 miles away from the Participant’s prior principal place of employment or service.

(d) Amounts Subject to Section 409A. Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this Section 12, to the extent that any Award granted under the Plan and outstanding at the time of a Change in Control is treated as “deferred compensation” under Section 409A, and not exempt from its requirements under any applicable exemption therefrom, no acceleration of payment of such Award shall be made upon a Change in Control unless such event is also a change in the ownership or effective control of the corporation, or in the ownership of a substantial portion of the assets of the corporation within the meaning of Section 409A. Any Award which is not payable upon the occurrence of a Change in Control solely by reason of the operation of this Section 12(d) shall become vested in accordance with Section 12(a) (unless the provisions of Section 12(b) apply to such Award), but shall be paid at the date or event that such Award would have been payable without regard to the occurrence of such Change in Control.

SECTION 13

EFFECTIVE DATE, AMENDMENT,

MODIFICATION AND TERMINATION OF PLAN

(a) Generally. The Plan shall be effective on the Effective Date, and shall continue in effect, unless sooner terminated pursuant to this Section 13, until the fifteenth anniversary of the Effective Date. The

Board or the Committee may at any time in its sole discretion, for any reason whatsoever, terminate or suspend the Plan, and from time to time, subject to obtaining any regulatory approval, including that of the New York Stock Exchange, may amend or modify the Plan; provided that without the approvalfilled by a majority of the votes cast atdirectors then in office, although less than a duly constitutedquorum, or by a sole remaining director.

Directors of any class shall hold office until the annual meeting of shareholders of the Company, no amendment or modification to the Plan may (i) materially increase the benefits accruing to Participants under the Plan, (ii) increase the number of shares of Common Stock subject to the Plan or the individual Award limitations, (iii) modify the class of persons eligible for participation in the Plan or (iv) materially modify the Plan in any other way that would require shareholder approval under any regulatory requirement that the Committee determines to be applicable, including, without limitation, the rules of the New York Stock Exchange.

SECTION 14

MISCELLANEOUS

(a) Nonassignability. Except as provided herein or in an Award Notice, no Award may be sold, assigned, transferred, pledged or otherwise encumbered except by will or the laws of descent and distribution; provided that the Committee may permit (on such terms and conditions as it shall establish) a Participant to transfer an Award for no consideration to the Participant’s child, stepchild, grandchild, parent, stepparent, grandparent, spouse, former spouse, sibling, niece, nephew,mother-in-law,father-in-law,son-in-law,daughter-in-law,brother-in-law, orsister-in-law, including adoptive relationships, any person sharing the Participant’s household (other than a tenant or employee), a trustyear in which these persons have more than fifty percent of the beneficial interest (a “Trust”) and any other entity in which these persons (or the Participant) own more than fifty percent of the voting interests (“Permitted Transferees”), provided further that nothing in this Section 14(a) shall prohibit the transfer of an Award from a Trust back to a Participant to whom the Award was originally granted, in accordance with the terms of the Trust. No amendment to the Plan or to any Award shall permit transfers other than in accordance with the preceding sentence. Any attempt by a Participant to sell, assign, transfer, pledge or encumber an Award without complying with the provisions of the Plan shall be void and of no effect. Except to the extent required by law, no right or interest of any Participant shall be subject to any lien, obligation or liability of the Participant. All rights with respect to Awards granted to a Participant under the Plan shall be exercisable during the Participant’s lifetime only by such Participant or, if applicable, his or her Permitted Transferee(s). The rights of a Permitted Transferee shall be limited to the rights conveyed to such Permitted Transferee, who shall be subject to and bound by the terms of the agreement or agreements between the Participant and the Company.

(b) Tax Withholding. The Company shall be entitled to deduct from any payment under the Plan, regardless of the formterm of such payment, the amount of all applicable income and employment taxes required by law to be withheld with respect to such payment or may require the participant to pay to it such tax prior to and as a condition of the making of such payment. Subject to any administrative rules, regulations or procedures established by the Committee, a Participant may pay the amount of taxes required by law to be withheld from an Award, in whole or in part, by requesting that the Company withhold from any payment of Common Stock due as a result of such Award, or by delivering to the Company, shares of Common Stock having a Fair Market Value less than or equal to the amount of such required withholding taxes.

(c) Noncompetition and Other Adverse Actions. Notwithstanding anything contained in this Plan to the contrary, unless the Award Notice specifies otherwise, a Participant shall forfeit all unexercised, unearned, and/or unpaid Awards, including Awards earned but not yet paid, all unpaid Dividend Equivalents, and all interest, if any, accrued on the foregoing if, (i) in the opinion of the Committee, the Participant, without the written consent of the Company, engages directly or indirectly in any manner or capacity as principal, agent, partner, officer, director, employee, or otherwise, in any business or activity competitive with the business conducted by the Company or any Subsidiary or (ii) the Participant performs any act or engages in any activity which in the opinion of the Committee is adverse to the best

interests of the Company. Notwithstanding anything else in the Plan to the contrary, the Committee may suspend the exercisability or the payment of any Award hereunder during any period during which the Company is determining whether the requirements of this Section 14(c) have been violated.

(d) Amendments to Awards. The Committee may at any time unilaterally amend any unexercised, unearned, or unpaid Award, including Awards earned but not yet paid, to the extent it deems appropriate, provided, however, that subject to Section 5(d) any such amendment which is adverse to the Participant shall require the Participant’s consent unless the Committee determines that such amendment or modification is necessary or advisable to comply with applicable law as a result of changes in law or regulation or to avoid the imposition of an additional tax, interest or penalty under Section 409A.

(e) No Right, Title or Interest in Company Assets. No Participant shall have any rights as a stockholder as a result of participation in the Plan until the date of issuance of a stock certificate or book entry shares in his name, and, in the case of Restricted Stock, Stock Options or SARs, until such rights are granted to the Participant. To the extent any person acquires a right to receive payments from the Company under this Plan, such rights shall be no greater than the rights of an unsecured creditor of the Company.

(f) Regulatory Approvals and Listings. Notwithstanding anything contained in this Plan to the contrary, the Company shall have no obligation to issue or deliver certificates of Common Stock evidencing Awards resulting in the payment of Common Stock prior to (i) the obtaining of any approval from any governmental agency which the Company shall, in its sole discretion, determine to be necessary or advisable, (ii) the admission of such shares to listing on the stock exchange on which the Common Stock may be listed, and (iii) the completion of any registration or other qualification of said shares under any state or federal law or ruling of any governmental body which the Company shall, in its sole discretion, determine to be necessary or advisable.

(g) No Right to Continued Employment or Grants. Participation in the Plan shall not give any Participant any right to remain in the employ of the Company or any Subsidiary. The Companyclass expires or, in the case of employment with a Subsidiary,Notwithstanding the Subsidiary, reserves the right to terminate any Participant at any time. Further, the adoption of this Plan shall not be deemed to give any person the right to be selected as a Participant or to be granted an Award, nor shall the grant of one Award guarantee the grant of further Awards in the future.

(h)foregoing,  No Constraint on Corporate Action. Nothing in this Plan shall be construed (i) to limit, impair or otherwise affect the Company’s right or power to make adjustments, reclassifications, reorganizations or changes of its capital or business structure, or to merge or consolidate, or dissolve, liquidate, sell, or transfer all or any part of its business or assets or (ii) to limit the right or power of the Company or any Subsidiary to take any action which such entity deems to be necessary or appropriate.

(i) Legal Fees. The Company shall pay all legal fees and related expenses incurred by a Participant in seeking to obtain or enforce any payment, benefit or right he may be entitled to under the Plan following the occurrence of a Change in Control, provided that the Participant shall be required to repay any such amounts to the Company to the extent a court of competent jurisdiction issues a final andnon-appealable order setting forth the determination that the position taken by the Participant was frivolous or advanced in bad faith.

(j) Governing Law. The Plan, and all agreements hereunder, shall be construed in accordance with and governed by the laws of the State of New Jersey, without regard to principles of conflict of laws.

(k) No Impact on Benefits. Except as may otherwise be specifically provided for under any employee benefit plan, policy or program provision to the contrary, Awards shall not be treated as compensation for purposes of calculating a Participant’s right under any such plan, policy or program.

(l)Captions. The headings and captions appearing herein are inserted only as a matter of convenience. They do not define, limit, construe, or describe the scope or intent of the provisions of the Plan.

APPENDIX D TO PROXY STATEMENT

NATIONAL FUEL GAS COMPANY

2009NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN

Amended and Restated December 5, 2018

1.

Purpose

The purpose of the Plan is to advance the interests of the Company and its stockholders, by enhancing the Company’s ability to attract and retain highly qualified individuals to serve asnon-employee members of the Board, and by encouraging such directors to acquire a proprietary interest in the long-term success of the Company, thereby aligning their financial interests with those of the Company’s stockholders.

2.

Definitions

2.1 “1997 Retainer Policy” means the Retainer Policy forNon-Employee Directors approvedelected by the Company’s stockholders at the 1997 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

2.2 “Board” means the Board of Directors to fill vacancies or newly-created directorships,shall hold office until the next annual meeting following their election, and upon their election by the stockholders, until the completion of the Company.

2.3 “Code” means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, and the rules, regulations and interpretations promulgated thereunder, as amended from time to time.

2.4 “Common Stock” means the common stockrespective unexpired terms of the Company.

2.5 “Company” means National Fuel Gas Company.

2.6 “Exchange Act” meansclasses, if applicable, in which the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended from time to time.

2.7 “Participant” means any individual to whom shares of Common Stock have been issued under this Plan.

2.8 “Plan” means the National Fuel Gas Company 2009Non-Employee Director Equity Compensation Plan, as amended from time to time. Any reference in the Plan to a paragraph number refers to that portion of the Plan.

3.

Administration

The Planvacancies were filled, and until their respective successors shall be administered byelected and shall qualify, subject to prior death, resignation, retirement, disqualification or removal from office.

Notwithstanding the Board. The Board shall have the authority to: (a) interpret the Plan; (b) establish such administrative rules, regulationsforegoing and procedures as it deems necessary for the proper administration of the Plan; (c) grant waivers of Plan terms and conditions when any such action would be in the best interest of the Company; and (d) take any and all other action it deems advisable for the proper administration of the Plan. All determinations of the Board shall be made by a majority of its members, and its determinations shall be final, binding and conclusive. For the avoidance of doubt, the Board shall not take any action under the Plan, including without limitation pursuant to this paragraph 3, which would result in the imposition of an additional tax under Section 409A of the Code on the Participant holding shares issued hereunder.

4.

Participants

Allnon-employee directors of the Company are Participants in the Plan, and may receive shares of Common Stock under the Plan, except as otherwise provided in this section. Shares of Common Stock will not be issued underby law, whenever the Plan to anynon-employee director who declines receipt of such shares or whose compensation as anon-employee director is otherwise determined by written agreement between the Company and thenon-employee director.

5.

Shares Available

The numberholders of shares of Preferred Stock shall have the right, voting separately from the Common Stock, whichto elect directors of this corporation, the number, election, term of office, filling of vacancies and other features of such directorships shall be available for issuance undergoverned by the Planterms and provisions of any amendment creating any series of Preferred Stock; and such directors so elected shall not be 450,000, subjectdivided into classes pursuant to adjustmentthis Article SIXTH. During the prescribed term of office of any such directors, the Board of Directors shall consist of such directors in addition to the number of directors determined as provided in paragraph 8. The shares of Common Stock available for issuance under the Plan may be authorized and unissued shares or treasury shares.

6.

Term

The Plan became effective as of March 12, 2009, the date of the Company’s 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, upon approval by the Company’s stockholders at such meeting. Unless earlier terminated by the Board pursuant to the provisions of the Plan, the Plan shall expire when all of the shares of Common Stock available for issuance under the Plan have been issued. The expiration of the Plan shall not adversely affect any rights of any Participant, without such Participant’s consent.

7.

Shares Issued Under the Plan

(a) Shares of Common Stock will be issued to Participants on a quarterly basis, in advance (as of the first business dayparagraph of the quarter), as compensation in whole or in part for the Participants’ service on the Board during the quarter. Shares will be issued in such amounts as the Board shall determine from time to time in its discretion, provided that the aggregate number of shares to be issued to any one Participant in any 12 month period shall not exceed 5,000. The number of shares to be issued to a Participant will be prorated as applicable for the quarter in which the Participant joins the Board and the quarter in which the Participant is scheduled to retire or resign from the Board, but shares actually issued under the Plan to a Participant shall not be subject to forfeiture or cancellation for any reason.this Article SIXTH.

(b) Each share of Common Stock issued under the Plan shall benon-transferable until the later of two years after its issuance or six months after the Participant’s cessation of service on the Board; provided, however, that upon a Participant’s death, whether in office or after his or her service as a director ceases, any restrictions on transferability imposed hereunder shall lapse.

(c) Participants shall be entitled to all of the rights of stockholders with respect to shares issued under the Plan, including, but not by way of limitation, the right to vote such shares, the right to receive dividends and the right to reinvest dividends into additional shares of Common Stock. Shares acquired by reinvesting dividends are not subject to the transferability restrictions in paragraphs 7(b) and/or 8.

(d) Shares of Common Stock issued under the Plan may be evidenced in such manner as the Board deems appropriate, including, without limitation, book-entry registration or issuance of a stock certificate or certificates.

8.

Adjustment of Shares Available

(a) Changes in Stock. In the event of changes in the Common Stock by reason of a Common Stock dividend, stock split, reverse stock split or other combination, appropriate adjustment shall be made by the Board in the aggregate number of shares available under the Plan and in the rate of payment of shares under the Plan. Such proper adjustment as may be deemed equitable may be made by the Board in its discretion to give effect to any other change affecting the Common Stock. Any shares of Common Stock or other securities acquired by a Participant as a dividend shall (i) be deemed to have been acquired at the same time as the securities on which the dividend or, if more than one, the initial dividend was paid, and (ii) be subject to the same terms and conditions, including restrictions on transfer, that apply to the securities on which the dividend or, if more than one, the initial dividend was paid. Any shares of Common Stock or other securities acquired by a Participant pursuant to a stock split, reverse stock split or other combination shall (i) be deemed to have been acquired at the same time as the securities involved in the stock split, reverse stock split or other combination, and (ii) be subject to the same terms and conditions, including restrictions on transfer, that apply to the securities involved in the stock split, reverse stock split or other combination.

(b) Changes in Capitalization. In case of a merger or consolidation of the Company with another corporation, a reorganization of the Company, a reclassification of the Common Stock of the Company, a spinoff of a significant asset or other changes in the capitalization of the Company, appropriate provision may be made with respect to shares of Common Stock issued under the Plan for (i) the substitution, on an equitable basis, of appropriate stock or other securities or other consideration to which holders of Common Stock of the Company will be entitled pursuant to such transaction or succession of transactions, or (ii) adjustment in the number of shares issuable pursuant to the Plan and in the rate of payment of shares under the Plan, in each case as deemed appropriate by the Committee. Any securities acquired by a Participant pursuant to this paragraph shall (i) be deemed to have been acquired at the same time as the securities surrendered in or otherwise subject to the transaction or succession of transactions described in this paragraph, and (ii) be subject to the same terms and conditions, including restrictions on transfer, that apply to the securities surrendered in or otherwise subject to such transaction or succession of transactions.

9.

Regulatory Approvals and Listings

Notwithstanding anything contained in this Plan to the contrary, the Company shall have no obligation to issue or deliver shares of Common Stock prior to (a) the obtaining of any approval from any governmental agency which the Company shall, in its sole discretion, determine to be necessary or advisable, (b) the admission of such shares to listing on the stock exchange on which the Common Stock may be listed, and (c) the completion of any registration or other qualification of said shares under any state or federal law or ruling of any governmental body which the Company shall, in its sole discretion, determine to be necessary or advisable.

10.

No Right to Continued Service on Board

Participation in the Plan shall not give any Participant any right to remain on the Board.

11.

Other Compensation ofNon-Employee Directors

The Plan is not the only means of compensating Participants for their service on the Board. The Board may provide, outside of the Plan, for payment ofnon-equity compensation for such service, including cash, on terms and in amounts as determined by the Board in its discretion. The 1997 Retainer Policy is hereby amended so as to provide that all restrictions on the transferability of shares ever issued under the 1997 Retainer Policy shall lapse upon the death of the holder of those shares.

12.

Amendment

The Board may suspend or terminate the Plan at any time. In addition, the Board may, from time to time, amend the Plan in any manner, provided however, that any such amendment shall be subject to stockholder approval (i) at the discretion of the Board and (ii) to the extent that shareholder approval may be required by law or under the applicable requirements of any exchange on which the Common Stock is listed to trade. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Board may not amend the Plan in any manner that would either (i) result in the imposition of an additional tax under section 409A of the Code on any Participant, or (ii) adversely affect any Participant with respect to shares already issued under the Plan, without that Participant’s consent.

13.

No Right, Title or Interest in Company Assets

To the extent any person acquires a right to receive payments from the Company under this Plan, such rights shall be no greater than the rights of an unsecured creditor of the Company.

LOGO

NATIONAL FUEL GAS COMPANY

6363 MAIN STREET

WILLIAMSVILLE, NY 14221

  

LOGO

LOGO

PROXY VOTING INSTRUCTIONS

VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903

Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up through March 6, 2019.10, 2021.

Have your proxy card in hand.

 

VOTE BY MAIL

Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it (for receipt by March 6, 2019)10, 2021) in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.

 

VOTE BY INTERNET

Before The Meeting -Go towww.proxyvote.com/NFG

Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up through March 6, 2019.10, 2021. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site.

During The Meeting - Go to www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/NFG2021

You may attend the meeting via the Internet and vote during the meeting. Have the information that is printed in the box marked by the arrow available and follow the instructions.

 

Your QR vote, telephone vote or Internet vote authorizes the named proxies to vote the shares in the same manner as if you marked, signed and returned your proxy card.

 

FOR EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLAN VOTES:

Please note, all votes must be received by 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time onMarch 5, 20199, 2021.

 

Control Number located in box below:

 

TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS:    
  E53313-P15589D27842-P47630          KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS

— — — — — — — — — — — — —  — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —  — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED.  DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY
  

 

 NATIONAL FUEL GAS COMPANY

 

The Board of Directors recommends a voteFOR the Election of Directors

  

 

For

All

 

 

Withhold

All

 

 

For All Except

  

 

To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee(s), mark “For All Except” and write the number(s) of the nominee(s)nominee (s) on the line below.

 

   

            
 
   

 

PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

 

         
         01)  David C. CarrollH. Anderson03)  Barbara M. Baumann
      02)  David P. Bauer04)  Rebecca Ranich             
         02)  Steven C. Finch

The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR Proposals 2, 3 and 4

     ForAgainstAbstain    
         03)  Joseph N. Jaggers

PROPOSAL 2. Advisory approval of named executive officer compensation

    
         04)  David F. SmithPROPOSAL 3. Approval of an amendment of the Restated Certificate of Incorporation to declassify the Board of Directors    
   

PROPOSAL 4. Ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2021

    
          ForQuestion 1.  AgainstAbstain 
   

The Board of Directors recommends a voteFORProposals 2, 3, 4 and 5

ForAgainstAbstain  

PROPOSAL 4. Approval of the amended and restated 2009 Non-Employee Director Equity Compensation Plan

 

LOGO

 

In appreciation for you casting your

vote prior to the meeting, we will

send you a $5 Dunkin Donuts gift

card.

      
   

PROPOSAL 2. Advisory approval of named executive officer compensation

PROPOSAL 3. Approval of the amended and restated 2010 Equity Compensation Plan

PROPOSAL 5. Ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2019

    Question 1.

For address changes and/or comments, please check this box and write them on the back where indicated.

        LOGO

In appreciation for you casting your  

vote prior to the meeting, we will  

send you a $5 Dunkin Donuts gift  

card.  

LOGO

Please indicate if you plan to attend this meeting.

Yes

No

    

To accept the gift card check YES. If you prefer instead a donation to Make-A-Wish® check NO. If no selection is made, you will receive a card.

 

    Yes

 

    ☐

 

No

 

  
   

Please sign as name appears hereon. Joint owners should each sign. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, trustee or guardian, please give full title as such.

       
        
                                                  
                           
   Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX]         Date     

Signature (Joint Owners)

 

 Date    


Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting:

The Notice and Proxy Statement, 20182020 Summary Annual Report to Stockholders and

fiscal 20182020 financial statements are available at http://investor.nationalfuelgas.com/proxy.

 

 

— — — — — — — — — — — — —  — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —  — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

E53314-P15589D27843-P47630                    

 

 

 

PROXY

NATIONAL FUEL GAS COMPANY

Annual Meeting of Stockholders - March 7, 201911, 2021

THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE COMPANY

 

The undersigned hereby appoints R. J. TanskiD. P. Bauer and S. J. Mugel, and each of them, with power to act without the other and with power of substitution, as proxies and attorneys-in-fact and hereby authorizes them to represent and vote, as provided on the other side, all the shares of National Fuel Gas Company Common Stock which the undersigned is entitled to vote, and, in their discretion, to vote upon such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Company to be held March 7, 201911, 2021 or at any adjournment or postponement thereof, respecting (i) matters of which the Company did not have timely notice but that may be presented at the meeting; (ii) approval of the minutes of the prior meeting; (iii) the election of any person as a director if a nominee is unable to serve or for good cause will not serve; (iv) any stockholder proposal omitted from the enclosed proxy statement pursuant to Rule 14a-8 or 14a-9 of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s proxy rules, and (v) all matters incident to the conduct of the meeting.This proxy may be revoked by notice to the Secretary of the meeting as described in the Proxy Statement.

 

EmployeeEmployee Benefit Plans.This card also provides voting instructions for shares held in the National Fuel Gas Company Employee Stock Ownership Plan and the National Fuel Gas Company Tax-Deferred Savings Plans. If you are a participant in any of these plans and have shares of the Common Stock of the Company allocated to your account under these plans, please read the following authorization to the Trustee of those plans as to the voting of such shares.

 

Trustee’s Authorization.The undersigned on the reverse side of this card authorizes and instructs Vanguard Fiduciary Trust Company as Trustee of the National Fuel Gas Company Tax Deferred Savings Plans and the National Fuel Gas Company Employee Stock Ownership Plan to vote all shares of the Common Stock of the Company allocated to the undersigned’s account under such plan(s) (as shown on the reverse side) at the Annual Meeting, or at any adjournment thereof, in accordance with the instructions on the reverse side. All shares of Company Stock for which the Trustee has not received timely directions shall be voted or exercised by the Trustee in the same proportion as the shares of Company Stock for which the Trustee received timely directions, except in the case where to do so would be inconsistent with the provisions of Title I of ERISAERISA. . You may revoke your instructions by notice to the Trustee as described in the enclosed Proxy Statement.

 

This proxy, when properly executed, will be voted as directed by the stockholder. See below for important provisions and additional instructions.

 

Incomplete Directions and Instructions. If this card is returned signed but without directions marked for one or more items, regarding the unmarked items, you are instructing the Trustee and granting the Proxies discretion to voteFOR items 1, 2, 3 4 and 54.

 

This proxy may be revoked by notice to the Secretary of the meeting as described in the Proxy Statement.

 

THIS PROXY CARD IS CONTINUED ON THE REVERSE SIDE. PLEASE VOTE BY QR CODE, TELEPHONE, INTERNET OR SIGN ON THE REVERSE SIDE AND RETURN PROMPTLY.

 

  

      

 

    

  

Address Changes/Comments: 

 

                
  

 

(If you noted any Address Changes/Comments above, please mark corresponding box on the reverse side.)

 

(Continued and to be marked, dated and signed, on the other side)